原型 · 预览版:收录官方注册中心里的全部服务器,每 30 分钟同步一次。评价和账户功能将在后续阶段推出。
PopNx MCP为使用 AI 的人准备的 MCP 服务器 · 用大白话讲清楚

Email Verifier (SMTP, MX, Catch-All)

作者:sumitrmardy版本 1.0.0i★ –i在云端运行
注册名称io.github.sumitrmardy/email-verifier

安装

概览

作者提供的说明(英文原文)

Bulk email verification: live SMTP mailbox check, MX, catch-all, disposable and role detection.

PopNx MCP 的三大支柱

这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。

它能帮你做什么

我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。

  • 连接方式: 在云端运行
  • 传输方式: Streamable HTTP
  • 分类: 聊天与邮件
  • 你需要填写:Authorization

安装

选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。

安装之前

标为机密的值是你账户的钥匙。千万不要分享给别人,也不要粘贴到聊天里。

你需要

你用的是哪个应用?

在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。

这个地址需要在请求的 header 中放入密钥,而添加连接器的菜单无法设置。请改用 Claude Code、Cursor 或 VS Code。

在终端中运行这条命令

claude mcp add --transport http email-verifier 'https://mcp.apify.com/?tools=sumitr_mardy/email-verifier' --header 'Authorization: your-value'

运行前请先填写空着的值。

在 Cursor 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "email-verifier": {
      "url": "https://mcp.apify.com/?tools=sumitr_mardy/email-verifier",
      "headers": {
        "Authorization": "your-value"
      }
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

在 VS Code 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json

{
  "servers": {
    "email-verifier": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://mcp.apify.com/?tools=sumitr_mardy/email-verifier",
      "headers": {
        "Authorization": "your-value"
      }
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

这个地址需要在请求的 header 中放入密钥,而添加连接器的菜单无法设置。请改用 Claude Code、Cursor 或 VS Code。

你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。

需要你填写的值

  • Authorization 机密 HTTP header
    Optional. Bearer for clients without OAuth sign-in. Get one at https://console.apify.com/settings/integrations

这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。

它能做什么

我们还没有读取这个服务器的工具列表;我们会轮流检查各个端点。

基础检查i

我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月6日

  • ✓ 通过

    作者与仓库一致

    注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 sumitrmardy 验证,该账户拥有此仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    仍在维护

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    有许可证

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    端点有响应

    尚未检查;我们会轮流检查各个端点

  • … 尚未检查

    使用 OAuth 登录

    尚未检查;我们会轮流检查各个端点

  • … 尚未检查

    工具描述中没有隐藏指令

    尚未检查;我们会在检查端点时读取工具列表

与“聊天与邮件”中的其他服务器比较i

  • 星标数多于此分类中其他 1768 个服务器的 0%
  • 发布到注册中心的时间比此分类中其他 1768 个服务器的 64% 更新
  • 基础检查结果等于或优于此分类中其他 1768 个服务器的 100%

与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。

常见问题

Email Verifier (SMTP, MX, Catch-All) 安全吗?

它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。

它需要哪些密钥或代码?

你需要填写:Authorization

它在我的电脑上运行还是在云端?

它在作者的云端运行。通过互联网连接,无需安装,但你发送的内容会经过作者的服务器。

它还在维护吗?

GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(1.0.0)于16天前进入注册中心。

哪些应用可以使用它?

支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。它通过 URL 连接,所以接受远程 MCP 服务器的应用也可以使用,例如开启开发者模式的 ChatGPT。

有什么可以替代它?

同一分类中有:Vexa, emailmd, MCP WhatsApp Cloud

替代选择

同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。

如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i

Vexa

作者:Vexa-ai

Meeting bot and transcripts for Google Meet, Teams and Zoom. Live or after, speakers labelled.

在云端运行★ 2,949Apache-2.02个月前更新
安装

emailmd

作者:anypost

Render markdown into email-safe HTML, lint drafts for deliverability problems, and preview emails.

电脑或云端★ 1,385MIT31天前更新
安装

MCP WhatsApp Cloud

作者:codespar

MCP server for WhatsApp Cloud API (Meta) — messages, media, and templates via Graph API

在你的电脑上运行★ 277MIT5个月前更新
安装

作者的 README

打开 README

按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。

English | 简体中文

Bulk Email Verification API — for n8n, AI Agents & MCP

Verify email addresses in bulk: RFC 5322 syntax → DNS/MX → disposable, role and free-provider lists → a live SMTP handshake with a mandatory catch-all probe. No email is ever sent — the check opens an SMTP session, reads the reply codes and hangs up.

➜ Try it on Apify
{

"email": "john@example.com", "status": "deliverable", "sub_status": "valid_mailbox", "score": 100, "checks": { "syntax": true, "domain_exists": true, "mx_found": true, "smtp_connectable": true, "mailbox_exists": true, "catch_all": false, "disposable": false, "role_based": false, "free_provider": false, "a_record_fallback": false, "has_tag": false }, "mx_record": "aspmx.l.google.com" }


Why pipelines like it

Most verifiers are written for a human reading a dashboard. This one assumes the caller is code.

That changes what the output has to guarantee:

1. `status` is always one of four values. deliverable, undeliverable, risky, unknown. Never null, never empty, never a fifth value. Enumerate them once and stay correct.

2. All eleven `checks` keys are present on every record. A check that never ran is false, and the reason lives in sub_status. Nothing disappears.

3. Catch-all domains and Gmail-type providers are reported honestly. They come back risky with a reason, not a fabricated "valid".

