Supabase
MCP server for interacting with the Supabase platform
作者提供的说明(英文原文)
Safe PostgreSQL migrations: schema drift, lock analysis, safe rewrites, data checksums. Read-only.
这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。
我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。
选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。
SOURCE_DATABASE_URL, TARGET_DATABASE_URL, PGVOUCH_LLM标为机密的值是你账户的钥匙。千万不要分享给别人,也不要粘贴到聊天里。
你需要
你用的是哪个应用?
在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。
打开 Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config,把下面的内容粘贴到 claude_desktop_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"pgvouch": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"pgvouch",
"mcp"
],
"env": {
"SOURCE_DATABASE_URL": "your-value",
"TARGET_DATABASE_URL": "your-value",
"PGVOUCH_LLM": "your-value"
}
}
}
}在终端中运行这条命令
claude mcp add pgvouch --env SOURCE_DATABASE_URL=your-value --env TARGET_DATABASE_URL=your-value --env PGVOUCH_LLM=your-value -- npx -y pgvouch mcp运行前请先填写空着的值。
粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"pgvouch": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"pgvouch",
"mcp"
],
"env": {
"SOURCE_DATABASE_URL": "your-value",
"TARGET_DATABASE_URL": "your-value",
"PGVOUCH_LLM": "your-value"
}
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json
{
"servers": {
"pgvouch": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"pgvouch",
"mcp"
],
"env": {
"SOURCE_DATABASE_URL": "your-value",
"TARGET_DATABASE_URL": "your-value",
"PGVOUCH_LLM": "your-value"
}
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。
你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。
PGVOUCH_LLM env这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。
它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。
我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月7日
注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 Shubh-Sgr 验证,该账户拥有此仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点
在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置
它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表
与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。
它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。
你需要填写:SOURCE_DATABASE_URL, TARGET_DATABASE_URL
它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。
GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.4.4)于34天前进入注册中心。
支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Node.js。
同一分类中有:Supabase, MongoDB MCP Server, Elasticsearch MCP Server
同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。
如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i
MCP server for interacting with the Supabase platform
MongoDB Model Context Protocol Server
MCP server for interacting with Elasticsearch
按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。
An MCP server + CLI that lets AI assistants safely inspect, plan and _prove_ PostgreSQL migrations. The LLM proposes; deterministic code decides.
Real output against the seeded demo databases (1M transactions, 2M ledger entries) with the target broken as in step 2 below. Typing is real-time; command run times are shortened (the verify run took 14.0 s).
Writing ALTER TABLE is the easy part of a database migration. The hard parts are:
CREATE INDEX on a busy table blocks every write until it finishes. A "1 ms" ALTER TABLE can still cause an outage by waiting in the lock queue.AI assistants now write migrations, but they hallucinate objects, ignore locks and can't prove anything. PgVouch gives them (and you) read-only tools that answer those four questions, and it wraps every AI suggestion in deterministic checks.
All numbers come from npm run eval against the seeded Docker databases. The full tables are in evals/.
