原型 · 预览版:收录官方注册中心里的全部服务器,每 30 分钟同步一次。评价和账户功能将在后续阶段推出。
PopNx MCP为使用 AI 的人准备的 MCP 服务器 · 用大白话讲清楚

agentburn

作者:Socialpranker版本 0.14.0i★ –i在你的电脑上运行
注册名称io.github.Socialpranker/agentburn

安装

概览

作者提供的说明(英文原文)

Local profiler: which usage window took you out, and where your agent's money goes

PopNx MCP 的三大支柱

这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。

它能帮你做什么

我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。

  • 连接方式: 在你的电脑上运行
  • 传输方式: stdio
  • 分类: 其他

安装

选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。

安装之前

  • 基础检查:1 项中通过 1 项
  • 在你的电脑上运行,拥有你的用户账户的权限(文件、网络、应用)。
  • 注册中心没有列出需要填写的密钥。

你需要

  • PyPI已安装 Python 的 uv(用于 uvx 命令)

你用的是哪个应用?

在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。

打开 Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config,把下面的内容粘贴到 claude_desktop_config.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "agentburn": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "agentburn",
        "mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

在终端中运行这条命令

claude mcp add agentburn -- uvx agentburn mcp

在 Cursor 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "agentburn": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "agentburn",
        "mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

在 VS Code 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json

{
  "servers": {
    "agentburn": {
      "type": "stdio",
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "agentburn",
        "mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。

你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。

这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。

它能做什么

它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。

基础检查i

我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月7日

  • ✓ 通过

    作者与仓库一致

    注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 Socialpranker 验证,该账户拥有此仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    仍在维护

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    有许可证

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • – 不适用

    端点有响应

    它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点

  • – 不适用

    使用 OAuth 登录

    在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置

  • … 尚未检查

    工具描述中没有隐藏指令

    它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表

与“其他”中的其他服务器比较i

  • 星标数多于此分类中其他 32686 个服务器的 0%
  • 发布到注册中心的时间比此分类中其他 32686 个服务器的 33% 更新
  • 基础检查结果等于或优于此分类中其他 32686 个服务器的 100%

与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。

常见问题

agentburn 安全吗?

它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。

它需要哪些密钥或代码?

注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。

它在我的电脑上运行还是在云端?

它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。

它还在维护吗?

GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.14.0)于2个月前进入注册中心。

哪些应用可以使用它?

支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Python (uv)。

有什么可以替代它?

同一分类中有:Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, Microsoft Exchange Online MCP

替代选择

同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。

如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i

Spec Driven Development

作者:formulahendry

MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.

在你的电脑上运行★ 440MIT14个月前更新
安装

Remote Desktop Commander

作者:desktop-commander

Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.

在云端运行★ 211前天更新
安装

Exchange Online admin for MSPs: forwarding audits, EWS posture and offboarding, no PowerShell

在你的电脑上运行今天更新
安装

作者的 README

打开 README

按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。

[Claude Code](#supported-agents) · [Codex CLI](#supported-agents) · [Gemini CLI](#supported-agents) · [opencode](#supported-agents) · [OpenClaw](#supported-agents) · [Hermes Agent](#supported-agents) — one normalized core, local, read-only, zero dependencies

uvx agentburn

[▶ Try it in your browser — no install](https://socialpranker.github.io/agentburn/)


You didn't run out on your average day

You ran out inside one window. On this machine that window was 5.4× the median one — same person, same week, same subscription.

Your assistant's own logs already know which window it was and what filled it. Nothing else on your machine does: the built-in counter shows a total, your invoice shows a total, and neither says *which five hours took you out.*

⏳ agentburn limits — claude-code · rolling 5-hour windows

PEAK WINDOW Aug 04 12:45–17:45 · 555M weighted opus 91% · sonnet 9% · cli 93% · subagent 7% TYPICAL WINDOW 104M median of 83 active 5h slots PEAK / TYPICAL 5.4× a wall is hit by the peak, not by the median

WHAT FILLS THE WINDOW cache reads 64% · cache writes 25% · output 11%

One command, no account, nothing leaves your computer:

uvx agentburn            # where it burns, and what to change

uvx agentburn limits # how fast you fill a usage window, and how long until the wall uvx agentburn context # what long contexts cost — and what a /clear at 150k would have saved

