原型 · 预览版:收录官方注册中心里的全部服务器,每 30 分钟同步一次。评价和账户功能将在后续阶段推出。
PopNx MCP为使用 AI 的人准备的 MCP 服务器 · 用大白话讲清楚

obsify

作者:Formative-Sum41版本 0.2.0i★ –i在你的电脑上运行
注册名称io.github.Formative-Sum41/obsify

安装

概览

作者提供的说明(英文原文)

Local, privacy-preserving PII toolkit over MCP — shape to the model, substance stays local.

PopNx MCP 的三大支柱

这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。

它能帮你做什么

我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。

  • 连接方式: 在你的电脑上运行
  • 传输方式: stdio
  • 分类: 其他

安装

选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。

安装之前

  • 基础检查:1 项中通过 1 项
  • 在你的电脑上运行,拥有你的用户账户的权限(文件、网络、应用)。
  • 注册中心没有列出需要填写的密钥。

你需要

  • PyPI已安装 Python 的 uv(用于 uvx 命令)

你用的是哪个应用?

在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。

打开 Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config,把下面的内容粘贴到 claude_desktop_config.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "obsify": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "obsify"
      ]
    }
  }
}

在终端中运行这条命令

claude mcp add obsify -- uvx obsify

在 Cursor 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "obsify": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "obsify"
      ]
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

在 VS Code 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json

{
  "servers": {
    "obsify": {
      "type": "stdio",
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "obsify"
      ]
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。

你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。

这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。

它能做什么

它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。

基础检查i

我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月6日

  • ✓ 通过

    作者与仓库一致

    注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 Formative-Sum41 验证,该账户拥有此仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    仍在维护

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    有许可证

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • – 不适用

    端点有响应

    它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点

  • – 不适用

    使用 OAuth 登录

    在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置

  • … 尚未检查

    工具描述中没有隐藏指令

    它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表

与“其他”中的其他服务器比较i

  • 星标数多于此分类中其他 32417 个服务器的 0%
  • 发布到注册中心的时间比此分类中其他 32417 个服务器的 28% 更新
  • 基础检查结果等于或优于此分类中其他 32417 个服务器的 100%

与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。

常见问题

obsify 安全吗?

它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。

它需要哪些密钥或代码?

注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。

它在我的电脑上运行还是在云端?

它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。

它还在维护吗?

GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.2.0)于3个月前进入注册中心。

哪些应用可以使用它?

支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Python (uv)。

有什么可以替代它?

同一分类中有:Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, FOGA node

替代选择

同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。

如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i

Spec Driven Development

作者:formulahendry

MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.

在你的电脑上运行★ 440MIT14个月前更新
安装

Remote Desktop Commander

作者:desktop-commander

Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.

在云端运行★ 211昨天更新
安装

FOGA node

作者:garyyang-finchip

A Finch OG Agent cell as an MCP server: read the world, dry-run and take ERC-8414 tenders by policy.

电脑或云端今天更新
安装

作者的 README

打开 README

按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。

obsify

Let an AI assistant work on sensitive files without their raw values ever entering the model's context.

obsify is a local, deterministic MCP server. The frontier model reasons over shape — schemas, synthetic twins, masked feedback — while deterministic local code touches the substance and returns only masked, aggregated results. No LLM calls, no network at runtime: detection is regex + checksums + dictionaries + Presidio's local NER.

It ships with Australian entity support (ABN / ACN / TFN, checksum-validated), credential/secret detection (cloud keys, API tokens, private keys, DB connection strings), and a label-driven routing layer that makes "when should the assistant avoid raw data" a deterministic, enforced decision rather than a judgement call.

Honest scope: run_on_real executes model-written code in a *best-effort* local sandbox

and masks its output *best-effort*. It is not a jail. Read SECURITY.md before

pointing it at anything you cannot afford to leak. Return aggregates.

Why

Feeding confidential documents to a hosted LLM means the substance leaves your perimeter. The usual answers are "don't use the LLM" or "trust the provider." obsify takes a third path — compute-to-data: bring the code to the data, not the data to the model.

  • The model sees the schema of a spreadsheet, not its rows.
  • The model develops against a synthetic twin (faked values, real structure).
  • The model's analysis code runs locally; only masked, aggregated output returns.

The frontier model's reasoning is preserved. Only its *eyes on raw values* are removed.

