Spec Driven Development
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
作者提供的说明(英文原文)
Signs, hash-chains, and verifies compute usage receipts via an MCP server, no issuer trust required.
这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。
我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。
选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。
你需要
你用的是哪个应用?
在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。
打开 Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config,把下面的内容粘贴到 claude_desktop_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"computeledger": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"computeledger-cli",
"computeledger",
"mcp"
]
}
}
}在终端中运行这条命令
claude mcp add computeledger -- uvx computeledger-cli computeledger mcp粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"computeledger": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"computeledger-cli",
"computeledger",
"mcp"
]
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json
{
"servers": {
"computeledger": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"computeledger-cli",
"computeledger",
"mcp"
]
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。
你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。
这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。
它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。
我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月7日
注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 RudrenduPaul 验证,该账户拥有此仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点
在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置
它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表
与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。
它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。
注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。
它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。
GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.1.3)于3个月前进入注册中心。
支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Python (uv)。
同一分类中有:Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, Draugr
同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。
如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.
Security scanning for AI agents: SAST, SCA, secrets, IaC, DAST, ranked by real risk.
按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。
Install • Quickstart • Features • CLI reference • Comparison • FAQ
Sign, hash-chain, and independently verify compute usage, portable across any provider.
ComputeLedger records a compute job's usage (GPU-hours, hardware, duration, workload type) as a cryptographically signed receipt and appends it to a tamper-evident local ledger. Anyone can verify a receipt's authenticity and the ledger's integrity without trusting the issuer, and without buying into any single cloud, chain, or vendor's stack.
npm install -g computeledger-cli
pip install computeledger-cli
Both packages install the same computeledger command. Receipts are interoperable either way: a receipt signed by the npm binary verifies correctly with the PyPI binary, and vice versa.
$ computeledger keys generate --local
Generated Ed25519 keypair. Public key: COxK/lkoWxWB42QKXjvcHnmBPozH4Oo2JHoOKDjsoU8= Private key: ./.computeledger/keys/ed25519.pem (mode 600)
$ computeledger record --local --provider aws --hardware nvidia-h100 \ --duration-seconds 3600 --gpu-hours 1 --workload-type training Recorded usage receipt 39952199-0897-48b8-92c5-e351f773c83d.
$ computeledger ledger verify --local Ledger valid: 1 entries, unbroken hash chain.
Or wrap a real job directly, no manual record call needed:
computeledger run --local --provider on-prem --hardware nvidia-a100 -- python train.py
run executes the wrapped command as a real subprocess (never through a shell), measures wall-clock duration, samples GPU utilization via nvidia-smi when one is present, and signs + appends the resulting receipt automatically. On a machine with no NVIDIA GPU, it still produces a duration-only receipt.
Give the receipt to anyone, on any machine, with no ComputeLedger account and no network call:
computeledger verify receipt.json
Multi-cloud and multi-provider GPU usage has no portable, verifiable record. A cost dashboard tells you what a provider says you used; it does not let a third party independently confirm that record wasn't altered after the fact, and it only works with the providers it integrates with. ComputeLedger is a lightweight, provider-agnostic attestation format: any process that can run a CLI command or call an MCP tool can produce a receipt, and any process, in any language, can verify one.
This is deliberately narrow. It does not compete with GPU marketplaces, cost dashboards, or confidential-computing platforms, all of which do real, different jobs. See the comparison below for exactly where the line is.
ledger verify detects, even if the tampered entry's own signature still looks locally valid.computeledger binary verifies correctly against the PyPI package's computeledger binary. Both implementations serialize the receipt payload through the same deterministic canonical-JSON algorithm before hashing.--json for structured output, and computeledger mcp starts a Model Context Protocol server exposing record_usage, verify_receipt, list_ledger, and verify_ledger as callable tools.computeledger run -- executes the wrapped command via an argument array, never a shell string, so metacharacters in the wrapped command are inert.computeledger keys generate [--local]
computeledger keys show [--local] [--json] computeledger run [--local] [--provider ] [--hardware ] [--workload-type training|inference|unknown] [--no-record-command] [--json] -- computeledger record --provider --hardware --duration-seconds [--gpu-hours ] [--flops ] [--workload-type ] [--local] [--json] computeledger verify [--json] computeledger ledger list [--local] [--json] computeledger ledger show [--local] [--json] computeledger ledger verify [--local] [--json] computeledger export --format json|csv [--out ] [--local] computeledger mcp
| Flag | Meaning |
|---|---|
--local | Use ./.computeledger in the current directory instead of ~/.computeledger |
--json | Structured JSON on stdout instead of human-readable text |
--no-record-command | Omit the wrapped command string from the receipt (run only) |
ComputeLedger ships a Model Context Protocol server so an AI agent (Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-compatible client) can record and verify compute usage receipts directly, without a human invoking the CLI by hand. The Python package exposes the server as a subcommand rather than a separate console script, so computeledger mcp is the real invocation, not computeledger-mcp.
