Context7
Up-to-date docs for AI agents
作者提供的说明(英文原文)
Two-layer memory for AI agents with an immune system. Zero dependencies.
这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。
我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。
选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。
你需要
你用的是哪个应用?
在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。
打开 Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config,把下面的内容粘贴到 claude_desktop_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"anneal-memory": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"anneal-memory"
]
}
}
}在终端中运行这条命令
claude mcp add anneal-memory -- uvx anneal-memory粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"anneal-memory": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"anneal-memory"
]
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json
{
"servers": {
"anneal-memory": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"anneal-memory"
]
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。
你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。
这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。
它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。
我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月7日
注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 phillipclapham 验证,该账户拥有此仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点
在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置
它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表
与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。
它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。
注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。
它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。
GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.1.1)于7个月前进入注册中心。
支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Python (uv)。
同一分类中有:Context7, Codebase Memory, Exa
同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。
如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i
Up-to-date docs for AI agents
Codebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.
Connect AI agents to Exa for web search, content fetching, and multi-step research.
按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。
Living memory for AI agents. Episodes compress into identity.
Memory without grounding is amplification infrastructure.
Persistent user memory profiles increase agent sycophancy 16–45% across models (Gemini 2.5 Pro at 45%, others lower). Production deployments accumulate 97.8% junk entries within weeks. Clinical research documents memory scaffolding delusions across sessions00396-7). The failure mode here isn't memory. It's memory with nothing checking what gets kept.
anneal-memory puts a check between what an agent writes down and what it comes to believe. That idea isn't rare any more. MemTxn refuses a fact update whose values don't appear in the source it cites, and Agent Zero Memory answers only from evidence its reader actually opened.
Here's what I think is actually distinct, going by the 2026 systems I've read. A pattern in anneal is an abstraction, not a copied fact, and it has to earn its rank: it moves up a level (1x → 2x → 3x, up to a 9-digit level) only when it cites real episodes its explanation is grounded in, and a failed citation drops it a level (or holds it there for a while, marked carried-forward, if it was grounded recently). The consolidator can't quietly gut the memory it rewrites, either. On a store that declares an identity layer, a save that collapses those sections is refused, and consolidators wearing down their own memory is a documented failure. Then there's the assembly. An episodic evidence store, a bounded always-loaded continuity file, a long-term pattern tier recalled on cue, prospective tasks, a single-writer consolidation gate and a hash-chained audit log all ship in one package, with zero dependencies and no embeddings. None of those pieces is unique on its own. The combination is, as far as I've found.
The citation checks are narrow and structural: cited IDs must exist, the explanation must share words with the episode it cites, fabricated citations demote (unless carryforward holds a recently grounded pattern), one episode cited too often raises a flag, and re-citing old episodes doesn't count. They are not a complete defense against memory drift. *Honest scope* below says what they catch and what they don't.
And it's memory you own and govern. A local store, zero dependencies, no vendor in the loop — you decide what graduates into long-term memory, every change is recorded in a tamper-evident chain (best-effort on the write side — see *Hash-chained audit trail* for what verify can and cannot see), and the consolidation step that rewrites an agent's identity is gated to a human, not run unbidden (the *Single-consolidator gate* below). Own the substrate; govern what enters it.
An append-only episodic log, consolidated by a single writer into a versioned identity the agent always loads, with an immune system that decides what is allowed to graduate, and a long-term pattern tier recalled on cue. Plus prospective spores (what the agent intends to do next). That's Complementary Learning Systems: a fast episodic store and slow consolidation (see *The Memory Architecture* below). Earlier versions also built a Hebbian link graph and an affect weight. I measured them for months, they never changed what recall returned, and 1.0.2 stopped building them. Zero dependencies (Python stdlib only). Works with any agent framework.
pip install anneal-memory
anneal-memory runs on Windows. What to know:
grep -n "fcntl.flock" anneal_memory/*.py) include store.py's continuity lock, crystal.py's CrystalStore._transaction, spores.py's SporeStore._transaction, and audit.py's audit manifest and audit append locks. On Windows, concurrent writers to one store — whether separate processes or threads within one process — can race or lose updates, since there is no lock of any kind to serialize them there. A single writer (one process, one thread) is unaffected: the unique-tmp + atomic-replace write still prevents a torn file.flock locks follow the open file description, which a forked child inherits. Do not fork a process while an AuditTrail in it is in use; a child must open its own AuditTrail.chmod are skipped there, since Windows/NTFS doesn't restrict access the same way, as are the cross-process lock test (see the write-locking bullet above) and the missing-home-directory simulation that clears the whole environment (the no-home tests that patch Path.expanduser run everywhere).The library is the core product. Import it, use it in any framework or script.
