Context7
Up-to-date docs for AI agents
作者提供的说明(英文原文)
Local hybrid-search memory for AI agents over plain Markdown. Multi-tenant, offline, no LLM.
这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。
我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。
选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。
COGVAULT_MODEL, COGVAULT_LOG你需要
你用的是哪个应用?
在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。
打开 Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config,把下面的内容粘贴到 claude_desktop_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"cogvault": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"cogvault",
"mcp",
"--tenant",
"your-value"
],
"env": {
"COGVAULT_MODEL": "your-value",
"COGVAULT_LOG": "your-value"
}
}
}
}在终端中运行这条命令
claude mcp add cogvault --env COGVAULT_MODEL=your-value --env COGVAULT_LOG=your-value -- uvx cogvault mcp --tenant your-value运行前请先填写空着的值。
这个服务器需要在启动命令中填入值,请复制设置后自行填写。
粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"cogvault": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"cogvault",
"mcp",
"--tenant",
"your-value"
],
"env": {
"COGVAULT_MODEL": "your-value",
"COGVAULT_LOG": "your-value"
}
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
这个服务器需要在启动命令中填入值,请复制设置后自行填写。
粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json
{
"servers": {
"cogvault": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"cogvault",
"mcp",
"--tenant",
"your-value"
],
"env": {
"COGVAULT_MODEL": "your-value",
"COGVAULT_LOG": "your-value"
}
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。
你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。
COGVAULT_MODEL envCOGVAULT_LOG env这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。
它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。
我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月8日
注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 NBibikov 验证,该账户拥有此仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点
在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置
它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表
与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。
它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。
注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。
它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。
GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.12.2)于24天前进入注册中心。
支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Python (uv)。
同一分类中有:Context7, Codebase Memory, Exa
同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。
如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i
Up-to-date docs for AI agents
Codebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.
Connect AI agents to Exa for web search, content fetching, and multi-step research.
按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。
[Get started](#get-started-in-30-seconds) · [Why](#why) · [Compared](#compared-to) · [How it works](#how-it-works) · [Benchmark](#benchmark) · [Install](#install) · [Quickstart](#quickstart) · [MCP](#as-an-mcp-server-claude-code-cursor-any-mcp-client) · [Fleets](#multi-tenant-fleets)
Claude Code plugin — MCP server plus a skill that tells the agent when to recall and when to record:
/plugin install cogvault --marketplace NBibikov/cogvault
Claude Code before 2.1.275: /plugin marketplace add NBibikov/cogvault, then /plugin install cogvault@cogvault.
Memory lives in ~/.cogvault/memory (set COGVAULT_TENANT to change it). The plugin adds /cogvault:remember.
Any MCP client, one line (needs uv):
claude mcp add cogvault -- uvx cogvault mcp --tenant ~/agent/memory
Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline — JSON config
Add to claude_desktop_config.json, ~/.cursor/mcp.json, or your client's MCP config:
{
"mcpServers": { "cogvault": { "command": "uvx", "args": ["cogvault", "mcp", "--tenant", "~/agent/memory"] } } }
Already have Markdown memory? Point the tenant at it — nothing to import. Claude Code's auto-memory works as-is (frontmatter type, [[links]] and all):
M=~/.claude/projects/<project>/memory
uvx cogvault index --tenant $M --ignore MEMORY.md # first pass embeds, later passes are incremental uvx cogvault search --tenant $M "how do we deploy"
The MCP server indexes on start by itself; the CLI search reads the existing index. --ignore MEMORY.md keeps the index file from competing with the cards it points to.
Unedited answers from a real session (Sonnet, plugin installed, a demo memory of six cards); only the waiting time is cut.
Most "AI agent memory" tools want to be an autonomous LLM daemon that summarizes your work into an opaque database or a graph you can't read. For a fleet of coding agents that just need to *reliably recall a decision, a bug fix, or an infra detail*, that's the wrong trade.
cogvault makes the opposite bet:
git diff them. The SQLite index is a derived cache — delete it and it rebuilds from the files.Checked against each project's README and docs on 2026-10-05.
| cogvault | basic-memory | mem0 | Graphiti | Letta Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source of truth | Markdown files | Markdown files | Vector DB (Qdrant / pgvector) | Graph DB (Neo4j, FalkorDB, …) | Markdown in a git repo per agent |
| LLM needed to store or recall | No | No (optional reranker) | Yes by default (add() extracts facts) | Yes to ingest | Yes — the agent edits its memory |
| Retrieval | Vector + BM25, RRF, decay, MMR | Full-text + vector, optional rerank | Semantic + BM25 + entities | Semantic + BM25 + graph | File search; hybrid optional |
| Infra | One process, SQLite file | One process, SQLite (Postgres optional) | Library, or Docker + Postgres server | A graph database | Letta backend |
Pick something else when: you want an LLM to distil and merge facts for you (mem0), relationships between entities are the point (Graphiti), you want the agent to manage its own memory (Letta), or you want a richer notes app around the same Markdown idea, with Obsidian sync and a hosted option (basic-memory — the closest to cogvault).
