原型 · 预览版:收录官方注册中心里的全部服务器,每 30 分钟同步一次。评价和账户功能将在后续阶段推出。
PopNx MCP为使用 AI 的人准备的 MCP 服务器 · 用大白话讲清楚

Factum

作者:factum-project版本 0.1.3i★ –i在你的电脑上运行
注册名称io.github.factum-project/factum

安装

概览

作者提供的说明(英文原文)

Auditable memory for AI agents: provenance, cascade retraction, conflict refusal

PopNx MCP 的三大支柱

这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。

它能帮你做什么

我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。

  • 连接方式: 在你的电脑上运行
  • 传输方式: stdio
  • 分类: 搜索与 AI 记忆

安装

选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。

安装之前

  • 基础检查:1 项中通过 1 项
  • 在你的电脑上运行,拥有你的用户账户的权限(文件、网络、应用)。
  • 注册中心没有列出需要填写的密钥。

作者没有在注册中心列出安装信息。请查看下方作者的 README。

它能做什么

它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。

基础检查i

我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月8日

  • ✓ 通过

    作者与仓库一致

    注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 factum-project 验证,该账户拥有此仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    仍在维护

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    有许可证

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • – 不适用

    端点有响应

    它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点

  • – 不适用

    使用 OAuth 登录

    在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置

  • … 尚未检查

    工具描述中没有隐藏指令

    它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表

与“搜索与 AI 记忆”中的其他服务器比较i

  • 星标数多于此分类中其他 5668 个服务器的 0%
  • 发布到注册中心的时间比此分类中其他 5668 个服务器的 43% 更新
  • 基础检查结果等于或优于此分类中其他 5668 个服务器的 100%

与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。

常见问题

Factum 安全吗?

它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。

它需要哪些密钥或代码?

注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。

它在我的电脑上运行还是在云端?

它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。

它还在维护吗?

GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.1.3)于2个月前进入注册中心。

哪些应用可以使用它?

支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Rust。

有什么可以替代它?

同一分类中有:Context7, Codebase Memory, Exa

替代选择

同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。

如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i

Context7

作者:upstash

Up-to-date docs for AI agents

电脑或云端★ 64,224MIT昨天更新
安装

Codebase Memory

作者:DeusData

Codebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.

在你的电脑上运行★ 48,148MIT21天前更新
安装

Exa

作者:exa-labs

Connect AI agents to Exa for web search, content fetching, and multi-step research.

在云端运行★ 5,213MIT2个月前更新
安装

作者的 README

打开 README

按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。

Factum — Auditable Memory for AI Agents

Status: v0.1.3 — Early stage, seeking early collaborators.

Core write/query/retract pipeline works. Not production-ready. Architectural decisions are still open to change.

[Interactive docs](https://factum-project.github.io/factum/) — animated syntax parsing, 7-tuple explorer, query pipeline, token efficiency chart, and MCP architecture diagram.

Every fact an agent writes carries mandatory provenance. When a source is retracted, everything derived from it is invalidated automatically — cascade retraction. When facts conflict, Factum returns Ambiguous instead of guessing.

A structured knowledge language (S-expression based), Rust implementation, stdio MCP server — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and any MCP client.

Status: v0.1.3, early stage. Core write/query/retract pipeline works; no semantic search or memory consolidation yet — Factum handles verified structured facts, not conversation context. Best suited for compliance-sensitive agents, multi-agent shared knowledge bases, and anywhere "why did the agent believe X" needs an answer. See the multi-agent usage guide for shared knowledge base patterns.

How is this different from Mem0 / Zep / Letta?

Unique to Factum: grammar-enforced provenance · cascade retraction · conflict refusal.

Not (yet) in Factum: embedding-based semantic retrieval · memory consolidation · HTTP transport.

Complementary: Mem0/Letta store and retrieve context; Factum stores auditable structured facts. They can run side by side via MCP.

What this means in practice
Agent memory pain pointFactum mechanism
Can't tell "user said" from "LLM inferred"5-level provenance + grammar-enforced model name on Extracted nodes
Stale memory used as current factSoft delete + cascade retraction via reverse dependency graph
Conflicting memories silently pick oneAmbiguous — refuses to answer rather than guess
Memory pollution (prompt injection)Provenance chain makes contamination traceable and retractable
Enterprise can't let agents store sensitive dataIndex-level permission filtering — no post-query leakage

Academic context: The STALE benchmark (2025) shows that even the best LLM agents achieve only 55.2% accuracy at detecting when their own memories are outdated — confirming that memory staleness is an unsolved problem in agent systems.