from anneal_memory import Store, EpisodeType, prepare_wrap, validated_save_continuity
store = Store("./memory.db", project_name="MyAgent")
store.record("Connection pool is the real bottleneck", EpisodeType.OBSERVATION) store.record("Chose PostgreSQL as the database because ACID outweighs speed", EpisodeType.DECISION)
result = store.recall(episode_type=EpisodeType.DECISION, keyword="database") for ep in result.episodes: print(f"[{ep.type}] {ep.content}")
wrap = prepare_wrap(store) # fetches episodes, marks wrap in progress if wrap["status"] == "ready":
compressed = your_llm.compress(wrap["package"]) validated_save_continuity(store, compressed) # full immune system pipeline
store.close()
See Library Quickstart for the full guide.
Inspect, debug, and manage agent memory from the command line — a full operator CLI with machine-readable --json output. Agents with shell access (Claude Code, Aider, etc.) can use the CLI directly for the full memory workflow.
# Point the demo at its own store. Without --db or ANNEAL_MEMORY_DB every
export ANNEAL_MEMORY_DB=./demo.db
anneal-memory --project-name MyAgent init
anneal-memory record "Chose PostgreSQL as the database for ACID" --type decision anneal-memory search "database"
anneal-memory baton claim me
anneal-memory --project-name MyAgent prepare-wrap --session-id me # Get compression package
anneal-memory --project-name MyAgent save-continuity out.md \ --session-id me --wrap-token "$WRAP_TOKEN" # the 'Wrap token:' line
anneal-memory stats # Detailed analytics anneal-memory graph --format dot # Graph of links formed before 1.0.2 (Graphviz) anneal-memory diff --wraps 5 # Wrap metric progression anneal-memory audit --since 7d # Read audit trail anneal-memory audit-repair # Rebuild a quarantined audit manifest, or set aside a corrupt sealed week (--set-aside-unreadable: one that only fails to read) anneal-memory export --format json # Full store export
unset ANNEAL_MEMORY_DB
See examples/agent-instructions.lean.cli.example for the agent workflow snippet.
For MCP-capable agent harnesses — Claude Code, Codex and Gemini CLI.
The server is one command — anneal-memory --project-name MyProject serve — wired into the harness's MCP config. The serve subcommand starts the MCP server; --project-name (and optional --db) are global flags and come *before* serve. Each harness has its own config file and format:
Claude Code — mcpServers JSON (a project .mcp.json):
{
"mcpServers": { "anneal_memory": { "command": "uvx", "args": ["anneal-memory", "--project-name", "MyProject", "serve", "--session-id", "claude-code"] } } }
Codex — ~/.codex/config.toml (or a project .codex/config.toml):
[mcp_servers.anneal_memory]
command = "uvx" args = ["anneal-memory", "--project-name", "MyProject", "serve", "--session-id", "codex"]
Gemini CLI — ~/.gemini/settings.json (or a project .gemini/settings.json):
{
"mcpServers": { "anneal_memory": { "command": "uvx", "args": ["anneal-memory", "--project-name", "MyProject", "serve", "--session-id", "gemini"] } } }
Gemini CLI starts MCP servers only from a folder it trusts: in an untrusted folder gemini mcp list shows a server from the user-level settings as Disconnected and does not list one from a project .gemini/settings.json at all, even though the config is right (trust the folder, or set GEMINI_CLI_TRUST_WORKSPACE=true; measured with Gemini CLI 0.42.0, where the variable made the server show Connected).
Then add the agent-instructions snippet — agent-instructions.lean.example (the always-loaded baseline) or the .full.example reference — to the harness's instructions file (CLAUDE.md for Claude Code, AGENTS.md for Codex, GEMINI.md for Gemini CLI). It teaches the agent *when* and *how* to use the memory tools; without it the tools are available but the agent won't know the cognitive workflow. (See Claude Code / agent-harness adopters below for the lean/Skill/full layering.)
Consolidation is yours. Agents record episodes freely. Rewriting the agent's identity layer (the wrap) is the operator's act, so a new store consolidates only through a server whose --session-id you have claimed the baton for, once, from your own shell: uvx anneal-memory baton claim claude-code (or anneal-memory baton claim claude-code with a pip install). Until then the agent's wrap downgrades to capture-only, and both the downgrade and the status tool say how many episodes are waiting and the command for you to run. Set the id in the client's config as above, not in a shell profile (ANNEAL_MEMORY_SESSION_ID also works, but an exported one reaches every client launched from that shell). Every conversation started from one config shares its id, so after the claim each of that client's conversations may consolidate: the claim designates a client, not a single conversation. Move the baton between clients with baton claim NAME --take; see who h
只显示了开头部分;其余内容请在仓库中阅读