Tools

ToolWhat it doesReturns
scan_pii(path)Scan a file/folder for PIITypes, locations, counts — never values
make_synthetic_twin(path, out)Faithful fake of an Excel workbookSchema summary; twin written to out (values faked, leak-verified)
run_on_real(code, data_path)Compute-to-data: run your code locally against the real file (bound to DATA_PATH)Only PII-masked, size-capped stdout/stderr — return aggregates
redact_text(text)Mask PII in a string to tokensThe redacted string
verify_value_free(text, terms)Fail-closed check that text leaks none of terms (or their variants){"value_free": bool}

Supported documents: PDF (text + tables; complex-table fallback via obsify[tables]), Excel .xlsx/.xlsm, and Word .docx (paragraphs + tables). Unreadable or unsupported files are surfaced as explicit notes/blind spots, never silently dropped. (No OCR yet — scanned/image pages are flagged as low-coverage, not transcribed.)

Known-entity masking (optional). Supply a local .obsify.entities list of names to hide; scan_pii / redact_text deterministically catch them — and the suffix/abbreviation variants NER misses (BRIGHTWATER HLDGS P/L for *Brightwater Holdings Pty Ltd*) — as KNOWN_ENTITY. The list stays local and never enters the model's context. See docs/known_entities.md.

Demo

Poke at all five tools live against synthetic data with the official MCP Inspector:

python -m obsify.make_corpus --out ./corpus_demo

npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector obsify-mcp

Call scan_pii on ./corpus_demo/ledger.xlsx and confirm it returns types / counts / locations only — never values. See docs/verifying.md.

Try it — synthetic corpus

Generate a fake-but-realistic corpus (all synthetic; ABN/ACN/TFN are checksum-valid) spanning all three formats, then point a tool at it:

pip install "obsify[demo]"                 # reportlab, for the sample PDFs

python -m obsify.make_corpus --out ./corpus_demo

It writes a multi-sheet Excel ledger (a numeric false-positive minefield), a PDF engagement letter (prose + trial-balance table), and a DOCX audit memo (paragraphs + vendor table). Great for kicking the tyres on scan_pii / make_synthetic_twin without touching real data.

Install & run as an MCP server

Requires Python 3.11+. obsify speaks MCP over stdio — the client launches it as a local subprocess; nothing is hosted remotely. Register it with any MCP-capable client (Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code, …) by adding one block to that client's config.

Recommended — zero-install via [uvx](https://docs.astral.sh/uv/):

{ "mcpServers": { "obsify": { "command": "uvx", "args": ["--from", "obsify", "obsify-mcp"] } } }

uvx fetches obsify from PyPI and runs it on demand — no permanent install. On first run, obsify downloads the spaCy NER model (en_core_web_lg, ~560 MB) once and caches it; this fetches a public model and sends no user data (set OBSIFY_AUTO_DOWNLOAD=0 to forbid it and install the model yourself). Later runs are instant and fully offline.

Or install it (pip / pipx):

pipx install obsify        # isolated, on PATH  (or: pip install obsify)

Then point the client at the installed command:

{ "mcpServers": { "obsify": { "command": "obsify-mcp" } } }

Restart the client and the tools appear. Optional extras: obsify[tables] (complex-table PDF fallback via camelot + Ghostscript), obsify[compute] (pandas, handy inside run_on_real code).

PATH gotcha (the #1 cause of "server won't connect"): the command must resolve on the

PATH the *client* sees. A GUI client may not share your venv's PATH. Fixes: use uvx/pipx

(globally resolvable), or give an absolute path — "/path/to/.venv/bin/obsify-mcp" (macOS/Linux)

or "C:\\path\\to\\.venv\\Scripts\\obsify-mcp.exe" (Windows).

From this repo (before it's on PyPI):

pip install "git+https://github.com/Formative-Sum41/obsify.git"   # gets `obsify-mcp` + `obsify`

The routing layer — deterministic, not a judgement call

The hard part of "help me, but don't read the confidential file" is *deciding when to protect*. obsify moves that decision out of the model and into the environment:

  1. `.obsify.json` — a label manifest classifying paths (public / confidential / restricted).
  2. `obsify.guard` (run as python -m obsify.guard) — a PreToolUse guard that blocks a direct read of a labelled file (exit 2) and redirects the assistant to scan_pii / make_synthetic_twin / run_on_real.
  3. A convention (in CLAUDE.md) so the assistant *prefers* obsify before it even hits the guard.

