原型 · 预览版:收录官方注册中心里的全部服务器,每 30 分钟同步一次。评价和账户功能将在后续阶段推出。
PopNx MCP为使用 AI 的人准备的 MCP 服务器 · 用大白话讲清楚

Secureflows MCP

作者:michal-lefler版本 0.2.0i★ –i在云端运行
注册名称io.github.michal-lefler/secureflows-mcp

安装

概览

作者提供的说明(英文原文)

MCP server for secureFlows: token-free URL builders and integration-linting tools for AI agents.

PopNx MCP 的三大支柱

这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。

它能帮你做什么

我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。

安装

选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。

安装之前

你需要

你用的是哪个应用?

在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。

适用于网页版、桌面版和手机版 Claude:

  1. 打开 Settings → Connectors
  2. 点击 Add custom connector
  3. 粘贴下面的地址,然后点击 Add
  4. 如果要求登录,请登录作者的服务
SettingsConnectors1+ Add2https://…3
https://www.secure-flows.com/mcp

在终端中运行这条命令

claude mcp add --transport http secureflows https://www.secure-flows.com/mcp

在 Cursor 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "secureflows": {
      "url": "https://www.secure-flows.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

在 VS Code 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json

{
  "servers": {
    "secureflows": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://www.secure-flows.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器:

  1. 打开网页版 ChatGPT → Settings → Connectors (Apps)
  2. 点击 Create 或 Add(部分套餐需要先在 Advanced 中开启 Developer mode)
  3. 粘贴下面的地址,起个名字,然后保存
  4. 如果要求登录,请登录作者的服务
SettingsConnectors1+ Create2https://…3
https://www.secure-flows.com/mcp

菜单名称可能因套餐和版本不同而略有差异。

你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。

这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。

它能做什么

我们还没有读取这个服务器的工具列表;我们会轮流检查各个端点。

基础检查i

我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月8日

  • ✓ 通过

    作者与仓库一致

    注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 michal-lefler 验证,该账户拥有此仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    仍在维护

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    有许可证

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    端点有响应

    尚未检查;我们会轮流检查各个端点

  • … 尚未检查

    使用 OAuth 登录

    尚未检查;我们会轮流检查各个端点

  • … 尚未检查

    工具描述中没有隐藏指令

    尚未检查;我们会在检查端点时读取工具列表

与“其他”中的其他服务器比较i

  • 星标数多于此分类中其他 18372 个服务器的 0%
  • 发布到注册中心的时间比此分类中其他 18372 个服务器的 29% 更新
  • 基础检查结果等于或优于此分类中其他 18372 个服务器的 100%

与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。

常见问题

Secureflows MCP 安全吗?

它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。

它需要哪些密钥或代码?

注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。

它在我的电脑上运行还是在云端?

它在作者的云端运行。通过互联网连接,无需安装,但你发送的内容会经过作者的服务器。

它还在维护吗?

GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.2.0)于2个月前进入注册中心。

哪些应用可以使用它?

支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。它通过 URL 连接,所以接受远程 MCP 服务器的应用也可以使用,例如开启开发者模式的 ChatGPT。

有什么可以替代它?

同一分类中有:Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, A1RO — Irish employment tools

替代选择

同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。

如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i

Spec Driven Development

作者:formulahendry

MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.

在你的电脑上运行★ 440MIT14个月前更新
安装

Remote Desktop Commander

作者:desktop-commander

Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.

在云端运行★ 211前天更新
安装

作者的 README

打开 README

按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。

secureFlows MCP Server

Cloud-deployable MCP server that wraps the secureFlows OpenAPI surface tagged ai-safe and ai-optional.

This repo is a public mirror, published periodically from the private secureFlows monorepo

where development actually happens. Issues and PRs are welcome; large changes may take a

release cycle to land upstream first.

What is an MCP server?

An MCP server is a small HTTP service that exposes a set of “tools” an AI client can call in a standard way.

In this repo:

  • The secureFlows MCP server exposes tools that are auto-generated from your OpenAPI YAML specs.
  • When a client calls a tool, the MCP server forwards the call to your real secureFlows backend (connection.host) and returns the response in a normalized tool result.

