原型 · 预览版:收录官方注册中心里的全部服务器,每 30 分钟同步一次。评价和账户功能将在后续阶段推出。
PopNx MCP为使用 AI 的人准备的 MCP 服务器 · 用大白话讲清楚

Actionpin

作者:CloudCorpRecords版本 0.1.8i★ –i在你的电脑上运行
注册名称io.github.CloudCorpRecords/actionpin

安装

概览

作者提供的说明(英文原文)

GitHub Actions supply-chain hardener: audit workflows for unpinned actions and build a SHA pin plan.

PopNx MCP 的三大支柱

这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。

它能帮你做什么

我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。

  • 连接方式: 在你的电脑上运行
  • 传输方式: stdio
  • 分类: 开发者工具

安装

选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。

安装之前

  • 基础检查:1 项中通过 1 项
  • 在你的电脑上运行,拥有你的用户账户的权限(文件、网络、应用)。
  • 注册中心没有列出需要填写的密钥。

你需要

  • npm已安装 Node.js(用于 npx 命令)

你用的是哪个应用?

在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。

打开 Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config,把下面的内容粘贴到 claude_desktop_config.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "actionpin": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@reneturcios/actionpin",
        "mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

在终端中运行这条命令

claude mcp add actionpin -- npx -y @reneturcios/actionpin mcp

在 Cursor 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "actionpin": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@reneturcios/actionpin",
        "mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

在 VS Code 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json

{
  "servers": {
    "actionpin": {
      "type": "stdio",
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@reneturcios/actionpin",
        "mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。

你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。

这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。

它能做什么

它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。

基础检查i

我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月6日

  • ✓ 通过

    作者与仓库一致

    注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 CloudCorpRecords 验证,该账户拥有此仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    仍在维护

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    有许可证

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • – 不适用

    端点有响应

    它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点

  • – 不适用

    使用 OAuth 登录

    在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置

  • … 尚未检查

    工具描述中没有隐藏指令

    它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表

与“开发者工具”中的其他服务器比较i

  • 星标数多于此分类中其他 1384 个服务器的 0%
  • 发布到注册中心的时间比此分类中其他 1384 个服务器的 80% 更新
  • 基础检查结果等于或优于此分类中其他 1384 个服务器的 100%

与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。

常见问题

Actionpin 安全吗?

它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。

它需要哪些密钥或代码?

注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。

它在我的电脑上运行还是在云端?

它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。

它还在维护吗?

GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.1.8)于11天前进入注册中心。

哪些应用可以使用它?

支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Node.js, Docker。

有什么可以替代它?

同一分类中有:GitHub, Desktop Commander, Cloudflare MCP

替代选择

同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。

如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i

GitHub

作者:github

Connect AI assistants to GitHub - manage repos, issues, PRs, and workflows through natural language.

电脑或云端★ 34,245MIT3天前更新
安装

Desktop Commander

作者:wonderwhy-er

MCP server for terminal commands, file operations, and process management

在你的电脑上运行★ 10,225MIT15天前更新
安装

Cloudflare MCP

作者:cloudflare

Cloudflare MCP servers

在云端运行★ 4,446Apache-2.014个月前更新
安装

作者的 README

打开 README

按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。

actionpin

A version tag is a promise anyone can break. A commit SHA is not.

Quickstart

npx @reneturcios/actionpin audit

GitHub Actions are executable supply chain. When a workflow says uses: actions/checkout@v4, that tag can move. When a third-party action tag moves to a compromised commit, every workflow that trusts the tag runs the new code with that workflow's tokens. Pinning to a full 40-character commit SHA is the standard defense, and almost nobody does it consistently, because doing it by hand across every workflow is tedious and easy to get wrong.

actionpin audits every workflow in a repo, reports exactly which actions are pinned and which are not, and can rewrite the unpinned ones to SHAs for you, keeping the original tag as a comment so the pin stays readable.

Why this exists

GitHub Actions are the second largest confirmed open source supply-chain attack surface of the last year, behind only npm. Maintainer accounts and action tags have been hijacked before, and a mutable tag means the code your CI runs today is not guaranteed to be the code you reviewed. The fix is known and boring: pin to a SHA. actionpin makes the boring fix one command, and makes the audit callable by agents through MCP so it can run inside contribution and release workflows, not just by hand.

