Spec Driven Development
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
作者提供的说明(英文原文)
Classify PR review comments as actionable or noise, with the rule that fired as evidence.
这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。
我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。
选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。
你需要
你用的是哪个应用?
在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。
打开 Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config,把下面的内容粘贴到 claude_desktop_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"reviewthread": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@reneturcios/reviewthread",
"mcp"
]
}
}
}在终端中运行这条命令
claude mcp add reviewthread -- npx -y @reneturcios/reviewthread mcp粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"reviewthread": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@reneturcios/reviewthread",
"mcp"
]
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json
{
"servers": {
"reviewthread": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@reneturcios/reviewthread",
"mcp"
]
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。
你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。
这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。
它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。
我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月6日
注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 CloudCorpRecords 验证,该账户拥有此仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点
在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置
它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表
与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。
它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。
注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。
它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。
GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.1.0)于3天前进入注册中心。
支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Node.js, Docker。
同一分类中有:Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, Apify MCP Server
同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。
如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.
Extract data from any website with thousands of scrapers, crawlers, and automations on Apify Store ⚡
按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。
A pull-request review thread collects everything: a maintainer pointing at a genuinely broken check, a bot cheering "LGTM", the same coverage note posted twice, a comment on code that has since been rewritten. reviewthread sorts a batch of those comments into the five buckets a reviewer actually acts on — actionable, noise, closed, stale, and duplicate — and, for each one, names the exact rule that put it there, so the verdict can be checked rather than trusted.
You supply the facts, per comment: an id, the author's name, whether the author is a bot or a human, the body, the thread state (open, resolved, or outdated), and optionally whether the comment is attached to a currently failing check and the id of another comment it duplicates. Nothing is fetched; the classification is a pure function of what you pass in.
The rules run in a fixed order and the first match wins. A resolved thread is closed and an outdated one is stale, whatever else is true of the comment. A comment whose duplicate_of is non-empty after trimming is a duplicate, and its evidence names the trimmed target id. A comment attached to a failing check is actionable — that outranks everything a bot might say. Only then does authorship matter: a bot whose body is praise-only (after trimming, lowercasing, collapsing whitespace, and stripping trailing ! and . characters, the body is exactly one of a pinned eleven-phrase set such as lgtm, looks good to me, or ship it) is noise, and any other bot comment with no failing check is noise too. What remains — an open human comment — is actionable.
Two judgement calls are pinned. A duplicate_of that is absent, empty, or whitespace-only counts as no duplicate at all. And praise is judged against the exact phrase set only: a bot saying "great job, but the tests fail" is a generic bot comment, not praise-only, because the whole normalized body must match a phrase.
Malformed input — a missing or empty comments array, a comment that is not an object, a missing, empty, or non-string id or author, an author_kind outside bot / human, a missing or non-string body, a state outside open / resolved / outdated, a non-boolean failing_check, or a non-string duplicate_of — is a validation error naming the offending path, with no partial result. Unknown extra fields are ignored, including inside comment items.
npx @reneturcios/reviewthread triage --input args.json
npx @reneturcios/reviewthread --version
args.json contains the full arguments object:
{
"comments": [ { "id": "c1", "author": "ci-bot", "author_kind": "bot", "body": "Coverage dropped below the threshold.", "state": "open", "failing_check": true }, { "id": "c2", "author": "dependabot[bot]", "author_kind": "bot", "body": "LGTM!", "state": "open" }, { "id": "c3", "author": "marisol", "author_kind": "human", "body": "This still races when the cache is cold.", "state": "open" } ] }
The result is printed as JSON:
{
"comments": [ { "id": "c1", "author": "ci-bot", "verdict": "actionable", "evidence": "comment is attached to a failing check" }, { "id": "c2", "author": "dependabot[bot]", "verdict": "noise", "evidence": "praise-only bot comment with no failing check" }, { "id": "c3", "author": "marisol", "verdict": "actionable", "evidence": "open human comment" } ], "counts": { "actionable": 2, "noise": 1, "closed": 0, "stale": 0, "duplicate": 0 }, "total": 3 }
Exit codes: 0 on success, 1 on a runtime error (including an unreadable or invalid input file, or invalid input), 2 on a usage error.
npx -y @reneturcios/reviewthread mcp
MCP client config:
{
"mcpServers": { "reviewthread": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@reneturcios/reviewthread", "mcp"] } } }
triage_review_comments — Classify pull-request review comments as actionable, noise, closed, stale, or duplicate from caller-supplied comment facts.comments (array, required, at least 1 item) — the review comments to classify. Each item:id (string, required, non-empty) — comment identifierauthor (string, required, non-empty) — comment author nameauthor_kind (string, required, bot or human) — whether the author is a bot or a humanbody (string, required, may be empty) — comment body textstate (string, required, open, resolved, or outdated) — thread state of the commentfailing_check (boolean, optional, absent means false) — whether the comment is attached to a currently failing checkduplicate_of (string, optional) — id of another comment this one duplicatesReturns {comments, counts, total}, where comments is one {id, author, verdict, evidence} per input comment in input order, counts is {actionable, noise, closed, stale, duplicate} in that key order, and total is the number of input comments.
docker run -i ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/reviewthread
docker run --rm -v "$PWD:/w" ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/reviewthread triage --input /w/args.json
npm install
npm run build # tsc -> dist/ npm test # tsx --test test/*.test.ts (pure local, no network) npm run dev # run the CLI from source
MIT — Copyright (c) 2026 Rene Turcios