Spec Driven Development
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
作者提供的说明(英文原文)
A decision model for the calls that don't have a right answer. The better option, with a reason.
这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。
我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。
选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。
Authorization标为机密的值是你账户的钥匙。千万不要分享给别人,也不要粘贴到聊天里。
你需要
你用的是哪个应用?
在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。
这个地址需要在请求的 header 中放入密钥,而添加连接器的菜单无法设置。请改用 Claude Code、Cursor 或 VS Code。
在终端中运行这条命令
claude mcp add --transport http decider https://mcp.turingcorp.net/mcp --header 'Authorization: Bearer {agent_pass}'运行前请先填写空着的值。
粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"decider": {
"url": "https://mcp.turingcorp.net/mcp",
"headers": {
"Authorization": "Bearer {agent_pass}"
}
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json
{
"servers": {
"decider": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://mcp.turingcorp.net/mcp",
"headers": {
"Authorization": "Bearer {agent_pass}"
}
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
这个地址需要在请求的 header 中放入密钥,而添加连接器的菜单无法设置。请改用 Claude Code、Cursor 或 VS Code。
你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。
Authorization 机密 必填 HTTP header这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。
我们还没有读取这个服务器的工具列表;我们会轮流检查各个端点。
我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月6日
注册名称已通过域名 mcp.turingcorp.net 验证(注册中心会核实域名所有权)
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
尚未检查;我们会轮流检查各个端点
尚未检查;我们会轮流检查各个端点
尚未检查;我们会在检查端点时读取工具列表
与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。
它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。
你需要填写:Authorization
它在作者的云端运行。通过互联网连接,无需安装,但你发送的内容会经过作者的服务器。
GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(1.0.3)于41天前进入注册中心。
支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。它通过 URL 连接,所以接受远程 MCP 服务器的应用也可以使用,例如开启开发者模式的 ChatGPT。
同一分类中有:Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, debuff
同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。
如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.
Let coding agents play, test and tune your 2D web game: live state, explained errors, replays, fuzz.
按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。
A decision model for the calls that don't have a right answer. Your agent has two defensible options and has to pick one. Send both: a panel of models judges them together and returns the better one, how far apart it judged them (a calibrated confidence), and why.
https://mcp.turingcorp.net/mcphttps://mcp.turingcorp.net/ and https://mcp.turingcorp.net/mcp/https://mcp.turingcorp.net/healthzGET /mcp → 405 is normal.2026-07-28 (modern) and 2025-06-18 (legacy) — one route serves both.server/discover, tools/list) need no credentials — directory scanners can read the full tool list unauthenticated, by design.decide| In | task (string), optionA (string), optionB (string) — all required | |
| Out | job_id (string), betterOption ("option_A" \ | "option_B"), confidence (percentage string, e.g. "76.7%"), reason (string) |
| Annotations | readOnlyHint: true · openWorldHint: false · idempotentHint: false | |
| Timeout | Reserve 180–300 seconds — a decision is a long call. The timeout is a client/host setting, not a tool parameter: there is nothing to pass in the call. A 60s default cuts it off before the answer arrives; if that happens, do not call again — retrieve by job_id. | |
| Long calls | A client that declares the io.modelcontextprotocol/tasks extension gets a task handle back instead of holding one connection open for minutes, and polls tasks/get — see Retrieving a result. Clients that do not declare it see no change at all. |
A successful call returns the decision inline. job_id, betterOption, confidence and reason all arrive in the *same* tool result — there is nothing to poll and nothing to fetch afterwards. The job_id is only for the case where the call never came back (timeout, dropped connection, client gave up waiting).
confidence is this service's own judgement of how far apart the two options were — a reference for your decision-making, not an instruction, not a result, and not a prediction of how the choice turns out. As a rough reading: ≥90% clearly apart · 80–90% apart, less clearly · 70–80% a closer call · <70% close to evenly matched. These ranges are descriptive only. Choose your own threshold for your own use case; for high-stakes or irreversible decisions apply your own review policy. Observed accuracy for each range, and how it was measured, is published at https://api.turingcorp.net — that page is the authority on the bands and their measured accuracy.
⚠️ idempotentHint: false is an honest declaration: a retried call is a new call. Record the `job_id` the result returns — a decision you have already paid for can be collected for 7 days with the same credential (GET https://api.turingcorp.net/v1/jobs?job_id= ; without the id, GET https://api.turingcorp.net/v1/jobs lists the job ids for that credential). Retrieve instead of retrying.
task — state the decision neutrally, without leaning toward either side: *"Which email do I send?"*, not *"Should I send the honest one?"*optionA / optionB — one concrete option each, plus the case for it. Plain text or Markdown, any length; keep the two sides roughly comparable so the comparison is fair.{
"task": "Which version of the delivery-slip email do I send to a client we want to keep?", "optionA": "Short and direct: the integration took longer than planned, delivery moves to the 24th, everything else is unchanged.", "optionB": "Warmer and longer: thank them for the kickoff, explain that dependencies took more time, offer to walk through the details." }
More patterns — choosing the version you send, thresholding on the confidence, and writing the two options so the comparison is fair: [docs/COOKBOOK.md](docs/COOKBOOK.md).
