Spec Driven Development
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
作者提供的说明(英文原文)
A verified dependency-audit verdict any AI agent can call over MCP, not a raw scan.
这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。
我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。
选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。
你需要
你用的是哪个应用?
在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。
打开 Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config,把下面的内容粘贴到 claude_desktop_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"closeread-verify": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"closeread-verify"
]
}
}
}在终端中运行这条命令
claude mcp add closeread-verify -- uvx closeread-verify粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"closeread-verify": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"closeread-verify"
]
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json
{
"servers": {
"closeread-verify": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"closeread-verify"
]
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。
你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。
这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。
它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。
我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月7日
注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 FreeGuy-AI 验证,该账户拥有此仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点
在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置
它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表
与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。
它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。
注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。
它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。
GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.1.2)于5个月前进入注册中心。
支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Python (uv)。
同一分类中有:Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, Zendesk
同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。
如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.
Zendesk MCP Pack — tickets, users, organizations via OAuth.
按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。
A verified dependency-audit verdict any AI agent can call.
A free scanner gives you raw CVEs. closeread-verify gives you the judgment: the verdict checked against the version you actually installed, the one finding that matters, and the exact fix. It runs as an MCP server, so any agent (Claude Code, Cursor, your own) can call it before it ships code and get back a checked answer, not a wall of noise.
npm auditA raw scanner and the agent itself can already produce a list of CVEs. What they cannot manufacture is the *verdict*. closeread-verify is built around the one discipline that separates a real audit from a scan:
^4.17.0 in a manifest is not what you shipped. The tool resolves the real pinned version from your lockfile and checks *that*, so it does not cry wolf over a caret range you already patched, and does not miss a vulnerable pin a manifest-only scan would wave through.lead: the highest-severity *direct production* issue, with the exact fix. If the only findings are transitive or dev-only, the lead is honestly null rather than a manufactured headline.That verified artifact, not the raw scan, is the product.
pip install closeread-verify
Python 3.11+. No API key, no account, no source access. Lockfile in, verdict out.
examples/agent_loop.py is a runnable agent that uses closeread-verify as a pre-ship gate: it blocks on a real Flask CVE, applies the named fix, re-checks, and ships. Real MCP over stdio, real OSV advisories, no API key.
python examples/agent_loop.py
closeread-verify is the stdio command that starts the server:
closeread-verify
Add it to your MCP client. Claude Code / Cursor style (mcp.json / claude_desktop_config.json):
{
"mcpServers": { "closeread-verify": { "command": "closeread-verify" } } }
If you installed into a specific environment, point at that interpreter instead:
{
"mcpServers": { "closeread-verify": { "command": "python", "args": ["-m", "closeread.mcp_server"] } } }
| Tool | Input | Use it when |
|---|---|---|
audit_project | files: a {filename: content} map | You have a real checkout. Pass the manifest and its lockfile together (e.g. package.json + package-lock.json) so the direct-vs-transitive split is recovered. Subdir prefixes like server/package.json are allowed. |
audit_dependencies | lockfile_content: str, filename: str | You have a single manifest or lockfile and want a one-shot verdict. |
audit_repo | github_url: str | You have a public repo URL. It shallow-clones and runs the same audit. Returns an error, never a fabricated result, if the clone fails. |
The filename is load-bearing: it routes the content to the right ecosystem parser. Supported lockfiles include package-lock.json, yarn.lock, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, Pipfile.lock, Gemfile.lock, composer.lock, and Cargo.lock.
Calling audit_dependencies on a requirements.txt that pins flask==0.12.0:
{
"source": "lockfile:requirements.txt", "lead": { "summary": "flask@0.12.0 affected by GHSA-562c-5r94-xh97", "severity": "high", "is_direct": true, "dependency_kind": "prod", "location": "requirements.txt:1", "fix": "Update flask to a patched version (see references).", "confidence": 0.9 }, "findings": { "issues": [], "direct": [ { "kind": "dependency", "package": "flask", "severity": "high", "is_direct": true, "versions": ["0.12.0"], "advisories": ["GHSA-562c-5r94-xh97", "GHSA-5wv5-4vpf-pj6m", "GHSA-m2qf-hxjv-5gpq"], "locations": ["requirements.txt:1"], "recommendation": "Update flask to a patched version (see references)." } ], "transitive": [] }, "counts": { "product_critical": 3, "issues": 0, "direct": 1, "transitive": 0 }, "verification": { "basis": "each version is the INSTALLED version resolved from the lockfile, not the declared floor; advisories confirmed via OSV; result is deterministic and re-checkable", "scanner": "closeread SCA (deterministic, no LLM)", "advisory_source": "OSV.dev", "as_of": "2026-06-08T12:00:00+00:00" } }
The agent does not get a scan to interpret. It gets a verdict to act on: bump flask, here is the line, here is why.
Agents are starting to write, review, and ship code on their own. Before an agent opens a PR or green-lights a deploy, it needs an answer to a simple question with a checkable answer: *is anything I depend on known-vulnerable, in the version I actually pinned, and is it mine to fix?* closeread-verify is that primitive. One MCP call, a deterministic verdict, no LLM in the loop to hallucinate a CVE that does not exist or miss one that does.
MIT. Built by Free Guy.