原型 · 预览版:收录官方注册中心里的全部服务器,每 30 分钟同步一次。评价和账户功能将在后续阶段推出。
PopNx MCP为使用 AI 的人准备的 MCP 服务器 · 用大白话讲清楚

Aurora Agent

作者:AURORA-NEURO版本 0.1.4i★ –i在你的电脑上运行
注册名称io.github.MurariAmbati/aurora-agent

安装

概览

作者提供的说明(英文原文)

FIBER decision-context compiler with honest omission accounting: 259 evidence-bearing MCP tools.

PopNx MCP 的三大支柱

这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。

它能帮你做什么

我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。

  • 连接方式: 在你的电脑上运行
  • 传输方式: stdio
  • 分类: 会计、财务与税务

安装

选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。

安装之前

  • 基础检查:1 项中通过 0 项
  • 在你的电脑上运行,拥有你的用户账户的权限(文件、网络、应用)。
  • 注册中心没有列出需要填写的密钥。

你需要

  • npm已安装 Node.js(用于 npx 命令)

你用的是哪个应用?

在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。

下载作者的 .mcpb 文件

链接指向作者自己的文件;我们不托管也不重新打包它。打开文件后,Claude Desktop 会进行安装。

在终端中运行这条命令

claude mcp add aurora-agent -- npx -y aurora-agent-mcp

在 Cursor 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "aurora-agent": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "aurora-agent-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

在 VS Code 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json

{
  "servers": {
    "aurora-agent": {
      "type": "stdio",
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "aurora-agent-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。

你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。

这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。

它能做什么

它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。

基础检查i

我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月7日

  • ! 注意

    作者与仓库一致

    发布者(MurariAmbati)不是仓库所有者(AURORA-NEURO);可能是其他人代为上架的

  • … 尚未检查

    仍在维护

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    有许可证

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • – 不适用

    端点有响应

    它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点

  • – 不适用

    使用 OAuth 登录

    在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置

  • … 尚未检查

    工具描述中没有隐藏指令

    它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表

与“会计、财务与税务”中的其他服务器比较i

  • 星标数多于此分类中其他 1734 个服务器的 0%
  • 发布到注册中心的时间比此分类中其他 1734 个服务器的 36% 更新
  • 基础检查结果等于或优于此分类中其他 1734 个服务器的 32%

与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。

常见问题

Aurora Agent 安全吗?

它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 0 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。

它需要哪些密钥或代码?

注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。

它在我的电脑上运行还是在云端?

它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。

它还在维护吗?

GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.1.4)于2个月前进入注册中心。

哪些应用可以使用它?

支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 MCPB, Node.js。

有什么可以替代它?

同一分类中有:Finance Toolkit, SolidInvoice, Korea Tax Calculator

替代选择

同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。

如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i

Finance Toolkit

作者:JerBouma

500+ transparent financial methods calculated from raw statements, not third-party endpoints.

电脑或云端★ 5,496MIT今天更新
安装

SolidInvoice

作者:SolidInvoice

Create and send invoices and quotes, manage clients, and track payments in SolidInvoice.

在云端运行★ 981MIT8天前更新
安装

Korea Tax Calculator

作者:UpstageAI

Korean tax calculation and tax-audit judgment MCP: 96 tools with statutory citations.

在你的电脑上运行★ 97MIT昨天更新
安装

作者的 README

打开 README

按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。

AURORA Agent (bioprism)

Query-compiled inference for executable biology.

Context engineering, with receipts.

An MCP server and CLI built on the FIBER decision-context compiler: a typed decision query is compiled into the smallest decision-sufficient evidence region, delivered with a Context Certificate stating exactly what was omitted.

The preclinical glioma engine now compiles a complete bounded research workflow, adapts its next stage from typed outcomes, and admits only capability-matched institution-local workers before dispatch. Worker routing is deterministic and fail-closed; the engine never turns an unimplemented stage into a generic action and never makes clinical decisions. The route can also drive the autonomous engine end to end through the typed stage/action adapter; MCP exposes this as a simulation-only rehearsal, while production hosts supply their own local workers. Evidence is an execution gate, not a passive report: P01 cross-family triangulation must qualify before the P07 stage router can admit a worker. The evidence-gated stage engine returns an explicit evidence hold or capability hold with next actions, and only then runs bounded evidence, multimodal, mechanism, experiment, computation, replication, release, and federation stages.

