Spec Driven Development
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
作者提供的说明(英文原文)
Text-blind context control plane for AI agents. Select high-utility context under token budgets.
这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。
我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。
选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。
你用的是哪个应用?
在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。
链接指向作者自己的文件;我们不托管也不重新打包它。打开文件后,Claude Desktop 会进行安装。
在终端中运行这条命令
浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。
你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。
这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。
它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。
我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月7日
注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 cole-h06 验证,该账户拥有此仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点
在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置
它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表
与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。
它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。
注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。
它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。
GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(1.0.9)于12天前进入注册中心。
支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 MCPB。
同一分类中有:Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, ProAgentStore
同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。
如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.
MCP-first control plane for ProAgentStore agents and private instances.
按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。
Provenance-aware context control plane for AI agents.
Omneum is an open-source context control plane for AI agents, built to optimize the evidence entering an LLM's context window.
Agents accumulate context from retrieval, tools, memory, and previous sessions, but longer context windows don't guarantee better reasoning. Context rot can slowly degrade downstream answer accuracy even when the relevant information has already been retrieved.
Install Omneum:
pip install omneum
Run the context reconstruction demo:
git clone https://github.com/cole-h06/omneum.git
cd omneum python -m examples.context_quality_demo.before_after
Five retrieved chunks, four distinct claims, 80-unit context budget.
Compare retrieval-order packing with Omneum's claim-coverage selection under the same context budget.
| Metric | Raw RAG | Omneum |
|---|---|---|
| Chunks retained | 3 | 2 |
| Claim coverage | 2/4 | 4/4 |
| Budget used | 75/80 | 51/80 |
Packing chunks in retrieval order consumes 75 units while covering only two claims. Omneum retains two original chunks covering all four, using 32% less context capacity.
The demo measures its budget with the SDK's word/punctuation counter.
Set up the MCP server →
Omneum uses a graph-based mathematical analysis, calculated from Observation objects, to estimate the structural reliability of sources and the support for claims found in retrieved context.
Importantly, this analysis does not naively assume every source has derived its information independently. The same information often propagates across multiple sources. Without dependency tracking, five observations from different sources can be difficult to distinguish from five reports derived from the same upstream source.
For example, consider:
Source A: Acme's 2025 annual report
Claim: Acme reported $4.2 billion in revenue for 2025.
Source B: Financial article reporting the same claim Claim: Acme reported $4.2 billion in revenue for 2025. Upstream: Acme's 2025 annual report
How much support should that claim receive? That depends partly on the reliability of the sources reporting it. But how do we determine the reliability of the sources? By looking at the claims they support.
This definition seems circular, and it is. Nonetheless, it provides a well-defined notion of reliability that helps distinguish strongly supported context from weakly supported context.
Of course claim-level scores are only useful for context selection if they can be mapped back to chunks. To bridge this gap, Omneum stores a claim-to-chunk mapping: each chunk retains its original text and chunk_id, while its associated claim_ids reference the claims evaluated in the graph. A chunk can contain multiple claims, and the same claim can appear across multiple chunks. This allows the algorithm to associate claim support with the actual passages competing for space in the context window.
But selecting context is not simply a matter of ranking chunks by their individual scores. Omneum derives chunk utility from the claims associated with each passage, then ranks chunks to fill the model's window under a limited token budget. When a nonempty question is supplied, finalized claim contributions are weighted by deterministic, local lexical relevance over the original passage text. Repeated evidence from the same inferred source cluster earns only an improvement over its best selected relevance. Without a question, Omneum keeps its question-blind claim-coverage selection. Selected passages are reconstructed from their original text.
The selected passages are then reconstructed from their original text into the context passed to the LLM. The analysis itself never needs to read that text because it operates exclusively on structured relationships between sources and claims.
Omneum runs between retrieval and generation. The Python SDK accepts retrieved chunks and relevance scores from the calling retrieval pipeline, or computes relevance locally using BM25 or MiniLM when explicitly enabled.
