原型 · 预览版:收录官方注册中心里的全部服务器,每 30 分钟同步一次。评价和账户功能将在后续阶段推出。
PopNx MCP为使用 AI 的人准备的 MCP 服务器 · 用大白话讲清楚

TheCrawler

作者:manchittlab版本 0.5.8i★ –i在你的电脑上运行
注册名称io.github.manchittlab/thecrawler

安装

概览

作者提供的说明(英文原文)

Universal web scraper with LLM-ready markdown, RAG chunking, PDF/DOCX support.

PopNx MCP 的三大支柱

这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。

它能帮你做什么

我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。

  • 连接方式: 在你的电脑上运行
  • 传输方式: stdio
  • 分类: 搜索与 AI 记忆

安装

选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。

安装之前

  • 基础检查:1 项中通过 1 项
  • 在你的电脑上运行,拥有你的用户账户的权限(文件、网络、应用)。
  • 注册中心没有列出需要填写的密钥。

你需要

  • npm已安装 Node.js(用于 npx 命令)

你用的是哪个应用?

在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。

打开 Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config,把下面的内容粘贴到 claude_desktop_config.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "thecrawler": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "thecrawler"
      ]
    }
  }
}

在终端中运行这条命令

claude mcp add thecrawler -- npx -y thecrawler

在 Cursor 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "thecrawler": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "thecrawler"
      ]
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

在 VS Code 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json

{
  "servers": {
    "thecrawler": {
      "type": "stdio",
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "thecrawler"
      ]
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。

你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。

这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。

它能做什么

它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。

基础检查i

我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月7日

  • ✓ 通过

    作者与仓库一致

    注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 manchittlab 验证,该账户拥有此仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    仍在维护

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    有许可证

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • – 不适用

    端点有响应

    它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点

  • – 不适用

    使用 OAuth 登录

    在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置

  • … 尚未检查

    工具描述中没有隐藏指令

    它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表

与“搜索与 AI 记忆”中的其他服务器比较i

  • 星标数多于此分类中其他 7256 个服务器的 0%
  • 发布到注册中心的时间比此分类中其他 7256 个服务器的 19% 更新
  • 基础检查结果等于或优于此分类中其他 7256 个服务器的 100%

与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。

常见问题

TheCrawler 安全吗?

它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。

它需要哪些密钥或代码?

注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。

它在我的电脑上运行还是在云端?

它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。

它还在维护吗?

GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.5.8)于4个月前进入注册中心。

哪些应用可以使用它?

支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Node.js。

有什么可以替代它?

同一分类中有:Context7, Codebase Memory, Exa

替代选择

同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。

如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i

Context7

作者:upstash

Up-to-date docs for AI agents

电脑或云端★ 64,224MIT今天更新
安装

Codebase Memory

作者:DeusData

Codebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.

在你的电脑上运行★ 48,148MIT20天前更新
安装

Exa

作者:exa-labs

Connect AI agents to Exa for web search, content fetching, and multi-step research.

在云端运行★ 5,213MIT上个月更新
安装

作者的 README

打开 README

按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。

TheCrawler — AI-ready web scraper with validated extraction contracts

Scrape web pages, run LLM-powered structured extraction, or diagnose whether URLs are ready for a built-in extraction contract before spending LLM tokens. Open source engine (AGPL-3.0). $0.005 per successfully scraped page on Apify.

Start with a safe test: run one public URL with dryRun: true on Apify, or clone the current GitHub source and run the local CLI/MCP build from engine/. A small proof pack is in examples/diagnostic-challenge, including a sample readiness report at examples/diagnostic-challenge/sample-report.md.

$500 extraction readiness sprint

Use this when you need to know whether one real public-web workflow is worth automating before you spend engineering time on extraction.

  • Scope: up to 25 public URLs and one target output shape.
  • First step: send a public fit check through the structured issue form or use the private fit-check path on the sprint page.
  • Payment: requested only after the workflow looks like a fit, by one-off $500 payment link or invoice.
  • Output: a readiness report with ready, mixed, blocked, or not-worth-automating-yet guidance.
  • Credit: if the workflow continues into setup or hosted usage, the $500 is credited toward that next step.

The public offer thread is GitHub issue #1. The proof pack includes a sample readiness report showing the report shape before a buyer sends URLs.

Public fit checks should use this shape:

Workflow type:

Public URLs (up to 25): Target output shape / required fields: Known blockers or constraints: Timing:

Do not include login credentials, private URLs, personal data, or raw customer data in GitHub issues.