Two ways agents cost you, two questions

If you pay…what actually runs outask
a subscription (Claude Code Pro/Max)the rolling usage window — the invoice is fixed, the wall is notagentburn limits
per token (API keys, OpenClaw, Hermes)money, mostly while you're asleepagentburn

Both read the same local logs. Neither invents a number the data doesn't contain.

agentburn limits — the subscription view

Optimizing a subscription doesn't change your bill. It changes how far you get before you're cut off. That is a *window* problem, and windows need intra-session resolution — a single session routinely spans several of them.

  • Peak vs typical. Your worst rolling 5-hour window against the median of your own active ones. The ratio is the finding: a wall is hit by the peak.
  • What filled it — by model, by source (you / subagents / scheduled work), and by kind (cache reads vs cache writes vs output).
  • Measured against your own wall — automatically. Anthropic doesn't publish the formula behind those allowances, so agentburn refuses to invent a threshold. But Claude Code writes the cut-off into the transcript itself (*"You've hit your session limit · resets 8:30pm"*), and every one of those moments is a measured ceiling. With several, the ceiling is their median:
  YOUR MEASURED CEILING

median of 35 cut-offs Claude Code recorded itself ceiling 146M weighted tokens peak window 137% of your ceiling last 5h 16% of your ceiling TIME TO WALL 2.7 h at the pace of the last 30 min

No cut-off in your logs yet? --hit "2026-08-20 14:30" names one by hand. A measured ceiling is remembered in ~/.agentburn/ceiling.json, so the status line below knows it too.

  • Codex: the provider's own reading. Codex CLI writes rate_limits.used_percent next to every request. agentburn pairs each reading with your weighted usage of the same window and takes the median — a ceiling from the provider's arithmetic, not from a cut-off. Treat it as an estimate: that percentage counts every device and app on the account, while your local rollouts are only part of it — and when Codex stops reporting a window (plan or client change), a later peak is flagged as measured on earlier windows, not sold as an overrun.
  • Time to wall. Ceiling minus the current window, divided by the pace of the last half hour. The number you actually want while working.
  • The week, too. The heaviest rolling 7-day span, how much of it this week already is, and a weekly ceiling when Claude Code recorded a weekly cut-off.
  • By project. Sessions record their working directory; the peak window is split by it.
agentburn statusline — the wall, live, inside Claude Code

One line, no colour, built for Claude Code's statusLine:

⏳ 5h 63% · wall in 47 min · week 71%
{ "statusLine": { "type": "command", "command": "uvx agentburn statusline" } }

Reads only the last three days of logs (the ceiling comes from the state file), so it stays cheap enough to run on every turn.

agentburn context — what a long context costs

Every call re-reads its whole context, and on a subscription that re-reading *is* the window: a turn at 300k costs what three turns at 100k cost. Claude Code records the exact context size of every call, so this is measured, not modelled:

📏 agentburn context — claude-code · what a long context costs

CALLS 156,226 median context 143K · p90 316K · max 704K

WHERE THE WINDOW GOES, BY CONTEXT SIZE 100–200k ██████············ 35% 59,780 calls 200–400k ████████·········· 43% 42,420 calls

400k ██················ 11% 7,257 calls

IF YOU HAD RESTARTED AT… /clear at 100K → 41% of the window not spent (108,573 calls were past it) /clear at 150K → 26% of the window not spent (73,600 calls were past it)

WHAT A SKILL COSTS handoff 7.96K per load × 226 = 1.8M claude-api 33.6K per load × 14 = 470K

  • The `/clear` arithmetic — the part of every call's context above a threshold, at the cache-read rate: the honest saving of a restart habit, assuming the same work in shorter sessions.
  • Skill costs, measured — the context growth right after a lone Skill call, median of recent loads. Bundled skills never touch the disk; the transcript sees all of them.
  • By effort level — how much of the window each effort setting took.
  • Findings with a lever land in agentburn fix: the restart threshold, and the heavy skills.
agentburn commits — what a commit cost you

