Spec Driven Development
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
作者提供的说明(英文原文)
Reverse-engineering evidence from a running Windows process, not the binary on disk.
这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。
我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。
选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。
你用的是哪个应用?
在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。
链接指向作者自己的文件;我们不托管也不重新打包它。打开文件后,Claude Desktop 会进行安装。
在终端中运行这条命令
浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。
你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。
这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。
它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。
我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月7日
注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 r0ptik 验证,该账户拥有此仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点
在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置
它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表
与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。
它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。
注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。
它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。
GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.1.1)于3个月前进入注册中心。
支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 MCPB。
同一分类中有:Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, Claude Checkpoint MCP
同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。
如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.
MCP server that checkpoints Claude Code session context to survive crashes and token limits
按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。
English · 繁體中文 · 简体中文 · 日本語 · 한국어
**An MCP server that gives AI agents evidence from a *running* process.**
Every reverse-engineering MCP server so far bridges a *static* analyzer — Ghidra, IDA, apktool. They hand your agent the file on disk. None of them can tell the agent what the program is actually doing right now: what got decrypted into that buffer, which address the vtable slot resolved to at runtime, which call site sent that packet.
Argus is the other half. It attaches to a live Windows process and returns runtime evidence: real bytes at real addresses, disassembly of the code that actually executed, resolved IAT thunks, caller chains walked from live memory, and a hypothesis ledger that tracks what has been proven versus what is still a guess.
It does not draw conclusions for the model. It returns addresses, module/RVA context, instructions, callers, callees, and local evidence, then gets out of the way.
Games die. The publisher shuts the servers down, the studio folds, the genre moves on. What survives is a client sitting on somebody's hard drive that can no longer connect to anything — no source, no protocol documentation, no server left to talk to. Just an executable that still remembers how to speak a language nobody is listening to anymore.
Argus was built to bring those back.
Reconstructing a server for a dead game means recovering its protocol: packet layouts, encryption, opcode dispatch, the state machine on the other side of the wire. The only surviving specification is the client binary itself. Nobody wrote the document you need, and the people who knew have long since moved on.
Static analysis gets you partway. But a twenty-year-old client is packed, its strings are encrypted, its handlers dispatch through tables that only exist once the process is up. So you run it, and you watch it work — which is where the next section comes in.
That is what this tool is for: not breaking into something alive, but getting something dead to speak again.
A CPU cannot execute ciphertext.
Whatever a program does to protect itself on disk — packing, string encryption, virtualized instructions, imports resolved at load time — all of it has to be undone before the processor can run the code. At the instant of execution, the real instructions and the real data are sitting in memory in the clear. They have to be. That is not a flaw in any particular protector; it is a consequence of how processors work, and no amount of obfuscation gets around it.
So the two approaches are reading different things:
When those two differ, the second one is the truth.
| Situation | Static analyzer | Argus |
|---|---|---|
| Packed / self-decrypting code | sees the packer | disassembles the unpacked bytes in memory |
| Indirect call through a vtable | sees call [rax+0x18] | resolves the slot to a concrete target |
| Import resolved at runtime | sees a thunk stub | resolves the thunk to the real API |
| Buffer contents after decryption | nothing | reads the plaintext |
| Which of 40 call sites actually fires | guesses | records the one that ran |
The trade runs the other way too, and it is worth being blunt about it: a static analyzer sees *every* path, including the ones that never execute. Argus only sees what actually ran. A branch that was never taken leaves no runtime evidence at all, and a function nobody called may as well not exist.
Neither view is complete on its own. That is what correlate_addr is for — map a runtime address back to a module and RVA, look it up in Ghidra or IDA, and work with both halves. Argus is built to sit alongside a static analyzer, not to replace one.
Process and memory processes_list · processes_find · mem_attach · mem_modules · memory_regions mem_read · mem_read_chain · mem_write
Scanning scan_bytes · scan_string · scan_regex · scan_pointers_to · scan_callers scan_x86_call_sites · value_scan_start · value_scan_refine · value_explain · real_rate
Disassembly and structure recovery disasm_at · analyze_function · find_vtable · extract_dispatch_tables analyze_send_call_sites · read_struct · diff_struct
Import and API resolution runtime_imports · runtime_exports · resolve_iat_thunks · resolve_api_targets
Tracing and correlation trace_call_chain · correlate_addr · locate
Evidence ledger record_hypothesis · verify_hypothesis · query_hypotheses · add_evidence
Attaching a 64-bit analyzer to a 32-bit (WOW64) target is a classic source of silently wrong pointer arithmetic and garbage PE parsing. Argus ships a thin front-end, argus-router, which inspects the target process, determines whether it is x86 or x64, and dispatches to the matching argus-rs build. You configure one binary; the correct engine is selected per target.
Agents are good at producing plausible explanations and bad at noticing when a plausible explanation is unsupported. record_hypothesis / verify_hypothesis / add_evidence force the distinction: a claim is stored as a hypothesis, and only becomes an established fact when evidence is attached and verification passes. query_hypotheses lets a later session pick up where the previous one stopped without re-deriving everything.
Download the latest release and unpack it anywhere:
[Releases](https://github.com/r0ptik/argus/releases)
The archive contains argus-router.exe plus both engine builds (argus-rs-x64.exe, argus-rs-x86.exe). Keep them in the same directory.
Requires a Rust toolchain with both Windows targets installed:
rustup target add x86_64-pc-windows-msvc i686-pc-windows-msvc
git clone https://github.com/r0ptik/argus cd argus cargo build --release --target x86_64-pc-windows-msvc cargo build --release --target i686-pc-windows-msvc
claude mcp add argus -- C:\path\to\argus-router.exe
{
"mcpServers": { "argus": { "command": "C:\\path\\to\\argus-router.exe" } } }
Argus is a reverse-engineering and program-analysis tool. It is built for work such as game and server preservation, network protocol analysis, interoperability and clean-room reimplementation, malware analysis, crash and corruption debugging, and security research.
It is explicitly not built for attacking live services. No cheat features are accepted into this repository — see CONTRIBUTING.md.
It requires the ability to open and read another process, so use it only against processes you own or are authorized to analyze. Attaching to software you do not have permission to analyze may violate that software's terms or your local law. That is your responsibility, not the tool's.
Windows only. The memory access layer (argus-winmem) is built on the Win32 process and memory APIs; there is no Linux or macOS backend today.
Both x86 and x64 targets are supported, including 32-bit processes running under WOW64.
| Crate | Role |
|---|---|
argus-router | front-end binary; architecture detection and dispatch |
argus-rs | MCP server; tool definitions and request handling |
argus-engine | analysis engine; disassembly, structure recovery, tracing |
argus-winmem | Win32 process and memory access |
argus-scan | pattern and value scanning primitives |
evidence-core | address, module, RVA and evidence data models |
MIT. See LICENSE.