Spec Driven Development
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
作者提供的说明(英文原文)
Verify every spec requirement is claimed by an issue, PR, or code reference; list gaps.
这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。
我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。
选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。
你需要
你用的是哪个应用?
在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。
打开 Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config,把下面的内容粘贴到 claude_desktop_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"speccheck": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@reneturcios/speccheck",
"mcp"
]
}
}
}在终端中运行这条命令
claude mcp add speccheck -- npx -y @reneturcios/speccheck mcp粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"speccheck": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@reneturcios/speccheck",
"mcp"
]
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json
{
"servers": {
"speccheck": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@reneturcios/speccheck",
"mcp"
]
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。
你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。
这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。
它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。
我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月6日
注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 CloudCorpRecords 验证,该账户拥有此仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点
在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置
它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表
与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。
它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。
注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。
它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。
GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.1.0)于3天前进入注册中心。
支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Node.js, Docker。
同一分类中有:Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, zanadir
同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。
如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.
Find what a repository's CI is missing, and which security checks cannot fail the build.
按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。
A spec is only as good as the work that actually answers it. Requirements get written, issues get filed, pull requests get merged, code lands — and somewhere in that pile the mapping between "what the spec asked for" and "what claims to have done it" quietly rots. speccheck audits that mapping. You supply the spec's requirements and the claims made against them, and it reports which requirements are covered, which are not, which claims point at requirements that do not exist, and how many claims each requirement collected.
Nothing is fetched. A requirement counts as covered the moment at least one claim names its id; the claiming source can be an issue, a pull request, or a code reference, and duplicate claims each count — three issues claiming the same requirement is a fact worth seeing in the count, not noise to deduplicate. A claim naming an id that no requirement has is dangling: it is echoed back in full, in the order the claims arrived, and it counts nowhere — not toward coverage, not toward any requirement's total. It usually means a renamed requirement or a typo, and either way it is the spec owner's problem to see, not the tool's to guess at.
The verdict compresses the report into one word. If every requirement is claimed, the spec is fully_covered. Otherwise the coverage percentage — covered over total, rounded to the nearest integer — decides: 80 or above is mostly_covered, 50 or above is partial, and anything lower is sparse. The counts always travel with the verdict, so the word never has to be taken on faith.
Malformed input is a validation error naming the offending path, with no partial result: requirements must be a non-empty array of objects each carrying a non-empty id and text, requirement ids must be unique (a duplicate is an error naming the id), and claims must be an array — possibly empty — of objects each carrying a non-empty requirement_id and source_ref plus a source_kind of issue, pr, or code. Unknown extra fields are ignored. The computation is pure and local: no network, no configuration, and no repository is read or touched.
npx @reneturcios/speccheck check --input args.json
npx @reneturcios/speccheck --version
args.json contains the full arguments object:
{
"requirements": [ { "id": "REQ-1", "text": "Users can sign in with a passkey" }, { "id": "REQ-2", "text": "Sessions expire after 24 hours" }, { "id": "REQ-3", "text": "Admins can revoke any session" } ], "claims": [ { "requirement_id": "REQ-1", "source_kind": "pr", "source_ref": "PR #412" }, { "requirement_id": "REQ-1", "source_kind": "issue", "source_ref": "issue #388" }, { "requirement_id": "REQ-2", "source_kind": "code", "source_ref": "src/session.ts" }, { "requirement_id": "REQ-9", "source_kind": "issue", "source_ref": "issue #401" } ] }
The result is printed as JSON:
{
"covered": ["REQ-1", "REQ-2"], "uncovered": ["REQ-3"], "dangling_claims": [ { "requirement_id": "REQ-9", "source_kind": "issue", "source_ref": "issue #401" } ], "claim_counts": { "REQ-1": 2, "REQ-2": 1, "REQ-3": 0 }, "coverage_percent": 67, "verdict": "partial", "requirement_count": 3, "claim_count": 4 }
claim_counts carries an entry for every requirement, including zeros, with keys in the order the requirements were supplied. Exit codes: 0 on success, 1 on a runtime error (including an unreadable or invalid input file, or invalid input), 2 on a usage error.
npx -y @reneturcios/speccheck mcp
MCP client config:
{
"mcpServers": { "speccheck": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@reneturcios/speccheck", "mcp"] } } }
check_spec_coverage — Verify a spec's requirements are claimed by issues, pull requests, or code, from caller-supplied requirement and claim facts.requirements (array, required, at least 1 item) — the spec's requirements; each item is an object with a non-empty id and text, and ids must be uniqueclaims (array, required, may be empty) — claims that an issue, pull request, or code reference addresses a requirement; each item is an object with a non-empty requirement_id, a source_kind of issue, pr, or code, and a non-empty source_refReturns {covered, uncovered, dangling_claims, claim_counts, coverage_percent, verdict, requirement_count, claim_count}.
docker run -i ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/speccheck
docker run --rm -v "$PWD:/w" ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/speccheck check --input /w/args.json
npm install
npm run build # tsc -> dist/ npm test # tsx --test test/*.test.ts (pure local, no network) npm run dev # run the CLI from source
MIT — Copyright (c) 2026 Rene Turcios