Pick cogvault when: you run several agents and want each one's memory isolated in its own directory behind one process; you want recall to be deterministic and offline; and you want to *measure* it — cogvault eval scores recall on your agents' real queries and cogvault analyze lists what they tried to recall and couldn't.
Hybrid retrieval fuses semantic (vector) and keyword (BM25/FTS5) ranking with Reciprocal Rank Fusion, then applies optional temporal decay (recent memory outranks stale) and MMR (diverse top results, not five near-duplicates). Each card contributes only its best chunk, so one long file can't fill the whole result list.
Measured on real recall traffic, not synthetic questions: 66 queries sampled from the query logs of 6 live agent tenants (58% Ukrainian, the rest English), each judged against the actual cards — including answers that no configuration returned. One query has no answer in memory and counts as a gap, so 65 are scored. Every configuration was re-indexed from scratch on copies of the same tenants with cogvault 0.11.0.
| Configuration | hit@1 | hit@5 | MRR@10 |
|---|---|---|---|
multilingual-e5-small, chunk_chars = 700, summary chunk | 0.57 | 0.91 | 0.70 |
multilingual-e5-small, chunk_chars = 700, no summary chunk | 0.55 | 0.86 | 0.69 |
paraphrase-multilingual-MiniLM-L12-v2 (built-in default) | 0.54 | 0.80 | 0.66 |
bge-small-en-v1.5 (English-only) | 0.57 | 0.77 | 0.65 |
What the numbers do and don't say:
assets/benchmark.json; the queries are private and stay in each tenant.A cross-encoder reads the query and each candidate card together, so it can tell which card answers the question, not only which one is about the same topic. With rerank = "BAAI/bge-reranker-v2-m3-int8", cogvault scores the hybrid top 10 by the first 800 characters of each card file and reorders them. On the same 65 queries (cogvault 0.12.0, e5-small + summary chunk):
| hit@1 | hit@5 | MRR@10 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| hybrid only | 0.60 | 0.88 | 0.70 |
| hybrid + reranker | 0.80 | 0.91 | 0.85 |
The reranker made 17 queries better and 3 worse. The 95% bootstrap interval of the hit@1 gain is +0.09 to +0.34. The cost is ~2 GB RAM and 1–2 s per recall on an Apple M-series CPU, so it runs only in the shared daemon and in cogvault eval (--no-rerank scores without it).
Run the same check on your own memory: put judged queries in /.cogvault-golden.jsonl ({"query": "...", "relevant": ["file.md"]}, empty relevant = a known gap) and run cogvault eval --tenant DIR.
Agent memory is often not English-only. The default is multilingual so nothing is *broken* out of the box — but pick the model that matches your fleet's language mix (set COGVAULT_MODEL, or Config(model=...)). Switching models auto-rebuilds the index.
Model (COGVAULT_MODEL) | Dim | Size | Real-query hit@5* | Cyrillic / multilingual | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
paraphrase-multilingual-MiniLM-L12-v2 (default) | 384 | 0.22 GB | 0.80 | ✅ works | Mixed-language fleets; safe default |
BAAI/bge-small-en-v1.5 | 384 | 0.13 GB | 0.77 | ❌ Cyrillic vectors break | English-only memory |
intfloat/multilingual-e5-small | 384 | 0.47 GB | 0.91 | ✅ best per GB (512-token window) | Mixed-language fleets; use chunk_chars = 700 |
intfloat/multilingual-e5-large | 1024 | 2.24 GB | not measured | ✅ best | Max quality, RAM to spare |
*From the benchmark above: 65 real queries over mixed EN/UK memory, cogvault 0.11.0. On English-only memory bge-small-en is a fine choice; on Ukrainian content it returns a negative relevance margin (a distractor outranks the answer), so it is unsafe for non-English memory. Run cogvault eval on your own vault to decide.
COGVAULT_MODEL=BAAI/bge-small-en-v1.5 cogvault index --tenant ~/agent/memory
Pin the model per tenant so it travels with the data instead of relying on every command exporting COGVAULT_MODEL (forget it once and a model mismatch silently re-embeds the whole index). Drop
只显示了开头部分;其余内容请在仓库中阅读