原型 · 预览版:收录官方注册中心里的全部服务器,每 30 分钟同步一次。评价和账户功能将在后续阶段推出。
PopNx MCP为使用 AI 的人准备的 MCP 服务器 · 用大白话讲清楚

Wallcheck

作者:CloudCorpRecords版本 0.5.0i★ –i在你的电脑上运行
注册名称io.github.CloudCorpRecords/wallcheck

安装

概览

作者提供的说明(英文原文)

Probe a URL and name the bot wall: vendor, verdict, and evidence. CLI plus stdio MCP server.

PopNx MCP 的三大支柱

这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。

它能帮你做什么

我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。

  • 连接方式: 在你的电脑上运行
  • 传输方式: stdio
  • 分类: 其他

安装

选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。

安装之前

  • 基础检查:1 项中通过 1 项
  • 在你的电脑上运行,拥有你的用户账户的权限(文件、网络、应用)。
  • 注册中心没有列出需要填写的密钥。

你需要

你用的是哪个应用?

在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。

打开 Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config,把下面的内容粘贴到 claude_desktop_config.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "wallcheck": {
      "command": "docker",
      "args": [
        "run",
        "-i",
        "--rm",
        "ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/wallcheck:0.5.0"
      ]
    }
  }
}

在终端中运行这条命令

claude mcp add wallcheck -- docker run -i --rm ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/wallcheck:0.5.0

在 Cursor 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "wallcheck": {
      "command": "docker",
      "args": [
        "run",
        "-i",
        "--rm",
        "ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/wallcheck:0.5.0"
      ]
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

在 VS Code 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json

{
  "servers": {
    "wallcheck": {
      "type": "stdio",
      "command": "docker",
      "args": [
        "run",
        "-i",
        "--rm",
        "ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/wallcheck:0.5.0"
      ]
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。

你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。

这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。

它能做什么

它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。

基础检查i

我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月6日

  • ✓ 通过

    作者与仓库一致

    注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 CloudCorpRecords 验证,该账户拥有此仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    仍在维护

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    有许可证

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • – 不适用

    端点有响应

    它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点

  • – 不适用

    使用 OAuth 登录

    在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置

  • … 尚未检查

    工具描述中没有隐藏指令

    它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表

与“其他”中的其他服务器比较i

  • 星标数多于此分类中其他 32435 个服务器的 0%
  • 发布到注册中心的时间比此分类中其他 32435 个服务器的 74% 更新
  • 基础检查结果等于或优于此分类中其他 32435 个服务器的 100%

与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。

常见问题

Wallcheck 安全吗?

它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。

它需要哪些密钥或代码?

注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。

它在我的电脑上运行还是在云端?

它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。

它还在维护吗?

GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.5.0)于13天前进入注册中心。

哪些应用可以使用它?

支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Docker。

有什么可以替代它?

同一分类中有:Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, Apify MCP Server

替代选择

同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。

如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i

Spec Driven Development

作者:formulahendry

MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.

在你的电脑上运行★ 440MIT14个月前更新
安装

Remote Desktop Commander

作者:desktop-commander

Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.

在云端运行★ 211昨天更新
安装

Apify MCP Server

作者:apify

Extract data from any website with thousands of scrapers, crawlers, and automations on Apify Store ⚡

在云端运行今天更新
安装

作者的 README

打开 README

按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。

wallcheck

Point an agent at a URL. Find out what actually stops it: with receipts.

0.5.0: stamped final at the ship-readiness pass (release candidate at Wave 9). Not yet published; the launch hold stands. What is proven, what is not, and what the ship decision still needs: campaign/LAUNCH-READINESS.md.

Agents die silently on bot walls. A fetch returns 403, a browser session churns through environment after environment, an upload never starts : and nothing can say *what* stopped it, *whose* wall it was, or show the evidence. wallcheck probes a URL once, honestly, and classifies what an agent really hits: OPEN, CHALLENGED, WALLED, LOGIN_GATED, RATE_LIMITED, or UNREACHABLE: naming the vendor (Cloudflare, PerimeterX, DataDome, Akamai, Imperva, AWS WAF, Microsoft Azure WAF, Kasada, AWS CloudFront) and the exact signals that prove it.

No LLM anywhere in the verdict: the classifier is a deterministic pure function of (status, headers, body). Same response in, same verdict out: which is what makes the results safe to put in CI, in an incident report, or in the public Bot Wall Index.