Key Features (Implemented)

  • Node 7-tuple: Every knowledge node carries id, predicate, validity, provenance, confidence, authority, and permissions — plus optional :note for human-readable context
  • Auto node IDs: Use "auto" as the node ID in factum_insert or factum_assert to auto-generate content-based IDs — no manual ID management
  • 5-level provenance: Verbatim / Summary / Extracted / Derived / Asserted — full audit chain
  • Grammar-enforced model reference: Extracted nodes MUST carry model + version — the parser rejects them if missing (not just a documentation convention)
  • Cascade retraction: Derived nodes auto-invalidate when upstream sources are retracted (via deps_rev reverse dependency graph); configurable node limit prevents cascade explosion in large knowledge bases
  • Corroboration detection: When a second agent asserts the same fact, factum_assert returns corroborated (not an error) — independent agreement is the most valuable multi-agent signal
  • Conflict arbitration: LatestWins / HighestAuthority / Unanimous / WeightedVote — pattern-aware grouping ensures value conflicts trigger arbitration; returns Ambiguous when it cannot uniquely resolve
  • Index-level permissions: No post-query filtering — prevents aggregate leakage
  • Lossless numerics: All numbers use Dec(i128, u8) — zero floating-point error
  • MCP bridge: JSON-RPC 2.0 tools/resources; stdio transport verified with real MCP clients (Claude Code, Cursor)

What's Implemented vs. What's Not

ModuleStatusNotes
factum-core (types, lexer, parser, serialize)✅ Implemented100% syntactic round-trip
factum-rt (store, query, arbitration, permissions, verifiers)✅ ImplementedIn-memory store (default) + RocksDB persistence (--features rocksdb); 5 column families, WriteBatch atomic writes
factum-mcp (JSON-RPC bridge)✅ Protocol + handlerstdio transport verified end-to-end; HTTP transport not yet implemented (remote deployment requires custom wrapper)
factum-bench (benchmarks)✅ ImplementedSyntax round-trip + token efficiency + query perf
factum-l (latent space projection)❌ Not startedResearch item — see ROADMAP.md
Wikidata/Mathlib corpus converters❌ Not startedM2 milestone
Lean/Z3 verifiers❌ Not startedOnly Schema + DecimalRange verifiers implemented
Embedding-based semantic search❌ Not startedNot on roadmap — consider using Mem0 alongside Factum
Memory consolidation/summarization❌ Not startedNot on roadmap — consider using Letta alongside Factum
Inspector (visual debugger)❌ Not started

Quick Start

# Build

cargo build

Run tests

cargo test

Run demo

cargo run -p factum-demo

Build with RocksDB persistence backend

cargo build --features rocksdb cargo test --features rocksdb

Build MCP server with RocksDB persistence

cargo build --release -p factum-mcp --features rocksdb --bin factum-mcp-server

Fuzz (requires nightly)

cargo +nightly fuzz run fuzz_parser -- -max_total_time=600

Use as an MCP server (Claude Code / Cursor)
# Build the MCP server binary (in-memory, default)

cargo build --release -p factum-mcp --bin factum-mcp-server

Or build with RocksDB persistence (survives restarts)

cargo build --release -p factum-mcp --features rocksdb --bin factum-mcp-server

Register with Claude Code (in-memory)

claude mcp add --transport stdio --scope local factum -- "$(pwd)/target/release/factum-mcp-server"

Register with Claude Code (persistent — recommended for agent memory)

claude mcp add --transport stdio --scope local factum -- \ "$(pwd)/target/release/factum-mcp-server" --db-path ~/.factum/store

Verify connection

claude mcp get factum

See Getting Started with Factum MCP for the full guide.

Factum-F Syntax Example

; Acme Corp knowledge graph

(node n001 :pred (instance-of @ACME-CORP organization) :conf 0.99 :auth 0.95 :perm public :src (asserted "wikidata"))

(node n004 :pred (shareholder-major @ACME-CORP @FOUNDER-1 0.73 :since #date(2001-03-15)) :conf 0.85 :auth 0.8 :perm confidential :src (extracted "doc002" [100 200] (model "claude-sonnet-4" "2025-01")))

(node n006 :pred (subsidiary-of @ACME-SUB @ACME-CORP :since #date(2001-03-15)) :src (derived n001 "rule-subsidiary-merge") :deps [n001])

When n001 is retracted, n006 is automatically invalidated — the agent knows it can no longer trust the subsidiary relationship.

