World Monitor
Real-time global intelligence on conflict, markets, energy, trade, shipping and cyber. 97 tools.
Read-only verification evidence for paid machine services and buyer policy checks.
选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。
通过 2/3 项检查 · 在你的电脑上运行
第一步:你用哪个 AI?
选择你用的应用,步骤会显示在下方。
Claude 暂时无法连接 Atinamos Evidence
还没有通过检查的安装方式。请看作者的说明,或选择同类的其他服务器
ChatGPT 暂时无法连接 Atinamos Evidence
还没有通过检查的安装方式。请看作者的说明,或选择同类的其他服务器
B · 其他 类中能连接 ChatGPT 的其他服务器
从同类中使用较多的里挑选,仅限用地址即可连接、无需密钥的
Claude Code 暂时无法连接 Atinamos Evidence
还没有通过检查的安装方式。请看作者的说明,或选择同类的其他服务器
Cursor 暂时无法连接 Atinamos Evidence
还没有通过检查的安装方式。请看作者的说明,或选择同类的其他服务器
VS Code 暂时无法连接 Atinamos Evidence
还没有通过检查的安装方式。请看作者的说明,或选择同类的其他服务器
还没有通过检查的安装方式。请看作者的说明,或选择同类的其他服务器
依据这个服务器的连接方式和各应用自己的文档,检查于 2026年11月10日。
通过互联网连接,适用于
GooseLM StudioMsty StudioCherry StudioVisual StudioWindsurf (Devin Desktop)ZedKiroClineContinueJetBrains AI AssistantCodex CLIGemini CLIOpenCodenodecodeWarpLibreChatOpen WebUIRaycast
我们上次检查时服务器没有响应,所以无法读取它的工具。
我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月14日
注册名称已通过域名 atinamos.co.uk 验证(注册中心会核实域名所有权)
代码最后更新于2个月前
不适用:由 atinamos.co.uk 的所有者自己运行的云端服务器,你不会运行仓库里的代码
我们检查时,6 秒内没有响应
我们检查时,6 秒内没有响应
尚未检查;我们会在检查端点时读取工具列表
提问、分享技巧或报告无法使用。按“有帮助”数量排序。
还没有评价
与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。
它在 3 项适用的基础检查中通过了 2 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。
注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。
它在作者的云端运行。通过互联网连接,无需安装,但你发送的内容会经过作者的服务器。
GitHub 仓库最后更新于2个月前,最新版本(1.0.0)于3个月前进入注册中心。
支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。它通过 URL 连接,因此也能用于接受远程 MCP 的应用,例如网页版 ChatGPT(Business 及以上为完整 MCP;Pro 为只读)。
同一分类中有:World Monitor, Claude Flow, Windmill
同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。
如何看卡片:↓ 每周下载量i★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i
Real-time global intelligence on conflict, markets, energy, trade, shipping and cyber. 97 tools.
AI orchestration with hive-mind swarms, neural networks, and 87 MCP tools for enterprise dev.
按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。
Public research, schemas and technical evidence for Atinamos independent verification of paid AI-agent and machine services.
Human-readable research: https://verify.atinamos.co.uk Technical evidence: this repository
You can pay to be tested. You cannot pay to be trusted.
Atinamos produces scoped evidence. The buyer decides what that evidence means under its own policy.
Atinamos does not issue a universal trust score, certification, approval, safe/unsafe verdict or permanent provider rating.
Read the canonical public status first:
The main technical milestone is now the first unattended generic external Assurance execution from an already-frozen plan.
service: POST https://keyronne.com/api/json-repair
run: 1b5bc844-368c-445a-8f84-e62be6d88baa adapter: generic-transaction-fulfilment v1.0 state: PLAN_FROZEN → COMPLETE spend: 0.001 USDC
One internal production coordinator invocation handled the routine paid execution stages without an operator manually stepping x402 challenge acquisition, payment signing, paid dispatch, settlement observation, fulfilment evaluation or Verification publication.
Independent Base settlement:
transaction: 0xc42bb177c41d21a56e9d3c02546fa8ebeda911cff3bc1139169a61c89f7b495c
block: 50996015
Signed evidence:
atinamos:receipt:10e40afd-f6b1-57bd-9c1e-0a4a1695a428
Observed evidence layers:
PAYMENT SETTLED
FULFILMENT FULFILLED CORRECTNESS NOT_EVALUATED QUALITY NOT_EVALUATED
The service returned the advertised kind of JSON deliverable. Atinamos did not infer semantic correctness or quality from that fulfilment.
