原型 · 预览版:收录官方注册中心里的全部服务器,每 30 分钟同步一次。评价和账户功能将在后续阶段推出。
PopNx MCP为使用 AI 的人准备的 MCP 服务器 · 用大白话讲清楚

Weavatrix Refactor

作者:Weavatrix版本 1.0.11i★ –i在你的电脑上运行
注册名称io.github.Weavatrix/weavatrix-refactor

安装

概览

作者提供的说明(英文原文)

Transactional refactoring extension with 11 evidence-backed tools, previews, and rollback.

PopNx MCP 的三大支柱

这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。

它能帮你做什么

我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。

  • 连接方式: 在你的电脑上运行
  • 传输方式: stdio
  • 分类: 其他

安装

选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。

安装之前

  • 基础检查:1 项中通过 1 项
  • 在你的电脑上运行,拥有你的用户账户的权限(文件、网络、应用)。
  • 需要你自己填写: WEAVATRIX_ALLOW_SOURCE_EDITS

你需要

  • npm已安装 Node.js(用于 npx 命令)

你用的是哪个应用?

在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。

打开 Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config,把下面的内容粘贴到 claude_desktop_config.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "weavatrix-refactor": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "weavatrix-refactor",
        "mcp",
        "."
      ],
      "env": {
        "WEAVATRIX_ALLOW_SOURCE_EDITS": "your-value"
      }
    }
  }
}

在终端中运行这条命令

claude mcp add weavatrix-refactor --env WEAVATRIX_ALLOW_SOURCE_EDITS=your-value -- npx -y weavatrix-refactor mcp .

运行前请先填写空着的值。

在 Cursor 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "weavatrix-refactor": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "weavatrix-refactor",
        "mcp",
        "."
      ],
      "env": {
        "WEAVATRIX_ALLOW_SOURCE_EDITS": "your-value"
      }
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

在 VS Code 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json

{
  "servers": {
    "weavatrix-refactor": {
      "type": "stdio",
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "weavatrix-refactor",
        "mcp",
        "."
      ],
      "env": {
        "WEAVATRIX_ALLOW_SOURCE_EDITS": "your-value"
      }
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。

你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。

需要你填写的值

  • WEAVATRIX_ALLOW_SOURCE_EDITS env
    Set to 1 to authorize confirmed apply operations and rollback to write source files; unset, the refactor tools stay preview-only

这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。

它能做什么

它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。

基础检查i

我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月6日

  • ✓ 通过

    作者与仓库一致

    注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 Weavatrix 验证,该账户拥有此仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    仍在维护

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    有许可证

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • – 不适用

    端点有响应

    它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点

  • – 不适用

    使用 OAuth 登录

    在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置

  • … 尚未检查

    工具描述中没有隐藏指令

    它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表

与“其他”中的其他服务器比较i

  • 星标数多于此分类中其他 32398 个服务器的 0%
  • 发布到注册中心的时间比此分类中其他 32398 个服务器的 30% 更新
  • 基础检查结果等于或优于此分类中其他 32398 个服务器的 100%

与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。

常见问题

Weavatrix Refactor 安全吗?

它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。

它需要哪些密钥或代码?

注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。

它在我的电脑上运行还是在云端?

它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。

它还在维护吗?

GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(1.0.11)于2个月前进入注册中心。

哪些应用可以使用它?

支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Node.js。

有什么可以替代它?

同一分类中有:Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, AI Deprecations

替代选择

同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。

如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i

Spec Driven Development

作者:formulahendry

MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.

在你的电脑上运行★ 440MIT14个月前更新
安装

Remote Desktop Commander

作者:desktop-commander

Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.

在云端运行★ 211昨天更新
安装

AI Deprecations

作者:aideprecations.com

AI model shutdown dates, replacements, change feed and webhook alerts for 8 providers.

在云端运行今天更新
安装

作者的 README

打开 README

按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。

Weavatrix Refactor

The explicit source-write layer of the Weavatrix ecosystem; Core remains read-only.

Refactor across files without letting the agent guess.

Weavatrix Refactor is a native MCP server for coding agents. It finds a symbol through the repository graph, previews byte-exact edits, reports every same-named occurrence it could not prove, and writes only after an explicit, hash-bound confirmation.

The useful difference is not “AI can rename a word.” It is that the agent gets evidence before the write and a recoverable transaction after it.