Set it up with one command:

obsify init [--dir PATH] [--with-claude-md]

obsify init is non-destructive by design — it owns exactly one file and hands you snippets for the rest:

  • `.obsify.json` — obsify owns this; init writes it (never overwritten without --force).
  • `.claude/settings.json` — *your* file: init prints the PreToolUse hook block to paste, never edits it (it runs code, so registering it is your call).
  • `CLAUDE.md` — *your* file: the convention is opt-in. Default prints it; --with-claude-md appends a marker-wrapped, idempotent block that never clobbers your content.

Full convention: docs/obsify_routing.md.

How detection stays precise

  • Checksum-validated identifiers. ABN/ACN/TFN candidates are proposed by regex and confirmed by their official checksums, so a random number is never reported as an identifier.
  • Context-required IDs. A bare number is only accepted as an ABN/ACN/TFN when a label word ("TFN", "ABN", "BSB", …) is nearby — this kills the sequential-journal-ID false-positive flood on numeric ledgers.
  • Letterless / NER-with-digit suppression. Pure numbers, amounts, dates and alnum codes are not flagged as names/orgs; real names, emails and addresses (which carry letters) are unaffected. Validated letterless PII stays exempt: checksum IDs (ABN/ACN/TFN/Medicare), Luhn cards, valid IPs, BSB-adjacent accounts, and phones (via context or phone shape) — while a decimal point still marks an amount, not a phone.
  • Credentials, not just PII. Cloud keys (AWS/GitHub/Google/Slack/Stripe), JWTs, private-key blocks and DB connection strings are flagged as CREDENTIAL by *anchored* patterns — vendor prefixes (AKIA…, ghp_…) or a keyword-gated secret = , never entropy heuristics (which would flood on hex/base64 ledger columns). The whole BEGIN…END private-key block is masked, not just its header, so no key body is left behind.

Measured accuracy

obsify ships a scored evaluation harness (eval/ — labelled synthetic corpus + answer key + scorer against the *shipping* detector, plus an independent third-party cross-check). Headline on the synthetic corpus: 100% recall on expected-detect items, 0 false positives on a numeric FP-torture sheet (with a grouped-number guard), bare context-gated IDs correctly suppressed. Independent cross-check vs Microsoft presidio-research: EMAIL/IBAN 100%, PERSON 94%.

The harness earned its keep — it found real defects, which were then fixed: credit cards and phone numbers were being silently suppressed by the numeric-noise filter (now exempt via checksum validation / phone shape), and Medicare, IP, date-of-birth, AU passport and driver-licence had no recognizer (now added, checksum- or context-gated). Full method, numbers, and remaining documented gaps (SWIFT/BIC, non-DOB dates): eval/README.md.

Tests

pip install -e ".[dev]"

pytest tests/ # or run any file directly: python tests/test_obsify.py

Thirteen suites (88 tests), run in CI on Linux + Windows / Python 3.11 + 3.12:

  • mcp-protocol — launches the real server over stdio and speaks MCP to it (the same path a client like Claude uses): confirms all five tools register with valid schemas and that calls round-trip through JSON-RPC — including scan_pii returning shape only, end to end.
  • checksums — anchored to externally-published ABN/ACN/TFN worked examples (valid and corrupted), which breaks the generator↔validator circularity.
  • obsify / twin / redaction — the privacy invariants: shape-only output, leak-free twins, and a fail-closed self-check.
  • precision — the false-positive suppressors kill numeric-ledger noise while keeping real names.
  • credentials — the anchored secret patterns catch cloud keys / tokens / JWTs / private-key blocks / connection strings, while keyword-anchored generics stay precise on prose (no entropy).
  • routing — the guard's block/allow classification and obsify init's non-destructive contract.
  • corpus — the synthetic PDF+Excel+DOCX corpus end to end: per-format detection, DOCX paragraph+table extraction, and shape-only output across every format.
  • evaluation — the scored harness as a regression gate (recall, suppression, FP-torture, gaps).
  • robustness — graceful degradation: corrupt/oversized/empty/nested/unsupported inputs never crash and are always surfaced as notes.
  • model / variants — first-run model auto-download logic; variant normalization behind verify_value_free.

For interactive verification (MCP Inspector) and the live-client last-mile check, see docs/verifying.md.

Related work

obsify is one of several MCP servers tackling "let an AI touch sensitive data safely" — they're mostly complementary, solving the same problem from different ends. Worth

只显示了开头部分;其余内容请在仓库中阅读

问 PopNx