Spec Driven Development
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
作者提供的说明(英文原文)
Predicts the DDL a dbt change will execute, before you run it. Reads files, not the warehouse.
这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。
我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。
选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。
你需要
你用的是哪个应用?
在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。
打开 Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config,把下面的内容粘贴到 claude_desktop_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"dbt-plan": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"dbt-plan"
]
}
}
}在终端中运行这条命令
claude mcp add dbt-plan -- uvx dbt-plan粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"dbt-plan": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"dbt-plan"
]
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json
{
"servers": {
"dbt-plan": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"dbt-plan"
]
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。
你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。
这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。
它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。
我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月6日
注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 PresentJay 验证,该账户拥有此仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点
在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置
它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表
与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。
它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。
注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。
它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。
GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.18.6)于3天前进入注册中心。
支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Python (uv)。
同一分类中有:Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, Symantec Cloud DLP AIops
同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。
如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.
Governed Symantec Cloud DLP — 14 MCP tools, read-only with audit.
按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。
Static analysis tool that warns about risky DDL changes before dbt run.
Like terraform plan for dbt, and used the same way: you run it before the thing that changes your warehouse, not only in CI afterwards.
Analyzes compiled SQL files from warehouses including Snowflake, BigQuery, Redshift, Postgres and DuckDB through one code path. SQL dialect support varies; see analysis limits.
$ dbt-plan check
dbt-plan -- 4 model(s) changed dialect: snowflake (default; adapter: unknown) baseline: unknown revision, unknown snapshot time
Review required: DESTRUCTIVE (before policy; exit policy is separate) Next: Review the finding evidence and affected source files before running dbt. Next: Resolve the unreadable downstream SQL and recompile before rerunning check.
DESTRUCTIVE int_order_enriched (incremental, sync_all_columns) ADD COLUMN billing_method ADD COLUMN shipping_city DROP COLUMN billing_info DROP COLUMN shipping_info Downstream: dim_customers, fct_daily_sales (2 model(s))
> BROKEN_REF fct_daily_sales: reads dropped column(s): shipping_info
SAFE dim_customers (table) CREATE OR REPLACE TABLE
SAFE dim_publishers (table) CREATE OR REPLACE TABLE
SAFE fct_daily_sales (incremental, append_new_columns) ADD COLUMN total_sales
Causal explanations (before policy)
Observation: model.sample.int_order_enriched -> model.sample.dim_customers; unknown read check; not a column-flow edge; columns (not recorded); read_unresolved Explanation detail omitted: 0 associations; 0 graph edges not displayed. Full relevant graph and findings: JSON. External consumer coverage: unknown. Exposures are declared consumers only.
dbt-plan: 4 checked, 3 safe, 0 warning, 1 destructive, 1 cascade risk(s); overall review: DESTRUCTIVE (before policy)
dbt-plan analyzes compiled SQL diffs to catch dangerous schema changes at PR time:
* and lose it without their own file changing; and the tests whose fixtures pin it down. Names the exposures whose owners need tellingCAST types between revisionsSELECT * resolution**: reads the columns from the CTEs of the same statement, and follows a ref() into the referenced model's compiled SQLThe analysis reads files, compares them, and warns; it does not connect to a warehouse or simulate dbt run. The optional dbt-plan run workflow invokes your compile command, which can require credentials and execute macros.
The repository includes before/after compiled SQL and a manifest, so you can try the analysis without installing dbt or configuring warehouse credentials:
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/PresentJay/dbt-plan
cd dbt-plan python -m pip install dbt-plan bash examples/sample-project/run-example.sh
The sample prints text, GitHub markdown and JSON output. It intentionally contains a dropped column, so the inner check reports exit code 1 (destructive); the example script itself completes successfully. See the sample scenario for the expected finding.
python -m pip install dbt-plan
dbt-plan run # compile baseline → compile current → check
dbt-plan run does the whole thing in one command and needs whatever credentials your dbt compile normally needs. If your project already has compiled artifacts, use dbt-plan check directly; it only reads local files and does not connect to a warehouse.
Once you have a baseline, the inner loop is a single sub-second command. Edit a model or a macro, recompile, and see what dbt run would do — *before* running it:
dbt-plan snapshot # once, on the revision you are changing from
dbt compile && dbt-plan check
dbt-plan check reads local compiled artifacts. Its latency is separate from dbt compile, which can depend on your adapter, macros, and warehouse. See the reproducible CLI benchmark for measured workloads, raw samples, and commands to measure your machine.
An agent editing models cannot eyeball a diff and hesitate. Give it the check and the reasons behind it:
dbt-plan agent-setup # writes dbt-plan guidance into your AGENTS.md
dbt-plan check --format json
The guidance leads with what an agent most often gets wrong: adding a model to ignore_models, or downgrading on_schema_change from sync_all_columns to ignore, silences a real finding without making the change safe.
Or give it the check as an MCP tool:
pip install 'dbt-plan[mcp]'
dbt-plan-mcp # stdio MCP server exposing plan and snapshot
plan returns the verdict, the per-model operations, and — separately — a refusals list naming everything dbt-plan declined to judge. That separation is the point: a person reading "safe" may still glance at the diff, an agent reading it proceeds, so a non-empty refusals must never be collapsed into the verdict.
Both tools accept target_dir when dbt writes artifacts outside the default target/, for example plan(project_dir=".", target_dir="build").
The
只显示了开头部分;其余内容请在仓库中阅读