Implementation of the AURORA BioPRISM / OncoWorld / FIBER blueprint (v0.6, 935 registered spec modules). A Rust workspace whose central idea is that context assembly is a compiler pass: instead of retrieval plus summarisation plus vibes-based compaction, a typed decision query is compiled into the smallest decision-sufficient evidence region, delivered as a Decision Section, and accompanied by a Context Certificate that states exactly what was omitted and whether the omission could have changed the decision.

Compile the smallest decision-sufficient evidence region. Never traverse the whole knowledge

structure by default.

What the measurements actually say

The reference world ships 761 facts, 750 of them exploratory distractors that all consume the same protected cohort_id hub. FIBER compiles the query down to 11 facts (1.45% of the world) and the deterministic oracle still returns the correct verdict with all four leakage witnesses.

It is not alone in doing so. Under equal tuning, a 5-hop incidence walk and a BM25 retriever at k=11 select *exactly the same eleven facts*. The distribution's own compare_baselines.py measures the graph baseline only at depth 7 and unbounded — the two settings where it returns everything — and reports a 69× advantage that vanishes under equal tuning. That is a strawman comparison, and correcting it is what 43.38 and 43.41 require.

So the reference world cannot tell these methods apart. crates/worldgen makes the structure a parameter and builds one that can — distractors attached near the target instead of at a hub leaf, decisive facts behind a relay chain, and distractor tags camouflaged to tokenise into the protected vocabulary:

StrategyFactsSound?ClosureAdmissible
full-context762yes100%yes
graph-5-hop750no0%no
graph-7-hop750no0%no
graph-11-hop761yes100%yes
lexical-top-11 (BM25)11yes91%no
fiber11yes100%yes

Three distinct failure modes appear. The graph walk has no usable depth: 5–10 pull in 98% of the world *and still miss every decisive witness*; 11 is the first sound setting and by then it has taken everything. BM25 reaches the *right verdict* from a 91% protected closure — right by luck, having dropped a protected fact that happened not to matter, and raising k to 50 never recovers it. FIBER is the only admissible strategy: right verdict and full closure, at 11 facts.

That last failure is why the harness ranks on admissibility rather than verdict alone — ranking on verdict would have crowned the strategy that violated the mandatory closure and got away with it.

This does not show FIBER wins generally: the discriminating world was built to expose these modes, just as the reference world was built to expose hub expansion. The full structural family sweep has now been run — 36 cells over attachment x relay depth x tag style x distractor count — and the two formerly missing baselines are in the panel. The sweep's headline is a negative result for FIBER: a plain backward walk over the *directed* factor edges, closure first, is admissible in all 36 cells at exactly FIBER's fact count, so on this family admissibility and cost cannot distinguish the compiler from that walk; the fixed-basis embedding retriever, by contrast, fails every camouflaged cell at the tight budget. Full analysis: docs/FINDINGS.md. How much of the blueprint the workspace actually covers, and which sections have nothing standing in for them: docs/COVERAGE.md. The crate layout and the blueprint path: docs/ARCHITECTURE.md.

The Rust glioma research engine tracks executable capabilities in docs/glioma/PROGRAM_PLAN.md. P10 F32 adds longitudinal replication transport through analyze_glioma_longitudinal_transport and the MCP tool glioma_longitudinal_transport_analyze: studies must bind the same estimand and effect unit and cover one shared time grid, with incomplete studies excluded rather than imputed. Different model systems incur the maximum transport gap and are included only when the request explicitly allows that maximum; signature similarity weights admitted sources. Effects are bounded to ±1,000,000,000 milli-units before fixed-point pooling. Its gate and threshold policy is explicitly repository-defined because this checkout has no configured detailed source blueprint for that slot.

P10 F03 plans prospective resolvers for conflicting preclinical claims through analyze_glioma_prospective_contradiction and MCP glioma_prospective_contradiction_plan. Rival statements, evidence reports, design reports, and local artifacts remain digest-bound. Evidence is counted by independent group, shared support across rivals cannot establish exclusive support, and low-quality, null, and unresolved findings remain visible. Resolver prediction intervals must separate a rival pair and pass feasibility, risk, and budget gates. A plan_ready result means the bounded portfolio covers all declared rival pairs; it does not mean an experiment ran or a claim was resolved. Its contract is repository-defined because this checkout has no detailed P10-F03 blueprint configured.

