原型 · 预览版:收录官方注册中心里的全部服务器,每 30 分钟同步一次。评价和账户功能将在后续阶段推出。
PopNx MCP为使用 AI 的人准备的 MCP 服务器 · 用大白话讲清楚

Codebase Doctor

作者:subhajitlucky版本 0.1.10i★ –i在你的电脑上运行
注册名称io.github.subhajitlucky/codebase-doctor

安装

概览

作者提供的说明(英文原文)

Read-only codebase audits for coding agents: secrets, RLS, deps, review verdicts. No writes.

PopNx MCP 的三大支柱

这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。

它能帮你做什么

我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。

  • 连接方式: 在你的电脑上运行
  • 传输方式: stdio
  • 分类: 开发者工具

安装

选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。

安装之前

  • 基础检查:1 项中通过 1 项
  • 在你的电脑上运行,拥有你的用户账户的权限(文件、网络、应用)。
  • 注册中心没有列出需要填写的密钥。

你需要

  • npm已安装 Node.js(用于 npx 命令)

你用的是哪个应用?

在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。

打开 Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config,把下面的内容粘贴到 claude_desktop_config.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "codebase-doctor": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "codebase-doctor"
      ]
    }
  }
}

在终端中运行这条命令

claude mcp add codebase-doctor -- npx -y codebase-doctor

在 Cursor 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "codebase-doctor": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "codebase-doctor"
      ]
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

在 VS Code 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json

{
  "servers": {
    "codebase-doctor": {
      "type": "stdio",
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "codebase-doctor"
      ]
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。

你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。

这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。

它能做什么

它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。

基础检查i

我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月6日

  • ✓ 通过

    作者与仓库一致

    注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 subhajitlucky 验证,该账户拥有此仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    仍在维护

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    有许可证

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • – 不适用

    端点有响应

    它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点

  • – 不适用

    使用 OAuth 登录

    在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置

  • … 尚未检查

    工具描述中没有隐藏指令

    它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表

与“开发者工具”中的其他服务器比较i

  • 星标数多于此分类中其他 1392 个服务器的 0%
  • 发布到注册中心的时间比此分类中其他 1392 个服务器的 62% 更新
  • 基础检查结果等于或优于此分类中其他 1392 个服务器的 100%

与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。

常见问题

Codebase Doctor 安全吗?

它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。

它需要哪些密钥或代码?

注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。

它在我的电脑上运行还是在云端?

它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。

它还在维护吗?

GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.1.10)于32天前进入注册中心。

哪些应用可以使用它?

支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Node.js。

有什么可以替代它?

同一分类中有:GitHub, Desktop Commander, Cloudflare MCP

替代选择

同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。

如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i

GitHub

作者:github

Connect AI assistants to GitHub - manage repos, issues, PRs, and workflows through natural language.

电脑或云端★ 34,245MIT3天前更新
安装

Desktop Commander

作者:wonderwhy-er

MCP server for terminal commands, file operations, and process management

在你的电脑上运行★ 10,225MIT15天前更新
安装

Cloudflare MCP

作者:cloudflare

Cloudflare MCP servers

在云端运行★ 4,446Apache-2.014个月前更新
安装

作者的 README

打开 README

按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。

Codebase Doctor

Models build. Codebase Doctor verifies.

It finds the thing, and it never guesses.

Most repository scanners fail in one of two ways: they flood you with false positives, or they silently skip the hard case and report "clean." Codebase Doctor does neither. Every finding carries evidence, every audit reports what it *couldn't* analyze, and a clean run means the scope was actually checked.

npx -y codebase-doctor audit . --changed --format brief
codebase-doctor brief

scope=full findings=1 shown=1 coverage=incomplete score=80 [high] security/secrets/provider-token src/config.ts:12 — Have an authorized human or external coding agent remove the value and rotate it, then rerun the audit. coverage-limitations: validation: skipped, database: skipped, security: partial

That last line is the point. Most tools print findings and stop. This one tells you what it *didn't* check, every single run.


Why this exists

Coding agents ship code faster than review can keep up. The failure isn't that agents can't write code — it's that nothing verifies what they wrote before it merges.

