Korean Law MCP
Korean law: statutes, precedents, ordinances, treaties and citation verification (법제처 API).
作者提供的说明(英文原文)
MCP compliance proxy between agent and tools: deterministic governance, fail-closed, audit trail.
我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。
选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。
通过 2/2 项检查 · 在你的电脑上运行
第一步:你用哪个 AI?
选择你用的应用,步骤会显示在下方。
可连接 Claude,但需要先准备
需要先在电脑上安装 Node.js(只需一次) · 仅限电脑上的 Claude 应用(Windows 或 Mac),网页和手机不可用
SettingsDeveloperEdit Config
{
"mcpServers": {
"kcp-harness": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"kcp-harness",
"serve"
]
}
}
}用 kcp-harness — KCP compliance proxy 告诉我你能帮我做什么,然后做一件给我看✓ 如果 Claude 说正在使用 kcp-harness — KCP compliance proxy,或回答中出现 kcp-harness — KCP compliance proxy 的工具名称,就表示连接成功
菜单名称已于 2026年11月11日 对照 Anthropic 帮助页面核实 · 你的界面可能因版本略有不同
ChatGPT 暂时无法连接 kcp-harness — KCP compliance proxy
kcp-harness — KCP compliance proxy 需要安装在你的电脑上,而 ChatGPT 只能连接在网上运行的服务器
A · 使用能连接 kcp-harness — KCP compliance proxy 的应用
B · 法律与政府数据 类中能连接 ChatGPT 的其他服务器
从同类中使用较多的里挑选,仅限用地址即可连接、无需密钥的
可连接 Claude Code,但需要先准备
需要先在电脑上安装 Node.js(只需一次)
Mac:按 Command+空格,输入 Terminal · Windows:打开 PowerShell
claude mcp add kcp-harness -- npx -y kcp-harness serve应能看到 kcp-harness — KCP compliance proxy 在列表中并显示已连接
用 kcp-harness — KCP compliance proxy 告诉我你能帮我做什么,然后做一件给我看✓ 如果 Claude Code 说正在使用 kcp-harness — KCP compliance proxy,或回答中出现 kcp-harness — KCP compliance proxy 的工具名称,就表示连接成功
菜单名称已于 2026年11月11日 对照 Anthropic 帮助页面核实 · 你的界面可能因版本略有不同
可连接 Cursor,但需要先准备
需要先在电脑上安装 Node.js(只需一次)
用 kcp-harness — KCP compliance proxy 告诉我你能帮我做什么,然后做一件给我看✓ 如果 Cursor 说正在使用 kcp-harness — KCP compliance proxy,或回答中出现 kcp-harness — KCP compliance proxy 的工具名称,就表示连接成功
菜单名称已于 2026年11月11日 对照 Cursor 帮助页面核实 · 你的界面可能因版本略有不同
可连接 VS Code,但需要先准备
需要先在电脑上安装 Node.js(只需一次)
用 kcp-harness — KCP compliance proxy 告诉我你能帮我做什么,然后做一件给我看✓ 如果 VS Code 说正在使用 kcp-harness — KCP compliance proxy,或回答中出现 kcp-harness — KCP compliance proxy 的工具名称,就表示连接成功
菜单名称已于 2026年11月11日 对照 VS Code 帮助页面核实 · 你的界面可能因版本略有不同
Claude Code
claude mcp add kcp-harness -- npx -y kcp-harness serveClaude Desktop (claude_desktop_config.json)
{
"mcpServers": {
"kcp-harness": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"kcp-harness",
"serve"
]
}
}
}Cursor (~/.cursor/mcp.json)
{
"mcpServers": {
"kcp-harness": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"kcp-harness",
"serve"
]
}
}
}VS Code (mcp.json)
{
"servers": {
"kcp-harness": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"kcp-harness",
"serve"
]
}
}
}这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。
依据这个服务器的连接方式和各应用自己的文档,检查于 2026年11月10日。
在你的电脑上运行,适用于
ClaudeGooseLM StudioMsty StudioCherry StudioCursorVS Code + GitHub CopilotVisual StudioWindsurf (Devin Desktop)ZedKiroClineContinueJetBrains AI AssistantClaude CodeCodex CLIGemini CLIOpenCodenodecodeWarpLibreChatRaycast
它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。
我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月12日
注册名称已通过域名 cantara.no 验证(注册中心会核实域名所有权)
代码最后更新于35天前
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点
在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置
它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表
提问、分享技巧或报告无法使用。按“有帮助”数量排序。
还没有评价
与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。
它在 2 项适用的基础检查中通过了 2 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。
注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。
它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。
GitHub 仓库最后更新于35天前,最新版本(0.4.1)于4个月前进入注册中心。
支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Node.js。
同一分类中有:Korean Law MCP, Global law, Tw Legal Rag
同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。
如何看卡片:↓ 每周下载量i★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i
Korean law: statutes, precedents, ordinances, treaties and citation verification (법제처 API).
