Context7
Up-to-date docs for AI agents
作者提供的说明(英文原文)
Git-aware memory store for AI coding agents; memories are anchored to git blob hashes.
这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。
我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。
选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。
你需要
你用的是哪个应用?
在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。
打开 Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config,把下面的内容粘贴到 claude_desktop_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"robo-cortex": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"robo-cortex",
"mcp"
]
}
}
}在终端中运行这条命令
claude mcp add robo-cortex -- uvx robo-cortex mcp粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"robo-cortex": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"robo-cortex",
"mcp"
]
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json
{
"servers": {
"robo-cortex": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"robo-cortex",
"mcp"
]
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。
你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。
这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。
它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。
我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月7日
注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 robotel-limited 验证,该账户拥有此仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点
在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置
它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表
与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。
它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。
注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。
它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。
GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.4.1)于4个月前进入注册中心。
支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Python (uv)。
同一分类中有:Context7, Codebase Memory, Exa
同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。
如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i
Up-to-date docs for AI agents
Codebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.
Connect AI agents to Exa for web search, content fetching, and multi-step research.
按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。
Git-aware knowledge integrity for AI coding agents.
Your AI agent debugs a bug, learns the lesson, and forgets it by next week — or worse, keeps citing a "lesson" that the code has since made false. robo-cortex is a local knowledge base built for that specific failure mode: memories are anchored to git blob hashes, so when the code they're about changes, the memory is automatically flagged for review instead of being silently trusted or silently lost. In other words: drift detection and stale-memory detection for AI agent memory, done deterministically from git history — not an LLM guess, not an embedding-similarity heuristic.
Most agent-memory tools are embeddings + a vector database + a cloud dependency. robo-cortex is deliberately none of that. Four things it does that a generic key-value memory store doesn't:
needs_review on the next retrieve/search/affected call — and a committed revert automatically heals it back. The healing requires three conditions: (a) the revert must be committed (git blob hash must match HEAD again), (b) the memory must have been flagged by the system (not manually via change_status), and (c) you must run a lazy trigger (retrieve/search/affected) after the revert to scan for changes. Few memory tools tie themselves to your actual code's history this deterministically — no embedding similarity, no LLM judgment call, just a git blob hash matching or not.provisional memory only becomes active once real evidence backs it, or a human explicitly promotes it..cortex/memory.db is just a file — inspect it with sqlite3 any time.active → superseded → archived, etc.) requires a --reason, permanently recorded. Nothing disappears silently; wrong lessons are marked invalidated, not deleted.A 30-session benchmark (3 real historical bugs from this repo, re-introduced and solved 10× each by a small model — Claude Haiku 4.5 — with and without a robo-cortex memory pack) measured, at identical fix quality (30/30 correct, zero disqualifications): ~12% fewer fresh tokens and ~15% lower API-equivalent cost (medians of paired per-task deltas), scaling up to −26% tokens / −39% cost on the task whose fix was hardest to locate unaided. Recording a lesson was itself metered: a memory pays for itself after ~1–6 sessions that reuse it (median ≈ 5). We make no wall-clock claim — time differences were noise-dominated. Full methodology, per-run raw evidence (usage logs, diffs, prompts), and the reusable harness are in the repo: docs/benchmark-results.md, benchmark-results-20260718/, scripts/benchmark/. Known limits, stated plainly: one subject model (small — an earlier n=3 pilot on a larger model measured a smaller 2.7% effect, see EVALUATION.md §9), one well-documented codebase (likely compresses the effect), 3 task types. We'd rather publish a modest number we measured than a dramatic one we didn't.
Prerequisite: robo-cortex requires a git repository (staleness detection needs git history to compare against):
git init && git add -A && git commit -m "initial commit"
pip install robo-cortex
If pip install refuses with error: externally-managed-environment (common on recent Debian/Ubuntu), use a virtual environment or pipx:
python3 -m venv .venv && source .venv/bin/activate && pip install robo-cortex
If you plan to use robo-cortex with an MCP-capable agent (Claude Desktop/Code, etc.), install the MCP extra instead:
pip install 'robo-cortex[mcp]'
cd /path/to/your/project
roco init
roco record --type lesson --scope repo \ --statement "Copy-to-clipboard fails on HTTP; use a textarea+execCommand fallback." \ --confidence high
roco retrieve --task "copy to clipboard http"
matched=1 returned=1 needs_review=0 contradicted=0 [1] score=0.650 repo lesson Copy-to-clipboard fails on HTTP; use a textarea+execCommand fallback.
