原型 · 预览版:收录官方注册中心里的全部服务器,每 30 分钟同步一次。评价和账户功能将在后续阶段推出。
PopNx MCP为使用 AI 的人准备的 MCP 服务器 · 用大白话讲清楚

AegisCore

作者:Sandeep-Hipparagi版本 0.1.3i★ –i在你的电脑上运行
注册名称io.github.Sandeep-Hipparagi/aegiscore

安装

概览

作者提供的说明(英文原文)

Deterministic zero-trust policy enclave and cryptographic WORM audit ledger for MCP tools.

PopNx MCP 的三大支柱

这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。

它能帮你做什么

我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。

  • 连接方式: 在你的电脑上运行
  • 传输方式: stdio
  • 分类: 会计、财务与税务

安装

选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。

安装之前

  • 基础检查:1 项中通过 1 项
  • 在你的电脑上运行,拥有你的用户账户的权限(文件、网络、应用)。
  • 注册中心没有列出需要填写的密钥。

你需要

  • npm已安装 Node.js(用于 npx 命令)

你用的是哪个应用?

在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。

打开 Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config,把下面的内容粘贴到 claude_desktop_config.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "aegiscore": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@aegiscore-ai/core",
        "mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

在终端中运行这条命令

claude mcp add aegiscore -- npx -y @aegiscore-ai/core mcp

在 Cursor 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "aegiscore": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@aegiscore-ai/core",
        "mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

在 VS Code 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json

{
  "servers": {
    "aegiscore": {
      "type": "stdio",
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@aegiscore-ai/core",
        "mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。

你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。

这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。

它能做什么

它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。

基础检查i

我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月8日

  • ✓ 通过

    作者与仓库一致

    注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 Sandeep-Hipparagi 验证,该账户拥有此仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    仍在维护

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    有许可证

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • – 不适用

    端点有响应

    它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点

  • – 不适用

    使用 OAuth 登录

    在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置

  • … 尚未检查

    工具描述中没有隐藏指令

    它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表

与“会计、财务与税务”中的其他服务器比较i

  • 星标数多于此分类中其他 2951 个服务器的 0%
  • 发布到注册中心的时间比此分类中其他 2951 个服务器的 67% 更新
  • 基础检查结果等于或优于此分类中其他 2951 个服务器的 100%

与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。

常见问题

AegisCore 安全吗?

它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。

它需要哪些密钥或代码?

注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。

它在我的电脑上运行还是在云端?

它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。

它还在维护吗?

GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.1.3)于15天前进入注册中心。

哪些应用可以使用它?

支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Node.js, Python (uv)。

有什么可以替代它?

同一分类中有:Finance Toolkit, SolidInvoice, Korea Tax Calculator

替代选择

同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。

如何看卡片:↓ 每周下载量i★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i

Finance Toolkit

500+ transparent financial methods calculated from raw statements, not third-party endpoints.

作者:JerBouma广泛使用↓ 1.6万/周★ 5496前天更新

电脑或云端

SolidInvoice

Create and send invoices and quotes, manage clients, and track payments in SolidInvoice.

作者:SolidInvoice正在增长★ 9819天前更新

在云端运行✓ solidinvoice.co

Korea Tax Calculator

Korean tax calculation and tax-audit judgment MCP: 96 tools with statutory citations.

作者:UpstageAI正在增长↓ 3172/周★ 97今天更新

在你的电脑上运行

作者的 README

打开 README

按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。

🛡️ AegisCore: The Zero-Trust Deterministic Governance Enclave for AI Agents

AegisCore is an open-source reverse-proxy, deterministic invariant policy enclave, and cryptographic WORM audit ledger for autonomous AI agents. It intercepts model tool calls, validates them against strict schemas and deterministic invariants, and only executes approved actions within an isolated boundary.