Every call returns a job_id. A call that is allowed to finish returns the decision inline — the `job_id` is only for the case where it never came back.
⚠️ How to retrieve — use `get_result`. Retrieval needs the Agent Pass, and inside an MCP host the agent usually does not have it — so retrieval is a tool call, not a REST call: get_result is authenticated by the host, which attaches the pass for you. An agent never handles the pass, and the credential is deliberately not a tool argument (it would end up in prompts and transcripts).
readOnlyHint: true, idempotentHint: true).io.modelcontextprotocol/tasks extension can poll tasks/get instead. Most clients do not declare it yet, which is why get_result exists.Operator/host, with the pass (the same data over REST):
GET https://api.turingcorp.net/v1/jobs?job_id= using the same Agent Pass.GET https://api.turingcorp.net/v1/jobs lists the job ids that credential created in the last 7 days; then fetch one as above. The list carries only the job id, the product and a timestamp.job_id=0 placeholder: {"object":"list","window_seconds":604800,"data":[]}. Asking for 0 returns 404 No such job.Retrieval returns the job's status and, once it succeeded, the same body the call itself would have returned. A job that is not yours, or older than 7 days, is reported as unavailable. GET https://api.turingcorp.net/v1/account returns {"account_id":"…"}.
The practical answer is not to need retrieval: reserve 180–300 seconds so the call is allowed to finish.
There is no free tier, so we publish the evidence instead: 27 real decisions, recorded verbatim — the question, both options, which one was preferred, the confidence reported, and the reason. Nine domains, three cases each: Writing · Tech · Business · Research · Career · Money · People · Travel · Everyday.
→ [https://github.com/TuringCorp-net/poe-demo-public](https://github.com/TuringCorp-net/poe-demo-public) — dataset: examples.json
Read the confidence column first. On ordinary, closely matched questions it reports 70–90%, not 99% — and that is the point of a calibrated number rather than a decorative one: a high value means the comparison was decisive and the pick can be acted on, a low value means the two options really are close and the choice stays yours. In this set the range is 27.3%–88.3%, median 74.0%, none above 90%, because these are everyday close calls, not easy ones. What the bands deliver when they *are* decisive is published at https://api.turingcorp.net.
Send an Agent Pass: Authorization: Bearer .
Issued at [https://agent-pass.turingcorp.net](https://agent-pass.turingcorp.net) — self-service signup (email verification) → top up → get a pass. A pass is valid for 7 days and can be re-rolled. If a call is refused as an invalid credential, sign in there again and re-roll.
Errors fall into two classes, and they arrive in different places:
Credential problems are rejected before the call (HTTP 401 +
WWW-Authenticate). Business failures come back as a tool result withisError: trueplus a JSON block{error, http_status, action_url, message}—http_statusis the upstream status; the tool call itself is HTTP 200.
| Class | What comes back | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Credential | HTTP 401 + WWW-Authenticate — no tool result is produced | no credential · expired or invalid pass (invalid_credential, with a re-login URL in the message) |
| Business | HTTP 200, tool result isError: true, plus a JSON block | insufficient balance (http_status 402, action_url pointing at top-up) · over quota (http_status 429) |
Branch on the HTTP status first: a 401 will not succeed on retry without a new credential, whereas a business failure was a call that ran and was declined — read the block for the reason and the next step. The detailed contract is under *Errors are machine-readable* below.
Entry rate limit: 120 requests / 60 s / client IP. This is flood damping, not a quota — the real per-key quota is enforced separately. The counter is approximate: it is maintained per edge location and is eventually consistent, so a brief overshoot is possible.
Authorization: Bearer yourself, and you can retrieve a job by id.⚠️ The part that catches people out: being able to call the tool through a host does not mean you can reach the REST API. The host may never hand you the underlying Agent Pass, so a job-retrieval call you make on your own can come back 401. If your host declares the Tasks extension, retrieve through the tool surface instead (see Retrieving a result); if it does not, retrieval may simply not be reachable from where you are.
You need an Agent Pass to call the tool. Discovery (tools/list) works without one — calling decide does not.
🔑 Where the pass lives matters. If your client can keep it out of the file, do that — VS Code's ${input:…}, Codex's bearer_token_env_var. A pass written in plain text inside mcp.json or any client config is readable by every agent and process that can read that file, and assistants do read their own config — one can print your pass straight into its output. Treat a client config as public within your machine.
Self-service at [https://agent-pass.turingcorp.net](https://agent-pass.turingcorp.net): sign up with an email address, verify it, add credit. The pass is shown once; it is valid for 7 days and can be re-rolled at any time. Agents can do the same thing over the API — see that site's /llms.txt.
Any client that reads a JSON config — Cursor, Windsurf, Claude Desktop:
{
"mcpServers": { "TuringCorp": { "type": "http", "url": "https://mcp.turingcorp.net/mcp", "headers": { "Authorization": "Bearer " } } } }
Keep the `"type": "htt
只显示了开头部分;其余内容请在仓库中阅读