--path links a memory to a file, but only accepts a path that already exists at HEAD (no memory is ever born pointing at a dead link). For code you just wrote but haven't committed yet: record the memory without --path now, commit, then attach the path afterward:
roco record --type decision --scope repo --statement "..." --confidence high
git add new_module.py && git commit -m "add new_module.py" roco record 7 --add-path new_module.py
Reusable lessons (not specific to this project) use scope=global and require --assumptions — the conditions under which the lesson applies, so it doesn't get suggested everywhere by accident:
roco record --type lesson --scope global \
--statement "Safari 14 breaks CSS grid+gap. Use flexbox+margin instead." \ --confidence high \ --assumptions "css grid gap safari"
Global-scope commands (record --scope global, show, search, status, link, evidence, list) work from anywhere, including outside any git repository — the global store (~/.cortex/global.db) isn't tied to a project. retrieve is the one exception: it's local-repo-aware by design, so it still requires an initialized repo.
roco hooks install
Installs a git pre-commit hook: if the commit touches code linked to a memory that's active/provisional/needs_review, the commit is blocked with the memory's id and a review prompt, until you've reviewed it or bypassed explicitly. Example, for a memory linked to src/scanner.py when that file is part of the commit:
robo-cortex: this commit touches code linked to memories that need review:
[1] path_changed:src/scanner.py@working_tree scanner batches at 50 items deliberately
Review with: roco show Then either re-verify (roco status activate --reason "...") or supersede it, and commit again. To bypass this check: git commit --no-verify
The bypass is real and documented — git commit --no-verify skips it, same as any git hook. This is "enforcement by default, bypass explicit," not "impossible to skip." See roco hooks --help for uninstall/status. For a CI-level check on pull requests instead of (or in addition to) local commits, see docs/ci-example.yml.
There's also an optional post-commit hook, purely informational (it never blocks — the commit it reports on already happened by the time it runs):
roco hooks install --post-commit
It runs roco affected --diff-range HEAD~1..HEAD after each commit and reports anything at risk, so a flag shows up immediately instead of waiting for the next retrieve/search/affected call. --post-commit also works with uninstall/status, independently of the pre-commit hook.
rocoBoth robo-cortex and roco are identical commands (same binary, two script entry points). Use whichever fits your fingers:
roco retrieve --task "..." # Shorter alias
robo-cortex retrieve --task "..." # Full name, backwards compatible
Name collision note: PyPI already has an unrelated package named roco ("Runtime Config Generator"). If that package is also installed in the same environment, whichever was installed last wins the roco command — use the full robo-cortex name to be unambiguous, or check roco --version to confirm which one you're actually running.
roco completion bash >> ~/.bashrc
Completes subcommand names and each subcommand's own flags (not flag values, and not nested sub-subcommands like hooks install). It's a static script generated from the installed version — re-run the command after upgrading to pick up new commands or flags.
| Scenario | Best method | Why |
|---|---|---|
| One-off CLI commands (shell, scripts, manual testing) | CLI: roco retrieve --task "..." | Simplest, no dependencies, immediate |
| Python agent or script running your own code | Python SDK: from robo_cortex import retrieve, record | In-process (no subprocess), real exceptions, not string-parsed errors |
| LLM agent (Claude Code, or any MCP client) with tool-calling | MCP server: add to your MCP config | Agent decides when to call; tool descriptions ship with the package |
All three call the same underlying robo_cortex.core functions — pick based on what the calling code already uses.
{
"mcpServers": { "robo-cortex": { "command": "roco", "args": ["mcp", "--repo", "/path/to/project"] } } }
Available tools: retrieve_context, record_memory, search_memory, attach_evidence, verify_evidence, change_status, get_memory, list_affected. Full contract in MCP_TOOLS.md.
from robo_cortex import retrieve, record
memories = retrieve("feature description", repo_path="/srv/project") if memories["data"]: print(f"Found solution: {memories'data'['statement']}")
record( type="lesson", statement="What you learned", confidence="high", repo_path="/srv/project", )
Full API, including the RoboCortex class for multiple calls against the same repo, in PYTHON_SDK.md.
Every memory has a status that reflects its confidence and applicability. New memories start provisional; manual review or evidence changes their status:
| Status | Meaning | Can transition to |
|---|---|---|
| provisional | New memory, not yet validated | active, needs_review, abandoned |
| active | Confident, applicable to futur
只显示了开头部分;其余内容请在仓库中阅读