| What | Result |
|---|---|
| Drift detection over 32 seeded scenarios (tables, views, functions, triggers, enums, extensions, RLS) | 100% precision, 100% recall (34 true positives, 0 false positives, 0 missed) |
| Exact differing rows found by checksum bisection | 100% of seeded row changes, 0 false rows |
| Rows fetched to find them | 311 rows instead of 6,079,997 (the rows in the mismatched tables, both sides) |
Lock mode predicted vs lock actually taken (read from pg_locks) | 36/36 statements, on PostgreSQL 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17 |
Table rewrite predicted vs actual rewrite (pg_class.relfilenode changed) | 35/35 statements |
| Sequence left behind its data after a copy (next INSERT would hit a duplicate key) | found 1/1, 0 false alarms in 10 checks |
| Rules-only migration plans that pass a shadow run on a real schema copy | 27/27 |
| LLM plans (local llama3.2, 3B), 17 drift scenarios of the first 21-scenario suite, *validator-only acceptance (v0.1.0)* | 5.9% valid on first try, 17.6% after one retry, 82.4% fell back to the rules plan; 0/3 accepted LLM plans passed the shadow run |
Application stall during the migration, measured on the 1M-row table with a probe query every ~10 ms (evals/results-rewrite.md):
| Migration | Original: max stall | PgVouch rewrite: max stall | Rewrite total time |
|---|---|---|---|
CREATE INDEX | 1.58 s | 47 ms | 2.1 s |
ADD FOREIGN KEY (2M rows) | 1.01 s | 49 ms | 1.2 s |
ADD CHECK | 440 ms | 63 ms | 0.85 s |
SET NOT NULL | 625 ms | 31 ms | 0.68 s |
ADD COLUMN ... NOT NULL DEFAULT gen_random_uuid() | 10.94 s | 964 ms | 108.7 s (batched backfill) |
ALTER COLUMN merchant_id TYPE bigint | 6.51 s | 93 ms | 28.0 s (includes re-creating its foreign key; +3 manual steps) |
What the LLM numbers show: a small local model is not reliable at migration planning. That's why PgVouch never trusts it. The validator rejected 14/17 plans (unparseable SQL, hallucinated or duplicate objects, blocking DDL). The 3 it accepted were *safe but incomplete*, and only the shadow run caught that (e.g. a missing index and a sequence left out when re-creating a dropped table). Deterministic rules plans passed all 17 (27/27 with the scenarios added later). Details: evals/results-llm.md.
What changed because of it: those numbers were measured when the validator alone decided. Now an LLM plan is accepted only if it passes the validator and a shadow run whose result matches the source exactly; a shadow failure is sent back to the LLM for one retry, then PgVouch falls back to the rules plan. So the 3 incomplete plans above would now be rejected. The LLM eval has not been re-run with the new pipeline yet, so there is no new number here.
The trade-off is visible: the rewrites that need a backfill take much longer in total, but the application keeps running. These are single runs on a laptop (Apple M1, 8 cores, Docker Desktop). Expect the absolute numbers to vary; the gap is the point.
flowchart LR
A["AI assistant (Claude Code, Cursor)"] -- "MCP (JSON-RPC, stdio)" --> S U["You (terminal)"] -- CLI --> S subgraph S["PgVouch core"] I["F1 introspect pg_catalog"] --> D["F2 diff (pure function)"] D --> P["F7 planner LLM + guardrail validator"] L["F5 lock analyzer (Postgres parser)"] --> R["F6 safe rewrites"] R --> P P --> SH["F10 shadow run (throwaway container)"] V["F3 chunked checksums"] --> B["F4 bisection"] P --> RC["F12 receipt (SHA-256)"] end S -- "read-only SQL" --> SRC[("source DB")] S -- "read-only SQL" --> TGT[("target DB")] P -. "structured facts only, no rows" .-> LLM["Ollama (local) or Gemini"]
Golden rule: the LLM never touches a database and never decides pass/fail. It proposes; the parser, the rules and the shadow run decide.
| # | Feature | How |
|---|---|---|
| F1 | Schema introspection | pg_catalog (not information_schema, which hides index methods, partial-index predicates and NOT VALID) |
| F2 | Drift detection | A pure diffSchemas(source, target) over tables, columns, indexes, constraints, sequences, views, functions, triggers (including disabled ones), enum types, extensions and row-level security: deterministic and sorted, with severity rules, and it never guesses renames |
| F3 | Data verification | md5(string_agg(md5(row::text) ORDER BY pk)) per primary-key chunk, inside a REPEATABLE READ snapshot with normalized session settings. Text keys are ordered byte-wise (COLLATE "C"), so servers with different collations agree. Also checks that every identity/serial sequence on the target is ahead of its data. On a target still being replicated to, --recheck looks at the differences again after a delay and reports only those that never catch up |