Codebase Doctor is that verification step. It builds a source graph, scans for committed secrets, dependency drift, unsafe Dockerfiles, workflow injection, RLS mistakes, and accessibility regressions — then tells you exactly what it could not verify.

Benchmarked, not vibes: 17 seeded single-defect fixtures score 100% rule recall and zero medium+ false positives (results, reproducible with npm run benchmark).

Red-teamed: an adversarial mutation corpus tries to hide each defect in a different shape — 11/11 mutants caught, 7/7 controls clean, gated in CI (corpus, reproducible with npm run red-team).

Cross-checked: two independently written offline analyzers (this repo's sql-rls and rls-doctor) run over the same SQL corpus — 10 findings matched, 0 severity mismatches, 1 documented coverage difference, safe schema clean under both (scoreboard, npm run differential).

Field study: of 100 agent-configured public repositories, 23% ship at least one high-severity finding — 10% have broken imports, 4% committed key material, 11% risky agent configuration (report, anonymized and reproducible).

Install

npx -y codebase-doctor audit .          # no install

npm install -g codebase-doctor # global

Quick start

codebase-doctor demo                             # disposable fixture: secret, broken import, blast radius

codebase-doctor bisect security/secrets/provider-token . # when did this enter history? codebase-doctor audit . --json # full audit codebase-doctor audit . --changed --json # just my diff codebase-doctor audit . --changed --base main --json # PR review codebase-doctor audit . --format sarif # GitHub code scanning codebase-doctor audit . --format html > report.html # shareable standalone report codebase-doctor verify . --baseline before.json # confirm fixes landed

demo needs no configuration and no repository: it builds a disposable git fixture with a tracked secret and a broken import, audits the simulated agent edit with the real pipeline, prints the blast radius, and exits 1 to show the CI gate. Nothing outside a temp directory is touched.

Options

--run-checks          Permit configured validation commands

--changed Audit Git changes and their affected scope (implied by review) --base Compare changed scope from the merge base with this ref --json Emit schema-versioned JSON --format Output format: text, json, sarif, brief, or html (review adds markdown, github) --all-findings Review only: include findings outside the changed lines --output Review only: write the report to a file as well as stdout --exclude Exclude a repository-relative path glob; repeatable --baseline Compare with a prior Codebase Doctor JSON report --timeout Per-command timeout (default: 120000) --fail-on info|low|medium|high|critical|none (default: high) --require-complete Exit 2 when audit coverage is incomplete --max-findings Cap brief output (default: 100) --score Print only the Repo Health score --badge Print a shields.io badge URL for the Repo Health score --receipt Write a portable coverage receipt (digest-verified) --receipt-key Sign the receipt with an Ed25519 private key (PEM) --pheromone Write a privacy-bounded signal (rules and counts only) --with-database Permit live PostgreSQL catalog access --with-advisories Opt-in OSV advisory lookup over lockfile packages --database-schema Schema to inspect; repeatable (default: public) --database-timeout Catalog statement timeout in ms (default: 10000)

Code review

review is the pull-request command. It always audits changed scope, narrows findings to added diff lines, and prints a verdict — NO_CHANGES, APPROVE, COMMENT, or REQUEST_CHANGES — so unrelated old issues never fail a PR and an empty checkout is never represented as an approval:

codebase-doctor review . --base origin/main --format markdown > review.md

codebase-doctor review . --base origin/main --format github codebase-doctor review . --format json # includes a machine-readable review envelope codebase-doctor review . --base origin/main --receipt review.json codebase-doctor review . --base origin/main --receipt review.json --receipt-key key.pem

  • --format markdown renders a PR-comment-ready body with the verdict, findings, source impact, and coverage limitations.
  • --format github emits ::error / ::warning / ::notice workflow commands that annotate pull-request diffs inline from Actions logs, with no network access.
  • A finding on an unchanged line is out of scope for the verdict and counted as omitted; the full audit still reports it. --all-findings disables narrowing, and --output writes the report to a file as well as stdout.
  • With --baseline, only *new* findings in the diff gate the verdict.
  • An empty diff reports NO_CHANGES, not APPROVE. Use --require-base in CI to fail closed when the base ref was not supplied.
  • --receipt writes a portable review receipt with the verdict, diff-scope counts, coverage limitations, and finding fingerprints. Add --receipt-key to sign it with Ed25519; verify-receipt checks integrity and prints the review verdict.
  • Exit 1 means the review requests changes; exit 2 is an operational failure, never a clean result. Inspect coverage before calling the reviewed diff verified or clean.

