Flakiness Knowledge Graph MCP
概览
作者提供的说明(英文原文)
MCP server + Playwright reporter that builds a flakiness knowledge graph from test run history
PopNx MCP 的三大支柱
这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。
- 用户评价i暂无评价评价功能将在后续阶段与账户功能一起开放
- 我们的基础检查i1 项中通过 1 项依据公开信息检查;尚未扫描代码
- 使用情况i非常新↓ 50/周 · ★ –
它能帮你做什么
我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。
- 连接方式: 在你的电脑上运行
- 传输方式: stdio
- 分类: 搜索与 AI 记忆
安装
选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。
安装之前
- 基础检查:1 项中通过 1 项
- 在你的电脑上运行,拥有你的用户账户的权限(文件、网络、应用)。
- 注册中心没有列出需要填写的密钥。
你需要
- npm已安装 Node.js(用于 npx 命令)
你用的是哪个应用?
在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。
打开 Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config,把下面的内容粘贴到 claude_desktop_config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"flakiness-knowledge-graph": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"flakiness-knowledge-graph-mcp"
]
}
}
}在终端中运行这条命令
claude mcp add flakiness-knowledge-graph -- npx -y flakiness-knowledge-graph-mcp或者自己复制设置
粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"flakiness-knowledge-graph": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"flakiness-knowledge-graph-mcp"
]
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
或者自己复制设置
粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json
{
"servers": {
"flakiness-knowledge-graph": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"flakiness-knowledge-graph-mcp"
]
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。
你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。
这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。
它能做什么
它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。
基础检查i
我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月10日
- ✓ 通过
作者与仓库一致
注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 vola-trebla 验证,该账户拥有此仓库
- … 尚未检查
仍在维护
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
- … 尚未检查
有许可证
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
- – 不适用
端点有响应
它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点
- – 不适用
使用 OAuth 登录
在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置
- … 尚未检查
工具描述中没有隐藏指令
它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表
与“搜索与 AI 记忆”中的其他服务器比较i
- 星标数多于此分类中其他 5831 个服务器的 0%
- 发布到注册中心的时间比此分类中其他 5831 个服务器的 13% 更新
- 基础检查结果等于或优于此分类中其他 5831 个服务器的 100%
与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。
常见问题
Flakiness Knowledge Graph MCP 安全吗?
它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。
它需要哪些密钥或代码?
注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。
它在我的电脑上运行还是在云端?
它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。
它还在维护吗?
GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.2.2)于6个月前进入注册中心。
哪些应用可以使用它?
支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Node.js。
有什么可以替代它?
同一分类中有:Context7, Codebase Memory, Exa
替代选择
同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。
如何看卡片:↓ 每周下载量i★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i
Codebase Memory
Codebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.
Exa
Connect AI agents to Exa for web search, content fetching, and multi-step research.
作者的 README
打开 README
按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。
📊 flakiness-knowledge-graph-mcp
A Playwright custom reporter + MCP server that builds a local flakiness knowledge graph from your test run history. Ask your AI agent which tests are unreliable, on which browser, and whether they're getting worse.
🤔 The Problem
A single Playwright trace tells you _what_ failed right now. It doesn't tell you whether this test has been silently flaking for two weeks, or only fails on Firefox in CI, or is getting slower with every release.
This tool fixes that by accumulating run history into a SQLite database and exposing it to AI agents via MCP.
🛠️ Tools
| Tool | Arguments | What it returns |
|---|---|---|
get_flaky_tests | db_path, min_runs?, limit?, since_days? | Tests ranked by flakiness rate (failed+flaky / total runs) |
get_test_history | db_path, test_id, limit? | Full run history for a specific test — status, duration, error, retry, browser, OS |
get_failure_patterns | db_path, since_days? | Failure rates broken down by browser × OS combination |
get_slow_tests | db_path, limit? | Tests ranked by average duration |
get_error_groups | db_path, min_failures?, limit?, since_days? | Failures clustered by exact error prefix — surfaces shared root causes across tests |
get_flakiness_trend | db_path, test_id, days? | Daily flakiness rate over the last N days — shows whether a test is getting worse |
cluster_semantic_error_trees | db_path, min_instances?, since_days? | Like get_error_groups but normalises dynamic values (UUIDs, IDs, URLs) first, then fuzzy-merges with Levenshtein |
correlate_git_commit_flakiness | db_path, min_stable_runs?, since_days? | Finds the exact commit SHA where a test transitioned stable→flaky (or back), with branch and author |
🚀 Setup
1. Install
npm install -g flakiness-knowledge-graph-mcp
Or build from source:
git clone https://github.com/vola-trebla/flakiness-knowledge-graph-mcp.git
cd flakiness-knowledge-graph-mcp npm install && npm run build
2. Add the reporter to your Playwright project
// playwright.config.ts
export default defineConfig({ reporter: [["html"], ["flakiness-knowledge-graph-mcp/reporter", { dbPath: "./flakiness.db" }]], });
Run your tests normally — the reporter writes every result to flakiness.db automatically.
