原型 · 预览版:收录官方注册中心里的全部服务器,每 30 分钟同步一次。评价和账户功能将在后续阶段推出。
PopNx MCP为使用 AI 的人准备的 MCP 服务器 · 用大白话讲清楚

devmcp

作者:rudranaresh0201版本 0.2.1i★ –i在你的电脑上运行
注册名称io.github.rudranaresh0201/devmcp

安装

概览

作者提供的说明(英文原文)

Git/CI MCP server with the full protocol surface (tools, resources, prompts, roots, sampling).

PopNx MCP 的三大支柱

这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。

它能帮你做什么

我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。

  • 连接方式: 在你的电脑上运行
  • 传输方式: stdio
  • 分类: 搜索与 AI 记忆

安装

选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。

安装之前

  • 基础检查:1 项中通过 1 项
  • 在你的电脑上运行,拥有你的用户账户的权限(文件、网络、应用)。
  • 注册中心没有列出需要填写的密钥。

你需要

  • PyPI已安装 Python 的 uv(用于 uvx 命令)

你用的是哪个应用?

在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。

打开 Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config,把下面的内容粘贴到 claude_desktop_config.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "devmcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "devmcp-server",
        "--repo-path",
        "your-value"
      ]
    }
  }
}

在终端中运行这条命令

claude mcp add devmcp -- uvx devmcp-server --repo-path your-value

这个服务器需要在启动命令中填入值,请复制设置后自行填写。

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "devmcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "devmcp-server",
        "--repo-path",
        "your-value"
      ]
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

这个服务器需要在启动命令中填入值,请复制设置后自行填写。

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json

{
  "servers": {
    "devmcp": {
      "type": "stdio",
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "devmcp-server",
        "--repo-path",
        "your-value"
      ]
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。

你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。

这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。

它能做什么

它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。

基础检查i

我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月7日

  • ✓ 通过

    作者与仓库一致

    注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 rudranaresh0201 验证,该账户拥有此仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    仍在维护

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    有许可证

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • – 不适用

    端点有响应

    它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点

  • – 不适用

    使用 OAuth 登录

    在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置

  • … 尚未检查

    工具描述中没有隐藏指令

    它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表

与“搜索与 AI 记忆”中的其他服务器比较i

  • 星标数多于此分类中其他 5650 个服务器的 0%
  • 发布到注册中心的时间比此分类中其他 5650 个服务器的 29% 更新
  • 基础检查结果等于或优于此分类中其他 5650 个服务器的 100%

与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。

常见问题

devmcp 安全吗?

它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。

它需要哪些密钥或代码?

注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。

它在我的电脑上运行还是在云端?

它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。

它还在维护吗?

GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.2.1)于3个月前进入注册中心。

哪些应用可以使用它?

支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Python (uv)。

有什么可以替代它?

同一分类中有:Context7, Codebase Memory, Exa

替代选择

同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。

如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i

Context7

作者:upstash

Up-to-date docs for AI agents

电脑或云端★ 64,224MIT昨天更新
安装

Codebase Memory

作者:DeusData

Codebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.

在你的电脑上运行★ 48,148MIT21天前更新
安装

Exa

作者:exa-labs

Connect AI agents to Exa for web search, content fetching, and multi-step research.

在云端运行★ 5,213MIT上个月更新
安装

作者的 README

打开 README

按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。

A trusted agent stack for MCP

Listed on the official MCP Registry as io.github.rudranaresh0201/verimcp and io.github.rudranaresh0201/devmcp.

[Watch the console →](https://verimcp-console.onrender.com) — a recorded session replaying in the browser: three verified calls, five caught lies, one honest backend error.

Problem

MCP tool calls are trusted by default, in two different ways that both bite in production agent workflows:

  1. Claims aren't checked. When a server says a commit succeeded, a file was written, or a CI check passed, the Host has no way to know if that's true — isError: false only means the tool didn't crash, not that it did what it claimed. An agent wired up to git, CI, or infrastructure through MCP is one confidently-wrong tool response away from acting on a lie.
  2. Retries aren't safe. When a Host resends a tools/call after an ambiguous response (a timeout, a dropped connection), nothing in MCP stops the backend from just running it again — a second commit, a second CI run, a second charge. The protocol has no concept of "didn't I already do this?"

