GitHub
Connect AI assistants to GitHub - manage repos, issues, PRs, and workflows through natural language.
作者提供的说明(英文原文)
Kubernetes MCP server for diagnosis, resource management, GitOps, and RBAC-enforced operations.
这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。
我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。
选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。
你需要
你用的是哪个应用?
在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。
打开 Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config,把下面的内容粘贴到 claude_desktop_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"radar": {
"command": "docker",
"args": [
"run",
"-i",
"--rm",
"ghcr.io/skyhook-io/radar:1.19.0"
]
}
}
}在终端中运行这条命令
claude mcp add radar -- docker run -i --rm ghcr.io/skyhook-io/radar:1.19.0粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"radar": {
"command": "docker",
"args": [
"run",
"-i",
"--rm",
"ghcr.io/skyhook-io/radar:1.19.0"
]
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json
{
"servers": {
"radar": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "docker",
"args": [
"run",
"-i",
"--rm",
"ghcr.io/skyhook-io/radar:1.19.0"
]
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。
你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。
这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。
它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。
我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月7日
注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 skyhook-io 验证,该账户拥有此仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点
在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置
它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表
与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。
它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。
注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。
它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。
GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(1.19.0)于8天前进入注册中心。
支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Docker。
同一分类中有:GitHub, Desktop Commander, Cloudflare MCP
同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。
如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i
Connect AI assistants to GitHub - manage repos, issues, PRs, and workflows through natural language.
MCP server for terminal commands, file operations, and process management
Cloudflare MCP servers
按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。
The missing open-source Kubernetes UI, with a built-in MCP server for your AI agent.
Single binary. No account required. Free forever.
🌐 [radarhq.io](https://radarhq.io) · Docs · Benchmarks · Releases
Radar shows you what's broken in a Kubernetes cluster, why, and what changed: issues, topology, a timeline of events and resource changes, Helm, GitOps, traffic, audit, and upgrade impact. Your AI agent reads the same cluster data and relationships through Radar's MCP server, and Radar can run an AI investigation for you with the agent CLI you already use. It runs on your laptop as a kubectl plugin or desktop app, or in-cluster with Helm.
Table of contents
Install and run in 30 seconds:
curl -fsSL https://get.radarhq.io | sh && kubectl radar
Or brew install kubectl-radar. Windows, Krew, desktop app and Helm ↓
Then, with Radar running, connect your AI agent (read-only):
claude mcp add --transport http radar http://localhost:9280/mcp-readonly
Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, other clients, and the desktop app ↓
"Have Radar deployed at work. As far as Kubernetes dashboards go, this is one of the best." — u/TheRealNetroxen
Start from [Issues](#issues), a ranked queue of what's broken right now. Open a failing resource to see it in context: its owners, Pods, Services, and config on the [Topology](#topology), what changed and when on the [Timeline](#timeline) (with diffs), and its events, logs, and YAML in the detail drawer. [Helm](#helm), [GitOps](#gitops), and [Traffic](#traffic) cover how it got deployed and who talks to it. When you want help, Investigate hands the same evidence to your agent (AI investigations). Radar records resource changes while it watches the cluster; history is in memory by default, and --timeline-storage=sqlite or postgres keeps it across restarts.
Issues for the incident the agent diagnoses below: a crash loop on checkout and a Service with no endpoints
Pointed at raw kubectl, an agent spends its context window on YAML and its time on round trips. Radar's built-in Model Context Protocol (MCP) server gives it what Radar already knows instead: how resources connect, what is unhealthy, deduplicated events, recent changes with diffs, and filtered logs. In our benchmarks, the same agent and model reached a diagnosis about 3× faster through Radar than through kubectl (details).
Claude Code on Radar's read-only endpoint, finding why a rollout failed (replay of a real session)
MCP is on by default and served on the same port as the UI: 9280 unless you set --port. The desktop app picks its own port: copy the URL from Radar's MCP dialog and change the final /mcp to /mcp-readonly. Start with the read-only endpoint:
# Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http radar http://localhost:9280/mcp-readonly
codex mcp add radar --url http://localhost:9280/mcp-readonly
Setup for Cursor, VS Code (GitHub Copilot), Copilot CLI, OpenCode, Google Antigravity, Kiro, JetBrains, Cline, Devin, Claude Desktop, Zed, Gemini CLI, and any other MCP client is in the [MCP guide](docs/mcp.md#setup-instructions). Its examples use /mcp; use /mcp-readonly instead to keep Radar's tools read-only. Your agent's other tools follow its own configuration.
/mcp-readonly has no write tools. The full /mcp endpoint, also on by default, adds write tools (restart, scale, apply, rollback, GitOps sync, node drain) marked destructive so clients can ask before running them. On /mcp, diagnose can also run an in-cluster reachability probe that creates short-lived pods. Calls use Radar's Kubernetes access: your kubeconfig locally, or each user's own RBAC when authentication is on. --mcp-read-only turns /mcp off (and with it, applying a fix from an AI investigation); --no-mcp turns MCP and AI investigations off. Neither blocks ordinary UI writes.data or .stringData. Environment variables, Helm values, and logs are scrubbed for known secret patterns, which can't catch everything, and the opt-in exec_pod tool returns raw command output. See MCP securityRadar can also run the investigation for you, with the agent CLI you already have — Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, or OpenCode — on your machine and signed in with your own account. Radar needs no API key of its own. Start one from a resource's Investigate action, from an issue, by describing what you're seeing on the AI investigations page (where to start, since when, and optionally the resource it's about), or from a terminal against a running Radar:
radar diagnose deploy/checkout -n shop
radar diagnose deploy/checkout -n shop --json > conclusion.json
Every investigation ends on the same Findings page, with the evidence behind each claim. Radar's investigation tools can only read the cluster, and Radar applies a fix only when you approve it, from an investigation of the resource it changes. What else the agent can do depends on how Radar runs it. Radar safeguards (Claude Code and Codex) shuts off the agent's other MCP servers and its ability to write. Your agent setup (the only option for Cursor and OpenCode) runs the agent with its normal configuration, tools, and MCP servers, which Radar cannot constrain and which may be able to change your cluster. Cursor and OpenCode approve tool requests automatically in these runs, without asking you. See agents and isolation.
Investigations need a supported agent CLI on the machine running Radar, MCP on, and authentication off. In-cluster installs don't run them. See the AI investigations guide and agent CLI setup.
Three studies of an AI agent diagnosing live faults from SREGym (Microsoft and UIUC) on a 3-node EKS cluster, with the same judge scoring every tool. Times are averages to a submitted answer, right or wrong. These are our own benchmarks; compare numbers within a study, not across studies.
| Study | Faults | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Radar MCP vs raw kubectl — same agent and model | 50 | 64s vs 191s to a diagnosis (about 3× faster); 86% vs 60% diagnosed correctly within two minutes |
| Kubernetes MCP servers — Radar, containers/kubernetes-mcp-server, Flux159/mcp-server-kubernetes, Amazon EKS MCP Server, k8sgpt, raw kubectl | 25 | Radar took 57s, 2.3× faster than the next-fastest MCP server; on the 14 faults every tool got right, 33s vs 58s for the next-fastest |
|
只显示了开头部分;其余内容请在仓库中阅读