3. Add the MCP server to your editor
Cursor / VS Code (.cursor/mcp.json or .vscode/mcp.json)
{
"mcpServers": { "flakiness-knowledge-graph": { "command": "flakiness-knowledge-graph-mcp" } } }
Claude Code
claude mcp add flakiness-knowledge-graph flakiness-knowledge-graph-mcp
4. Try it with demo data
No Playwright project yet? Generate 30 days of realistic sample data:
npx flakiness-graph-seed ./demo.db
Then point your AI agent at ./demo.db to explore all 8 tools.
💬 Example usage
I've been running my Playwright suite for two weeks. The DB is at /my-project/flakiness.db.
- get_flaky_tests — which tests are most unreliable? Show last 7 days only.
- get_test_history for the top flaky test — is it getting worse?
- get_flakiness_trend for the same test over 14 days — plot the daily rate.
- get_failure_patterns — does it only fail on a specific browser or OS?
- cluster_semantic_error_trees — are multiple tests failing with semantically identical errors?
- correlate_git_commit_flakiness — which commit introduced the flakiness?
- get_slow_tests — which tests should I optimize for CI speed?
Grouping errors that look different but aren't
get_error_groups clusters by raw string prefix — if the error contains a UUID or element ID it creates separate groups for what is really one root cause. cluster_semantic_error_trees strips dynamic values first:
{
"total_clusters": 2, "clusters": [ { "cluster_id": "cluster-1", "canonical_message": "TimeoutError: locator.click: Timeout 30000ms exceeded\n waiting for locator('#submit-btn')", "normalized_message": "TimeoutError: locator.click: Timeout ms exceeded waiting for locator", "error_taxonomy": "TimeoutError", "instance_count": 14, "affected_tests": 3, "sample_test_ids": ["checkout > submit order", "cart > add item", "checkout > apply coupon"] }, { "cluster_id": "cluster-2", "canonical_message": "Error: 2 requests to https://api.example.com/orders/8f3a1c were made. Expected 1", "normalized_message": "Error: requests to were made. Expected ", "error_taxonomy": "AssertionError", "instance_count": 6, "affected_tests": 1, "sample_test_ids": ["api-mock > intercept order"] } ] }
Finding the commit that broke a test
correlate_git_commit_flakiness uses a state machine — it looks for runs where a test was stable for ≥3 consecutive passes, then failed. The transition record includes the SHA from the CI environment:
{
"total_transitions": 1, "transitions": [ { "test_id": "auth > login > should redirect after login", "title": "should redirect after login", "transition_type": "stable_to_flaky", "git_commit_sha": "a3f8c1d9e2b54f6a", "git_branch": "main", "git_author": "dev-handle", "transition_date": "2025-04-14" } ] }
The reporter reads GITHUB_SHA / CI_COMMIT_SHA / CIRCLE_SHA1 / GIT_COMMIT automatically — no reporter config changes needed beyond upgrading to v0.2.0.
🔗 Works great with playwright-trace-decoder-mcp
These two MCP servers are designed to complement each other:
- flakiness-knowledge-graph-mcp answers "is this test flaky historically, and which commit caused it?"
- [playwright-trace-decoder-mcp](https://github.com/vola-trebla/playwright-trace-decoder-mcp) answers "what exactly failed in this specific run?"
Combined, an AI agent can diagnose whether a CI failure is a known flaky test or a new regression — without you opening a single file.
⚖️ Parallel Execution & CI Sharding
flakiness-knowledge-graph-mcp uses an in-process write queue to ensure that parallel Playwright workers within a single Node process do not corrupt the database.
However, if you run tests across multiple independent processes (e.g., parallel CI shards or separate machine runners) writing to the same shared network file:
- Race Conditions: Standard file systems do not guarantee atomic writes for SQLite files across processes without OS-level locking.
- Recommended Approach: Each CI shard should write to its own database file (e.g.,
flakiness-shard-1.db,flakiness-shard-2.db). - Merging: At the end of the CI pipeline, you can merge these files into a single master database using standard SQLite tools or by running a script that reads from one and inserts into the other.
For local development or single-machine CI runs, the default configuration is safe.
🏗️ Architecture
playwright.config.ts
└── FlakinessReporter → flakiness.db (SQLite via sql.js)
flakiness.db └── test_runs table id, test_id, title, suite, file, status, duration_ms, browser, os, timestamp, error, retry, git_commit_sha, git_branch, git_author ← added in v0.2.0
MCP server └── reads flakiness.db on demand (in-process handle reuse)
sql.js is used instead of better-sqlite3 — pure JavaScript SQLite compiled to WebAssembly, no native compilation needed. The git columns are added via ALTER TABLE migration on first use — existing databases upgrade automatically.
📋 Scripts
npm run build # compile TypeScript → dist/
npm run lint # ESLint npm run format # Prettier --write npm run format:check # Prettier check (used in CI) npm run seed # populate flakiness.db with 30 days of demo data
📄 License
MIT