| F4 | Checksum bisection | Merkle-style: split the mismatched chunk at its median key and recurse only into halves whose hashes differ |
| F5 | Lock analyzer | libpg-query (Postgres' own parser, WASM) → rule table → risk from reltuples |
| F6 | Safe rewrites | CONCURRENTLY, NOT VALID + VALIDATE, UNIQUE ... USING INDEX, expand/contract, batched DO loops with COMMIT per batch |
| F7 | Guarded LLM planner | zod-checked JSON → validator (parses, allow-list, objects exist, no unsafe DDL) → shadow run (the result must match the source) → one retry with the errors → rules-only fallback |
| F8 | MCP server | 7 read-only tools over stdio |
| F9 | Eval suite | 32 drift/data scenarios, 36 lock statements with ground truth from Postgres, and a stall benchmark under load |
| F10 | Shadow runs | Copies the target's *schema* into a disposable container, applies the plan, and diffs the result against the source |
| F11 | Reversibility | Tags each step reversible / reversible-with-backfill / data-lossy and generates rollback SQL |
| F12 | Receipts | JSON of drift + verification + plan + shadow, with a SHA-256 over canonical (sorted-key) JSON |
| F13 | Lock-queue preflight | "Safe to run right now?": the locks each statement needs vs. live pg_locks + pg_stat_activity, using Postgres' full 8×8 lock conflict table |
| F14 | PR review action | pgvouch review --format markdown + a GitHub Action: lock analysis and safe rewrites of changed migrations as a job summary and one PR comment |
There are two ways to use PgVouch:
| Option A: npm package | Option B: clone the repo | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Your own databases, CI, or an AI assistant | Trying every feature on seeded demo databases, or contributing |
| Needs | Node 22 (or 20.12+) | Node 22 (or 20.12+) and Docker |
| Commands run as | pgvouch (or npx pgvouch ) | npm run cli -- |
1. Try it now, no database needed. Point it at any migration file:
npx pgvouch locks my_migration.sql --offline # the locks each statement takes, and the risk
npx pgvouch rewrite my_migration.sql --offline # a safe, non-blocking version of the same migration
No migration file handy? Create one: echo "CREATE INDEX idx_amount ON transactions (amount);" > my_migration.sql
2. Install it (optional: npx pgvouch works without installing):
npm install -g pgvouch
pgvouch --help
3. Point it at your databases. Create a read-only role on each database (the SQL is here), then put a .env file in the folder you run PgVouch from:
SOURCE_DATABASE_URL=postgres://pgvouch_ro:PASSWORD@staging-host:5432/your_db
TARGET_DATABASE_URL=postgres://pgvouch_ro:PASSWORD@prod-host:5432/your_db PGVOUCH_LLM=none # rules-only plans; set it to ollama to let a local LLM propose plans
Variables already set in your environment take precedence over .env. Then check that both connections are read-only:
pgvouch doctor # must say read_only=true and write privileges: none
4. Run it:
pgvouch diff # schema drift (exit code 1 if any)
pgvouch verify --rows # checksums + exact differing rows pgvouch verify --rows --recheck 3 # target still being replicated to: ignore rows in flight pgvouch locks my_migration.sql # lock impact per statement, with real table sizes pgvouch preflight my_migration.sql # would it have to wait for locks RIGHT NOW? pgvouch rewrite my_migration.sql # safe multi-step script pgvouch review --format markdown migrations/*.sql # PR-comment report (offline, used by the GitHub Action) pgvouch plan --no-llm # rules-only plan that makes target match source pgvouch plan # LLM plan (Ollama) behind guardrails pgvouch shadow # plan, then prove it on a throwaway container (needs Docker) pgvouch receipt --shadow # hashed audit record pgvouch receipt-verify pgvouch-receipt.json
locks --fail-on high exits with code 1, so it can gate a CI pipeline on risky migrations.
preflight answers a different question: not "what will this lock?" but "is anyone holding or waiting for a conflicting lock right now?". It lists the sessions it would queue behind (pid, user, application, state, transaction age; never their query text), and flags that CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY waits for every older transaction in the database. It exits with code 1 if the migration would wait. PgVouch never terminates sessions.
5. Also: use it from an AI assistant (npx -y pgvouch mcp), or review every migration pull request with the GitHub Action (step 4 there).
The repo includes two seeded Postgres databases, so you can try every feature without touching a real database. Requirements: Node 22 (or 20.12+) and Docker.
git clone https://github.com/Shubh-Sgr/pgvouch.git && cd pgvouch
npm in
只显示了开头部分;其余内容请在仓库中阅读