原型 · 预览版:收录官方注册中心里的全部服务器,每 30 分钟同步一次。评价和账户功能将在后续阶段推出。
PopNx MCP为使用 AI 的人准备的 MCP 服务器 · 用大白话讲清楚

Unicode Logic Kit

作者:fvossel版本 0.35.0i★ –i在你的电脑上运行
注册名称io.github.fvossel/unicode-logic-kit

安装

概览

作者提供的说明(英文原文)

Parse, check, prove and translate logic formulas: first-order, modal, description, higher-order.

PopNx MCP 的三大支柱

这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。

它能帮你做什么

我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。

  • 连接方式: 在你的电脑上运行
  • 传输方式: stdio
  • 分类: 其他

安装

选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。

安装之前

  • 基础检查:1 项中通过 1 项
  • 在你的电脑上运行,拥有你的用户账户的权限(文件、网络、应用)。
  • 注册中心没有列出需要填写的密钥。

你需要

  • PyPI已安装 Python 的 uv(用于 uvx 命令)

你用的是哪个应用?

在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。

打开 Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config,把下面的内容粘贴到 claude_desktop_config.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "unicode-logic-kit": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "unicode-logic-kit",
        "mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

在终端中运行这条命令

claude mcp add unicode-logic-kit -- uvx unicode-logic-kit mcp

在 Cursor 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "unicode-logic-kit": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "unicode-logic-kit",
        "mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

在 VS Code 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json

{
  "servers": {
    "unicode-logic-kit": {
      "type": "stdio",
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "unicode-logic-kit",
        "mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。

你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。

这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。

它能做什么

它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。

基础检查i

我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月6日

  • ✓ 通过

    作者与仓库一致

    注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 fvossel 验证,该账户拥有此仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    仍在维护

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    有许可证

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • – 不适用

    端点有响应

    它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点

  • – 不适用

    使用 OAuth 登录

    在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置

  • … 尚未检查

    工具描述中没有隐藏指令

    它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表

与“其他”中的其他服务器比较i

  • 星标数多于此分类中其他 32476 个服务器的 0%
  • 发布到注册中心的时间比此分类中其他 32476 个服务器的 75% 更新
  • 基础检查结果等于或优于此分类中其他 32476 个服务器的 100%

与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。

常见问题

Unicode Logic Kit 安全吗?

它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。

它需要哪些密钥或代码?

注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。

它在我的电脑上运行还是在云端?

它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。

它还在维护吗?

GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.35.0)于12天前进入注册中心。

哪些应用可以使用它?

支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Python (uv)。

有什么可以替代它?

同一分类中有:Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, zanadir

替代选择

同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。

如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i

Spec Driven Development

作者:formulahendry

MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.

在你的电脑上运行★ 440MIT14个月前更新
安装

Remote Desktop Commander

作者:desktop-commander

Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.

在云端运行★ 211昨天更新
安装

zanadir

作者:MustacheCase

Find what a repository's CI is missing, and which security checks cannot fail the build.

在你的电脑上运行今天更新
安装

作者的 README

打开 README

按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。

unicode-logic-kit

A Python toolkit for logic with Unicode operators — *parse, transform, and reason about* formulas of classical first-order logic and well beyond it: modal, temporal, hybrid, many-valued, fuzzy, intuitionistic, relevant, second- and third-order, description, dependence/IF, substructural, and a range of further non-classical logics. On top of that sits infrastructure for NL→logic research: one small API a verification loop can drive, one uniform verdict type over a dozen provers, and an evaluation toolbox for scoring LLM-generated formulas against benchmark gold data.

from unicode_logic_kit import MSFLParser, is_valid

phi = MSFLParser().parse( "∀x (Human(x) → Mortal(x)) ∧ Human(socrates) → Mortal(socrates)") print(is_valid(phi)) # True

Renamed in 0.31.0. Up to 0.30.0 this package was unicode-fol-kit

(import unicode_fol_kit): first-order logic is one of the logics it handles,

not the whole of it. pip install -U unicode-fol-kit still works — it installs

this package and forwards the old import name with a DeprecationWarning — but

new code should pip install unicode-logic-kit and import unicode_logic_kit.

Nothing else changed its name, the UFK_ environment variables included.

Why this kit?

