原型 · 预览版:收录官方注册中心里的全部服务器,每 30 分钟同步一次。评价和账户功能将在后续阶段推出。
PopNx MCP为使用 AI 的人准备的 MCP 服务器 · 用大白话讲清楚

Murphy MCP

作者:lucianomanetta版本 0.1.0i★ –i在你的电脑上运行
注册名称io.github.lucianomanetta/murphy-mcp

安装

概览

作者提供的说明(英文原文)

Gives a coding agent a record it did not write: what changed on disk and in git, versus its claims.

PopNx MCP 的三大支柱

这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。

它能帮你做什么

我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。

  • 连接方式: 在你的电脑上运行
  • 传输方式: stdio
  • 分类: 开发者工具

安装

选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。

安装之前

  • 基础检查:1 项中通过 1 项
  • 在你的电脑上运行,拥有你的用户账户的权限(文件、网络、应用)。
  • 注册中心没有列出需要填写的密钥。

你需要

  • npm已安装 Node.js(用于 npx 命令)

你用的是哪个应用?

在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。

打开 Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config,把下面的内容粘贴到 claude_desktop_config.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "murphy": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "murphy-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

在终端中运行这条命令

claude mcp add murphy -- npx -y murphy-mcp

在 Cursor 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "murphy": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "murphy-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

在 VS Code 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json

{
  "servers": {
    "murphy": {
      "type": "stdio",
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "murphy-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。

你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。

这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。

它能做什么

它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。

基础检查i

我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月8日

  • ✓ 通过

    作者与仓库一致

    注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 lucianomanetta 验证,该账户拥有此仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    仍在维护

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    有许可证

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • – 不适用

    端点有响应

    它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点

  • – 不适用

    使用 OAuth 登录

    在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置

  • … 尚未检查

    工具描述中没有隐藏指令

    它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表

与“开发者工具”中的其他服务器比较i

  • 星标数多于此分类中其他 4923 个服务器的 0%
  • 发布到注册中心的时间比此分类中其他 4923 个服务器的 99% 更新
  • 基础检查结果等于或优于此分类中其他 4923 个服务器的 100%

与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。

常见问题

Murphy MCP 安全吗?

它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。

它需要哪些密钥或代码?

注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。

它在我的电脑上运行还是在云端?

它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。

它还在维护吗?

GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.1.0)于今天进入注册中心。

哪些应用可以使用它?

支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Node.js。

有什么可以替代它?

同一分类中有:GitHub, Desktop Commander, Cloudflare MCP

替代选择

同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。

如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i

GitHub

作者:github

Connect AI assistants to GitHub - manage repos, issues, PRs, and workflows through natural language.

电脑或云端★ 34,245MIT5天前更新
安装

Desktop Commander

作者:wonderwhy-er

MCP server for terminal commands, file operations, and process management

在你的电脑上运行★ 10,225MIT17天前更新
安装

Cloudflare MCP

作者:cloudflare

Cloudflare MCP servers

在云端运行★ 4,446Apache-2.014个月前更新
安装

作者的 README

打开 README

按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。

murphy-mcp

An MCP server that gives a coding agent a record it did not write.

A coding agent finishes a task and tells you what it did. The report is coherent, well structured, and usually correct. It is also the only account you have, written by the party being assessed.

This server produces the other account. It records the workspace before the work starts, reads it again afterwards, and reports what actually changed: every file added, modified or deleted, plus what moved in git. Then it holds the agent's own account against that record and reports the disagreements.

It does not ask the agent what happened. That is the point.

Built on the 2026-07-28 MCP specification with the v2 TypeScript SDK. MIT licensed.


What it catches

The failure mode is not a lying agent. An agent's report is a summary written from its own context window, and that context is a partial view of a system with far more state than the agent can hold. The report is usually accurate about intent and less reliable about effect.

Three things show up again and again:

  • Side effects outside the narrative. The agent describes editing three files. Four were written. The fourth was a cache, a lockfile, a generated artifact, or a config the tooling rewrote.
  • Completion claimed at the boundary of knowledge. The agent finishes the part it can see and reports the task complete, because from inside its context the task is complete.
  • Claims nothing on disk supports. "The tests pass." "The bug is fixed." Possibly true, and not something a file listing can settle either way.

This server names all three, separately.

