Spec Driven Development
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
作者提供的说明(英文原文)
Learn and adopt the Capability Host Protocol — the agentic web's open evidence layer.
这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。
我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。
选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。
你需要
你用的是哪个应用?
在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。
适用于网页版、桌面版和手机版 Claude:
https://capabilityhostprotocol.com/api/mcp在终端中运行这条命令
claude mcp add --transport http chp https://capabilityhostprotocol.com/api/mcp粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"chp": {
"url": "https://capabilityhostprotocol.com/api/mcp"
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json
{
"servers": {
"chp": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://capabilityhostprotocol.com/api/mcp"
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器:
https://capabilityhostprotocol.com/api/mcp菜单名称可能因套餐和版本不同而略有差异。
你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。
这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。
我们还没有读取这个服务器的工具列表;我们会轮流检查各个端点。
我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月6日
注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 capabilityhostprotocol 验证,该账户拥有此仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
尚未检查;我们会轮流检查各个端点
尚未检查;我们会轮流检查各个端点
尚未检查;我们会在检查端点时读取工具列表
与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。
它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。
注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。
它在作者的云端运行。通过互联网连接,无需安装,但你发送的内容会经过作者的服务器。
GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.8.0)于4个月前进入注册中心。
支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。它通过 URL 连接,所以接受远程 MCP 服务器的应用也可以使用,例如开启开发者模式的 ChatGPT。
同一分类中有:Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, 오늘냥이 (Oneul Nyangi)
同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。
如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.
Real cat photos, diaries, profiles, age and food reference calculators, and breeds.
按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。
CHP is the open protocol for declaring, governing, and proving what agents, tools, and systems do — the single signed plane where a human approval, an agent's action, and a system call become the same governed, tamper-evident, replayable event.
The hook is simple:
See what your agents and tools actually did — and what governed it.
Your coding agent reads files, runs commands, calls tools. This puts a governed boundary at the point of action — no application code changes:
pip install chp-core
chp hooks install # hooks Claude Code chp hooks install --all-harnesses # ...or Claude Code + Codex + Gemini CLI
Use your agent normally, then look at what it did:
chp session list
chp session tree
Every tool call is a typed evidence event, hash-chained and stored locally in ~/.chp/evidence.sqlite. A denial is a first-class event with a reason code — not a swallowed exception — and the chain is tamper-evident, so someone who did not run the agent can still tell whether the record is intact.
Prefer to drive the protocol directly? chp serve-demo starts a governed host and prints a copy-pasteable first invocation.
Full guide: docs/quickstart.md · why it exists: docs/why-chp.md · docs site: docs.capabilityhostprotocol.com
Replay is by correlation ID, and the record answers more than "what happened" — from examples/agent-operations-demo/:
[
{"sequence": 1, "event_type": "execution_started", "capability_id": "trace_execution", "outcome": null}, {"sequence": 3, "event_type": "execution_completed", "capability_id": "trace_execution", "outcome": "success"}, {"sequence": 7, "event_type": "execution_started", "capability_id": "tool.add", "outcome": null}, {"sequence": 12, "event_type": "execution_started", "capability_id": "tool.multiply", "outcome": null}, {"sequence": 13, "event_type": "execution_completed", "capability_id": "tool.multiply", "outcome": "success"} ]
You can also ask what a policy *would* have done to a run that already happened:
{
"invariant": {"id": "deny_multiply_tool", "kind": "capability_id_matches"}, "would_have_denied": true, "violating_events": [{"capability_id": "tool.multiply", "event_type": "execution_started"}] }
CHP is not another agent framework, tool protocol, or workflow engine. It is the governed evidence plane at the capability boundary: what ran *and* what governed it (policy, risk tier, safety checks, human approval, autonomy budgets, denial) emit onto one signed, correlated record. Observability tools split execution across separate, optional, unsigned signals and carry no governance; CHP unifies both and proves them.