The Keyronne run began at PLAN_FROZEN.
It proves:
frozen independent plan
→ real bounded external purchase → independent Base settlement observation → fulfilment evidence → immutable Verification package → signed receipt → COMPLETE
It does not yet prove the complete public seller journey:
raw seller URL
→ non-spending discovery → scope explanation → independent frozen plan → seller funding → durable queue → proven Runner → signed evidence
That seller product journey is now the main development lane.
PROVEN ENGINE
↓ SELLER PRODUCT ↓ FIRST USERS ↓ REVENUE / MARKET FEEDBACK
Human seller productisation comes first. A later AI-seller API/MCP should use the same underlying Assurance run/order model rather than introducing another execution engine.
On 6 September 2026, Atinamos completed the first end-to-end external deterministic commissioning of the current Assurance Runner → Verification publication path against:
POST https://api.ibanforge.com/v1/iban/validate
Two bounded x402 calls were made at 0.005 USDC each. Settlement was independently observed on Base, useful fulfilment returned, and the returned valid field matched independently derived ISO 13616 MOD-97 expectations for one valid and one invalid fixture.
total observed test spend: 0.010 USDC
Base settlements observed: 2 successful fulfilments: 2 independent controls passed: 2 / 2 signed Assurance receipts: 2
That run was human-triggered commissioning. It remains an important earlier milestone and should not be retroactively described as unattended.
On 28 August 2026, an Atinamos-operated bounded buyer was given a task, maximum spend and buyer policy. It independently searched an external x402 marketplace, checked exact-route viability, queried published Atinamos evidence, applied its own policy, selected an external seller without the human naming the seller, made a bounded payment, consumed the result and validated the purchased output.
Final clean run:
selected seller: Keyronne JSON Repair
payment: 0.001 USDC on Base x402: v2 / exact paid HTTP: 200 proof3_complete: true
This proves the controlled Atinamos buyer experiment. It does not establish widespread external-agent adoption of Atinamos evidence.
Also on 28 August 2026, Atinamos observed an unrelated external client purchase Atinamos JSON Repair for 0.005 USDC through x402 and receive successful HTTP fulfilment.
This establishes external commercial use of an Atinamos machine service. It does not establish that the purchaser was definitely an autonomous AI agent.
The repository deliberately retains successful and unsuccessful observations, including:
See EVIDENCE_INDEX.md for the current consolidated index.
Atinamos keeps these evidence layers separate:
PAYMENT
Did payment settle?
FULFILMENT Did the advertised kind of deliverable return?
CORRECTNESS Was the returned content independently checked?
QUALITY Was subjective quality independently evaluated?
Guardrails:
UNKNOWN != UNSAFE
SETTLED != FULFILLED FULFILLED != CORRECT CORRECT != HIGH QUALITY SIGNED RECEIPT != PERMANENT TRUST SAMPLE COUNT != RELIABILITY PERCENTAGE
Endpoint and HTTP method are material evidence identity where applicable.
AI agents and developers can query selected published Atinamos evidence through the read-only Atinamos Evidence MCP:
https://verify.atinamos.co.uk/mcp
The MCP exposes published evidence and buyer-supplied policy evaluation. It does not expose wallet access, payment signing, verification-triggering writes or a universal trust verdict.
Atinamos exposes a bounded read-only projection of machine-service discovery observations:
GET https://verify.atinamos.co.uk/v1/market/search?q=<query>&limit=<1-50>
GET https://verify.atinamos.co.uk/v1/market/service/
Market Search reports observed listings and provenance. A market listing is not verification evidence.
Current signed Assurance evidence can be read using:
GET https://verify.atinamos.co.uk/v1/assurance/receipts/<receipt_id>
GET https://verify.atinamos.co.uk/v1/assurance/evidence?endpoint= &method=
Endpoint and HTTP method are material evidence identity.
Historical evidence should remain valid in the format in which it was issued rather than being silently rewritten.
This repository is the deliberately sanitised public technical publication layer for Atinamos Verification and Assurance research.
It may contain:
It does not contain:
GitHub is not where Atinamos Verification runs. It is where Atinamos publishes selected technical evidence and documentation for public scrutiny and machine consumption.
Copyright © 2026 MotionFil-AI.
See LICENSE.md for details.