原型 · 预览版:收录官方注册中心里的全部服务器,每 30 分钟同步一次。评价和账户功能将在后续阶段推出。
PopNx MCP为使用 AI 的人准备的 MCP 服务器 · 用大白话讲清楚

LLM Preflight

作者:feronovak版本 2.23.1i★ –i在你的电脑上运行
注册名称io.github.feronovak/llm-preflight

安装

概览

作者提供的说明(英文原文)

Local, cross-provider preflight checks for LLM integration changes.

PopNx MCP 的三大支柱

这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。

它能帮你做什么

我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。

  • 连接方式: 在你的电脑上运行
  • 传输方式: stdio
  • 分类: 搜索与 AI 记忆

安装

选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。

安装之前

  • 基础检查:1 项中通过 1 项
  • 在你的电脑上运行,拥有你的用户账户的权限(文件、网络、应用)。
  • 注册中心没有列出需要填写的密钥。

你需要

  • PyPI已安装 Python 的 uv(用于 uvx 命令)

你用的是哪个应用?

在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。

打开 Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config,把下面的内容粘贴到 claude_desktop_config.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "llm-preflight": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "llm-preflight",
        "--workspace",
        "{workspace_path}"
      ]
    }
  }
}

在终端中运行这条命令

claude mcp add llm-preflight -- uvx llm-preflight --workspace '{workspace_path}'

在 Cursor 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "llm-preflight": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "llm-preflight",
        "--workspace",
        "{workspace_path}"
      ]
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

在 VS Code 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json

{
  "servers": {
    "llm-preflight": {
      "type": "stdio",
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "llm-preflight",
        "--workspace",
        "{workspace_path}"
      ]
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。

你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。

这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。

它能做什么

它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。

基础检查i

我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月8日

  • ✓ 通过

    作者与仓库一致

    注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 feronovak 验证,该账户拥有此仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    仍在维护

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    有许可证

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • – 不适用

    端点有响应

    它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点

  • – 不适用

    使用 OAuth 登录

    在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置

  • … 尚未检查

    工具描述中没有隐藏指令

    它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表

与“搜索与 AI 记忆”中的其他服务器比较i

  • 星标数多于此分类中其他 5668 个服务器的 0%
  • 发布到注册中心的时间比此分类中其他 5668 个服务器的 96% 更新
  • 基础检查结果等于或优于此分类中其他 5668 个服务器的 100%

与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。

常见问题

LLM Preflight 安全吗?

它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。

它需要哪些密钥或代码?

注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。

它在我的电脑上运行还是在云端?

它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。

它还在维护吗?

GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(2.23.1)于昨天进入注册中心。

哪些应用可以使用它?

支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Python (uv)。

有什么可以替代它?

同一分类中有:Context7, Codebase Memory, Exa

替代选择

同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。

如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i

Context7

作者:upstash

Up-to-date docs for AI agents

电脑或云端★ 64,224MIT昨天更新
安装

Codebase Memory

作者:DeusData

Codebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.

在你的电脑上运行★ 48,148MIT21天前更新
安装

Exa

作者:exa-labs

Connect AI agents to Exa for web search, content fetching, and multi-step research.

在云端运行★ 5,213MIT2个月前更新
安装

作者的 README

打开 README

按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。

LLM Preflight

Last reviewed: 2026-10-29 · As of: v2.23.0

Check LLM responses against the output rules your application depends on—before changing a model, prompt, schema, or provider.

Define the JSON shape, routing labels, or exact output your feature needs. Check responses against those rules, preview provider requests and estimated cost, and keep evidence for the change review.

Built for engineers maintaining an LLM feature. Runs locally as a CLI, GitHub Action, or MCP server. Python 3.10+; no third-party runtime dependencies.

Try it · Observed models · Use your own contract · CI and agents

Watch an invalid response get caught and fixed (23 seconds).

billing passes → change the response to sales → check fails → restore billing → check passes. The allowed labels stay unchanged.

*Real CLI output with synthetic response fixtures. This checks the validator; it makes no provider requests and does not execute your application's parser.* Watch the MP4.

New in 2.23.0

This release adds GPT-6.1 Terra pricing and native Kimi, MiniMax, Mistral and Cohere text checks, plus GLM Flash and restricted Mythos coverage. See native provider checks for bounded examples and request limits. New coverage has deterministic protocol fixtures; live observations below cover the listed 19 routes. Other added providers retain fixture-only coverage.

Try it in 60 seconds

In a new directory, install the tool and run the local mock—no API key or provider request:

python3 -m venv .venv

. .venv/bin/activate python3 -m pip install llm-preflight llm-preflight init llm-preflight benchmark.json --no-save --no-env-file

The activation command above is for POSIX shells; PowerShell uses .\.venv\Scripts\Activate.ps1.

init refuses to overwrite an existing config. Look for local-mock with PASS in the quality gate: the mock replied ok and passed the exact-output test. The overall decision is inconclusive (exit 3) because a local mock provides no live-provider evidence. The demo worked; it cannot approve a model. --no-save skips JSON/Markdown result artifacts; --no-env-file skips credential files.