New in v0.2: signed agent identity. wallcheck keygen mints an RFC 9421 signing key and wallcheck probe --sign key.json attaches a real HTTP Message Signature (hmac-sha256, tag="web-bot-auth") to the probe: an agent with a name, not an anonymous bot. wallcheck verify-server --key key.json runs a tiny server that honors only correctly signed requests, so site owners can test their side. The hmac-sha256 variant covers bilateral agent↔owner setups; Ed25519 (v0.4) covers the public directory case: see validation/wave2/SIGNING.md.

New in 0.5.0: the owner-side audit joins the MCP server as the audit tool (up to 10 honest GETs per call, same bounded-fetch discipline as probe_url), the docs pass in Wave 9 corrected every stale count against measured reality, and the suite stood at 120 tests at the Wave 9 stamp. Waves 10-17 took it to 428 tests (the Wave 17 audit's 423 predates the W17-007 live fix's 5 fixtures : see validation/wave17/STABILITY-12.md); Wave 18's battery v10 plus the W18-007 live fix took it to 481. Wave 19's battery v11 took it to 532; Wave 20's battery v12 took it to 571; Wave 21's battery v13 took it to 608; Wave 22's battery v14 took it to 638; Wave 23's battery v15 took it to 674; Wave 24's battery v16 took it to 710; Wave 25's battery v17 took it to 747; Wave 26's battery v18 took it to 788; Wave 27's battery v19 took it to 831.

New in v0.5: the classifier learned the territory the Wave 5 expansion measured: Microsoft Azure WAF, Kasada, and AWS CloudFront detection; the Akamai reference-token deny page; a verdict rule for status 444 (a dropped request is a refusal, never an OPEN); and the end of the false-challenge species where a served page merely embeds a reCAPTCHA/hCaptcha loader for its own forms. All five Wave 5 defects are fixed test-first from live captures (PROBLEMS.md). The index now covers 500 sites (Waves 6-7 expansion, Wave 18 row 500), and Wave 5 ran the first signed-vs-unsigned experiment with the shipped signer (SIGNED-EXPERIMENT.md): an unregistered key changed no verdict anywhere: the measured baseline the campaign's identity front has to move. For owners, the Fix Kit turns audit findings into vendor-verified remediation steps.

New in v0.4: Ed25519 signed identity. The signer now implements Ed25519 per RFC 8032 in pure Python stdlib (verified against the official RFC 8032 §7.1 test vectors), so wallcheck keygen --alg ed25519 mints a directory-compatible Web Bot Auth key: the public half publishes in a /.well-known/http-message-signatures-directory document, and probe --sign auto-detects the key's algorithm. Wave 4 also took the index's third data point and ran the first signed-agent-directory census of all 154 index domains (DIRECTORY.md).

New in v0.3: the owner-side audit. wallcheck audit grades a site's agent-access posture across six checks: robots.txt AI-agent directives, llms.txt sanity (an HTML soft-404 *fails*), sitemap, feed discovery, API discovery, and Web Bot Auth signed-agent readiness: each PASS/WARN/FAIL with evidence and a concrete fix, rolled into an A-F grade. First live audits (validation/wave3/AUDITS.md): our own properties grade D/F: the audit found real work on our own sites before anyone else's. v0.3 also adds AWS WAF detection to the classifier and merges the census into the Bot Wall Index working table (499 sites after the Waves 6-7 expansion).

Non-goals

wallcheck will never solve CAPTCHAs, spoof fingerprints or user agents, or bypass/evade a wall, rate limit, or access control. The probe identifies itself (wallcheck/ user agent). The combat is detection + evidence + standards: a wall an agent can *name* is a bug report; signed agent identity (Web Bot Auth, RFC 9421: prototype shipped in v0.2, see SPEC.md) is how agents stop being anonymous in the first place.

Usage

CLI
# No install needed beyond Python 3.11+ (standard library only):

PYTHONPATH=src python3 -m wallcheck probe https://www.upwork.com

Or install the package:

pip install . # then: wallcheck probe [--json]

Example output (a real run: see DOGFOOD.md for the full set):

https://example.com -> OPEN

status: 200 vendor: none detected elapsed: 87ms evidence:

  • STATUS_200

Exit codes: 0 for OPEN, 1 for any other verdict, 2 for usage errors: CI-ready. --json prints one stable object: {url, final_url, status, verdict, vendor, evidence[], elapsed_ms, redirect_chain[]}.

Signed probes and owner-side verification:

PYTHONPATH=src python3 -m wallcheck keygen --out wallcheck-key.json

PYTHONPATH=src python3 -m wallcheck probe https://example.com --sign wallcheck-key.json PYTHONPATH=src python3 -m wallcheck verify-server --key wallcheck-key.json --port 8799

Owner-side audit of your own site's agent-access posture:

PYTHONPATH=src python3 -m wallcheck audit example.com [--json]

Seven checks (robots.txt, llms.txt, sitemap, feed, API, signed-agent readiness, security contact) → per-check PASS/WARN/FAIL + evidence + a fix list, and a grade (out of 14 since the security-contact check was added; earlier grades were out of 12). Exit 0 for grade A/B, 1 otherwise.

