Spec Driven Development
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
作者提供的说明(英文原文)
Passive security scanner: audits MCP servers against the OWASP MCP Top 10, graded A-F.
这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。
我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。
选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。
你需要
你用的是哪个应用?
在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。
打开 Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config,把下面的内容粘贴到 claude_desktop_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"scan": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"owasp-mcp-scan",
"--serve"
]
}
}
}在终端中运行这条命令
claude mcp add scan -- npx -y owasp-mcp-scan --serve粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"scan": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"owasp-mcp-scan",
"--serve"
]
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json
{
"servers": {
"scan": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"owasp-mcp-scan",
"--serve"
]
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。
你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。
这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。
它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。
我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月6日
注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 CodingSelim 验证,该账户拥有此仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点
在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置
它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表
与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。
它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。
注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。
它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。
GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.2.1)于4个月前进入注册中心。
支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Node.js。
同一分类中有:Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, Symantec Cloud DLP AIops
同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。
如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.
Governed Symantec Cloud DLP — 14 MCP tools, read-only with audit.
按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。
Passive security scanner for Model Context Protocol servers. Point it at any running MCP server; it audits the live server against the OWASP MCP Top 10 and grades it A–F. Read-only, so it is safe to run against production.
npx owasp-mcp-scan --stdio "npx -y @modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem /tmp"
I ran it against the 12 most-installed MCP servers. [9 of them failed.](#real-findings-on-real-servers) No install, no config, no exploiting anything.
MCP tool descriptions are fed straight into your model's context, and most public servers were never security-reviewed. A bad one can hide instructions in a description, expose a raw-shell tool, or leak a key; and your agent acts on it. Endor Labs found 82% of servers prone to path traversal, 34% to command injection.
mcp-scan is the gut-check before you wire a server in. It's passive: it reads advertised capabilities and analyzes them statically, never invoking tools, so it's safe against production servers.
toxic-flow reasons across the whole toolset for the lethal trifecta (reads private data + ingests untrusted content + can exfiltrate), the shape single-tool scanners miss.It never calls a tool, never fuzzes, and never sends an exploit. The worst it does is read what the server already tells everyone.
12 popular npm servers, actual output (snapshot 2026-07-11, full benchmark):
| Server | Tools | Grade | 🔴 | 🟠 | 🟡 | Notable |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
firecrawl-mcp | 26 | F | 2 | 11 | 1 | lethal trifecta (MCP10) + code exec (MCP05) |
@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem | 14 | F | 0 | 1 | 11 | unconstrained path params (MCP01) |
@modelcontextprotocol/server-puppeteer | 7 | F | 1 | 2 | 0 | script param executes JS (MCP05) |
tavily-mcp | 5 | F | 0 | 3 | 1 | untrusted-input + exfiltration (MCP10) |
@modelcontextprotocol/server-memory | 9 | F | 0 | 3 | 0 | delete_* tools, no confirmation (MCP02) |
@modelcontextprotocol/server-github | 26 | D | 0 | 0 | 2 | state-changing tools (MCP02) |
@modelcontextprotocol/server-slack | 8 | C | 0 | 1 | 0 | reads + posts = data + exfil (MCP10) |
@modelcontextprotocol/server-everything | 13 | A | 0 | 0 | 0 | clean ✓ |
@kazuph/mcp-fetch | 1 | A | 0 | 0 | 0 | clean ✓ |
9 of 12 flagged, 3 clean, every row audited finding-by-finding, false positives stripped rather than padded. Reproduce any row yourself:
npx owasp-mcp-scan --stdio "npx -y firecrawl-mcp" # F: lethal trifecta + code exec
npx owasp-mcp-scan --stdio "npx -y @modelcontextprotocol/server-everything" # A: clean
CLI
npx owasp-mcp-scan --stdio "<command>" # local stdio server
npx owasp-mcp-scan --url https://host/mcp --header "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" npx owasp-mcp-scan --config ~/.cursor/mcp.json --format sarif --output mcp.sarif
As an MCP server, let your agent scan servers on demand (*"scan this MCP server before I add it"*). Add to any client; this mcpServers shape works in Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, VS Code, and Gemini CLI:
{ "mcpServers": { "mcp-scan": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "owasp-mcp-scan", "--serve"] } } }
OpenAI Codex (~/.codex/config.toml):
[mcp_servers.mcp-scan]
command = "npx" args = ["-y", "owasp-mcp-scan", "--serve"]
Exposes two tools: `scan_mcp_server` (audit a stdio/HTTP target) and `list_checks`.
Claude Code plugin
/plugin marketplace add CodingSelim/mcp-scan
/plugin install mcp-scan@mcp-scan
Also on the official MCP registry as io.github.CodingSelim/mcp-scan. Publishing steps: PUBLISHING.md.
Full OWASP MCP Top 10 (2025) coverage, 12 checks:
| Check | OWASP | Catches |
|---|---|---|
secret-exposure | MCP01 | AWS / OpenAI / Anthropic / GitHub / GitLab / Stripe / SendGrid / npm / HF / DB URIs / JWT / private keys in advertised text |
transport | MCP01 | Plaintext http:// to a non-loopback host |
path-traversal | MCP01 | file:///{path} templates and unconstrained path params |
excessive-scope | MCP02 | Destructive tools (delete, drop, transfer) with no confirmation |
tool-poisoning | MCP03 | Instruction overrides, hidden exfiltration directives, zero-width / Unicode-tag smuggling |
tool-shadowing | MCP03 / MCP09 | Duplicate tool-name collisions and "call me first" precedence injection |
supply-chain | MCP04 / MCP09 | Unpinned/placeholder versions and homoglyph server names |
command-injection | MCP05 | Unconstrained command / shell / code params, raw SQL, advertised execution |
ssrf | MCP05 | Arbitrary url / host params with no allowlist |
tool-poisoning (dynamic) | MCP06 | Injection in resource contents and server instructions |
authn | MCP07 | HTTP servers that complete an unauthenticated handshake |
telemetry | MCP08 | High-impact tools with no audit trail (advisory, unscored) |
toxic-flow | MCP10 | Lethal trifecta: one server that reads private data, ingests untrusted content, and can exfiltrate |
toxic-flow is the standout, it reasons across the whole toolset, catching the GitHub-MCP / email-agent injection shape that per-tool checks miss.
console (default) · json · sarif (GitHub Code Scanning). Exit code is non-zero at/above --fail-on (default high), so it gates CI:
- run: npx owasp-mcp-scan --url ${{ secrets.MCP_URL }} --format sarif --output mcp.sarif
npm install && npm run build && npm test # 48 tests, incl. live end-to-end fixture scans
Checks are pure and isolated (src/checks/), reusing detectors in src/detectors/. See CONTRIBUTING.md.
OWASP MCP Top 10 · MCP Security Cheat Sheet · Vulnerable MCP Project · MCPTox
MIT © CodingSelim