Watch the interactive default template (30 seconds)

Select the mock and default Reply with ok test, review the plan, and confirm the local run. The session also reads the same decision through CLI JSON:

*Local test: passed. Live provider: not tested. No API keys or provider calls.* Watch the MP4 or start with the text walkthrough and interactive CLI JSON example.

For benchmark runs, read the decision before acting:

  • `pass`, exit `0`: the configured checks passed with the required evidence.
  • `fail`, exit `1`: a configured check failed; inspect the cause.
  • `inconclusive`, exit `3`: evidence is insufficient; read the blocking warnings.

A passing run is evidence for the configured workload, not production approval.

Observed results on a support-routing contract

The latest measurement, 2026-10-29, tested 19 native model routes on eight synthetic support-routing and strict JSON cases each. 144 of 152 checks passed: three outputs failed their contract and five Kimi calls returned HTTP 429. 15 models passed all eight checks. These are workload observations, not a ranking of general intelligence or production approval.

Latency includes successful API responses, including contract failures, and excludes API errors. The known token-cost subtotal is $0.06902127; total cost is unknown because five error responses supplied no usage. Each request used a 1,024-token output allowance and one attempt. No retries were made. Read all 19 rows, the method and failure analysis. Previous dated measurements remain available as history.

First live run

Start with one rule your application already enforces. The project integration guide provides a complete routing contract with accepted/rejected fixtures and a no-spend pull-request check. Match your deployed prompt and response parser; local fixture checks do not execute application code automatically.

To try a minimal provider starter instead:

llm-preflight init live.json --template provider \

--provider openai --model gpt-6.1-sol --api-key-env OPENAI_API_KEY

The starter asks for exactly ok. Add this top-level field to live.json, keeping its existing fields, to check the validator locally:

{

"validation_fixtures": [ {"name": "accepted-label", "response": "ok", "expect": "pass"}, {"name": "rejected-label", "response": "not ok", "expect": "fail"} ] }

Set OPENAI_API_KEY in your shell or in an uncommitted .env.production beside live.json. The config stores the variable name, never the key. Preview the check without making a generation request:

llm-preflight live.json --contract-check

llm-preflight live.json --doctor llm-preflight live.json --pricing-check llm-preflight live.json --dry-run

The starter has a three-request limit and a $0.05 estimated-cost cap. Resolve warnings and review the route, retry-expanded request bound, pricing and retention settings. The starter saves failed responses by default; review artifacts before sharing them.

Paid request: only after reviewing and authorizing that plan, run:

llm-preflight live.json

A direct CLI run has no separate approval prompt. Results are saved as JSON and Markdown under results/ unless you use --no-save. The CLI reads the config-adjacent .env.production without replacing existing shell values; choose another file with --env-file PATH or skip it with --no-env-file.

Choose your path

See a contract change fail

A review artifact retains the decision, contract validity, latency, usage, estimated cost and blocking warnings. Render saved schema-version-1 JSON as a standalone report without another provider request. Substitute the saved JSON path printed by your run for results/run.json:

llm-preflight report results/run.json --output report.html

The renderer omits prompts, responses, local paths and identifying run metadata. For reproducible examples, run these from a source checkout:

python3 -m llm_preflight report examples/reports/schema-baseline.json --format markdown

python3 -m llm_preflight report examples/reports/schema-break.json --format markdown

The first synthetic result passes; the second reports contract_failure, 67% contract validity and one contract-only failure. The report gallery also demonstrates a gate blocked with no_record (exit 1). These fixtures make no provider calls and cannot supply attested CI evidence.

CLI, CI, and MCP

Works as a CLI, GitHub Action, and local MCP server. The Action defaults to no generation requests; a live MCP run requires explicit paid-run confirmation. Keep the client's tool approval enabled: its confirmation field is not proof that a person authorized spending.

No preflight, no merge. With a required check configured, the offline gate requires a fresh passing CI record matching the current contract, routes, prompts and run selection. Protect the producer and gate workflows; signed records also need gh attestation verify before the gate. Follow proof of preflight to configure it. A local fixture pass or installed package does not enforce a merge policy.

It doesn't certify production behaviour. It proves the check was done.

MCP for coding agents

Configure the installed stdio command in your MCP client:

{

"mcpServers": { "llm-preflight": { "command": "llm-preflight-mcp", "args": ["--workspace", "/absolute/path/to/repository"] } } }

The eight tools (migrate_plan is main branch only, not in 2.23.1) audit literal model IDs, validate a config, preview a plan, run a preflight, compare saved baselines, verify a record, gate CI evidence and plan a retired-model migration. For an existing contract, begin with validate_config and dry_run_plan. Agents must read the structured decision and report missing evidence. See the MCP guide for request/result examples and workspace boundaries.

The agent-smoke suite with --smoke makes six requests per model before configured retries. Use the coding-agent workflow for CLI commands. An agent must not weaken a validator to get a pass or infer permission for paid work from a gate result.

Common jobs

  • **Audit existing model

只显示了开头部分;其余内容请在仓库中阅读

问 PopNx