This lets an AI client:

  • discover available secureFlows operations via listTools
  • call them via callTool
  • without hardcoding the API surface or manual auth/header wiring

What it does

Two kinds of tools, registered together in src/server.ts:

Generated tools (src/tools/build-tools.ts) — one per OpenAPI operation:

  • Loads:
  • docs/openapi/session/secure-flows-session-api.yaml
  • docs/openapi/user/secure-flows-user-api.yaml
  • docs/openapi/docs/secure-flows-docs-api.yaml
  • Exposes only operations tagged ai-safe or ai-optional as MCP tools
  • Forwards requests to a caller-provided secureFlows host — a thin, generic HTTP wrapper with no secureFlows-specific judgment. Every one of these requires a live auth.* token, so they're only useful once a session already exists (see Runtime model below).
  • Maps secureFlows auth headers from MCP tool inputs:
  • auth.firebaseToken
  • auth.sessionToken
  • auth.userToken

Static tools (src/tools/static-tools.ts) — hand-written, not generated from the spec:

  • secureflows_build_login_url / secureflows_build_logout_url — build the hosted-login and redirect-logout URLs correctly by construction (always /app/sessions/login, never the legacy /app/login; refuses a post-logout redirect_uri that points at /callback or leaks session_token). No secureFlows token required.
  • secureflows_lint_integration — checks generated app source against the integration rules and reports structured findings instead of leaving them as prose the agent has to self-police. No secureFlows token required. Two kinds of finding:
  • `scope: "file"` — a forbidden construct is *present*, at an exact file:line: env-var config constants, token in localStorage, legacy /app/login, fetch/XHR logout, client-side JWT decode, revoke-on-sign-out, empty catch {}, restore setSession(null) on non-auth errors, Continue CTA gated on session === null, …
  • `scope: "project"` — required handling is *absent* across every file passed in: detecting 401/410 but never clearing the token, never handling 403, or handling 403 without the BILLING_GRACE_LOCK carve-out.

The absence checks exist because the pattern rules structurally could not catch the defect class that dominates real generated apps. Measured: on a real trial's app that the eval harness's LLM judge scored 4/10 — citing "stale token never cleared on signed-out", "403 variants unhandled", "no error handling" — the pattern rules alone produced zero findings, because every one of those bugs is an *absence*, and a regex can only see what is present. With the absence checks it produces 3, including the error-severity token-clearing one. Both check kinds are validated against the canonical templates/web-app-secureflows starter, which must stay at zero findings.

Still heuristic text analysis, not a parser or type checker: it misses what it has no rule for, a project check can be satisfied by the right keyword in the wrong place, and it cannot cover the checks that need a running app (auth-guard mount races, the fresh-reload check). A fast first pass — not a replacement for the Agent implementation checklist in SKILL.md.

These static tools exist because the generated tools can't help with the part of an integration that happens *before* a session exists — scaffolding the redirect/callback/token-lifecycle code — which is exactly where most secureFlows integration mistakes happen.

Prompt (src/prompts/security-review.ts) — one MCP prompt, security-review. It asks the agent to review how the current project manages user accounts, list the security gaps, grade each one against secureFlows, and write a migration plan. Read-only, no secureFlows token required. The same text ships as the Claude Code plugin skill skills/security-review (run it with /secureflows:security-review) and as the copy-paste prompt on https://www.secure-flows.com/docs/getting-started/security-review/. The TypeScript constant is the source; test/security-review-prompt.test.ts fails if either copy drifts from it.

Uses a stateless HTTP MCP transport, so the server does not persist tenant config or secrets.

Runtime model

Each tool call receives:

  • connection.host: secureFlows base URL
  • connection.workspaceName: optional default workspace
  • connection.appId: optional default application id
  • auth.*: whichever token the selected endpoint needs

workspaceName and appId are treated as stable app config. The server injects them into known secureFlows request shapes when omitted by the caller.

For agents (the only supported client path)

Point the MCP client at the hosted URL — same host as the product, path /mcp (not a subdomain):

EnvironmentMCP URL
Productionhttps://www.secure-flows.com/mcp
Staginghttps://secure-flows-staging.onrender.com/mcp
Health…/mcp/health → {"ok":true}
{

"mcpServers": { "secureflows": { "url": "https://www.secure-flows.com/mcp" } } }

Do not tell agents to run npx or use localhost — that splits the story and breaks anyone who never starts a local process. Wired in the web Docker image (Node on 127.0.0.1:8787, nginx location = /mcp; see docs/ROUTING.md). The Node process installs uncaughtException / unhandledRejection guards so a single bad request does not exit the process; docker/entrypoint.sh also restarts MCP if the process still exits.