Install

Published builds:

npx -y murphy-mcp

Claude Code:

claude mcp add murphy -- npx -y murphy-mcp

Any MCP client, by config:

{

"mcpServers": { "murphy": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "murphy-mcp"] } } }

From a clone:

npm install && npm run build

then point the client at node /absolute/path/to/murphy-mcp/dist/index.js.

Use

Take a checkpoint before the work, then check the account afterwards.

checkpoint        { root: "/path/to/project", label: "refactor auth" }

-> checkpointId

... the agent works ...

check_claims { root, checkpointId, claimedPaths: ["src/auth.ts", "src/session.ts"], claimedStatements: ["All tests pass."] }

What comes back:

# Evidence report

2 unreported · 1 contradicted · 1 confirmed · 1 unverifiable

Unreported: observed on disk, never mentioned

  • b.txt (deleted)
  • generated/out.bin (added)

Contradicted: claimed, but nothing changed

  • never_touched.ts — no such file at checkpoint time and none now

Unverifiable: outside what this record can settle

  • The test suite passes. — a filesystem and git record cannot settle this; it needs its own evidence

Confirmed: claimed and observed

  • a.txt (modified)

Disagreements come first, because that is what a person is for. Nobody reviews a flat log of 50,000 events; anyone can scan a list of four disagreements in a minute.

The four buckets

They are kept apart on purpose. Collapsing them is what makes a claim read as evidence.

BucketMeaning
confirmedClaimed, and observed on disk
contradictedClaimed, and nothing changed
unreportedChanged on disk, and never mentioned
unverifiableNothing in a filesystem or git record can settle it

unverifiable is stated explicitly instead of being quietly guessed. Presenting a guess at the same confidence as a fact is the failure this is meant to stop.

Tools

checkpoint

Records the workspace as it is now: path, size, modification time and SHA-256 for every file, plus git HEAD, branch and status --porcelain. Returns a checkpoint id.

root (required) · label · ignore · noDefaultIgnores · maxFiles · maxFileBytes

evidence_since

Rescans and reports what changed since the checkpoint. The observed record alone, with no claims involved.

root (required) · checkpointId (required) · the same scan options

check_claims

Holds the agent's account against the record and returns the four buckets.

root (required) · checkpointId (required) · claimedPaths · claimedStatements · the same scan options

list_checkpoints

Lists the checkpoints stored under a workspace, most recent first.

root (required)

Design decisions worth knowing

Build output is not ignored. Only .git, node_modules and the server's own .murphy store are skipped by default. Ignoring dist, .next, target or coverage would hide exactly the writes that tend to fall outside an agent's account. If you want them skipped, pass them in ignore.

Checkpoints are written to disk, under .murphy/checkpoints in the workspace, with a .gitignore that keeps the store out of the repository. The 2026-07-28 protocol core is stateless, so nothing that has to outlive a single call is kept in the process. It also means the evidence survives the session it describes, which is when anyone actually wants to read it.

Symbolic links are recorded and never followed. A snapshot that can wander outside its root cannot say where it looked.

Hashing has limits, and they are reported. Files over 8 MiB are not hashed; for those a change is inferred from size and modification time, which is weaker evidence, and the report says so. Every truncation, skipped directory and unhashed file appears under "What this report does not cover".

What this does not do

Honest scope, so nobody is surprised:

  • No process ancestry and no network capture. It sees the filesystem and the git repository. It cannot tell you which command produced a write, or what was fetched.
  • It does not read `.gitignore`. The default ignore list is the three directories above and whatever you pass.
  • It is not a sandbox or a guardrail. It observes after the fact. It blocks nothing.
  • It cannot verify behaviour. "The tests pass" comes back as unverifiable every time, by design. Run the tests.

Relation to MURPHY

MURPHY is a separate, commercial, local-first Windows tool that reconstructs agent activity from process ancestry, filesystem activity, workspace boundaries and network behaviour. This server is an independent, cross-platform, open implementation of the filesystem and git half of the same idea, usable from any MCP client.

The reasoning behind both is written up in An agent's report is not evidence.

Development

npm install

npm run build node test/smoke.mjs

The smoke test builds a throwaway git workspace, drives the server over a real stdio MCP connection, makes three changes, reports one of them, and asserts that the other two come back as unreported.

Licence

MIT. See LICENSE.

问 PopNx