The law of nearly every country on earth, any date: read it, see what changed it, check citations.
Taiwan law MCP server: 22M court judgments, statutes, agency rulings, with citation checks
按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。
Deterministic knowledge governance for any AI agent.
*Your agent can read every file in your project. Can it prove why it read what it read?*
KCP Harness is an MCP compliance proxy that sits between an AI coding agent and its tools. It intercepts knowledge-related calls, routes them through the kcp-agent deterministic planner (14-gate cascade, no LLM), and produces compliance artifacts — decision traces, audit logs, budget ledgers — as a side effect of normal agent operation.
The agent can't bypass governance because it only talks to the proxy's MCP interface. The proxy decides what knowledge is accessible, tracks spend, and logs every decision. Fail-closed: if the harness can't verify a request, the agent gets nothing.
Agent (Claude Code / Cursor / Copilot / Windsurf / Cline / Crush / OpenClaw / ...)
│ │ MCP tool call v ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ kcp-harness │ │ │ │ classify → govern (14 gates) → execute → audit │ │ │ │ Side outputs: │ │ · Decision traces (per-request, deterministic) │ │ · Audit log (append-only JSONL) │ │ · Budget ledger (itemized, ceiling-enforced) │ │ · Temporal drift (plan validity over time) │ │ · Approval tickets (named-human sign-off, durable) │ │ · Confidence verdicts (post-synthesis gate) │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ v Knowledge manifests (knowledge.yaml)
[Documentation →](https://cantara.github.io/kcp-harness/)
Enterprises need agents that are *defensible* — auditable, reproducible, budget-controlled, temporally pinned. Today's agents can't prove why they read what they read. The harness adds a compliance layer without replacing the agent.
| What you keep | What the harness adds |
|---|---|
| Your agent (Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, ...) | Deterministic knowledge selection |
| Your workflow (coding, reviewing, shipping) | Decision traces (14 gates per unit) |
| Your tools (MCP servers, shell, browser) | Budget enforcement (ceiling, per-currency) |
| Temporal governance (drift detection) | |
| Append-only audit log | |
| Replay / cross-examination | |
| Human-approval gates (named reviewer + policy citation) | |
| Confidence gating (post-synthesis, route-to-human) |
You sell the compliance layer. The agents are pluggable.
npm install -g kcp-harness
Or use without installing:
npx kcp-harness --help
Pre-built binaries (no Node/Deno required) for Linux x64/arm64, macOS x64/arm64, and Windows x64 — grab them from a release. To build one yourself:
npm ci && npm run build
deno compile --allow-read --allow-env --allow-net --allow-run \ --node-modules-dir=auto --output kcp-harness dist/cli.js
kcp-harness init # creates harness.yaml
kcp-harness integrate claude-code # or: pi, cursor, copilot, windsurf, cline, continue, crush, openclaw
Your agent now routes knowledge access through the harness. Every decision is logged.
| Agent | Config | Integration |
|---|---|---|
| Claude Code | .mcp.json + PreToolUse hooks | kcp-harness integrate claude-code |
| Cursor | .cursor/mcp.json + .mdc rules | kcp-harness integrate cursor |
| GitHub Copilot | .vscode/mcp.json (uses "servers" key) | kcp-harness integrate copilot |
| Windsurf | global config + .windsurfrules | kcp-harness integrate windsurf |
| Cline | MCP settings + .clinerules | kcp-harness integrate cline |
| Continue | .continue/mcpServers/*.yaml | kcp-harness integrate continue |
| Crush | crush.json + PrepareStep | kcp-harness integrate crush |
| OpenClaw | openclaw.json + plugin hooks | kcp-harness integrate openclaw |
| Pi | .pi/mcp.json + project skills | kcp-harness integrate pi |
Each agent has its own MCP config format, rules file, and quirks. The integrate command handles them all — one governance layer, any agent.
Every tool call flows through a five-stage pipeline:
1. RECEIVE MCP JSON-RPC request from agent
The classifier examines each tool call and determines whether it targets governed knowledge. Read("docs/api.md") where docs/ is governed? Route through the planner. Read("package.json") where package.json isn't governed? Pass through. KCP tools (kcp_plan, kcp_load) are always governed.
