原型 · 预览版:收录官方注册中心里的全部服务器,每 30 分钟同步一次。评价和账户功能将在后续阶段推出。
PopNx MCP为使用 AI 的人准备的 MCP 服务器 · 用大白话讲清楚

sift

作者:slymnysr版本 1.1.0i★ –i在你的电脑上运行
注册名称io.github.slymnysr/sift

安装

概览

作者提供的说明(英文原文)

Runs a command, keeps every byte on disk, returns only the lines that matter

PopNx MCP 的三大支柱

这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。

它能帮你做什么

我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。

  • 连接方式: 在你的电脑上运行
  • 传输方式: stdio
  • 分类: 其他
  • 你需要填写:NVIDIA_API_KEY

安装

选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。

安装之前

标为机密的值是你账户的钥匙。千万不要分享给别人,也不要粘贴到聊天里。

你需要

  • PyPI已安装 Python 的 uv(用于 uvx 命令)

你用的是哪个应用?

在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。

打开 Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config,把下面的内容粘贴到 claude_desktop_config.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sift": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "sift-cli",
        "mcp"
      ],
      "env": {
        "NVIDIA_API_KEY": "your-value"
      }
    }
  }
}

在终端中运行这条命令

claude mcp add sift --env NVIDIA_API_KEY=your-value -- uvx sift-cli mcp

运行前请先填写空着的值。

在 Cursor 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sift": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "sift-cli",
        "mcp"
      ],
      "env": {
        "NVIDIA_API_KEY": "your-value"
      }
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

在 VS Code 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json

{
  "servers": {
    "sift": {
      "type": "stdio",
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "sift-cli",
        "mcp"
      ],
      "env": {
        "NVIDIA_API_KEY": "your-value"
      }
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。

你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。

需要你填写的值

  • NVIDIA_API_KEY 机密 env
    A free NVIDIA NIM key. Optional: without one every tool still runs the command, still keeps every byte, and still returns the exit code -- what is lost is the model's choice of lines, not the output.…

这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。

它能做什么

它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。

基础检查i

我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月7日

  • ✓ 通过

    作者与仓库一致

    注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 slymnysr 验证,该账户拥有此仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    仍在维护

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    有许可证

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • – 不适用

    端点有响应

    它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点

  • – 不适用

    使用 OAuth 登录

    在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置

  • … 尚未检查

    工具描述中没有隐藏指令

    它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表

与“其他”中的其他服务器比较i

  • 星标数多于此分类中其他 32700 个服务器的 0%
  • 发布到注册中心的时间比此分类中其他 32700 个服务器的 38% 更新
  • 基础检查结果等于或优于此分类中其他 32700 个服务器的 100%

与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。

常见问题

sift 安全吗?

它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。

它需要哪些密钥或代码?

你需要填写:NVIDIA_API_KEY

它在我的电脑上运行还是在云端?

它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。

它还在维护吗?

GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(1.1.0)于2个月前进入注册中心。

哪些应用可以使用它?

支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Python (uv)。

有什么可以替代它?

同一分类中有:Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, Agent Data Tools: Utilities

替代选择

同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。

如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i

Spec Driven Development

作者:formulahendry

MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.

在你的电脑上运行★ 440MIT14个月前更新
安装

Remote Desktop Commander

作者:desktop-commander

Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.

在云端运行★ 211前天更新
安装

Agent Data Tools: Utilities

作者:Nutshell2000

103 tools: JSON repair, CSV, hashes, cron, dates, units, validators. 25 free calls.

在云端运行今天更新
安装

作者的 README

打开 README

按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。

sift

Runs your command, then gives the model only the lines that matter.

A test suite prints 4,000 lines and eleven of them are the failure. A build prints a progress bar that redraws 900 times. An install lists every package it touched. All of it lands in the context window, and — this is the part that costs — it is re-sent in full on every turn that follows.

sift is an MCP server and a command line for that problem. It runs the command itself, keeps every byte on disk, and hands the model a view: the failures, the summary, the lines a reader would actually stop on. The rest is marked, not deleted.

Two numbers, both measured, both reproducible from this repository. Running this project's own test suite prints 652 lines — 21,392 tokens, as the model's own tokenizer counts them. What comes back is 8 lines and 208 tokens: 99% fewer (python test/kazanc.py). Removing almost everything is the easy half. Over a 22-sample corpus of real build and test output, the default budget keeps 138 of the 140 lines a reader could not do without (python test/budget.py).

