原型 · 预览版:收录官方注册中心里的全部服务器,每 30 分钟同步一次。评价和账户功能将在后续阶段推出。
PopNx MCP为使用 AI 的人准备的 MCP 服务器 · 用大白话讲清楚

Cap Shield

作者:robinlidberg-dot版本 0.4.1i★ –i在你的电脑上运行
注册名称io.github.robinlidberg-dot/cap-shield

安装

概览

作者提供的说明(英文原文)

Context selection and compression for AI agents - recall measured, not claimed.

PopNx MCP 的三大支柱

这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。

它能帮你做什么

我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。

  • 连接方式: 在你的电脑上运行
  • 传输方式: stdio
  • 分类: 其他
  • 你需要填写:CAP_SHIELD_API_KEY

安装

选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。

安装之前

  • 基础检查:1 项中通过 1 项
  • 在你的电脑上运行,拥有你的用户账户的权限(文件、网络、应用)。
  • 需要你自己填写: CAP_SHIELD_API_KEY

标为机密的值是你账户的钥匙。千万不要分享给别人,也不要粘贴到聊天里。

你需要

  • PyPI已安装 Python 的 uv(用于 uvx 命令)

你用的是哪个应用?

在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。

打开 Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config,把下面的内容粘贴到 claude_desktop_config.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cap-shield": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "cap-shield"
      ],
      "env": {
        "CAP_SHIELD_API_KEY": "your-value"
      }
    }
  }
}

在终端中运行这条命令

claude mcp add cap-shield --env CAP_SHIELD_API_KEY=your-value -- uvx cap-shield

运行前请先填写空着的值。

在 Cursor 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cap-shield": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "cap-shield"
      ],
      "env": {
        "CAP_SHIELD_API_KEY": "your-value"
      }
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

在 VS Code 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json

{
  "servers": {
    "cap-shield": {
      "type": "stdio",
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "cap-shield"
      ],
      "env": {
        "CAP_SHIELD_API_KEY": "your-value"
      }
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。

你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。

需要你填写的值

  • CAP_SHIELD_API_KEY 机密 env
    Only needed for the two tools that store and retrieve memory. measure_traffic and list_packages work without it.

这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。

它能做什么

它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。

基础检查i

我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月7日

  • ✓ 通过

    作者与仓库一致

    注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 robinlidberg-dot 验证,该账户拥有此仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    仍在维护

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    有许可证

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • – 不适用

    端点有响应

    它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点

  • – 不适用

    使用 OAuth 登录

    在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置

  • … 尚未检查

    工具描述中没有隐藏指令

    它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表

与“其他”中的其他服务器比较i

  • 星标数多于此分类中其他 32599 个服务器的 0%
  • 发布到注册中心的时间比此分类中其他 32599 个服务器的 30% 更新
  • 基础检查结果等于或优于此分类中其他 32599 个服务器的 100%

与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。

常见问题

Cap Shield 安全吗?

它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。

它需要哪些密钥或代码?

你需要填写:CAP_SHIELD_API_KEY

它在我的电脑上运行还是在云端?

它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。

它还在维护吗?

GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.4.1)于2个月前进入注册中心。

哪些应用可以使用它?

支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Python (uv)。

有什么可以替代它?

同一分类中有:Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, Zendesk

替代选择

同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。

如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i

Spec Driven Development

作者:formulahendry

MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.

在你的电脑上运行★ 440MIT14个月前更新
安装

Remote Desktop Commander

作者:desktop-commander

Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.

在云端运行★ 211前天更新
安装

Zendesk

作者:pipeworx-io

Zendesk MCP Pack — tickets, users, organizations via OAuth.

电脑或云端今天更新
安装

作者的 README

打开 README

按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。

CAP-Shield MCP server

Context selection and compression for AI agents — with the recall measured, not claimed.

One file. No dependencies. No SDK required.

Why

More context makes agents worse. ETH Zurich found context files LOWER task success versus giving the agent no repository context at all, while raising inference cost by over 20 %. Around two thirds of production agent failures trace to context problems, not to the model being incapable.

