Spec Driven Development
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
作者提供的说明(英文原文)
Scans MCP server auth code for OAuth 2.1 anti-patterns: token passthrough, missing audience
这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。
我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。
选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。
你需要
你用的是哪个应用?
在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。
打开 Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config,把下面的内容粘贴到 claude_desktop_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"oauth-auditor": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@guardbee/mcp-oauth-auditor"
]
}
}
}在终端中运行这条命令
claude mcp add oauth-auditor -- npx -y @guardbee/mcp-oauth-auditor粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"oauth-auditor": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@guardbee/mcp-oauth-auditor"
]
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json
{
"servers": {
"oauth-auditor": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@guardbee/mcp-oauth-auditor"
]
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。
你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。
这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。
它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。
我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月7日
注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 GuardBee 验证,该账户拥有此仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点
在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置
它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表
与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。
它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。
注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。
它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。
GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.5.1)于7天前进入注册中心。
支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Node.js。
同一分类中有:Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, AvaHR
同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。
如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.
Read hiring data and create inactive assessment and questionnaire drafts for human review.
按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。
🇬🇧 English | 🇹🇷 Türkçe | 🇨🇳 中文 | 🇯🇵 日本語 | 🇰🇷 한국어 | 🇧🇷 Português | 🇪🇸 Español | 🇩🇪 Deutsch
An MCP (Model Context Protocol) server that scans an MCP server's own authorization code for OAuth 2.1 anti-patterns named in the MCP specification's own Security Considerations section.
The MCP spec doesn't leave this to guesswork — it explicitly calls out token passthrough (forwarding a client's token to a downstream API unchanged, instead of exchanging/re-scoping it) and missing audience validation (accepting a token whose aud claim was never issued for this server) as the central authorization failure modes for a server acting as an OAuth resource server. This package checks for exactly those two, plus three related anti-patterns in the same family.
Telemetry is off by default. With
GUARDBEE_TELEMETRY=1it sends the server, tool, success, duration and short parameter values such as a file path; longer strings and fields likecontent,tokenorpasswordare replaced with a placeholder. See@guardbee/mcp-telemetry.
Claude ──► oauth-auditor ──► Your MCP server's auth code
│ ├─ token-passthrough (client's token forwarded unchanged downstream) ├─ token-validation (jwt.verify() with no audience check) ├─ discovery-ssrf (OAuth/OIDC discovery URL built from client input) ├─ pkce (authorization request missing code_challenge) ├─ redirect-validation (redirect_uri checked with startsWith/includes, not exact match) └─ secrets-exposure (hardcoded client_secret)
Token passthrough matters because a token a client presented to *this* server was scoped and audienced for this server — not whatever downstream API the server's own tool handlers call next. Forwarding it unchanged means the downstream service is trusting a credential it never issued, on the basis of a server-side decision the original token issuer never approved.
Missing audience validation is the same failure from the other direction: jwt.verify(token, key) confirms a token's *signature* is valid, but says nothing about who it was issued *for*. Without an explicit audience check, a token minted for a completely unrelated resource server — one that happens to share the same issuer/signing key — will verify successfully here too. This is the textbook confused-deputy substitution the MCP spec is warning about.
The other three patterns are adjacent, concrete instances of the same "an MCP server's auth code trusts something it shouldn't" theme: an OAuth/OIDC discovery URL built from client-supplied input (the shape behind a real disclosed CVE), a redirect_uri validated with a prefix/substring check instead of an exact match (open-redirect bypass), and PKCE silently missing from an authorization request (required by OAuth 2.1 unconditionally, not just for public clients).