  • One facade, seven verbs, built for LLM loops. api.parse_any (dialect auto-detection over Unicode / TPTP / LaTeX / Prover9 / SMT-LIB — never raises, records every parser's objection), api.check (well-formedness + signature conformance with did-you-mean suggestions), api.equivalent, api.prove, api.countermodel, api.repair (a diagnose→suggest→fix generator whose fixer callback is *your* LLM), api.translate (logic-to-logic via a comorphism registry). Every result has a JSON-compatible to_dict(), and the API carries an explicit stability policy.
  • Logics as values, and a translation that carries its side conditions. FOL(MSFOL(f)) converts a sorted formula and keeps its side axioms (each sort is non-empty, each sorted constant lies in its sort) *with* the term, as a Sentence; api.prove adds them as premises itself, which is the difference between a proof and a spurious countermodel. Each of the nine registry edges declares what it preserves (comorphism.GUARANTEES), which side axioms its image needs and which options it reads; a composed path reports the weakest guarantee on it. There is no implicit coercion between logics on purpose — see Translating between logics for why a translation is not an upcast.
  • An MCP server out of the box. pip install unicode-logic-kit[mcp], then python -m unicode_logic_kit.mcp (or, with nothing installed, uvx "unicode-logic-kit[mcp]" mcp) exposes the toolkit as thirty-seven Model Context Protocol tools (23 general-purpose, 6 for chemistry, 8 for description logic) — any MCP client (Claude Code/Desktop, agent frameworks, editors) can parse, prove, diagnose and translate without writing Python; the repair loop inverts naturally (the client LLM is the fixer). An error-analysis layer comes along: prediction-vs-gold breakdowns with symbol diffs (compare_formulas), corpus metrics (score_batch), satisfiability of premise sets with model witnesses (check_consistency), normal forms, cross-syntax rendering, truth tables, signature extraction, and DRS→FOL for discourse phenomena.
  • Model checking against real structures, not just model finding. A molecule, a knowledge-graph neighbourhood, a scene graph is *given* — the question is whether a definition holds of it. FiniteStructure + evaluate_in_structure answer that directly: no prenex form, no CNF (both are documented timeout sources elsewhere), quantifiers ranging over indexed candidate sets rather than the whole domain, counting quantifiers counted instead of expanded, and properties that are decidable on a structure but not first-order definable over it (connectivity, ring membership) admitted as computed predicates. unicode_logic_kit.chem turns a SMILES string into such a structure over the ChemLog signature.
  • Rule learning, both directions, with the silent failures made loud. unicode_logic_kit.ilp turns those same structures into an ILP task (Popper's bk.pl / exs.pl / bias.pl) and reads the learned Prolog clause back as a kit formula you can model-check. Two encoding mistakes produce a hypothesis that scores precision 1.00 and means nothing — example-local individual names a learner joins across, and the example argument on every predicate — and both are refused rather than documented, on the way out and on the way back. check_separation asks the question that has to come first: does your reference definition separate the two example sets at all?
  • Exact probabilistic logic — no sampling, no floats. prob.entailment_bounds answers "what does P(bird)=0.9 entail about P(fly)?" with the exact tightest interval (Nilsson's probabilistic entailment as a rational LP over possible worlds, conditionals included); prob.query answers ProbLog-style queries over definite programs with independent probabilistic facts under Sato's distribution semantics — every result an exact Fraction, every unsupported fragment a loud refusal.
  • Twenty-five prover backends, one honest `Verdict`. The kit's own calculi and semantic searches (resolution — with sound paramodulation/demodulation for equality, no hand-supplied congruence axioms needed —, analytic tableaux with recorded, independently checkable proof objects, modal tableau, finite model finder, bounded Kripke enumeration, QML embedding) are first-class citizens next to Z3, cvc5, Vampire, E, Zipperposition, Twee (equational proofs re-verified by an independent checker before the kit reports them), Prover9, Leo-III, Isabelle, nanoCoP-M (native first-order modal logic, opt-in with a mandatory independent cross-check) and a Dockerized HETS server (CASL export *and* round-trip import with native many-sortedness, multi-spec DOL library emission, SPASS/darwin behind one name, comorphism provenance in every verdict). Every route returns the same Verdict with a semantic status (proved / refuted / unknown / error), a separate *why-not-more* axis (timeout ≠ bound_hit ≠ incomplete ≠ unsupported), the SZS status, wall time, and JSON-able witnesses. Chains, portfolios (portfolio_prove, parallel with agreement thresholds and a soundness alarm on prover disagreement), and cached batch runs (batch_decide) are built on top.
  • An evaluation toolbox for NL→FOL work. A graded equivalence ladder (exact → canonical → vocabulary-aligned → solver, with a tri-state solver level and partial credit), AST-level symbol alignment, gold-formula self-audit, and adapters for FOLIO, MALLS, GROVES, WillowNLtoFOL, ProntoQA, ProofWriter, LogicNLI, ProverQA and FraCaS — each with its upstream schema verified at the source and its limitations documented instead of smoothed over. FraCaS is the pure-NLI one: no gold formulas at all, so the translation step is an injected callable and the kit only decides.
  • Countermodels that explain themselves. api.countermodel returns a machine-readable witness *plus* a plain-English rendering ("The countermodel has 2 possible worlds. … At world 0 the formula fails."), and refutation actually covers the temporal fragment: Ⓕ P → P comes back refuted with a two-world Kripke witness, not "unknown".
  • Honesty as a contract. No route silently degrades: fuzzy input is refused by classical provers rather than collapsed, an unavailable backend raises instead of vanishing from the chain, incomplete methods report *why* they stopped, and every proof method has an independent checker.
from unicode_logic_kit import api