GitHub Action

permissions:

contents: read security-events: write

steps:

  • uses: actions/checkout@v4
  • uses: subhajitlucky/codebase-doctor@v0.5.0 with: format: sarif upload: "true" fail-on: high

Findings appear in the Security tab. See docs/github-action.md.


What it checks

Secrets — working tree and history

Precision-first and not exhaustive: it detects private-key material, provider-token shapes, paired AWS credentials, credential-bearing URLs, and high-confidence sensitive assignments. A Git-ignored .env is normal storage and is not a finding; a tracked one containing a real credential is.

security/secrets-history catches the case that matters most: a secret committed and later deleted from the working tree, so a rotated-looking repo doesn't hide an exposure. It inspects the most recent 200 commits across all branches without ever checking out, rewriting, or executing repository content. Changed audits scope the history log to changed paths, so deleting a leaked file cannot review clean.

Matched values are withheld from every finding, fingerprint, error, and report. Codebase Doctor never prints your secrets — including in its own SARIF. An external authorized human or agent must remediate the shareable content and rotate or revoke the credential, then rerun the same audit.

Dependencies

security/dependencies is read-only and offline. Lockfile-aware for npm lockfile versions 2 and 3, pnpm (v5+), Yarn (classic and Berry), Bun, and Python poetry and uv locks. Remaining ecosystems stay explicitly unsupported rather than receiving guessed findings.

Rule families: security/dependencies/missing-lockfile, security/dependencies/manifest-lock-drift, security/dependencies/insecure-source, security/dependencies/mutable-git-source, security/dependencies/missing-integrity, security/dependencies/workspace-registry-resolution, security/dependencies/competing-npm-lockfiles, and security/dependencies/competing-lockfiles.

A normal semver range such as ^5.0.0 is not a finding when the lock agrees. Raw dependency specifications and resolved URLs are withheld from reports and never enter a fingerprint. An external authorized human or agent must correct the metadata and rerun the same scope. Inspect coverage before calling the dependency graph clean or verified.

It never invokes npm, another package manager, a shell, an installer, or a lifecycle script, and makes no network request. It makes no CVE or advisory claim on its own. Python coverage parses poetry.lock and uv.lock package blocks and pyproject.toml Poetry and PEP 621 declarations with a bounded line scanner (no TOML dependency): insecure transports, unpinned git references, missing hash evidence, missing lockfiles, competing lockfiles, and decidable manifest-lock drift are reported, while undecidable specifiers, markers, direct-URL drift, transitive-only entries, and requirements-only layouts stay visible as partial coverage.

--with-advisories performs one bounded OSV lookup against resolved packages. Only names, versions, and ecosystems leave the machine.

Source impact — what breaks if I change this file

repository/source-graph uses a real syntax parser (never executes your code) to build a static import graph across JS/TS, Python, Go, Java, and Rust. In changed mode it walks reverse edges and reports a deterministic shortest impact path from each changed file.

Changed mode is mixed-scope per doctor, not a universal file filter: Project Doctor structural rules run with the full repository snapshot and may report findings outside changed paths for manifests, lockfiles, workspaces, and test visibility. File-local doctors (backend, frontend, infrastructure, agent surface, performance) examine only changed files present in the inventory, so changed audits stay proportional to the change. Configured validation check plans are built from full project topology and then filtered to affectedProjectIds. Static SQL selects affected migration streams and replays full current history for every selected stream. Live database remains a full observed schema-set audit only with separately requested --with-database. Zero changed findings is not a full clean result.

repository/source-graph recognizes static import, re-export, type-only import, literal require, and literal dynamic import edges across JavaScript and TypeScript (plus Python, Go, Java, and Rust) with a real syntax parser that never executes repository code. Cycles are valid topology, not f

只显示了开头部分;其余内容请在仓库中阅读

问 PopNx