原型 · 预览版:收录官方注册中心里的全部服务器,每 30 分钟同步一次。评价和账户功能将在后续阶段推出。
PopNx MCP为使用 AI 的人准备的 MCP 服务器 · 用大白话讲清楚

Midas

作者:vornicx版本 0.0.1i★ –i在你的电脑上运行
注册名称io.github.vornicx/midas

安装

概览

作者提供的说明(英文原文)

Local-first, source-traceable agent memory — no LLM at ingest, fully offline

PopNx MCP 的三大支柱

这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。

它能帮你做什么

我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。

  • 连接方式: 在你的电脑上运行
  • 传输方式: stdio
  • 分类: 搜索与 AI 记忆

安装

选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。

安装之前

  • 基础检查:1 项中通过 1 项
  • 在你的电脑上运行,拥有你的用户账户的权限(文件、网络、应用)。
  • 需要你自己填写: MIDAS_MCP_DB, MIDAS_MCP_EMBEDDER, MIDAS_MCP_MAX_RECORDS, MIDAS_MCP_MIN_IMPORTANCE

你需要

  • PyPI已安装 Python 的 uv(用于 uvx 命令)

你用的是哪个应用?

在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。

打开 Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config,把下面的内容粘贴到 claude_desktop_config.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "midas": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "midas-memory-mcp"
      ],
      "env": {
        "MIDAS_MCP_DB": "your-value",
        "MIDAS_MCP_EMBEDDER": "your-value",
        "MIDAS_MCP_MAX_RECORDS": "your-value",
        "MIDAS_MCP_MIN_IMPORTANCE": "your-value"
      }
    }
  }
}

在终端中运行这条命令

claude mcp add midas --env MIDAS_MCP_DB=your-value --env MIDAS_MCP_EMBEDDER=your-value --env MIDAS_MCP_MAX_RECORDS=your-value --env MIDAS_MCP_MIN_IMPORTANCE=your-value -- uvx midas-memory-mcp

运行前请先填写空着的值。

在 Cursor 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "midas": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "midas-memory-mcp"
      ],
      "env": {
        "MIDAS_MCP_DB": "your-value",
        "MIDAS_MCP_EMBEDDER": "your-value",
        "MIDAS_MCP_MAX_RECORDS": "your-value",
        "MIDAS_MCP_MIN_IMPORTANCE": "your-value"
      }
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

在 VS Code 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json

{
  "servers": {
    "midas": {
      "type": "stdio",
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "midas-memory-mcp"
      ],
      "env": {
        "MIDAS_MCP_DB": "your-value",
        "MIDAS_MCP_EMBEDDER": "your-value",
        "MIDAS_MCP_MAX_RECORDS": "your-value",
        "MIDAS_MCP_MIN_IMPORTANCE": "your-value"
      }
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。

你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。

需要你填写的值

  • MIDAS_MCP_DB env
    Path to a SQLite file to persist memory across restarts (default: in-memory)
  • MIDAS_MCP_EMBEDDER env
    Embedding backend: 'local' (bge ONNX, offline) or 'hashing' (default: local)
  • MIDAS_MCP_MAX_RECORDS env
    Cap the store; above it the lowest-value memories are auto-forgotten (no LLM)
  • MIDAS_MCP_MIN_IMPORTANCE env
    Relevance floor 1-5 for auto-capture; turns scoring below it are skipped

这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。

它能做什么

它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。

基础检查i

我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月7日

  • ✓ 通过

    作者与仓库一致

    注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 vornicx 验证,该账户拥有此仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    仍在维护

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    有许可证

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • – 不适用

    端点有响应

    它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点

  • – 不适用

    使用 OAuth 登录

    在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置

  • … 尚未检查

    工具描述中没有隐藏指令

    它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表

与“搜索与 AI 记忆”中的其他服务器比较i

  • 星标数多于此分类中其他 7281 个服务器的 0%
  • 发布到注册中心的时间比此分类中其他 7281 个服务器的 15% 更新
  • 基础检查结果等于或优于此分类中其他 7281 个服务器的 100%

与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。

常见问题

Midas 安全吗?

它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。

它需要哪些密钥或代码?

注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。

它在我的电脑上运行还是在云端?

它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。

它还在维护吗?

GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.0.1)于5个月前进入注册中心。

哪些应用可以使用它?

支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Python (uv)。

有什么可以替代它?

同一分类中有:Context7, Codebase Memory, Exa

替代选择

同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。

如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i

Context7

作者:upstash

Up-to-date docs for AI agents

电脑或云端★ 64,224MIT昨天更新
安装

Codebase Memory

作者:DeusData

Codebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.

在你的电脑上运行★ 48,148MIT21天前更新
安装

Exa

作者:exa-labs

Connect AI agents to Exa for web search, content fetching, and multi-step research.