Solution

`verimcp` is a transparent proxy that sits between an MCP Host and a backend server and forwards every message unchanged, except for two independent checks around each call:

  • Before forwarding *(pre-check)* — if this exact call was already sent once and independently verified true this session, answer the retry from that confirmed result instead of hitting the backend again. --idempotent-replay, see Proof below.
  • After the backend responds *(post-check)* — for calls it knows how to check, independently re-derive the real outcome (re-read the file, re-check the git log, re-run the safe parts of a CI step) and compare that against what the backend claimed. A lie gets rewritten into a real error before the Host ever sees it as a success.

`devmcp` is the backend it's proven against — a real git/CI MCP server, deliberately built with the full protocol surface (tools, resources, prompts, roots, sampling), because a proxy is only as convincing as what it's shown catching.

Host  <--stdio-->  verimcp (pre-check: dedupe retries + post-check: verify claims)  <--stdio-->  devmcp (git/CI server)

Both are independently installable and have no import dependency on each other — verimcp works in front of *any* MCP backend (proven against the official mcp-server-git too, not just devmcp), and devmcp works with any Host directly, unproxied.

Proof, not just claims

Two runnable benchmarks, real subprocess pipes, no mocks — the numbers below are what they actually print, gaps included:

pip install verimcp devmcp-server

python scripts/benchmark_claim_acceptance.py # does verimcp catch a lying backend? python scripts/benchmark_retry_duplication.py # does --idempotent-replay stop a retry from duplicating a side effect?

Claim-acceptance — a real MCP Host with no verification layer accepts 100% of fabricated results by construction; that's not a benchmark artifact, it's the actual gap in the protocol:

RAW claim-acceptance rate:     14/14  (100%)

verimcp claim-catch rate: 11/14 (79%)

The 79%, not 100%, is deliberate and stated in the script's own output: 3 of the 14 scenarios exploit documented, principled gaps in specific verifiers (e.g. a hash-exists check can't tell *this* call created the hash vs an old one) — named plainly rather than hidden, because a tool claiming a perfect score on its own benchmark is the real red flag.

Retry-duplication — same idea applied to --idempotent-replay, against 5 realistic non-idempotent side effects (a counter bump, a notification send, an invoice increment, an audit entry, a two-step pipeline):

RAW duplicate-action rate:      5/5  (100%)

verimcp duplicate-action rate: 0/5 (0%)

scripts/demo.py is the smaller, narrative version of the same proof — one fabricated commit hash caught, one real write confirmed and passed through unchanged. tests/test_adversarial_corpus.py and tests/test_proxy_integration.py run the same claims through the real proxy pipe in CI on every commit, not just on demand.

Technical summary

  • Correctness verifiers — one per tool/resource with an independently-checkable postcondition: write_file (disk hash-compare), git_commit/git_branch (re-derived from real git state), run_ci_pipeline (self-consistency + re-execution of steps marked safe to re-run), plus resource reads (repo://status, repo://log, repo://file/{path}). New verifiers are a plugin system (importlib.metadata.entry_points, the same mechanism pytest/Black use) — see docs/writing-a-verifier.md.
  • GitHub — create_pull_request, issue_write (create) and create_branch from GitHub's official MCP server are checked against GitHub's own REST API: the PR/issue/branch must exist *and* carry the title that was requested, which also catches a server handing back a real, older PR as if it were new. A 404 only counts once the repo is confirmed visible, so a private repo without a token is left unchecked rather than falsely flagged.
  • Receipts (--receipts, on by default under wrap) — every check records what it actually observed (a PR's real title and link, a commit's real message and author, a file's real hash), where it looked and when, for claims that held as well as ones that didn't. Written to the audit log and console always, appended to the tool reply with the flag.
  • Remote servers (--backend-url) — fronts a server over Streamable HTTP (MCP spec 2025-06-18: JSON and SSE replies, session ids, protocol-version header), with --header 'Authorization: Bearer ${TOKEN}' / --header-from-env so a secret never has to live in a config file or a command line. Checked against a hosted server (DeepWiki) as well as the test suite.
  • Roots from the Host — verimcp asks a roots-capable Host (Claude Code, Cursor) for its workspace itself, so filesystem and git verifiers work in front of servers that never ask, like mcp-server-git.
  • Verify-before-retry (--idempotent-replay) — a retried tools/call is only ever answered from cache if the *previous* identical call was independently verified true by the checks above; a key match with no prior verified success is a cache miss, not a false dedupe. Adapted from arXiv:2608.02645, moved to the proxy layer so it works for any Host/backend pair verimcp fronts, not just one agent framework's own retry wrapper.
  • Policy gates — allow/deny/require-approval rules evaluated *before* a call reaches the backend, for the calls that have no objective truth to check (sampling rate limits, arbitrary tool-name/argument policy via YAML, human-in-the-loop approval over real MCP elicitation/create).
  • Audit + replay — every call verimcp handles is logged and served back as a real verimcp://audit MCP resource; verimcp replay re-runs recorded traffic against a new policy to backtest "would this have changed anything."
  • Observability — every call gets an OpenTelemetry span/metric using the GenAI semantic conventions, exportable to any OTLP collector.
  • Proven against real clients, not just our own tests — the official MCP Inspector and VS Code's native MCP support (Copilot Chat) each caught a real bug our own test suite never triggered, now fixed with regression tests.