P10 F02 compares independent study effects through analyze_glioma_multistudy_concordance and MCP glioma_multistudy_concordance_analyze. It binds an exact estimand and unit, reports every eligible same-model pair by interval overlap and confident direction, and keeps cross-model pairs incomparable. It retains null, unresolved, and low-quality studies without imputation or pooling. The contract is repository-defined because this checkout has no configured detailed P10-F02 blueprint.

P10 F04 audits registered-outcome reporting through audit_glioma_registered_outcome_reporting and MCP glioma_registered_outcome_reporting_audit. It compares local registry protocols with reviewed result-report metadata, marks overdue missing primary outcomes, and separates incomplete, ambiguous, unregistered, and not-yet-due outcomes. It accepts no effect values and treats reporting differences as review signals rather than proof of publication bias or misconduct. Its contract is repository-defined because this checkout has no detailed P10-F04 blueprint.

P10 F05 adds build_glioma_registered_outcome_record and MCP glioma_registered_outcome_record_build for a single digest-bound study outcome. P10 F06 adds build_glioma_registered_outcome_evidence_panel and MCP glioma_registered_outcome_evidence_panel to combine compatible records across independent studies without pooling effects. The companion glioma_registered_outcome_sensitivity_analyze route evaluates caller-declared missing-result ranges as separate scenarios. These contracts are repository-defined because this checkout has no detailed P10-F05/F06 blueprints.

Autonomous agent process boundary

The Rust runtime also exposes an opt-in Docker-backed command boundary for callers that need an explicit Linux process boundary. It is not connected to agent tool dispatch or the trial provider; its limits and integration boundary are documented in docs/OCI_SANDBOX.md.

The Python SDK includes a secret-safe operator entry point for the autonomous brain:

cd python

python -m prism_sdk catalogue python -m prism_sdk evidence-plan --domain science python -m prism_sdk provider-status --provider openai

For keyless local development, the same boundary supports an explicit credentialless fixture: python -m prism_sdk provider-status --provider local and run --provider local --model local-model use the runtime's bounded in-memory transport; no key or network provider is contacted. For actual local-model inference without an OpenAI key, use the first-class Ollama preset: python -m prism_sdk provider-status --provider ollama (default endpoint http://127.0.0.1:11434/v1), then run with --provider ollama --model and --approve-provider-call. The Ollama path is explicit, credentialless, OpenAI-compatible, and loopback-by-default; it fails closed when the local server is unavailable rather than falling back to a synthetic response. For a grounded research pass, LocalNeurosurgicalAgent.grounded_real_data_research() / grounded_public_literature_research() (Python) or groundedRealDataResearch() / groundedPublicLiteratureResearch() (TypeScript) composes a bounded real-data or six-specialty PubMed context, an explicitly approved credentialless local-model call, and the matching authoritative draft-claim audit. It accepts Ollama or another caller-registered local provider, returns context/bundle digests and structured claims, and remains grounded_for_human_review; a provider outage fails closed and never produces synthetic evidence. Before the authoritative draft audit, the bridge requires every model citation to be present in the exact bounded context it received; unseen-but-valid snapshot records are rejected rather than treated as grounded. Set tool_loop=True (Python) or toolLoop: true (TypeScript) to expose bounded, read-only, credentialless snapshot tools to the local model: row search, a ClinicalTrials.gov trial-landscape view (neurosurgery_real_data_trial_landscape_view), and a cBioPortal/GDC molecular-coverage view (neurosurgery_real_data_molecular_coverage_view). Calls are capped by explicit turn and call budgets, recorded as a sanitized tool_trace, and their returned citation identities are added to the closure check; the final audit widens only to the same source facets, never to a network or patient-data tool. The trial and molecular views, plus the comparative neurosurgery_real_data_cohort_landscape_view, return descriptive aggregates plus exact rows for citation, not eligibility, efficacy, safety, treatment, or patient inference. A third review-queue view (neurosurgery_real_data_review_queue_view) exposes only explicit missing-link, abstract, date, or sample-cou

只显示了开头部分;其余内容请在仓库中阅读

问 PopNx