Status: CHP is a pre-1.0 release candidate (v0.9.3) — a frozen, additive wire surface backed by two independent implementations (Python + TypeScript) that pass conformance. chp-core ships on PyPI.
pip install chp-core # zero runtime dependencies
pip install 'chp-core[schema]' # enforce declared input_schema pip install 'chp-core[signing]' # ed25519 — signed hosts, bundles, mandates npm install @capabilityhostprotocol/sdk # TypeScript client + verifier (alpha)
chp host verify smoke-tests the install in under a second and reports whether input-schema validation is enforced.
From this checkout: python -m pip install -e packages/python.
from chp_core import LocalCapabilityHost, capability
host = LocalCapabilityHost("example-host")
@capability( id="math.add", version="1.0.0", description="Add two numbers.", ) def add(a: int, b: int): return {"sum": a + b}
host.register(add)
result = host.invoke( "math.add", {"a": 2, "b": 3}, correlation_id="demo-correlation", )
print(result.outcome) # "success" print(result.data) # {"sum": 5}
for event in host.replay("demo-correlation"): print(event.event_type) # execution_started, execution_completed
The host emits execution_started and execution_completed evidence for the invocation. If execution fails, it emits execution_failed. If the host denies invocation, it emits execution_denied.
spec/README.md: the specification index — core (v0.1), governance vocabulary, invocation pipeline, HTTP binding, evidence integrity + anchors (v0.2), reserved names, test vectors, changelog, proposal processschemas/: JSON Schemas for protocol objectspackages/python/chp_core/: reference host (Python)packages/chp-sdk/ + packages/chp-host-ts/: the second implementation (TypeScript)examples/capability-host-endpoint-demo/: HTTP-served host demoexamples/agent-operations-demo/: agent/tool observability demoexamples/codex-self-observation-demo/: Codex dogfooding demoexamples/mcp-bridge-demo/: experimental MCP-style bridge prototypeconformance/: conformance runnerdocs/quickstart.md: install, first run, serving, meshdocs/why-chp.md: the problem and the thesisdocs/adapter-authoring.md: writing your own capability adapterdocs/production-runbook.md: operations, backup/restore, key compromisedocs/comparisons/chp-vs-mcp.md: precise MCP comparisondocs/comparisons/chp-and-opentelemetry.md: OpenTelemetry alignment notedocs/comparisons/landscape.md: adjacent framework comparisondocs/security/threat-model-v0.1.md: v0.1 threat modelThe reference implementation is hardened for production operation: WAL multi-writer safety with hot backup (chp store backup --verify), SIGTERM drain (in-flight work completes before exit), a fail-loud auth flag (CHP_HOST_REQUIRE_AUTH=1), scheduled retention, and operator metrics (store size, witness-loop liveness, revocation counts, internal errors). Operations, backup/restore, rolling upgrades, and the key-compromise runbook: docs/production-runbook.md. Vulnerability reporting: SECURITY.md.
MCP exposes tools and context to AI applications. CHP governs and evidences execution of capabilities.
They fit together. MCP can be a source of capability invocation, and CHP adds correlation, replay, evidence, denial semantics, and governance at the execution boundary.
Read more: docs/comparisons/chp-vs-mcp.md.
Read CONTRIBUTING.md first. One thing to know before you open a pull request: this repository is a generated mirror of a private development repository. CI rejects pull requests that touch packages/, docs/, spec/, schemas/, or examples/ from a branch that is not sync/*, so a code PR against those paths will fail by construction no matter how good it is.
That is not a brush-off — it is the publishing model, and we would rather say so up front than let you find out from a red check. Issues, spec proposals, comparisons, and discussion are the highest-bandwidth way in today; open an issue and we will route the change through the internal flow with attribution.
Open source should include local visibility:
Commercial value can remain around production trust:
Guiding rule:
Local visibility should be free. Production trust should be paid.
CHP is dual-licensed by asset:
packages/, conformance/, examples/, scripts/): Apache License 2.0 — see LICENSE.spec/, schemas/, docs/): Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) — see LICENSE-DOCS. Implementing the specification is additionally covered by a royalty-free patent grant — see PATENTS.TRADEMARK.md.Contributions are accepted under the Contributor License Agreement; see CONTRIBUTING.md.
Copyright © 2026 Project Auxo, Inc. See NOTICE.