$ sift run -- pytest

FAILED test/test_auth.py::test_expired_token - assert 401 == 200 ... ─ 3,914 lines not shown · sift peek 9f2c41ab for any of them ─ === 1 failed, 212 passed in 18.4s ===

A file you did not produce — a log, a saved CI transcript, a crash dump — gets the same treatment without being run:

$ sift digest ci-run-8812.log

2026-09-02T04:11:07 Building 214 targets ─ 38,904 lines not shown · sift peek ci-run-8812.log for any of them ─ ERROR: //src/parser:parse_test failed in 4.1s ─ 1,022 lines not shown · sift peek ci-run-8812.log for any of them ─ FAILED: 1 of 214 targets

A list is not read in lines. A JSON array written for a machine often has no newlines at all, and there is nothing in a line of one worth choosing, so the record becomes the unit and the same rules hold:

$ sift digest export.json

{"id": 3, "status": "failed", "error": "connection refused"} ─ 412 records not shown · sift peek export.json for the text they came from ─ {"id": 416, "status": "ok"}

The same question, asked about source code instead, is a table of contents:

$ sift outline src/parser.rs

pub struct Parser { pub fn parse(input: &str) -> Result { ─ 34 lines not shown · sift peek src/parser.rs for any of them ─ impl Iterator for Tokens {

And a command that does not end — a dev server, a log tail, a build you want to keep working during — is started and then read a slice at a time:

$ sift run --background -- cargo build --release

9f2c41ab $ sift follow 9f2c41ab warning: unused import: std::fmt ─ 212 lines not shown · sift peek 9f2c41ab for any of them ─ error[E0308]: mismatched types sift 9f2c41ab · running · new lines 1-247 · 2 shown · nemotron $ sift follow 9f2c41ab # only what has arrived since $ sift follow --all --wait 30 # every run at once, holding for something new $ sift stop 9f2c41ab # ends it, and everything it started

Nothing is shown twice, and the numbers are the run's own: line 247 stays line 247 in sift peek for as long as the capture exists.

What decides

A free model does. sift sends it the numbered lines and asks one question: *which numbers matter?* It answers with numbers, and nothing else it says is used — the text you read above is printed from the local capture, byte for byte.

That is the whole trick, and it is why this is not a summariser. A summariser can be wrong about what a line said. sift cannot be: it never writes a line, it only chooses one.

It also means language coverage is not a list. A model reads Turkish, Japanese, Arabic and Hindi; it reads Rust, COBOL, Mojo and a language released last week. Nothing here enumerates them, so nothing here can be missing one.

Three rules

Nothing shown is invented. The judge returns line numbers. Text always comes from the local file.

Nothing is thrown away. sift peek returns the raw capture, unchanged. Every gap in a view says how many lines it covers.

Nothing can break your command. No API key, no network, an overloaded endpoint, a nonsense reply, a bug in the distiller, or a decision that nothing may leave this machine — every one of these falls back to rules that need none of them. The command still runs; you still get its output; you get its exit code.

What leaves the machine

One thing: the text of a question. Before it is sent, anything credential-shaped is replaced — tokens with a known prefix, JWTs, authorization headers, passwords in connection strings, the body of a PEM block.

That costs you nothing to read. The model is only ever asked for line numbers, and the lines are printed from your own file, so a line masked on the way out is still shown to you in full.

Three switches:

SIFT_MAX_CAPTURE=0  # keep everything a command writes, however much that is

SIFT_BASE_URL=... # ask your own endpoint instead, and no key is wanted SIFT_MODELS=a,b # which models to ask there, best first SIFT_NO_MODEL=1 # never send anything; use the deterministic view SIFT_MASK=0 # send unmasked SIFT_CACHE=0 # ask again, even about text already answered SIFT_EFFORT=low # let the model think less, and lose some of what matters SIFT_PATIENCE=0 # one quick pass only; do not wait out a busy hour

Masking is not complete and does not claim to be: a bare secret shaped like nothing in particular gets through. SIFT_NO_MODEL is the one that guarantees.

The fourth is a measured trade and is off by default. Asked which lines matter in a 404-line build, the model writes about 900 tokens of reasoning to produce a twelve-token answer, and you wait 15 seconds for it. At SIFT_EFFORT=low the same question takes 2.4 seconds — and over the corpus it loses 7.8% of the lines a reader could not do without, in exactly the places this tool exists for: a mainframe job's return code, a crash loop's diagnosis. Speed is available; it is not the default, and the price is written down.

The third is about not paying twice. An answer already given for exactly these bytes and exactly this question is used again instead of bought again — and what is kept is the numbers, never the view, so the text is still rendered from your own file and the gap still names your own capture. A view that cost no request says (remembered) where it would otherwise name the model.

