MCP YouTube Transcript
An MCP server retrieving transcripts of YouTube videos
作者提供的说明(英文原文)
Test ads, prices and sales pitches on simulated buyers; get a go / iterate / no-go report.
这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。
我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。
选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。
你需要
你用的是哪个应用?
在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。
打开 Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config,把下面的内容粘贴到 claude_desktop_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"market-mirror": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"marketmirror"
]
}
}
}在终端中运行这条命令
claude mcp add market-mirror -- uvx marketmirror粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"market-mirror": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"marketmirror"
]
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json
{
"servers": {
"market-mirror": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"marketmirror"
]
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。
你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。
这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。
它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。
我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月7日
注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 DarkWorldCoder 验证,该账户拥有此仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点
在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置
它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表
与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。
它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。
注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。
它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。
GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.4.2)于12天前进入注册中心。
支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Python (uv)。
同一分类中有:MCP YouTube Transcript, Google Analytics MCP, BibiGPT YouTube Video Summarizer
同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。
如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i
An MCP server retrieving transcripts of YouTube videos
GA4 MCP server for AI agents: schema discovery, server-side aggregation, analysis-ready defaults.
AI video summarizer: summarize and transcribe YouTube, Bilibili, TikTok and podcast videos.
按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。
Try your ads, prices, and sales pitch with simulated buyers before spending on a real campaign.
English · 简体中文
Open source and built for AI agents. Interviewed LLM buyer personas scroll simulated ad feeds, argue in an OASIS social simulation, answer a survey and hear your sales pitch. Ask in plain words (*"test these three ads on young parents in India"*) from Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor or any MCP client, and get a go / iterate / no-go report in one offline HTML dashboard. Self-hosted: only the model calls (to the provider you choose) and optional public research leave your computer.
Built on MiroFish and CAMEL-AI's OASIS · listed in the official MCP Registry as io.github.DarkWorldCoder/market-mirror
[Open the live demo](https://darkworldcoder.github.io/market-mirror/demo/): the full dashboard from a 2,999-buyer simulated run, in your browser, no install. (Fitloop is an invented app; every number is simulated.)
Try it (Linux, macOS or WSL; needs Git, uv and Python 3.12):
git clone https://github.com/DarkWorldCoder/market-mirror.git && cd market-mirror
bash install.sh --configure # installs the engine, then asks which model provider to use ./mm start && ./mm cli quickstart --out scenarios/acme # 9 questions; prepares a small simulated market, then stops for review
The last line already makes model calls on the provider you chose, so start with a small market. If you chose a Claude Code or Codex login, run ./mm gateway start claude (or codex) before it. Already in an MCP client? Add the server with claude mcp add market-mirror -- uvx marketmirror (any client: command uvx, args ["marketmirror"]), then ask your agent to run doctor and setup. Full quick start.
If MarketMirror saves you one bad launch, a ⭐ helps other people find it. To hear about new tests and releases, use Watch → Custom → Releases.
▶ Watch the 60-second launch film (with captions) · vertical 9:16 cut · made with HyperFrames from launch-video/
Meet the buyers · What you can test · Screenshots · How it works · Example results · Evidence and limits · Get started · Documentation
MarketMirror gives you a practice audience for your next marketing decision. Describe your product and the people you want to reach. It creates AI-generated people who can react to your ads, compare prices, ask questions, raise concerns, and respond to a sales pitch.
You get a report explaining what interested them, what put them off, what to change, and what to test with real customers next. You can also watch the simulation and explore the results in a dashboard.
For example: you are launching a fitness app. Should the ad lead with “15 minutes a day” or “less than one gym visit”? Should the free trial ask for a payment card? MarketMirror lets you rehearse those choices before a live campaign.
The buyers are simulated. Their responses are generated by AI, so use them to develop and compare ideas. Confirm promising findings with real customers and small live experiments.
| If you are… | Use MarketMirror to… |
|---|---|
| A founder or small business owner | Explore how different people might understand your product, price, or launch offer. |
| A marketer or agency | Compare ads, headlines, emails, and audiences before choosing a live test. |
| A sales team | Practice a pitch, discover likely concerns, and try clearer answers. |
| A product or research team | Explore buying decisions and website journeys, then plan customer research. |
| A developer or AI agent builder | Run the same workflows through commands, an API, a Python library, or connected AI assistants. |
A simulated buyer is an AI-generated character representing someone in your intended audience. The character has a background and practical reasons for accepting, questioning, or rejecting an offer.
You choose the groups you want to explore—for example, students, working parents, and young professionals in selected countries. MarketMirror creates different people within those groups and can ask them about their lives before showing them your marketing.
| What a buyer can have | Why it matters in a test |
|---|---|
| A background | Age, location, work, and life stage provide context for their response. |
| A budget and priorities | An offer may interest them but still compete with more urgent expenses. |
| A phone and internet connection | A heavy page or video may be inconvenient on their device or data plan. |
| People they consult | A partner, family member, or community may influence a purchase. |
| Trust concerns | Hidden fees, unclear claims, or a previous bad experience may make them hesitate. |
| A buying decision card | A summary records what could persuade them, what could stop them, and who else matters. |
An illustrative buyer: a busy parent who wants short home workouts, uses a budget phone, and worries about surprise charges. They might like a low monthly price but reject a “free” trial that immediately asks for a payment card. Another buyer may care more about workout quality than price. These are invented examples, not findings from real customers.
In tests within the same run, buyers can remember earlier experiences. Someone who disliked an ad can carry that reaction into a later survey or pitch. Separate comparison scenarios keep their own histories.
Detailed characters help you explore different viewpoints. They do not make the generated answers representative of a real population.
| Your question | What MarketMirror does | What you can learn from the simulation |
|---|---|---|
| Which ad gets attention? | Places your ads among ordinary posts in simulated Facebook, Instagram, Reddit, TikTok, LinkedIn, or X feeds. | Which ads buyers stop at, ignore, click, comment on, or hide. |
| Which headline or message is clearer? | Shows different versions to different buyers and asks for their reactions. | Which wording draws interest and which creates confusion. |
| Does the price or offer feel right? | Asks price questions and compares offers or pricing tiers. | Where price becomes a concern and which terms need explaining. |
| What might happen around a launch? | Lets buyers post, reply, and react in a simulated social conversation with scheduled brand posts and events. | Questions, objections, and themes that emerge in the discussion. |
| Will an email interest them? | Tests subject lines, email content, or a sequence in simulated inboxes. | Generated opening, reading, and response choices. No emails are sent. |
| How does our sales pitch land? | Presents the pitch, collects concerns, tries your answers, and asks again. | Which concerns persist and whether your response helps or makes things worse. |
| Where does our website lose people? | Sends simulated visitors through a real website and records their actions. | Where they hesitate, leave, or complete a checked task such as adding to cart. |
| Which audience should we investigate first? | Compares responses across the groups and countries you selected. | Differences worth following up with real customer research. |
| What should we test next? | Uses the run and, when supplied, real campaign exports to suggest follow-up experiments. | A practical starting point for the next live test. |
| Do the simulations match our results? | Compares paired simulated and observed outcomes. | How well the simulation held up on those experiments and where it needs adjustment. |
You can repeat a comparison to see whether its result changes between runs. You can also use different AI providers and inspect where they disagree. Both help reveal uncertainty within the simulation.
只显示了开头部分;其余内容请在仓库中阅读