Deeper design reasoning (why prompts/roots get no verifier on principle, why policy is a separate concept from verification, etc.) lives in docs/adr/ for anyone who wants to go that deep — the summary above is everything needed to use or evaluate the project.

Getting started

Fastest: protect the MCP servers you already have (0.4.0, not yet on PyPI — install from GitHub until it is):

pip install "verimcp[dashboard] @ git+https://github.com/rudranaresh0201/mcp"

verimcp wrap # puts verimcp in front of every server in Claude Code, Claude Desktop and Cursor verimcp-dashboard --audit-log ~/.verimcp/audit.jsonl # watch every verdict live at http://127.0.0.1:8787

Restart your MCP app and keep using it in plain English. wrap backs up each config file first, skips servers it can't safely front (ones that sign in through the app's own OAuth flow, legacy SSE), never puts a header token into command-line arguments, and verimcp unwrap restores the originals exactly. --dry-run shows the plan without writing anything.

What it looks like, from a real run through the official mcp-server-git and a deliberately lying file server:

[verimcp receipt] CONTRADICTED · FilesystemVerifier

todo.txt does not exist on disk

[verimcp receipt] VERIFIED · GitServerCommitVerifier commit b6fcbbd50b11 exists: 'Add hello file' by Rudra

As a user — install straight from PyPI:

pip install verimcp devmcp-server

verimcp -- devmcp --repo-path ./some-repo

Note on names: the PyPI distribution is devmcp-server (devmcp was blocked by

PyPI's typosquat-similarity check against an unrelated existing package), but the

Python import and CLI command are both still plain devmcp — nothing above changes

if you're reading devmcp's own source.

Use it with Claude Desktop, Claude Code, or Cursor — after pip install, add devmcp as an MCP server the normal way, just point its command at verimcp instead of devmcp directly:

{

"mcpServers": { "devmcp": { "command": "verimcp", "args": ["--root", "/path/to/your/repo", "--", "devmcp", "--repo-path", "/path/to/your/repo"] } } }

  • Claude Desktop: paste this into claude_desktop_config.json (macOS: ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json, Windows: %APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json).
  • Claude Code: claude mcp add devmcp -- verimcp --root /path/to/your/repo -- devmcp --repo-path /path/to/your/repo
  • Cursor: same JSON shape, in Cursor's MCP settings.

From then on your assistant sees write_file, git_commit, git_branch, run_ci_pipeline, sqlite_*, and docker_* as normal tools — no prompting change needed — except every claim those tools make gets independently re-checked before the assistant is told it succeeded.

In Docker — no local Python/git needed:

docker build -t verimcp-devmcp .

docker run -i -v /path/to/your/repo:/repo verimcp-devmcp

As a contributor — editable installs from this repo:

pip install -e ".[dev]"

pip install -e "./devmcp[dev]"

pytest tests devmcp/tests # 138 tests, real subprocess + real git repo, nothing mocked ruff check src tests devmcp/src devmcp/tests

python scripts/inspector_smoke_test.py # verify against the real MCP Inspector client (needs node/npx)

Try the observability yourself

# spans/metrics print to stderr (verimcp's stdout is the live MCP protocol channel)

verimcp --otel-exporter console -- devmcp --repo-path ./some-repo

or point a real collector, Jaeger, or Grafana Agent at it

pip install "verimcp[otel]" verimcp --otel-exporter otlp --otel-endpoint localhost:4317 -- devmcp --repo-path ./some-repo

Omitting --otel-exporter entirely means zero telemetry overhead — the default, same as every other opt-in flag here.

Watch it catch a lie

The console read

只显示了开头部分;其余内容请在仓库中阅读

问 PopNx