Captured bytes never leave $SIFT_HOME (~/.cache/sift by default). Nothing is uploaded, nothing is logged elsewhere, and removing a capture directory removes everything that was ever kept about it.

One capture keeps at most a gigabyte. That is far past any real build log and a few seconds of a command stuck in a loop, which is the case it exists for: nothing is thrown away, and the disk somebody else needs is not filled either. Reading never stops — a pipe nobody drains would stop the command, and that is the one thing this will not do — so the command finishes, its exit code is its own, and the footer says kept the first 1,073,741,824 bytes of it rather than letting you believe you have the whole run. SIFT_MAX_CAPTURE=0 turns the ceiling off for anyone who would rather have the disk.

They also never go away on their own. Nothing here sweeps, expires or tidies in the background: sift gc [DAYS] is the only thing that deletes a capture, and it deletes when you type it and not before. What it leaves is one line per handle — when it went and how big it was, never the command — so that a gap marker read a fortnight later gets *"removed on the 8th"* instead of the answer it would give for a handle you made up.

Commands

sift run [--timeout SECONDS] [--shell] [--background] [--cwd DIR]

[--budget LINES] [--keep PATTERN] [--] COMMAND... sift follow [HANDLE] [--all] [--wait N] what a background run has said since you last looked sift stop [HANDLE] end it, and everything it started sift outline PATH|- what a file declares, without its bodies sift digest PATH...|- what is in files somebody else produced sift peek HANDLE|PATH [FIRST] [LAST] sift hook answer one shell-command event on stdin sift mcp speak the protocol on stdin, for a client sift tools which dense tools this machine has sift tool NAME [ARGS...] run one of them, distilled sift memory [TERM] what has been run here before, and how it went sift list [COUNT] what is running, and what has been run sift stats [COUNT] what the shortening cost, and what it saved sift gc [DAYS] remove captures older than that, and say what went

A path of - reads standard input, which is the other way somebody else's output turns up:

$ journalctl -u nginx --since yesterday | sift digest -

Sep 08 04:11:07 nginx[2114]: worker process 2119 exited on signal 11 ─ 8,204 lines not shown · sift peek 7c1a04e9 for any of them ─ Sep 09 01:02:55 nginx[2114]: signal 15 (SIGTERM) received, exiting

What arrives on a pipe has no path anybody could type again, so it is kept as a capture of its own and the gap marker names that instead. The second rule is why: a view that left lines out and pointed at a scratch file would be pointing at nothing by the time somebody read it.

Several paths given to digest are asked about at the same time, and --all follows every running command in one go. Both are the same idea: the waiting is the cost, so do it once. --wait N holds until a run actually says something instead of answering that nothing has happened yet.

sift hook is the way to catch the shell commands a client runs on its own, without a proxy: point the client's pre-tool hook at it and every shell command comes here first. Everything is routed — nothing here guesses which commands are worth catching, because a list of those is a list of tools in disguise and how much a command prints is not knowable before it runs. Routing everything costs nothing: a view of twelve lines is twelve lines. It fails open, so a bug in it leaves your shell exactly as it was, and SIFT_HOOK=0 switches it off.

It is the part of this that pays most and the only part you have to turn on, so it offers itself rather than waiting to be found:

sift hook --install      # says what it gives and what it costs, then asks

sift hook --uninstall # and takes it back out

It writes one line into your client's settings, keeps a copy of the file as it was, and touches nothing else that is in there. sift run mentions it once, ever, and then stops.

sift tool runs one of three programs that answer a question *without opening the file* — sg (ast-grep) for structural search, diff (difftastic) for a diff that can tell a reindent from a change, loc (scc) for the size of a tree. Their output is large by nature, which is exactly why they belong here. No binaries ship with this package: sift tools says which of them this machine has and what each is called, and installing one stays your decision.

sift memory asks no model at all. The question is counting — how often, how it went, which command has never once worked here — and a model asked to count is slower, costs a request and is sometimes wrong. The model decides what cannot be computed, and nothing else.

sift stats says what the shortening saved and what it cost, and keeps those apart because they are not the same kind of number. The share is this tool's own arithmetic over bytes it holds, so it is exact. The cost is the endpoint's count of its own tokens, so it is measured. And beside it now sits the number the question is really about — what the output weighed, counted by the same tokenizer at the moment it was sent:

$ sift stats

handle captured shown part asks weighed cost command 9f2c41ab 62,003 B 450 B 0.7% 1 21,392 5,120 pytest -v

1 run · 62,003 B ca

只显示了开头部分;其余内容请在仓库中阅读

问 PopNx