pip install computeledger-cli
Add it to your MCP client's config (for Claude Desktop, claude_desktop_config.json):
{
"mcpServers": { "computeledger": { "command": "uvx", "args": ["--from", "computeledger-cli", "computeledger", "mcp"] } } }
The server exposes four tools, matching the CLI one-for-one:
record_usage(provider, hardware, durationSeconds, gpuHours?, estimatedFlops?, workloadType?, local?): signs a usage entry with the local Ed25519 key, appends it to the hash-chained ledger, and returns the signed receipt.verify_receipt(receipt): independently verifies a receipt's signature and hash integrity.list_ledger(local?): lists every receipt recorded in the local ledger.verify_ledger(local?): verifies every entry's signature plus the unbroken hash chain across the whole ledger.Example call:
record_usage(provider="lambda-labs", hardware="nvidia-h100", durationSeconds=3600, gpuHours=1, workloadType="training")
Transport is stdio, so there is nothing to host: the MCP client spawns the server as a local subprocess. Source: python/src/computeledger/mcp/server.py.
The npm package exposes the same four tools through the native TypeScript server (src/mcp/server.ts), invoked the same way with npx computeledger-cli mcp. Both implementations are cross-verified interoperable, and every tool returns the same structured JSON shape the CLI's --json mode produces.
import { createReceipt, verifyReceipt, Ledger, verifyChain, loadKeyPair, resolvePaths } from "computeledger-cli";
from computeledger import create_receipt, verify_receipt, Ledger, verify_chain, load_key_pair
ComputeLedger occupies a narrow, specific gap: a portable, cryptographically verifiable usage receipt that doesn't require adopting any single provider's chain or platform. It is not trying to replace the tools below, each of which does a real, different job.
| ComputeLedger | SkyPilot | OpenCost | AICert | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| What it is | Signed, portable usage receipts | Multi-cloud job orchestration + cost | Kubernetes/cloud cost monitoring | Training-provenance attestation |
| Cryptographic verification | Yes (Ed25519, offline) | No | No | Yes (TPM-based) |
| Provider lock-in | None | Orchestrates specific clouds | Kubernetes/cloud-native | None |
| Tamper-evident history | Yes (hash-chained ledger) | No | No | No (single artifact, no chain) |
| GitHub stars | New | 10,441 | 6,659 (CNCF) | 20 |
| Project activity | Active | Active | Active | No commits since June 2024 |
Agent-native (MCP/--json) | Yes | Partial (API/SDK) | No | No |
SkyPilot and OpenCost solve real, adjacent problems (running jobs across clouds, and visualizing what they cost) at far larger scale and maturity than this project. Neither produces a signed, independently verifiable usage record. AICert attempted training-compute provenance as a standalone OSS tool using TPM-bound attestation and has had no commits since June 2024; ComputeLedger's scope is deliberately narrower (a usage receipt, not a full training-provenance framework) and ships both an npm and a PyPI package from day one specifically so the receipt format isn't locked to one language's ecosystem.
ComputeLedger is an open-source CLI, library, and MCP server for producing and verifying cryptographically signed records of compute usage. It exists because compute usage claims (GPU-hours consumed, hardware used, workload duration) currently have no portable, offline-verifiable proof format: a billing dashboard is only as trustworthy as the provider issuing it, and it only covers that one provider. ComputeLedger's receipts are self-contained, signed JSON objects that any party, on any machine, in either of two independently maintained language implementations, can verify without a network call or a trusted third party.
Does ComputeLedger require an account or API key? No. Everything runs locally. Keys are generated and stored on your own machine (~/.computeledger or ./.computeledger with --local).
Can a receipt be forged? Not without the private key used to sign it. verify recomputes the payload hash and checks the Ed25519 signature against the embedded public key; the public key itself is part of the signed payload, so substituting a different key changes the hash and invalidates the receipt.
What happens if there's no GPU? computeledger run degrades gracefully: it records wall-clock duration and whatever --hardware/--provider you specify, and simply omit
只显示了开头部分;其余内容请在仓库中阅读