📺 Terminal Showcases & Scenario Deep-Dives

🎯 Focused Scenario Showcases (Click to Expand)

Scenario 01: Model Tool Hijack & Data Exfiltration Defense

Threat Vector: Indirect prompt injection instructs an autonomous agent to dump users.credentials.

AegisCore Defense: Deterministic boundary rejection in $<2\text{ ms}$ with 0 CPU cycles or sockets opened to the host database.

*Run live:* node --experimental-strip-types scripts/demo-scenario-1.js


Scenario 02: In-Flight DPDP PII Masking & Cryptographic Shredding

Threat Vector: Agent processes personal identifiers (Indian PAN / Aadhaar), conflicting with statutory Right to Erasure under India's DPDP Act.

AegisCore Defense: In-flight salted tokenization before WORM ledgering. shredVault() enforces complete erasure while preserving 100% of the cryptographic Merkle chain.

*Run live:* node --experimental-strip-types scripts/demo-scenario-2.js


Scenario 03: Cryptographic Merkle Chain & Tamper-Evident Audit

Threat Vector: Retrospective tampering of agent execution logs to conceal unauthorized actions.

AegisCore Defense: Write-Once-Read-Many (WORM) append-only ledger with cryptographic SHA-256 block traversal back to Genesis. Any bit alteration breaks chain validation.

*Run live:* node --experimental-strip-types scripts/demo-scenario-3.js


📦 Developer Packages & Distribution

PackageLanguage / ProtocolStatusDescription
@aegiscore-ai/coreNode.js / TypeScript (v0.1.3)AvailableCore deterministic engine, WORM ledger, bundled policies, and HTTP gateway daemon
@aegiscore-ai/sdkTypeScript (v0.1.3)AvailableZero-dependency client for OpenAI tool calls, LangGraph, and MCP with full parity
aegiscore-aiPython (>=3.8, v0.1.3)AvailableZero-dependency Python client for LangGraph, CrewAI, AutoGen (pip install aegiscore-ai)
MCP Registry ServerMCP Registry (v0.1.3)CertifiedOfficial MCP Registry server (io.github.Sandeep-Hipparagi/aegiscore)
MCP AdapterJSON-RPC StdioAvailableNative sidecar for Claude Desktop, Cursor, and LibreChat
DPDP GuideDocumentationCompleteIndia DPDP Act 2023 compliance architecture & cryptographic shredding
Security PolicySecurity & DisclosureActiveVulnerability disclosure SLAs, disclosure address, and runtime invariants
ChangelogRelease Historyv0.1.3Keep-a-Changelog history, security hardening, and test parity log
Audit ReportSecurity & AuditCertified (v0.1.2)External production readiness audit, DevSecOps report & empirical benchmarks
Show HNCommunityReadyHacker News launch narrative & technical breakdown

⚡ Empirical Performance & Security Audit (v0.1.2)

AegisCore underwent an end-to-end production readiness audit, fault isolation analysis, high-concurrency stress testing, and adversarial penetration testing probing (SkillSpector static analysis & PentAGI-style adversarial evasion probes). Read the complete audit and verification report in AUDIT_REPORT.md.

Verified Micro-Benchmarks (v0.1.2)
Benchmark MetricMeasurementOperational Impact
Cold Start Time0.291 msInstant container startup with zero JVM/Python runtime warm-up
P50 (Median) Pipeline Overhead58.2 µs (0.058 ms)Negligible sub-millisecond impact on agentic loop latency
Average Execution Overhead78.1 µs (0.078 ms)Full invariant verification, PII tokenization, and Merkle chaining
In-Memory Gateway Throughput>12,500 req/secSustained high-concurrency event loops without thread contention
Memory Footprint Delta (1k reqs)+1.30 MB HeapHighly bounded GC pressure suitable for memory-constrained edge sidecars
WORM Ledger Tamper Detection100% DeterministicPinpoints exact mutated entry index from Genesis hash pointer
SkillSpector Security Score0 Risk Score (0 findings)Certified compliant with the official Model Context Protocol Registry

[!TIP]

Production Readiness Score: 9.8 / 10 (Enterprise), 9.9 / 10 (Startup), 9.9 / 10 (OSS).