在云端运行★ 5,213MIT上个月更新
安装

作者的 README

打开 README

按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。

Midas

The local memory layer for long-horizon AI agents — remembers across sessions, keeps what's current, and won't act on stale memory. No LLM at ingest · $0 per message · fully local · every recall traces to its source.

Your AI assistant forgets everything between sessions. Midas is the memory that lives next to it, on your machine. Your coding agent remembers the decisions, conventions, and bugs from three sessions ago — without piping every message through an LLM to "extract" facts. It costs nothing per message, nothing leaves your computer, every memory traces back to the exact turn it came from, and it won't let an agent act on memory that's stale or never confirmed.

uv tool install "midas-memory[mcp,local]"   # install

midas init # create the shared memory + wire up your MCP clients

or, no Python: npx -y midas-memory-mcp # TypeScript port

or, as a library: pip install "midas-memory[local]"

uv tool upgrade midas-memory # Update Midas

Install in your agent · See the benchmarks · Complete overview · Roadmap


Why Midas

Most memory tools call an LLM to summarize every session — so you pay in tokens forever, add latency, ship every turn to a provider, and get back *rewritten* facts you can't audit. Midas makes the opposite bet, and that bet is what makes it cheap, private, and trustworthy:

  • $0 and private by construction. No LLM at ingest or query → no API spend, nothing leaves your machine, fast local ops (~tens of ms, no per-turn network round-trip).
  • You can trust what it recalls. Recall returns the verbatim source turn, not an LLM rewrite — so there's no extraction step that can silently hallucinate a "fact" you never said.
  • It stays current on its own. Typed belief revision supersedes the old value instead of piling up duplicates; selective forgetting keeps it bounded — all with no LLM.
  • It's safe to build on. A provenance guard lets memory inform planning but blocks memory-justified external or destructive actions unless you explicitly confirmed them — and a *superseded* memory can't authorize an action at all.
  • One file, many tools. Point Claude Code, Cursor, and your chat app at one SQLite file and they share one live memory.
  • Proven, not asserted. Every claim has a reproducible benchmark — *including the experiments that failed.*

How Midas compares

Every Midas number below is measured and reproducible from this repo; the LLM-at-ingest column reflects the structural properties of that design class (Mem0, Zep, Hindsight) and the figures documented in BENCHMARKS.md.

MidasLLM-at-ingest systems (Mem0, Zep, Hindsight)
LLM calls at ingest0≥1 per session
Cost per message$0per-token API spend, forever
Data egress at ingestNoneevery turn leaves the box
Ingest latency~16–116 ms, local, embed-bound~668 ms + API round-trip
Recall returnsverbatim source turn, traceableLLM-rewritten facts (source recall@k not computable)
Deterministic & reproducibleyes — every number, one commandno
Works fully offlineyes (measured end-to-end with a local Ollama reader)no
LongMemEval-s judged answer (gpt-4o)0.840.84 — Observational Memory, with LLM ingest
Whole-conversation aggregation / summarization❌ by design — top-k retrieval can't cover it (documented)✅ their structural edge

The last row is deliberate: Midas trades whole-conversation abilities for $0, privacy, and auditability, and publishes the measurements that show exactly where that trade bites.

More than recall: a memory you can govern

Finding a buried fact is table stakes. A long-horizon coding agent needs memory it can act on safely and resume from cleanly — which is where similarity search alone falls short:

You ask…Midas answers withWhy top-k recall can't
*"Can I run this destructive migration?"*Guard: allowed only if you confirmed it, and only if that confirmation is still currentprovenance + currency aren't a similarity match
*"What's the current state of project Apollo?"*`memory_state`: the live, non-superseded decisions / constraints / factsa broad "current state" query matches no single turn
*"What changed since our last session?"*`memory_diff`: beliefs added, and beliefs revised (old → new)"what's new" isn't a content query at all
*"How do I speed up the transactions list?"*the prior fix resurfaces, so the agent doesn't re-diagnose it—

These properties are measured, not asserted — the [agent-memory bench suite](docs/agent-memory-benches.md) scores action-safety, decision-adherence, repeated-mistake avoidance, resume fidelity, conflict detection/precision (live contradictions between agents found without over-flagging), and adversarial memory-safety across scripted multi-session projects. The safety eval blocks 10 / 10 adversarial attacks (ASR 0.00) — including a planted confirmation next to a prohibition, a confirmation for a *different* action, a provenance-laundering supersession, and a cross-namespace approval — with no over-blocking (benign-pass 1.00). Deterministic, $0, no LLM. Reproduce every number with one command:

uv run python -m eval.benches      # the whole governance suite — or `midas bench` from a checkout

How it does on the benchmarks

Deterministic, reader-independent retrieval (recall@k — fraction of the gold supporting turns pulled into context) on the full public sets, vs a recency-window baseline:

Benchmark (full set)baselineMidas
LongMemEval-`s` — 500 questions, 246,750 turns0.010.92
LoCoMo — 10 conversations, n=1,5400.050.73
BEAM — frontier benchmark, 100K → 10M tokens0.000.56 → 0.32

And the cross-system metric, judged answer-rate (same gpt-4o judge the leaderboards use):

Judged answerbaselineMidas
LongMemEval-s (gpt-4o reader, ties LLM-ingest SOTA at $0 ingest)—0.84
BEAM-100K (gpt-4o judge, raw-turn floor, $0 ingest)0.050.40

All of it at 0 LLM calls, $0, and 0 data egress at ingest. Full numbers, per-category breakdowns, reproduce commands, and the head-to-head vs Mem0/Zep/Mastra are in [BENCHMARKS.md](BENCHMARKS.md).

Eval-first means we publish the misses too. Hybrid retrieval, reranking, thread-diversification,

dual-granularity indexing, and *naive distillation* were all measured to not help (or to hurt) and

are documented as such. That honesty is the point — see BENCHMARKS.md and

docs/frontier-2026.md.


Connect it to your coding agent

One command wires up everything:

midas init        # creates the shared memory + configures every MCP client it finds

midas status # check what's wired · run midas init --dry-run to preview first

Both take `--json` to emit a machine-readable *client wiring receipt* — which memory each client got wired to, under which scope/policy, and which clients were skipped (config paths only, never memory contents). Paste it into a bug report, or let another agent verify the setup without scraping prose.

midas init creates one shared memory (~/.midas/memory.sqlite3) and points the MCP clients it detects — Claude Code, Codex, Grok Build, Cursor, Claude Desktop, Windsurf, VS Code, Gemini CLI, Cline, Zed — at it. So all your agents read and write the same memory, autonomously, with no per-client paths to keep in sync.

Prefer a single endpoint over per-client launches? Run one server and give your clients an MCP URL:

midas serve --http        # → http://127.0.0.1:7077/mcp   (one server, one memory, every client shares it)

midas serve --http --token # require Authorization: Bearer on every request

Keep Midas current with `midas update`. See your memory anytime with `midas inspect`.

Already carrying agent memory in files? `midas import --from claude-md CLAUDE.md` (or --from cursorrules, --from jsonl, --from mem0, --from zep) turns those rules and exports into first-class, recallable, governable memories — tagged with where they came from, idempotent on re-run.

Want memory even when the agent never calls capture? `midas init --claude-hook` installs a Claude Code SessionEnd hook that offers each session's user turns to memory — Midas's no-LLM policy still decides what is actually kept.

Manual setup — any client, or to customize (click to expand)

Midas is a standard MCP server: point any client at the `midas-mcp` command. It uses the shared store by default — no path needed. The universal block:

{ "mcpServers": { "midas": { "command": "midas-mcp", "env": { "MIDAS_MCP_EMBEDDER": "local" } } } }
ClientWhere the config goes
Claude Codeclaude mcp add midas -s user -e MIDAS_MCP_EMBEDDER=local -- midas-mcp
Cursor~/.cursor/mcp.json — paste the JSON block
Claude DesktopSettings → Developer → Edit Config (claude_desktop_config.json) — paste, restart
Codex CLIcodex mcp add midas -- midas-mcp
Grok Buildgrok mcp add --scope user midas -e MIDAS_MCP_EMBEDDER=local -e MIDAS_MCP_CLIENT=grok-build -- midas-mcp
Windsurf~/.codeium/windsurf/mcp_config.json — paste the block
VS Codeuser mcp.json (servers key, "type": "stdio") — midas init writes it
Gemini CLI~/.gemini/settings.json (mcpServers key) — midas init writes it
Clinecline_mcp_settings.json in VS Code global storage — midas init writes it
Zedsettings.json → context_servers — midas init writes it
Anything elsepoint it at command midas-mcp
No Pythonnpx -y midas-memory-mcp — the TypeScript port (experimental; semantic embeddings via optional @huggingface/transformers)

Override per client with env: `MIDAS_MCP_DB` (default ~/.midas/memory.sqlite3; :memory: = ephemeral) · MIDAS_MCP_MAX_RECORDS · MIDAS_MCP_MIN_IMPORTANCE · MIDAS_MCP_NAMESPACE.

⚠️ GUI apps don't share your shell `PATH`. If a client says *"command not found"*, use the absolute

path from which midas-mcp. On Windows use forward slashes in JSON paths.

Once connected, Midas injects a short policy into the agent (*recall first, then capture durable facts/decisions/preferences/constraints/corrections*). The agent captures freely; Midas decides what's kept — it scores importance (no LLM), drops trivia, skips duplicates, revises stale beliefs, and forgets the low-value tail to stay bounded. Before any memory-justified external or destructive action, the agent calls `che

只显示了开头部分;其余内容请在仓库中阅读

问 PopNx