jwt.verify(...) call (or the authorization-request URL construction) and confirm audience: / code_challenge is genuinely nowhere nearby, not just matched by a lucky string positionguardbee.yml\b after a ] character that can never match, since ] isn't a word character — silently missed the bracket-notation form of header access). End-to-end verified against a fixture with all 6 anti-patterns deliberately planted (caught all 6), and against the entire guardbee-mcp monorepo (401 files — zero findings in any real third-party code; the only non-test matches were the scanner's own pattern-definition source textually containing the string jwt.verify( inside a regex literal and a doc comment, not actual vulnerable usage){
"mcpServers": { "guardbee-oauth-auditor": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@guardbee/mcp-oauth-auditor"] } } }
npx @guardbee/mcp-oauth-auditor scan ./src --fail-on=high --format=sarif > results.sarif
| Tool | Description |
|---|---|
scan_text | Scans a code snippet |
scan_file | Scans a single file |
scan_directory | Recursively scans a directory |
list_patterns | Lists all supported patterns by category |
| Category | Pattern | Severity | OWASP |
|---|---|---|---|
| token-passthrough | token_passthrough_to_downstream | critical | MCP07 |
| token-validation | missing_audience_validation | high | MCP07 |
| discovery-ssrf | oauth_discovery_ssrf | critical | MCP07 |
| pkce | missing_pkce_on_auth_request | high | MCP07 |
| redirect-validation | loose_redirect_uri_validation | high | MCP07 |
| secrets-exposure | hardcoded_oauth_client_secret | high | MCP07 |
| state-handle | predictable_state_handle (+ Python) — state / session handle from Math.random, Date.now, a counter | high | MCP07 |
| state-handle | state_handle_not_bound_to_user — a handle from a tool argument looked up with no check that it is the caller's | medium | MCP07 |
| mix-up | missing_iss_validation — authorization code redeemed without checking iss (RFC 9207) | medium | MCP07 |
| auth-url | auth_url_scheme_not_validated — a server-provided URL opened with no scheme check (javascript:, data:, file:) | high | MCP07 |
| auth-url | auth_url_opened_via_shell — URL interpolated into open / xdg-open / start through a shell | critical | MCP05 |
| local-exposure | local_http_server_unauthenticated — HTTP MCP transport with no authentication | high | MCP07 |
| local-exposure | missing_host_origin_check — no Host / Origin validation (DNS rebinding) | medium | MCP07 |
| local-exposure | listen_all_interfaces — MCP server bound to 0.0.0.0 | medium | MCP07 |
The language comes from the file extension, and Python- and Go-specific rules run only on their own files.
python_missing_audience_validation (jwt.decode with no audience= and no authlib claims_options aud), python_audience_verification_disabled ("verify_aud": False), python_token_passthrough_to_downstream (the Authorization header or all of request.headers on a requests / httpx / client call), missing_pkce_on_auth_request on authlib create_authorization_url / authorize_redirect with no code_challenge, and the discovery SSRF, redirect, state and 0.0.0.0 rules.go_missing_audience_validation (jwt.Parse with no jwt.WithAudience), go_oidc_client_id_check_skipped, go_token_passthrough_to_downstream (out.Header.Set("Authorization", r.Header.Get("Authorization"))), go_hardcoded_oauth_client_secret, go_loose_redirect_uri_validation (strings.HasPrefix), go_predictable_state_handle (math/rand, time), go_oauth_discovery_ssrf, go_auth_url_opened_via_shell, missing_pkce_on_auth_request on AuthCodeURL with no S256ChallengeOption, and ListenAndServe(":8080") as listen_all_interfaces.token_passthrough_via_variable — the incoming Authorization header read into a variable that is then put on an outgoing request.Every finding links its section of the MCP spec Security Best Practices (SARIF helpUri) and carries its OWASP MCP Top 10 id as a SARIF tag. The newer rules are heuristics over one file at a time: a check done in another module (an auth middleware, an iss comparison in a helper) is not seen.
npx @guardbee/mcp-oauth-auditor probe http://127.0.0.1:3000/mcp
Read-only checks of a running HTTP MCP endpoint: does it answer an initialize without credentials (probe_unauthenticated_access), and does it accept a foreign Host (probe_dns_rebinding_host_accepted) or Origin (probe_foreign_origin_accepted)? It sends no credentials, calls nothing beyond initialize, closes any session it opened, and refuses a host that resolves to a public address unless --allow-public. CLI only: an agent cannot start it through the MCP tools.
guardbee.yml)oauth-auditor:
fail-on: high # any | critical | high | medium | none max-files: 5000 exclude:
client_secret or response_type=code.jwt.verify() call whose options object happens to be built far away from the call site (a variable passed in, rather than an inline object) won't be checked for audience correctly.npm run build
npm test
MIT — GuardBee
Questions, ideas, or a false positive? Start a thread in GitHub Discussions or open an issue. If GuardBee is useful to you, a ⭐ on the repository helps others find it.