What makes this different

  • Validated extraction contracts: select a built-in contract, get normalized data plus validation.valid, required fields, and missing-field evidence. Current contracts: real-estate-listing, product-page, docs-page.
  • Brand identity extraction (extractBrand: true): one call returns the site's ranked color palette, themeColor, and best-guess logo candidates (JSON-LD / header SVG / favicons / og:image). In Playwright mode it reads *rendered* colors via getComputedStyle — works on SPAs where static CSS can't. Deterministic, no LLM.
  • Content controls: onlyMainContent plus includeTags / excludeTags (CSS allow/deny) strip nav, footer, sidebars, and ads from text, markdown, links, and HTML output. Firecrawl-compatible. waitFor alias supported.
  • HTML formats: extractHtml (cleaned, main-content HTML) and extractRawHtml (full serialized DOM) alongside markdown.
  • No-LLM diagnostics: run diagnoseMode to score source readiness, identify blockers, and save a buyer-readable Markdown report before extraction.
  • LLM-powered extraction: send a JSON Schema or use a contract, get parsed typed data back. Endpoint-agnostic — point at OpenAI, your own llama.cpp / vLLM / LM Studio / Ollama. You bring the LLM, no vendor lock-in.
  • Adaptive crawling: Cheerio first (fast HTTP+parse), auto-fall-back to Playwright when an SPA shell is detected. Keeps browser rendering optional instead of mandatory for every page.
  • Structured errors: errorType enum (dns | timeout | rate-limit | blocked-bot | js-required | http-4xx | http-5xx | parse | network | unknown) + errorRetryable boolean. Agents branch programmatically — no regex on error strings.
  • Challenge-page detection: 200 OK responses with access-control or challenge-page bodies are flagged as errorType: 'blocked-bot' instead of returning challenge HTML as useful content.
  • Out-of-box extractors: JSON-LD, microdata, commerce data (price/SKU/rating), forms with field types, 16 analytics trackers detected (GA4, GTM, Meta Pixel, Hotjar, Segment, Mixpanel, etc.), hreflang, pagination, redirect chain. Email-like and phone-like public text extraction is opt-in.
  • Heading-aware RAG chunking: markdown chunked at h1-h3 boundaries with overlap and per-chunk SHA. Feed straight to a vector DB.

Three modes

Safe first run

Use dryRun: true for an Apify smoke test. The actor crawls the page but does not emit a billing event.

{

"urls": ["https://example.com"], "extractMarkdown": true, "dryRun": true }

For the current local MCP/CLI build:

git clone https://github.com/manchittlab/TheCrawler.git

cd TheCrawler/engine npm install npm run build node dist/cli.js crawl https://example.com --markdown

Plain crawl (default)
{

"urls": ["https://example.com"], "extractMarkdown": true, "rotateUserAgent": true, "requestRetries": 3 }

Returns rich PageData per URL: title, description, language, canonical URL, robots directives, full text, boilerplate-stripped markdown, links (with internal/external flag), images (with lazy-load src), meta tags, OG/Twitter Card, JSON-LD, microdata, commerce data, forms, analytics-detected, optional email-like/phone-like public text fields, social links, hreflang, pagination, redirect chain, response headers + timing, plus structured errorType + errorRetryable on failure.

LLM-powered extract mode
{

"urls": ["https://shop.example.com/products/123"], "extractMode": true, "extractJsonSchema": { "type": "object", "properties": { "productName": { "type": "string" }, "price": { "type": "number" }, "currency": { "type": "string" }, "inStock": { "type": "boolean" } }, "required": ["productName"] }, "llmBaseUrl": "https://api.openai.com/v1/chat/completions", "llmModel": "gpt-4o-mini" }

Crawls the URL → cleans to markdown → sends (markdown + schema) to your OpenAI-compatible chat-completions endpoint → returns parsed typed data per URL. Schema-backed extraction uses JSON Schema response format where supported, with fallbacks for endpoints that only support JSON-object or text output. Supports natural-language extractPrompt instead of/alongside the schema. The actor charges per page like normal; the LLM call cost is whatever your endpoint charges.

Note: extract mode requires a publicly-reachable LLM endpoint. LAN URLs (e.g. http://192.168.x.x) are not reachable from Apify infrastructure. Use OpenAI, hosted vLLM, or expose your local server via a tunnel.

Set THECRAWLER_LLM_API_KEY as an Actor environment variable so the LLM key never lands in run inputs (visible in run history).