Exposure scan of the page a site serves (opt-in, same single fetch):

PYTHONPATH=src python3 -m wallcheck probe https://example.com --exposure [--json]

Classifies the key-like material the page itself hands an anonymous visitor — CANDIDATE_EXPOSURE (server-secret classes that should never be public), PUBLIC_BY_DESIGN (frontend keys, app IDs), VISITOR_TOKEN (short-lived JWTs). Findings are fingerprint-only: pattern, class, length and a SHA-256 prefix, never the value. The method and its disclosure rules live in campaign/EXPOSURE-LAYER.md.

Verdicts
verdictmeaning
OPENServed. An agent can read it.
CHALLENGEDAn interactive human-verification challenge was presented (Cloudflare "Just a moment", a CAPTCHA page). Non-interactive agents stop here.
WALLEDA hard block page ("Sorry, you have been blocked", a deny page, a bare 403). No challenge is even offered.
LOGIN_GATEDRedirected to / served a login wall. Content exists, behind authentication.
RATE_LIMITEDHTTP 429 without a stronger wall signal. A throttle, not a wall.
UNREACHABLEThe fetch failed (DNS/TLS/timeout) or 5xx. No wall verdict is claimed.
MCP server

From npm (no install, needs Node 20+ and Python 3.11+ on PATH; the package is a thin launcher over the same Python stdlib code):

npx -y @reneturcios/wallcheck mcp

the same shim also forwards the CLI:

npx -y @reneturcios/wallcheck probe https://example.com

Or from this repo:

PYTHONPATH=src python3 -m wallcheck mcp

or, installed: wallcheck-mcp

Tools:

  • probe_url(url, timeout?): live fetch → classification object.
  • classify(status, headers, body): offline classification of a response you captured yourself. No network.
  • scan_exposure(url, timeout?): live fetch → classification object plus an exposure section (key-like material the page serves, classified, fingerprint-only). One honest GET, same discipline as probe_url; covers the probe's 64 KB body sample.
  • audit(domain, timeout?): owner-side agent-access audit: grade plus per-check PASS/WARN/FAIL. Up to 11 honest GETs to the one domain, same bounded-fetch discipline as probe_url.

Add to an MCP client config as a stdio server running either command, or via Docker with the GHCR image ghcr.io/cloudcorprecords/wallcheck:0.5.0 (see Dockerfile).

Tests

Fully offline: recorded fixtures exercise the pure classifier:

python3 -m unittest discover -s tests -v

Contributing evidence

Captured responses under validation/ are evidence, and evidence is scrubbed before it is published: run python3 scripts/scrub_captures.py on any new capture wave first. Served pages embed other sites' key material; the scrubber's redaction table is the exposure scanner's own pattern table, so anything the scanner can find, the scrubber removes. Private disclosure material (validation/monster-finding/) and unreleased candidate findings (validation/exposure-wave*/) are never published — both paths are gitignored on purpose.

Family

By Rene Turcios: sibling of greenlight (know before you claim an issue: GO/NO-GO with evidence) and mcpaudit (audit any MCP server, scored). Same house rules: deterministic core, named issues, evidence over vibes, dogfood on real targets before claiming anything.

Full product spec, roadmap (Web Bot Auth signing shipped as the v0.2 prototype; the owner-side audit shipped in v0.3), and the Bot Wall Index plan: SPEC.md. Validation waves live in validation/: Wave 2 added depth probing of 77 platform paths (PATHS.md) and the signing prototype (SIGNING.md); Wave 3 added the stability re-probe, the 154-site index, and the audit's first live runs (AUDITS.md). Wave 4 added the third stability data point (STABILITY-2.md), the signed-agent directory census (DIRECTORY.md), and Ed25519. Wave 5 added the territory growth, the signed-vs-unsigned experiment, and the owner fix kit; Wave 6 hardened the classifier against 25 adversarial shapes; Wave 7 took the index to 499 sites, ran the second directory census (4 adopters) and an audit sweep; Wave 8 probed paths on 46 more platforms and took the front-doors file to 65 platforms. Wave 9 stamped 0.5.0-rc and added the audit MCP tool; Waves 10-28 ran nineteen more stability rounds (rounds 6-24) and adversarial batteries v2-v20, took the suite to 885 tests, and kept the launch hold.

License

MIT: see LICENSE.

问 PopNx