Sessions record their working directory and branch; your repositories record when each commit landed. The usage between two consecutive commits is what the second one cost — read-only git log, nothing written:

   COSTLIEST COMMITS

124M 33_Thoforge 1f7a31a1 Aug 30 fix(ui): правки UX-аудита — раскладка, навигация 81.2M 33_Thoforge ad19bff7 Aug 28 feat(ui): цель над деревом и развилка в карточке

BY REPOSITORY 33_Thoforge 1.95M median · 287 commits · 1.52B total

Weighted tokens = tokens × *published* price ratios (cache read 0.1×, cache write 1.25×, output per model), normalized to one input token of the reference model. Every ratio is public; none of them is a guess about how the provider counts.

agentburn — the money view
  • Where it burns — by source: cron / subagent / gateway:telegram|discord|whatsapp / cli. Always-on ≠ free.
  • 🌙 While you slept — the overnight bill, isolated and named (--night 23-7).
  • Fixed overhead — uncached input tokens per API call, per source, calibrated against a public benchmark.
  • Subagent rollups — delegation cost chained back to the session that spawned it.
  • `agentburn why` — behavioral forensics: re-read loops, retry storms, idle heartbeats, per-cron receipts, context thrash.
  • `agentburn fix` — ready-to-paste config patches, dry-run by design.

agentburn fix — findings become config, not advice

Not "consider a cheaper model" but the exact file and the exact lines. Patch generators exist only for levers verified against the agent's own source or documented configuration:

🔧 agentburn fix — claude-code · DRY-RUN (nothing was changed)
  1. Drop 2 MCP server(s) you never called why : registered but not called once in the last 30d: blender-mcp, pixellab. Every registered server ships its tool definitions with the context of every session that loads it. proposed: claude mcp remove blender-mcp
  1. Trim the always-loaded memory files (2,254 tokens) why : loaded into every session's context and re-sent whenever the prompt cache expires or the context is compacted — at least 3,565× this window.
AgentVerified levers
Claude Coderegistered MCP servers (~/.claude.json, .mcp.json), always-loaded CLAUDE.md memory files, the session-restart threshold (measured), heavy skills (measured per load)
Hermesper-job model / enabled_toolsets (cron/jobs.py), per-platform toolsets (gateway/run.py)
OpenClawheartbeat.{every, activeHours, model, lightContext} (config/types.agent-defaults.ts)

There is no --apply on purpose: it's your agent's config. Paste it yourself, then prove the saving with --save-baseline → --compare.

Why trust these numbers

Token trackers quietly disagree with each other (2–91× in public issue threads). agentburn takes the opposite stance:

  • Numbers come from the agent's own accounting, read-only. No scraping, no proxies, no guessing.
  • One reply is counted once. Claude Code writes one transcript line per content block, each carrying the same usage; summing lines inflates calls and tokens ~1.8×. agentburn deduplicates by requestId (found and fixed in 0.14.0 — earlier absolute totals from this tool were inflated by that factor; ratios were not).
  • Provider-billed costs are shown as-is; estimates are marked ~; mixed data is labeled mixed.
  • Where a price doesn't exist, none is invented. Claude Code records no costs and subscription usage has no honest per-token price — so that adapter reports tokens and windows, never dollars.
  • Sessions with messages but zero recorded tokens (known accounting gaps, e.g. hermes-agent #12023) are detected: totals become an explicit lower bound, and fixing the accounting becomes recommendation #1.
  • Result weights on agents that don't record them are labeled *estimates*, and only ever used to rank findings against each other.

Speed

Transcripts are append-only, so they are parsed once. Each file's parse is cached under its size and mtime in ~/.agentburn/cache, and a run reuses every file that hasn't changed:

30 days over 3.1 GB of Claude Code logs
first run (parses everything, writes the cache)~190 s
every run after that~3 s
cache size29 MB (0.9% of the logs)

A file that grew is re-parsed and re-cached; nothing else is touched. --no-cache (or AGENTBURN_NO_CACHE=1) forces a full re-parse, --clear-cache deletes it. The cache is derived data — deleting it costs time, nothing else.

Privac

只显示了开头部分;其余内容请在仓库中阅读

问 PopNx