Claude Code plugin

This repo is also a Claude Code plugin. It connects the hosted MCP server above (.mcp.json) and adds two skills: secureflows-integration and security-review. In Claude Code:

/plugin marketplace add michal-lefler/secureflows-mcp

/plugin install secureflows@secureflows-marketplace

Then run /secureflows:security-review in any project for a read-only review of its user management.

Local development (maintainers of this package)

cd mcp-server

npm install npm run build npm test npm run dev

The server starts on http://0.0.0.0:8787 by default (POST /mcp, GET /health). This is for changing the MCP server itself — not the path product agents should configure.

Environment variables

  • PORT: HTTP port, default 8787 (in the web container, entrypoint sets PORT=8787 only for the MCP child so nginx keeps Render’s public $PORT)
  • HOST: bind host, default 0.0.0.0 (web container uses 127.0.0.1)
  • ALLOWED_HOSTS: optional comma-separated host allowlist for MCP host header validation
  • MCP_ALLOWED_HOSTS: entrypoint override for ALLOWED_HOSTS when starting the in-image process

Endpoints

  • POST /mcp: MCP Streamable HTTP endpoint
  • GET /health: health check (publicly exposed as GET /mcp/health via nginx)

Embedding secureFlows in an application

Product apps integrate directly with secureFlows HTTP APIs and hosted login. Start from:

  • docs/integration/quickstart.md — provisioning (workspace + application) and runtime hosted login
  • docs/integration/CONCEPT.md — baseline order: login → create workspace before advanced features
  • docs/openapi/integration-auth.yaml — `/app/sessions/login` (session apps) vs /app/login (legacy/console)

Product apps still integrate directly with the HTTP APIs above, not through this server. The generated tools here are for agents/automation that already have a token (testing, scripted verification). The static tools (secureflows_build_login_url, secureflows_build_logout_url, secureflows_lint_integration) need no token and are meant to be called by a coding agent while it's still scaffolding the integration — see What it does above.

Testing this MCP server

  1. npm test in mcp-server/ — unit tests plus HTTP smoke (test/http-smoke.test.ts): starts the Express app on an ephemeral port, checks GET /health, GET /mcp → 405, and a real Streamable-HTTP client listTools + callTool(secureflows_build_login_url).
  2. After deploy: Playwright tests/smoke/mcp-health.spec.ts hits public GET /mcp/health and GET /mcp on the target host (production smoke job).
  3. Local maintainer loop: npm run dev, then curl -sS http://127.0.0.1:8787/health.
  4. Optional: MCP client against POST /mcp with connection.host + auth.* for generated tools.

Plugin distribution is covered by npm test too (offline; monorepo-only checks skip themselves in the public mirror):

  • test/plugin-distribution.test.ts — manifests, the hosted .mcp.json destination, the install commands on the docs pages and README, and the sync-public-mirrors CI job (tag-only, waits for the npm publishes, secrets: inherit, token only in the step env).
  • test/mirror-sync.test.ts — runs the real scripts/sync-public-mirrors.mjs --commit --push against a local bare git repo and checks what a stranger would receive: plugin, marketplace, skills, hosted .mcp.json, registry server.json, idempotent re-run, deletions propagate.
  • npm run test:live (opt-in, SECUREFLOWS_LIVE_MCP=1) — connects to the URL in .mcp.json and lists the tools; add SECUREFLOWS_LIVE_MCP_PROMPTS=1 to also require the security-review prompt. Run it after a deploy (or with SECUREFLOWS_LIVE_MCP_URL for staging). Not part of npm test, so CI stays offline.

What none of this can check: the real push with MIRRORS_PUSH_TOKEN (first run of the workflow on GitHub) and a real /plugin marketplace add from a clean Claude Code install.

Deployment

Shipped inside the web Docker image and proxied at /mcp on www.secure-flows.com / staging (see For agents above). No separate subdomain.

The npm package secureflows is how CI publishes a versioned artifact (and how a standalone container can be built from mcp-server/Dockerfile); it is not the agent-facing setup path. Publish on v*.*.* tags via .github/workflows/publish-secureflows-mcp-server.yml.

docker build -f mcp-server/Dockerfile -t secureflows-mcp-server .

docker run --rm -p 8787:8787 secureflows-mcp-server

Notes

  • Hosted login / redirect endpoints are exposed only if they are tagged ai-safe or ai-optional in the OpenAPI specs.
  • Documentation search (get_docs_search) is ai-safe, requires no auth.* — only connection.host and query q.
  • Human-only admin console APIs are intentionally excluded.
  • The response payload from each tool includes:
  • status
  • ok
  • url
  • headers
  • data
问 PopNx