Contract diagnostic mode
{

"urls": ["https://example.com/listing-1", "https://example.com/listing-2"], "diagnoseMode": true, "extractContract": "real-estate-listing", "diagnosticReport": true }

Runs crawl + readiness scoring without an LLM call. Dataset output includes per-URL verdict, readyForExtraction, score, blockers, warnings, and recommendedNextStep, plus a workflow summary. When diagnosticReport is true, the actor saves contract-diagnostic-report in the run key-value store as Markdown with a missing-readiness-signal summary. The report intentionally excludes raw extracted contact details.

Contract extract mode
{

"urls": ["https://example.com/listing-1"], "extractMode": true, "extractContract": "product-page", "llmBaseUrl": "https://api.openai.com/v1/chat/completions", "llmModel": "gpt-4o-mini" }

Uses the selected contract schema and prompt, then appends contract validation to the extraction result. Agents can branch on validation.valid and validation.missingRequiredFields instead of trusting loose markdown. Built-in contracts currently cover real-estate-listing and product-page.

Reliability features

FeatureDefaultWhy
requestRetries3Transient failures (5xx, network, timeout) auto-retried
requestTimeoutSecs30Cap on per-request time
rotateUserAgenttrueUses standard browser User-Agent strings for compatibility; does not override access controls
cacheEnabledfalseOpt-in 5-min in-memory LRU per (URL + extract-flags)
Challenge-page detectionalways onFlags access-control or challenge-page bodies as errorType: 'blocked-bot'
Adaptive crawlopt-inadaptiveCrawling: true tries Cheerio first, escalates to Playwright on SPA detection

Search → scrape

Top-N Google results crawled in one call. Optional SerpAPI key for reliable search.

{ "searchQuery": "best CRM 2026", "searchLimit": 10, "extractMarkdown": true }

Sitemap → scrape

Sitemap.xml + sitemap-index files resolved automatically.

{ "sitemapUrl": "https://example.com/sitemap.xml", "maxPages": 50 }

File extraction

PDF and DOCX URLs are auto-detected and parsed. Returns extracted text + (for PDFs) metadata, page count.

Pricing

  • Crawl mode: $0.005 per page successfully scraped (failed pages don't charge).
  • Extract mode / diagnostic mode: still charged per successfully scraped page. LLM endpoint cost is paid by the endpoint owner, not by this actor.
  • Extraction readiness sprint: $500 after fit confirmation for one public workflow: up to 25 public URLs, one target output shape, and a ready / mixed / blocked report. Payment is by one-off link or invoice after scope is confirmed. If the workflow continues into setup or hosted usage, the $500 is credited toward that next step. If another stack is a better fit, the report says so.

Beyond the Apify Store

The current open-source engine source for this actor build is in engine/; drop it into your own Node project, MCP server, CLI, or REST API server. The published npm package is older than this GitHub source until the next npm publish, so use the GitHub-source path below for current validated-contract and MCP tools. Self-hosting avoids Apify per-page charges, while your own infrastructure and LLM endpoint costs still apply.

# Current GitHub source build

cd engine npm install npm run build

CLI

node dist/cli.js crawl https://example.com --markdown node dist/cli.js extract https://example.com --schema '{...}'

MCP server (Cline, Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf)

node dist/mcp.js

REST API server

THECRAWLER_API_KEY=local_test_key node dist/server.js --port 3000 curl -H "Authorization: Bearer local_test_key" \ "http://localhost:3000/v1/contracts?includeSchema=true" curl -X POST "http://localhost:3000/v1/scrape" \ -H "Authorization: Bearer local_test_key" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"url":"https://example.com/product","formats":["markdown","metadata","links","structuredData","commerceData"]}' curl -X POST "http://localhost:3000/v1/diagnose" \ -H "Authorization: Bearer local_test_key" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"contractName":"product-page","urls":["https://example.com/product"],"reportMarkdown":true}' curl -X POST "http://localhost:3000/v1/map" \ -H "Authorization: Bearer local_test_key" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"url":"https://example.com","maxPages":1}' curl -X POST "http://localhost:3000/v1/extract-contract" \ -H "Authorization: Bearer local_test_key" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"contractName":"product-page","urls":["https://example.com/product"],"llmBaseUrl":"http://localhost:1234/v1/chat/completions","llmModel":"qwen/qwen3.5-9b"}'

Older npm package; use for plain crawl only until the next publish

npm install thecrawler thecrawler crawl https://example.com --markdown

For Cline setup from a GitHub clone, use llms-install.md. The current GitHub source is the review path for validated contracts and MCP tools until npm is updated.

GitHub: https://githu

只显示了开头部分;其余内容请在仓库中阅读

问 PopNx