Three-Layer Architecture

LayerWhat It MeansStatus
Agent ReadAgent receives Factum-F as context via MCP — lower token overhead than verbose JSON✅ Token efficiency measured (real o200k_base: canonical −62%, compact −53% vs JSON)
Agent WriteAgent generates Factum-F nodes — parse uniqueness guarantees one valid interpretation, error classes enable self-correction✅ See authoring guide
Latent Reasoningfactum-l: encode Factum-F into continuous thought vector, reason in latent space, decode back for audit🔬 Research item — not started, not blocking layers 1-2

A structured knowledge language underpins the memory layer — S-expression based for parse uniqueness, with Dec(i128, u8) for lossless numerics and mandatory model references for LLM self-auditing. Full design rationale in docs/design-rationale.md.

Token Efficiency — The LLM-Native Metric

TL;DR: Factum canonical form saves ~62% tokens vs verbose JSON with the same metadata. All numbers measured with real o200k_base (GPT-4o) tokenizer via tiktoken-rs.

FormatReal tokens (5 nodes)vs verbose JSONWhat it includes
Factum canonical238−62%Full 7-tuple: provenance + confidence + validity + permissions
Factum compact (JSON)290−53%Same 7-tuple, JSON with numeric tags
Markdown181−71%Assertion text only — no provenance, no confidence, no permissions
JSON (pretty)623baselineSame 7-tuple metadata in verbose JSON encoding

Run cargo test -p factum-bench test_token_efficiency_real_tokenizer -- --nocapture to reproduce.

Key finding: The canonical S-expression form (238 tokens) is more token-efficient than the compact JSON form (290 tokens) — BPE tokenizers split JSON delimiters but merge S-expression parentheses. The form designed for correctness is also the most token-efficient.

Round-Trip Fidelity — What Exactly Is 100%?

  1. Syntactic round-trip ✅ — parse(serialize(parse(x))) == parse(x). 100% and verified by the test suite + fuzzing. This is the trust foundation.
  1. Semantic round-trip ❌ Not yet measured — requires factum-l (latent space projection, not implemented).

Morpheme Vocabulary — Current State

  • Seed morphemes: 200+ across 9 kinds (Entity, Relation, Quantifier, Modal, Temporal, Status, Action, Attribute, Classification) — covering organizational, people, spatial, financial, product/project, version control, document/knowledge, agent memory, permission, and cause/effect domains
  • Design target: 200–500 (to be loaded from morphemes.toml via build.rs)
  • Status: Sufficient for agent memory use cases. morphemes.toml codegen is a future M2 item for external contributions.

Relationship to Other Formats

FormatHow Factum Differs
RDF / JSON-LDRDF triples carry no per-node provenance, confidence, or permissions. Factum makes these first-class and non-optional.
MarkdownMarkdown has zero metadata. Factum trades human readability for machine verifiability.
JSONJSON has no schema, no provenance, no temporal validity. Factum compact form uses JSON as transport but adds structure and audit chain.
Mem0 / Zep / LettaThese store and retrieve agent memory. Factum adds grammar-enforced provenance, cascade retraction, and conflict refusal. Complementary, not competitive.

Project Structure

factum/

├── crates/ │ ├── factum-core/ # Data model, lexer, parser, serialization │ ├── factum-rt/ # Runtime: store (InMemory + RocksDB), query, arbitration, permissions, verifiers │ ├── factum-mcp/ # MCP bridge: JSON-RPC tools/resources, stdio transport │ ├── factum-bench/ # Benchmarks: round-trip, token efficiency, query perf │ └── factum-demo/ # End-to-end demonstration ├── fuzz/ # cargo-fuzz targets (parser, serialize round-trip, lexer) ├── spec/ # Conformance test vectors (JSON, language-agnostic) ├── docs/site/ # Interactive visualization (GitHub Pages) ├── .github/workflows/ # CI: test + fuzz + gitleaks + Pages deploy ├── Cargo.toml # Workspace root ├── ROADMAP.md # What's planned and in what order ├── SECURITY.md # Vulnerability disclosure ├── CONTRIBUTING.md # How to contribute ├── CHANGELOG.md # Version history ├── docs/design-rationale.md # Why each architectural decisio

只显示了开头部分;其余内容请在仓库中阅读

问 PopNx