Retrieval / tools
│ ▼ ┌───────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ ContextMapper / Observation input │ │ │ │ Source, claim and provenance mapping │ │ Structured Observation construction │ └─────────────────────┬─────────────────────┘ │ Structured observations ▼ ┌───────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Python SDK · prepare_context() │ │ │ │ Retrieved chunks and relevance scores │ │ Query conditioning / candidate discovery │ │ Original text retained locally │ └─────────────────────┬─────────────────────┘ │ Structured observations ▼ ┌───────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Omneum evaluator │ │ │ │ Provenance-aware graph inference │ │ Dependency-adjusted claim support │ │ No original source text required │ └─────────────────────┬─────────────────────┘ │ Graph evaluation ▼ ┌───────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Python SDK │ │ │ │ Claim-to-chunk score mapping │ │ Question-weighted claim support │ │ Marginal claim coverage │ │ Token-budget enforcement │ │ Original text reconstruction │ └─────────────────────┬─────────────────────┘ │ Reconstructed context ▼ Agent / LLM
client.prepare_context() uses Omneum's provenance-aware graph inference to evaluate source reliability and claim support, accounting for dependencies between sources. The SDK uses those results to rank and select retrieved passages within the token budget, then reconstructs their original text for the model.
The prepared context is returned in result["context"], with selected passages in result["chunks"] and evaluation scores in result["evaluation"].
Note: Omneum supports Python 3.11–3.14 on macOS and Ubuntu. The Python SDK is the currently supported client library.
Supported Platforms:
| Platform | Supported |
|---|---|
| macOS (Apple Silicon / arm64) | ✅ |
| macOS (Intel / x86_64) | ✅ |
| Linux (Ubuntu 22.04+ / x86_64) | ✅ |
Run the installer to configure the local evaluator:
omneum install
Run omneum install from your normal login account. Don't run the command with sudo.
The installer runs unprivileged while it downloads and verifies the evaluator release. The daemon version is pinned to the installed Python package version. For example, Omneum 1.0.3 only accepts daemon assets from v1.0.3; it doesn't resolve latest or fall back to another release.
The archive is verified against the release SHA256SUMS before installation. A missing checksum, mismatched digest, unexpected archive entry, link, or path traversal stops the install before anything from the archive runs.
Administrator access is requested only when installing machine-level service files. On Ubuntu, this includes the managed runtime under:
/opt/omneum
and public client configuration at:
/etc/omneum/config.toml
The evaluator runs under a dedicated service identity, isolating its VOPRF private key from the login account and MCP server process. macOS uses launchd; Ubuntu uses systemd.
omneum-server exposes Omneum's MCP tools over stdio and communicates with the locally installed evaluator service. The installer finishes by sending a VOPRF request through that path and verifying the response against the configured public key. A running service alone does not count as a successful installation.
See docs/guides/installation.md for service accounts, sockets, installed paths, custom endpoints, and failure handling.
Add Omneum to your MCP configuration:
{
"mcpServers": { "omneum": { "command": "omneum-server" } } }
Restart the MCP client. It launches omneum-server over stdio and exposes Omneum's tools to your agent.
If the executable isn't found, locate it with command -v omneum-server and use the returned absolute path as command.
Ask your agent to call Omneum's ping tool. A successful connection returns:
{
"status": "ok" }
Omneum evaluates structured observations, selects retrieved chunks under a token budget, and reconstructs the selected text for the downstream LLM. The evaluator computes dependency-adjusted claim support, while the Python SDK handles chunk selection and reconstruction.
In this example, the FAQ derives its audit retention claim from the security policy. The upstream dependency is recorded through upstream_sources.
from datetime import datetime, timezone
from omneum import ContextMapper, Source from omneum.information import SourceReference from omneum.context_selection import claim_id
now = datetime.now(timezone.utc) policy_url = "https://example.com/security-policy"
records = [ { "id": "obs-policy", "url": policy_url, "attribute": "audit_retention_days", "value": 90, "upstream": [], "text": "Audit logs are retained for 90 days.", }, { "id": "obs-faq", "url": "https://example.com/faq", "attribute": "audit_retention_days", "value": 90, "upstream": [ SourceReference(kind="web_document", identifier=policy_url) ], "text": "Audit logs are retained for 90 days.", }, { "id": "obs-incident", "url": "https://example.com/incident-report",
只显示了开头部分;其余内容请在仓库中阅读