What it checks

For every uses: line in .github/workflows/*.yml and *.yaml:

classificationmeaning
PINNEDRef is a full 40-character commit SHA (or a full sha256 or sha512 content digest for a container image)
MUTABLERef is a version tag such as v4 or v4.2.1. The tag can move.
BRANCHRef is a branch such as main, master, or HEAD. It moves by design.
LOCALA local path such as ./local/action. Never rewritten.

Owner types: official for actions owned by actions or github, third-party for everyone else, docker for docker:// container actions, and local for local paths.

Verdict rules:

  • PINNED: every non-local action is pinned to a full SHA. Exit code 0.
  • EXPOSED: at least one third-party or container action uses a mutable tag or a branch. Exit code 1.
  • PARTIAL: only official actions are unpinned. Exit code 1.
  • Usage errors exit with code 2.

Fix mode resolves a tag or branch to its commit SHA through the GitHub API and rewrites the line to owner/repo@ # , preserving indentation and all other content. Files are edited line-wise; YAML is never parsed and re-emitted, so formatting survives. If a ref cannot be resolved, its line is left unchanged and the failure is reported. Docker image refs are reported but not rewritten; pin those by digest.

Usage

CLI
# Audit the current repo

npx @reneturcios/actionpin audit

Audit another path, machine readable

npx @reneturcios/actionpin audit ~/src/my-repo --json

Audit every repo checkout under an org root and report pin drift

(the same action used at different refs in different repos)

npx @reneturcios/actionpin org ~/src/my-org --json

Preview the pinning plan without writing

npx @reneturcios/actionpin fix --dry-run

Pin everything resolvable, in place

npx @reneturcios/actionpin fix

Example output:

actionpin audit .: EXPOSED

workflows: 2, actions: 6, pinned: 1, mutable: 4, branch: 1, local: 0 [PINNED] .github/workflows/ci.yml:12 actions/checkout@0123456789abcdef0123456789abcdef01234567 (official) [MUTABLE] .github/workflows/ci.yml:13 actions/setup-node@v4 (official) [MUTABLE] .github/workflows/publish.yml:20 docker/build-push-action@v6 (third-party) EXPOSED: at least one third-party or container action uses a mutable tag or branch ref.

Set GITHUB_TOKEN for the higher authenticated GitHub API rate limit during fix mode. Auditing needs no credentials and no network.

MCP server

Add to your MCP client config:

{

"mcpServers": { "actionpin": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@reneturcios/actionpin", "mcp"] } } }

Tools:

  • audit_workflows: audit a repo path and return every action with its classification, owner type, file, and line, plus the verdict.
  • pin_plan: return the full SHA pinning plan for a path without writing any files.
Docker
docker run -i ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/actionpin mcp

docker run --rm -v "$PWD:/work" -w /work ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/actionpin audit .

Limits (pinned by the hardening battery)

These behaviors are deliberate, tested, and stated plainly so a green report is never misread:

