Vexa
Meeting bot and transcripts for Google Meet, Teams and Zoom. Live or after, speakers labelled.
作者提供的说明(英文原文)
Bulk email verification: live SMTP mailbox check, MX, catch-all, disposable and role detection.
这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。
我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。
选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。
Authorization标为机密的值是你账户的钥匙。千万不要分享给别人,也不要粘贴到聊天里。
你需要
你用的是哪个应用?
在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。
这个地址需要在请求的 header 中放入密钥,而添加连接器的菜单无法设置。请改用 Claude Code、Cursor 或 VS Code。
在终端中运行这条命令
claude mcp add --transport http email-verifier 'https://mcp.apify.com/?tools=sumitr_mardy/email-verifier' --header 'Authorization: your-value'运行前请先填写空着的值。
粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"email-verifier": {
"url": "https://mcp.apify.com/?tools=sumitr_mardy/email-verifier",
"headers": {
"Authorization": "your-value"
}
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json
{
"servers": {
"email-verifier": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://mcp.apify.com/?tools=sumitr_mardy/email-verifier",
"headers": {
"Authorization": "your-value"
}
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
这个地址需要在请求的 header 中放入密钥,而添加连接器的菜单无法设置。请改用 Claude Code、Cursor 或 VS Code。
你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。
Authorization 机密 HTTP header这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。
我们还没有读取这个服务器的工具列表;我们会轮流检查各个端点。
我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月6日
注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 sumitrmardy 验证,该账户拥有此仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
尚未检查;我们会轮流检查各个端点
尚未检查;我们会轮流检查各个端点
尚未检查;我们会在检查端点时读取工具列表
与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。
它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。
你需要填写:Authorization
它在作者的云端运行。通过互联网连接,无需安装,但你发送的内容会经过作者的服务器。
GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(1.0.0)于16天前进入注册中心。
支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。它通过 URL 连接,所以接受远程 MCP 服务器的应用也可以使用,例如开启开发者模式的 ChatGPT。
同一分类中有:Vexa, emailmd, MCP WhatsApp Cloud
同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。
如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i
Meeting bot and transcripts for Google Meet, Teams and Zoom. Live or after, speakers labelled.
Render markdown into email-safe HTML, lint drafts for deliverability problems, and preview emails.
MCP server for WhatsApp Cloud API (Meta) — messages, media, and templates via Graph API
按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。
English | 简体中文
Verify email addresses in bulk: RFC 5322 syntax → DNS/MX → disposable, role and free-provider lists → a live SMTP handshake with a mandatory catch-all probe. No email is ever sent — the check opens an SMTP session, reads the reply codes and hangs up.
{
"email": "john@example.com", "status": "deliverable", "sub_status": "valid_mailbox", "score": 100, "checks": { "syntax": true, "domain_exists": true, "mx_found": true, "smtp_connectable": true, "mailbox_exists": true, "catch_all": false, "disposable": false, "role_based": false, "free_provider": false, "a_record_fallback": false, "has_tag": false }, "mx_record": "aspmx.l.google.com" }
Most verifiers are written for a human reading a dashboard. This one assumes the caller is code.
That changes what the output has to guarantee:
1. `status` is always one of four values. deliverable, undeliverable, risky, unknown. Never null, never empty, never a fifth value. Enumerate them once and stay correct.
2. All eleven `checks` keys are present on every record. A check that never ran is false, and the reason lives in sub_status. Nothing disappears.
3. Catch-all domains and Gmail-type providers are reported honestly. They come back risky with a reason, not a fabricated "valid".
Those three together mean you write this:
const mailable = results.filter(r => r.status === 'deliverable');
const neverSend = results.filter(r => r.status === 'undeliverable' || r.checks.disposable); const retryLater = results.filter(r => r.status === 'unknown');
and not this:
const mailable = results.filter(r => r?.status === 'valid' && (r.checks?.catch_all ?? false) === false);
The second line is what every nullable-by-default API forces on you. It matters more for an agent than for a person: an agent cannot write `?? false` — it acts on what it reads. A field that sometimes vanishes is not an inconvenience, it is a wrong answer delivered with confidence.
status | sub_status | What to do |
|---|---|---|
deliverable | valid_mailbox | Send |
risky | role_based | Send only if a shared inbox is acceptable |
risky | catch_all | Mailbox unconfirmable — send at low volume, or enrich another way |
risky | free_provider_unverifiable | Treat as a consumer address; mailbox unknowable over SMTP |
risky | full_mailbox | Hold, retry in a few days |
risky | disposable | Do not send; block at signup |
unknown | greylisted | Retry in 30–60 min — not a bad address |
unknown | smtp_timeout | Retry later; if it persists, treat as unverified |
unknown | internal_error | Retry once |
undeliverable | any | Remove from the list |
Full table with scores and reasoning: [docs/statuses.md](docs/statuses.md)
The distinction that matters: undeliverable means *we found out it is dead*; unknown means *we could not find out*. Tools that merge the two report better-looking numbers and quietly delete real customers from your list.