Two automated modes, plus a human gate that outranks both:
kcp_plan first. The harness caches the approved plan. Subsequent reads are checked against the cached plan — no re-planning.kcp_plan.governance.approvals rule are held for a named reviewer (pending), no matter what the automated paths would decide. Tickets survive restarts and resolve via the kcp-harness approvals CLI (or any custom ApprovalProvider channel). Resolutions require a named reviewer *and* a policy citation.Every knowledge unit is evaluated through 14 deterministic gates, in order:
audience → not_for → temporal → deprecated → supersession → relevance →
skill_eligibility → attestation → payment → access → strict → max_units → money_budget → context_budget
A unit must pass all gates. The gate that blocks it is recorded in the decision trace. Same inputs → same plan. No model involved.
For the skill_eligibility gate's subject matter — governed kind: skill units — the authoring conventions, linter, and conformance vectors live in Cantara/kcp-skill.
Once connected, agents can use these governance tools:
| Tool | Description |
|---|---|
kcp_plan | Deterministic load plan — which units, in what order, which skipped and why |
kcp_load | Plan + load eligible unit content |
kcp_trace | Full 14-gate decision trace |
kcp_validate | Lint a knowledge.yaml |
harness_status | Current governance state |
harness_session | Approved plans + known units for this session |
harness_budget | Itemized spend tracking |
harness_temporal_check | Plan drift detection |
harness_approvals | Human-approval tickets (pending / approved / dismissed / expired) |
harness_assess | Confidence-gate a synthesized answer before acting on it |
Append-only JSONL. Every decision — governed or pass-through — is logged with sequence number, timestamp, tool, targets, and governance decision:
cat .kcp-harness/audit.jsonl | jq 'select(.governed == true)'
Append-only itemized spend tracking. Per-currency running totals. Ceiling enforcement — a load that would exceed the budget is rejected atomically (no partial loads).
Plans are registered with a temporal watcher. On subsequent calls, the watcher re-evaluates against the current time. If units have drifted (expired, newly valid), the harness emits a drift event. Long-running sessions stay honest.
Calls matching an approval rule open a durable ticket (pending_review → approved | dismissed | expired, plus used for a consumed one-shot grant). The ticket store survives restarts — sessions are ephemeral, human review is not. Every resolution records *who* approved, *when*, and *which policy* it satisfies — evidence generated at approval time, never reconstructed from logs.
An approval is a bounded grant, never a standing permission. It covers the session that opened the ticket, the exact tool and target, and the call's arguments digest — and it lapses. Each rule sets grant: once | session | (default session), always capped by governance.approvals.grant_max (default 24h). A call outside a valid grant is denied, audited as grant_denied (expired, wrong_session, used, ...) and opens a *new* ticket. A standing permission is a policy rule, not a click. A grant's window is measured from the store's own clock, not the reviewer-supplied reviewedAt; the first valid resolution of a ticket wins (a dismissed ticket cannot be re-approved by an appended line); with approvals.require_signed_resolutions signatures are verified on every read, not only in resolve(); and approvals.require_args_binding refuses grants from tickets not bound to the call's arguments. What the ticket store does *not* protect — write access to its directory — is stated in the Ticket store trust model. See Governance Model.
harness_assess runs kcp-agent's post-synthesis assess() over a synthesized answer before it may be acted on. The planner gates *loading*, grounding gates *asserting*, this gates *acting*. Below-threshold verdicts on routed configs open an approval ticket with the full verdict embedded as evidence.
# harness.yaml
version: "1.0"
governance: domains:
policy: fail_closed: true audit_all: true max_units: 5 budget: amount: 1.00 currency: USDC
confidence: # optional post-synthesis gate (harness_assess) threshold: 0.7 severity: critical route_to_role: account-owner
approvals: # optional human-approval gates provider: file rules:
require_args_binding: true # refuse grants not bound to the call's arguments (recommended)
audit: path: ".kcp-harness/audit.jsonl"
kcp-harness serve [--config harness.yaml] Start the MCP proxy
kcp-harness init Create a harness.yaml template kcp-harness check [--config harness.yaml] Validate configuration kcp-harness integrate [options] Generate agent integration files kcp-harness integrate --list List supported agents kcp-harness export [options] Export compliance evidence (SOC 2 / ISO 27001) kcp-harness dashboard [options] Launch the live compliance dashboard kcp-harness approvals list [--state s] List human-approval tickets kcp-harness approvals approve --reviewer --policy-ref kcp-harness approvals dismiss --reviewer -