  • Scope is workflow files plus in-repo composite actions. A directory audit scans .github/workflows/*.yml and *.yaml, and also the action definitions that live inside the scanned repo: the root-level action.yml or action.yaml (the scanned repo's own published action definition, scanned whether or not a workflow references it, which is the normal shape for a repo that ships an action), every action.yml and action.yaml under .github/actions/, plus any local action directory a workflow references with a ./ uses path. Their internal steps are inventoried and classified like workflow steps, flagged as composite action refs, and drive the verdict the same way. A root action whose steps reference the repo's own action (via ./ or via its published name) is scanned exactly once; self-reference never recurses or double counts. The report lists how many composite files were scanned, and names any action files found elsewhere in the repo that were not scanned (not the root action file, outside .github/actions, and not referenced by a workflow), so coverage is never implied beyond what was audited. Passing an action.yml file path directly also parses it like any other file. Job-level uses: lines (reusable workflow calls) are in scope and are audited and pinned like step-level ones.
  • A local path with a malformed prefix is local, and the typo stays visible. A uses value such as $/.github/actions/issues-helper (a stray character where the dot of the ./ prefix belongs, shipped by real repos) names no remote repository, so it is classified LOCAL and is never resolved against the GitHub API in fix mode. The finding carries a note that the prefix is not a valid remote reference and looks like a local path typo, because the spelling is a real defect in the target repo even though it is not a pinning exposure.
  • Dynamic values are skipped, not guessed. A uses: value that contains a GitHub expression (${{ matrix.action }}, actions/checkout@${{ inputs.ref }}) is decided at run time and cannot be classified statically. actionpin skips it entirely instead of inventing an action or a verdict for it. Audit the matrix or input values themselves if a workflow builds its actions dynamically.
  • Short SHAs never count as pinned. Only a full 40-character SHA (or a full sha256 or sha512 digest for docker:// images) is PINNED. A short SHA such as abc1234 is reported in the BRANCH bucket and fails the verdict, because a short prefix is not a stable pin.
  • Container tags never count as pinned. For docker:// images only a full content digest counts. A tag spelled as 40 hex characters is still a tag and can be re-pushed, and a truncated or non-hex digest is not a digest; both are MUTABLE.
  • YAML anchors and aliases are resolved within the file. GitHub Actions has supported them since September 2025. An anchored uses: value is classified by the value itself, an alias line (uses: *name, or a step alias - *name) inherits the anchored classification and is flagged viaAlias, and anchors must be defined before use in the same file, matching GitHub. Fix mode pins the anchor definition line and never rewrites an alias line.
  • Refs containing slashes (release/v1, feature/new-thing) are reported as BRANCH bucket moving refs. Fix mode resolves them through the git-ref API with the slash preserved.
  • Block and flow style are both inventoried. Parsing is line-wise so fix mode can preserve formatting, and a quote-aware flow scanner inventories uses: entries written in YAML flow style (for example steps: [{uses: 'actions/checkout@v4'}]), including several entries sharing one line, flow collections split across lines, and quoted (JSON-shaped) keys. Commented-out uses: lines are ignored, and a uses: word inside a quoted string or a run command invents no action. Fix mode pins a flow entry without adding a version comment on the shared line, because a comment would eat the rest of that line.
  • A file that cannot be fully parsed is reported, never silent. When a workflow or composite file carries a uses: key whose value cannot be extracted, the report names the file in unparsedWorkflows, carries a note saying it could not be fully parsed, and floors the verdict at PARTIAL, so the file never silently contributes zero actions to a PINNED verdict.
  • Docker refs are reported, never rewritten. Pin container images by digest yourself; fix mode leaves docker:// lines unchanged and says so in the plan.
  • Empty estates say so. When no workflows and no action definitions are found under the audited path, the report carries a plain note that nothing was audited. The verdict is computed over zero actions and is not an all-clear for that path. A repo whose only auditable surface is its root action definition is audited on that definition and carries no empty-estate note.
  • Missing or wrong-type targets are usage errors, never a verdict. A path that does not exist exits 2 with an error on stderr and no report, matching hookcheck and injectcheck, so CI wired to a mistyped path fails instead of going green on nothing. Passing a single file audits it only when it is a .yml or .yaml file; any other regular file (a package.json, a README) is a usage error exit 2, not a workflow. A target that is neither a file nor a directory is a usage error too.
  • Non-regular files are never opened. Discovery stats every candidate before opening it and skips anything that is not a regular file, so a FIFO (named pipe), socket, or device planted at a workflow or action file path cannot hang or block the audit; the regular files around it are audited normally.
  • Piped output is delivered whole, or the run fails. Reports are written through a flush-aware emit path, so a report of any size arrives complete through a pipe, the way agents, scripts, and CI consume it. If the reader closes the pipe before the report is delivered, actionpin exits 141 (the shell-visible equivalent of SIGPIPE) instead of reporting success for output nobody received. Fixed in 0.1.2 after Round 1 real-repo validation caught silent truncation at exactly 65,536 bytes with a success exit code.

The toolkit

actionpin is part of a family of small, single-purpose developer tools by the same author, all built the same way: one bin that serves a CLI and an MCP server, deterministic checks with evidence, no invented answers.

  • greenlight: pre-flight checks for open-source contributions: is this issue actually landable?
  • shipcheck: verify a release actually shipped across git, npm, the MCP Registry, and GHCR.
  • hookcheck: audit auto-exec hooks in a repo for persistence-style risks.

Development

npm install

npm run build npm test

Tests run on fixtures with an injected fetch function; no test touches the network.

#

只显示了开头部分;其余内容请在仓库中阅读

问 PopNx