Every template calls the Actor with the core HTTP Request node — no community node to install, works on n8n Cloud and self-hosted. Authentication is an n8n Header Auth credential named Apify API; no token is stored in any file here.
| Template | What it does | Import | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verify a Google Sheets lead list | Reads rows with no verdict, verifies in batches, writes status/score back. Safe to re-run and to schedule. | t1-google-sheets.json | ||
| Block disposable emails at signup | Webhook in, `{allow\ | review\ | block}` out, with the policy in one editable Code node. | t2-signup-check.json |
| Clean a CSV before cold email | Upload an Apollo/Instantly/HubSpot export, get back send_safe / review / drop as three CSVs. Greylisted rows are retried once. | t3-clean-csv.json | ||
| AI agent tool | An AI Agent with the verifier as its only tool, and a system prompt that teaches it the action table above. | t4-ai-agent-tool.json |
Chinese versions of all four, with localized sticky notes: workflows/zh-CN/
To import: download the JSON, then in n8n use *Workflows → Import from File*. Setup steps are on a sticky note inside each workflow.
MCP — the Apify MCP server, scoped to this one Actor. Config for Claude Desktop and Cursor: agents/mcp/
OpenAPI — one file that Dify, Coze, GPT Actions and LangChain's OpenAPI toolkit can all import: openapi/email-verifier.openapi.yaml
Tool definitions — ready-made JSON for OpenAI function calling and the Anthropic tool API: agents/tool-definitions/
For the agent itself — llms.txt is the whole contract in one pass: endpoint, input, output, the action table, batching limits.
Chinese-first setup guides: Dify · Coze / 扣子
curl -X POST "https://api.apify.com/v2/acts/sumitr_mardy~email-verifier/run-sync-get-dataset-items" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $APIFY_TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"emails":["john@example.com","someone@gmail.com"]}'
Python and Node examples, each under 25 lines and with no SDK required: examples/
Addresses go in one batch per call, never one call per address — batching is what makes this cheap and fast.
A synchronous Apify run must finish inside 300 seconds. Past that, use the async pattern: start the run, wait for it, then fetch the dataset. Working example: examples/batch-large-list/
Measured throughput and the batch size to use: docs/pricing-and-batching.md
Pay per event: one charge per address that gets a verdict — including undeliverable and unknown, because the work was done either way, and a confirmed bad address is exactly the result you were paying for. No per-run charge.
The rate is tiered by your Apify plan and is adjusted to track the market, so it is not reprinted here where it would go stale: [see current pricing](https://apify.com/sumitr_mardy/email-verifier/pricing).
You need an Apify account to call the API; there is a free tier.
Stated plainly, because you would find them anyway.
250 for addresses that do not exist, then bounce at delivery. Any vendor claiming a per-mailbox Gmail verdict from SMTP is guessing. You get risky/free_provider_unverifiable and checks.mailbox_exists: false.421/450 come back as unknown/greylisted, which is retryable. Template T3 does the retry for you.Does it send an email? No. It opens an SMTP session, sends EHLO, MAIL FROM and RCPT TO, reads the reply codes and disconnects. It never issues DATA, so no message body exists anywhere in the process.
Can it verify Gmail addresses? It verifies that the syntax and domain are valid and that the address is not disposable. It cannot confirm that a specific Gmail mailbox exists — Google answers identically for real and fake addresses. Nothing that uses SMTP can do better; tools that claim otherwise are guessing.
What is a catch-all domain? A domain configured to accept mail for every address, existing or not. Before asking about your address, the verifier sends a RCPT TO for a random local part that cannot exist. If that is accepted, the domain is catch-all and every address on it is reported risky/catch_all.
How many emails per call? As many as finish inside the 300-second sync limit. Measure with your own list; see docs/pricing-and-batching.md. Beyond that, use the async pattern.
How do I use it with an Apollo / Instantly / Lemlist export? Template T3 — upload the CSV, get three cleaned lists back. It picks the email column automatically and deduplicates first, so you are not charged twice for the same address.
What happens to duplicates? They are charged. Deduplicate before you call; every template here already does.
MIT licensed. Issues and pull requests welcome — particularly corrections to the n8n templates from anyone running a version where something behaves differently.