So the question is not how much you cut. It is whether what you kept was enough — and that is measured here, on a benchmark we did not choose: LongMemEval-S, 500 questions. Recall@10 of 97.1 % against a lexical baseline of 51.9 % (measured 2026-09-28 — figures update as retrieval does; fetch .well-known/cap-shield.json for the current number rather than trusting this file).

Recall@10 is the strict measure: a question counts only when ALL gold sessions were found. Finding half the answer means the agent answers confidently on half a basis.

Two of the eight tools need no account. Measure first, decide after.

Install

curl -O https://cap-shield-robin.fly.dev/cap_mcp.py
{

"mcpServers": { "cap-shield": { "command": "python", "args": ["/absolute/path/to/cap_mcp.py"] } } }

Python 3.9+. Nothing else.

The optional SKILL.md tells an agent *when* to use these tools — and when not to.

Use it from Claude (Claude.ai, Claude Desktop, or Cowork) — no download

The server is also reachable directly over HTTP, so a hosted Claude client can connect to it without installing anything locally.

In Claude: Settings → Connectors → Add custom connector, and enter the server URL:

https://cap-shield-robin.fly.dev/mcp

Under Authentication, choose No sign-in — this server is authenticated with an API key, not OAuth (OAuth support is not built yet; see Status below). Claude will warn that anyone with the URL can use the connector without sign-in — that warning is accurate, and is exactly why the two free tools below need no key at all, while the rest do.

`measure_traffic` and `list_packages` work immediately, with no header and no account — nothing more to configure.

To use the account tools (remember, assemble_context, pack_batch, unpack_batch, issue_pass): get a key first (get_account, or the console at https://cap-shield-console.lovable.app), then add it under Request headers in the same connector dialog:

HeaderValue
AuthorizationBearer YOUR_KEY_HERE

The Bearer prefix is required — a bare key without it is rejected with NYCKEL_KRAVS. This is a standard bearer-token header, so the same two fields should work in any MCP client that lets you add a custom request header to a remote server, not just Claude — that is just the one this has actually been tested against.

Tools

measure_traffic · *no account*

Measure how much of your own agent traffic could be saved. NO ACCOUNT OR KEY NEEDED — use this first. Returns byte savings over the wire and, if a query is given, token savings from selective context retrieval. Nothing is stored: the text is compressed in memory and discarded. Rate limited to 20 calls per hour per IP.

list_packages · *no account*

List the available dictionaries with their MEASURED compression, including the ones that perform badly. Each entry says whether it works one message at a time or only batched, and how many messages came out LARGER. No key needed.

remember · *requires a key*

Store a memory entry for later retrieval. REQUIRES A KEY. This does not call any language model — it stores text in an isolated per-tenant archive. Use assemble_context to get relevant entries back.

assemble_context · *requires a key*

Retrieve the memory entries that answer a question, within a token budget. REQUIRES A KEY. Send the returned 'context' to your language model INSTEAD of the whole history. This does not call a model itself — it selects what to send. The budget is a ceiling, not a target: selection stops where relevance runs out, often well below it. The response says how many entries were left behind and why.

pack_batch · *requires a key*

Pack several messages into ONE compressed packet instead of packing them one at a time. REQUIRES A KEY. Worth it for many small/medium messages (the per-message header cost is paid once per batch, and zstd shares context across them) — for a single message this has no advantage. Returns packet_b64 (hand it to unpack_batch to get the messages back) plus the measured byte savings versus packing each message separately. SECURITY: only batch messages that already share the SAME trust boundary (same tenant/agent — nothing attacker-influenced mixed in with a secret). Batched messages share one compression context, which can leak size-based information between them (a CRIME/BREACH-style side channel). There is no padding mitigation on this endpoint today, so trust-boundary separation is the only protection — don't rely on padding.

unpack_batch · *requires a key*

Unpack a batch packet made by pack_batch (or by the /api/v1/pack-batch endpoint) back into the exact original list of messages, in order. REQUIRES A KEY. Not for a packet made by the single-message pack endpoint — that is a different format and this will reject it.