Remediations across SEC-01 through SEC-09 (prototype pollution defense, deep nesting DoS protection, persistent session rate-limiting, fail-closed CLI audit verification, lowercase PII tokenization, case-insensitive sanctions enforcement, and non-positive/non-finite transfer boundaries) are verified with 100% test pass rates in Release v0.1.2. See AUDIT_REPORT.md.


⚡ The Core Problem: Why Prompt Guardrails Fail

Modern AI agent architectures couple model intent directly to tool execution. Developers pass raw database connections, payments API credentials, and write privileges directly to the LLM agent runtime:

[User / Jailbreak Prompt] ──> [LLM Model Weights] ──> [Direct Tool Execution] ──> 🔥 Disaster

Why prompt guardrails cannot guarantee security:

  1. Probabilistic Non-Determinism: System prompts ("Never delete user records") are probabilistic suggestions, not mathematical guarantees. Adversarial jailbreaks, indirect prompt injections, and context drift routinely bypass prompt instructions.
  2. Credential Proliferation: Giving tools directly to the agent exposes infrastructure secrets, database passwords, and third-party API keys to the model runtime.
  3. Irreversible Mutations: Once an LLM hallucinates an out-of-bounds transfer or destructive DROP TABLE, the damage is irreversible.
The AegisCore Solution: Strict Intent-Execution Decoupling

AegisCore strips all execution power from the agent. The agent produces only an Intent Proposal. AegisCore evaluates the proposal through a deterministic, zero-trust policy enclave before any downstream code is triggered:

                                  AEGIS-CORE GATEWAY ENCLAVE

┌────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ 1. DPDP PII Tokenizer & Vault │ │ 2. Strict Schema Quarantine │ [Agent Intent] ──(Proposal)──>│ 3. Invariant Engine (Rate / Bounds) │──(Only if APPROVED)──> [Isolated Execution Boundary] │ 4. WORM Cryptographic Merkle Chain │ │ (Sanitized Env / Timeout) │ 5. Asynchronous HITL Escalation Gating │ ▼ └────────────────────────────────────────┘ [Real Backend / DB / API]


📊 Core Architecture

               +-------------------------------------------------------------+

| AI AGENT LOOP | | (LangGraph / MCP / Raw OpenAI) | +-------------------------------------------------------------+ | (POST /v1/gateway/dispatch) v +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | AEGIS-CORE GATEWAY PIPELINE | | | | [Step 1: PII Sanitizer] ──> Detects PAN, Aadhaar, Phone, Email & tokenizes via salt | | [Step 2: Schema Validate] ──> Enforces strict types; extra fields fail closed | | [Step 3: Policy Engine] ──> Invariants: param_boundary, rate_limit, disallowed_targets | | | | | | | | | | (BLOCKED) | (REQUIRES_HITL) | (APPROVED) | | v v v | | [WORM Ledger Entry] [HITL Challenge Created] [WORM Ledger Entry]| | Return 403 Forbidden Wait for Supervisor Signoff Dispatch to Sandbox | +------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------+ v +---------------------------------+ | ISOLATED SANDBOX RUNNER | | - process.env secrets scrubbed | | - Hard safety timeout abort | | - Stack trace leak isolation | +---------------------------------+ | v [Protected Real System]


📐 Architectural Execution Flow: sdk/ ➔ core/ ➔ policies/

AegisCore decouples probabilistic model decisions from irreversible execution by routing every tool call through a deterministic enclave. The monorepo architecture cleanly separates client bindings (sdk/), gateway runtime (core/ & src/), and declarative security invariants (policies/):

只显示了开头部分;其余内容请在仓库中阅读

问 PopNx