Those three together mean you write this:

const mailable = results.filter(r => r.status === 'deliverable');

const neverSend = results.filter(r => r.status === 'undeliverable' || r.checks.disposable); const retryLater = results.filter(r => r.status === 'unknown');

and not this:

const mailable = results.filter(r => r?.status === 'valid' && (r.checks?.catch_all ?? false) === false);

The second line is what every nullable-by-default API forces on you. It matters more for an agent than for a person: an agent cannot write `?? false` — it acts on what it reads. A field that sometimes vanishes is not an inconvenience, it is a wrong answer delivered with confidence.


What to do with each result

statussub_statusWhat to do
deliverablevalid_mailboxSend
riskyrole_basedSend only if a shared inbox is acceptable
riskycatch_allMailbox unconfirmable — send at low volume, or enrich another way
riskyfree_provider_unverifiableTreat as a consumer address; mailbox unknowable over SMTP
riskyfull_mailboxHold, retry in a few days
riskydisposableDo not send; block at signup
unknowngreylistedRetry in 30–60 min — not a bad address
unknownsmtp_timeoutRetry later; if it persists, treat as unverified
unknowninternal_errorRetry once
undeliverableanyRemove from the list

Full table with scores and reasoning: [docs/statuses.md](docs/statuses.md)

The distinction that matters: undeliverable means *we found out it is dead*; unknown means *we could not find out*. Tools that merge the two report better-looking numbers and quietly delete real customers from your list.


Use it in n8n

Every template calls the Actor with the core HTTP Request node — no community node to install, works on n8n Cloud and self-hosted. Authentication is an n8n Header Auth credential named Apify API; no token is stored in any file here.

TemplateWhat it doesImport
Verify a Google Sheets lead listReads rows with no verdict, verifies in batches, writes status/score back. Safe to re-run and to schedule.t1-google-sheets.json
Block disposable emails at signupWebhook in, `{allow\review\block}` out, with the policy in one editable Code node.t2-signup-check.json
Clean a CSV before cold emailUpload an Apollo/Instantly/HubSpot export, get back send_safe / review / drop as three CSVs. Greylisted rows are retried once.t3-clean-csv.json
AI agent toolAn AI Agent with the verifier as its only tool, and a system prompt that teaches it the action table above.t4-ai-agent-tool.json

Chinese versions of all four, with localized sticky notes: workflows/zh-CN/

To import: download the JSON, then in n8n use *Workflows → Import from File*. Setup steps are on a sticky note inside each workflow.


Use it from an AI agent

MCP — the Apify MCP server, scoped to this one Actor. Config for Claude Desktop and Cursor: agents/mcp/

OpenAPI — one file that Dify, Coze, GPT Actions and LangChain's OpenAPI toolkit can all import: openapi/email-verifier.openapi.yaml

Tool definitions — ready-made JSON for OpenAI function calling and the Anthropic tool API: agents/tool-definitions/

For the agent itself — llms.txt is the whole contract in one pass: endpoint, input, output, the action table, batching limits.

Chinese-first setup guides: Dify · Coze / 扣子


Use it from code

curl -X POST "https://api.apify.com/v2/acts/sumitr_mardy~email-verifier/run-sync-get-dataset-items" \

-H "Authorization: Bearer $APIFY_TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"emails":["john@example.com","someone@gmail.com"]}'

Python and Node examples, each under 25 lines and with no SDK required: examples/


Large lists

Addresses go in one batch per call, never one call per address — batching is what makes this cheap and fast.

A synchronous Apify run must finish inside 300 seconds. Past that, use the async pattern: start the run, wait for it, then fetch the dataset. Working example: examples/batch-large-list/

Measured throughput and the batch size to use: docs/pricing-and-batching.md


Pricing

Pay per event: one charge per address that gets a verdict — including undeliverable and unknown, because the work was done either way, and a confirmed bad address is exactly the result you were paying for. No per-run charge.

The rate is tiered by your Apify plan and is adjusted to track the market, so it is not reprinted here where it would go stale: [see current pricing](https://apify.com/sumitr_mardy/email-verifier/pricing).

You need an Apify account to call the API; there is a free tier.


Known limits

Stated plainly, because you would find them anyway.

  • Free providers cannot be mailbox-verified. Gmail, Outlook, Yahoo and iCloud answer 250 for addresses that do not exist, then bounce at delivery. Any vendor claiming a per-mailbox Gmail verdict from SMTP is guessing. You get risky/free_provider_unverifiable and checks.mailbox_exists: false.
  • Catch-all domains cannot be mailbox-verified. By definition. The probe detects them and says so rather than returning a confident guess.
  • Greylisting is not a verdict. 421/450 come back as unknown/greylisted, which is retryable. Template T3 does the retry for you.

FAQ

Does it send an email? No. It opens an SMTP session, sends EHLO, MAIL FROM and RCPT TO, reads the reply codes and disconnects. It never issues DATA, so no message body exists anywhere in the process.

Can it verify Gmail addresses? It verifies that the syntax and domain are valid and that the address is not disposable. It cannot confirm that a specific Gmail mailbox exists — Google answers identically for real and fake addresses. Nothing that uses SMTP can do better; tools that claim otherwise are guessing.

What is a catch-all domain? A domain configured to accept mail for every address, existing or not. Before asking about your address, the verifier sends a RCPT TO for a random local part that cannot exist. If that is accepted, the domain is catch-all and every address on it is reported risky/catch_all.

How many emails per call? As many as finish inside the 300-second sync limit. Measure with your own list; see docs/pricing-and-batching.md. Beyond that, use the async pattern.

How do I use it with an Apollo / Instantly / Lemlist export? Template T3 — upload the CSV, get three cleaned lists back. It picks the email column automatically and deduplicates first, so you are not charged twice for the same address.

What happens to duplicates? They are charged. Deduplicate before you call; every template here already does.


MIT licensed. Issues and pull requests welcome — particularly corrections to the n8n templates from anyone running a version where something behaves differently.

问 PopNx