get_account

Get an account and an API key. Requires an email address. The key is returned ONCE and cannot be shown again — store it immediately. Beta quotas are low by design; they are hard stops, never overage billing.

issue_pass · *requires a key*

Agent identity / agent passport. Issue a short-lived (15 minute) signed credential (a JWT) stating who the caller acts for. REQUIRES A KEY. Anyone can verify it independently against /.well-known/jwks.json — without calling CAP-Shield again. 'acts_for' and 'scope' are NOT validated against reality: the pass only attests that the key holder claimed this, at this time, and that the claim is recorded in the audit chain. This is identity and claimed authorization, not a payment or access-control mechanism.

The descriptions above are copied verbatim from the server. If they ever differ from what tools/list returns, the server is right and this file is stale.

Optional: LLM escalation for the hardest questions

Retrieval and compression above never call a model. assemble_context also returns escalate_recommended: true on one specific category of question — multi-step counting ("how many times did I mention X?"), summing amounts spread across several memories, reconstructing chronological order across multiple events — where the answer is not sitting in any single entry and has to be assembled. Plain retrieval gets these right most of the time; this flag is for the rest.

What you do with that flag is yours to decide. CAP-Shield never spends your tokens or sees your model key.

cap_escalate_helper.py is a reference implementation of that one extra step: drop it into your own pipeline, call it with your own ANTHROPIC_API_KEY or OPENAI_API_KEY, only for the questions CAP-Shield flagged.

pip install anthropic   # or: pip install openai

export ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=...

from cap_escalate_helper import eskalera_om_behovs

cap_svar = assemble_context(...) # whatever CAP-Shield returned you svar = eskalera_om_behovs(cap_svar, fraga="How many times did I mention X?", modell="claude") # or modell="gpt-5-mini" print(svar["svar"])

If escalate_recommended is false, nothing is sent to any model — the function returns immediately, so it is safe to call unconditionally on every response; it only spends an API call when CAP-Shield actually asked for one.

python cap_escalate_helper.py --demo shows exactly what would be sent, no key required.

A more targeted entry point, eskalera_om_behovs_v5, asks the model to only extract the raw pieces (amounts, dates, event names) and lets plain Python do the counting, summing or sorting — removing an entire class of arithmetic/sequencing mistakes a model can make answering in free text. It is the version used in our own benchmark validation of this feature.

Reproducing a number we published against your own run requires the current version of this file — the prompts and matching logic behind it are still actively tuned, and an older local copy can score meaningfully differently.

What the numbers mean

Compression saves bytes over the wire. Selection saves tokens in the context. Two different mechanisms — adding them together produces a number that means nothing.

Compressed packets are decompressed before a model sees them, so this does not reduce inference cost. Saying otherwise is the easiest way to be wrong about this project.

Every figure is published live, including what has *not* been measured and which packages perform badly:

https://cap-shield-robin.fly.dev/.well-known/cap-shield.json

Fetch that rather than trusting this file. It goes stale; the document does not.

Measuring without MCP

pip install cap-shield
from cap_shield import measure, print_measurement

print_measurement(measure(texts=[...], query="..."))

No account, nothing stored. The response includes the degraded share — how many of your messages came out larger.

Batching has a security condition

Batching compresses several messages in the same context, which opens a CRIME/BREACH-style side channel: someone who can place chosen text in the same batch as a secret, and observe the batch size, learns something about the secret.

Only batch messages that already share a trust boundary. Optional padding closes the leak for under two bytes a message, and it is off by default — we say so rather than let you assume otherwise.

Individual packing does not have this problem at all.

Portability

Dictionary versions are never deleted, and the guarantee does not rest on us still being here: the archive export carries the dictionary binaries, and a standalone unpacker runs with no gateway, no network and no other part of the system.

https://cap-shield-robin.fly.dev/cap_unpack.py

It is served without a token, because whoever needs it most is whoever no longer has an account.

Status

Beta. Server version 0.5.0.

Docs: https://cap-shield-robin.fly.dev/docs/quickstart Console: https://cap-shield-console.lovable.app

Licence

MIT — see LICENSE.

问 PopNx