result = api.parse_any("∀x (Raven(x) → Black(x))") # LLM output, any dialect report = api.check(result.formula, signature={"predicates": {"Raven": 1, "Black": 1}}) verdict = api.prove(api.parse_any("Black(tweety)").formula, premises=[result.formula, api.parse_any("Raven(tweety)").formula]) print(verdict.status, verdict.backend, verdict.szs_status) # proved z3 Theorem

One parser class, MSFLParser, reads classical logic at the first, second and third order, each with or without sorts and with or without the modal family (modal/temporal/epistemic/deontic/hybrid): twelve combinations of three constructor flags. A fourth flag, fuzzy, puts the Łukasiewicz connectives in place of the two-valued ones in each of the twelve. Next to them stand team-semantic dependence/IF logic, intuitionistic linear logic, and the Lambek calculus. The surface syntax is natural Unicode (∀ ∃ ∧ ∨ ¬ → ↔ ⊕ ⊗ □ ◇ @ ⊸ 𝟙 …) with no ASCII fallbacks.

On top of the AST sits a full reasoning stack — four proof methods (a built-in resolution prover, Fitch natural deduction with checker *and* searcher, the Gentzen sequent calculi LK/LJ — the latter backed by Dyckhoff's G4ip, a genuine terminating decision procedure for propositional intuitionistic logic — and analytic tableaux), a finite model finder, SMT (Z3) and external-prover (Prover9 / Vampire) backends, truth tables, and dedicated semantics for every logic. Every proof method has an independent checker — including check_resolution_proof, which certifies externally produced resolution derivations (paramodulation steps included) with its own from-scratch unification, and check_tableau_proof, which re-derives every α/β/γ/δ step of a recorded tableau with its own substitution and δ-freshness check. Formulas import/export to TPTP (incl. header Status/Rating metadata via parse_tptp_problem), Prover9, SMT-LIB, LaTeX, and JSON.

📖 Documentation

Full guide and API reference: [https://unicode-logic-kit.readthedocs.io/](https://unicode-logic-kit.readthedocs.io/)

The documentation walks through every logic with runnable examples — start with the Quickstart and Choosing a tool.

Beyond deciding formulas: Model checking (evaluate a formula in a structure you already have — including molecules), Verification (is a definition *set* coherent, or just too easily satisfied?), Probabilistic logic (exact bounds and queries, no sampling), and MCP (the toolkit, grammar included, as tools for a language model).

Installation

pip install unicode-logic-kit

Requires Python 3.10+. Z3 ships with the package. pip install "unicode-logic-kit[cvc5]" adds cvc5 as a second in-process SMT backend (it then joins the default proving chain right after Z3); [mcp] adds the MCP server (python -m unicode_logic_kit.mcp); [hf] add

只显示了开头部分;其余内容请在仓库中阅读

问 PopNx