Install

Run the native binary through npm:

npx -y weavatrix-refactor mcp /absolute/path/to/repository

Or install it with Cargo:

cargo install weavatrix-refactor --locked

weavatrix-refactor mcp /absolute/path/to/repository

An MCP client can start it directly. Prefer an absolute path, or Cursor's ${workspaceFolder} so the write server never follows the host process cwd:

{

"mcpServers": { "weavatrix-refactor": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "weavatrix-refactor@1.0.11", "mcp", "${workspaceFolder}", "--profile=refactor"], "env": {"WEAVATRIX_ALLOW_SOURCE_EDITS": "1"} } } }

Leave WEAVATRIX_ALLOW_SOURCE_EDITS unset for preview-only sessions. Preview is a read; only a confirmed apply or rollback requires the gate. Refactor does not expose Core's open_repo, so it cannot silently retarget mid-session; the launch root is the only repository it will edit.

Install as a plugin

The repository also ships one plugin bundle for Cursor, Codex, Claude Code, and Grok Build. The plugin starts the extension-only profile, so it contributes the 11 Refactor methods without repeating Weavatrix Core's 43 read-only method definitions. Install the separate Weavatrix plugin when both surfaces are needed.

The bundled skill is optional and activates only for explicitly requested refactoring work. Its entry point stays short; each method has an individual reference card that is loaded only when needed.

  • Cursor: search for Weavatrix Refactor after marketplace approval.
  • Codex: add the Weavatrix/weavatrix-refactor marketplace from .agents/plugins, then add weavatrix-refactor@weavatrix-refactor.
  • Claude Code: add the same repository marketplace from .claude-plugin, then install weavatrix-refactor@weavatrix-refactor.
  • Grok Build: run grok plugin marketplace add Weavatrix/weavatrix-refactor, open /marketplace, and install it.

The plugin opens WEAVATRIX_ALLOW_SOURCE_EDITS=1, but every write still needs the exact preview's short-lived, plan-bound single-use token.

For a rename task, expose only the two tools the agent needs:

weavatrix-refactor mcp /absolute/path/to/repository --profile=rename

The rename profile keeps rename_symbol and rollback_last_apply; every unrelated graph and refactor tool is absent and cannot be called. Omit the option (or use --profile=refactor) for all 11 Refactor methods. The narrower catalog reduces repeated agent context; it does not weaken preview hashes, the write gate, the confirmation token, or rollback checks.

When Weavatrix Core is already installed as a separate MCP, expose only the 11 methods that Refactor adds:

weavatrix-refactor mcp /absolute/path/to/repository --profile=refactor

The refactor profile is the default for MCP and list-tools, including the marketplace plugin. The former full compatibility profile has been removed and is rejected by both commands: Refactor no longer republishes Core methods. Install Weavatrix Core as its own MCP when read-only repository intelligence is also needed.

A safe cross-file rename in three calls

Suppose two files declare resolveTarget. A bare name is ambiguous, so the server refuses to pick one and returns exact ids:

// rename_symbol

{"symbol":"resolveTarget","new_name":"locateTarget","output_format":"json"}

{ "status": "NOT_FOUND", "reason": "the name matches more than one symbol; pass one of the candidate ids", "candidates": [ "symbol:src/core.ts#function:resolveTarget@2:1", "symbol:src/shadow.ts#function:resolveTarget@3:1" ] }

Retry with the intended id. The result is still read-only: it contains the edit plan, content hashes, the proven edit count, and the references the backend refused to guess at.

// rename_symbol

{ "symbol": "symbol:src/core.ts#function:resolveTarget@2:1", "new_name": "locateTarget", "output_format": "json" }

{ "status": "PLANNED", "completeness": "PARTIAL", "renamedEdits": 7, "uncertainReferences": ["... three named locations ..."], "confirmToken": "single-use-token", "plan": {"schemaVersion":"weavatrix.edit-plan.v1","files":["..."]} }

After reviewing the plan, repeat the same operation with the same inputs and its token:

// rename_symbol

{ "symbol": "symbol:src/core.ts#function:resolveTarget@2:1", "new_name": "locateTarget", "mode": "apply", "confirm_token": "single-use-token", "output_format": "json" }

{"status":"APPLIED"}

This exact flow is exercised against the real stdio MCP server. The repository fixture requires seven edits across three files, preserves four traps (a longer identifier, string, comment, and unrelated shadow), and must still compile; it scores 12/12.

What is automatic today

The eleven tools do not all claim the same level of automation:

LevelToolsWhat the agent receives
Complete preview/apply workflowrename_symbol, rename_related_symbolsA generated plan and token, then a confirmed write by repeating the same operation
Plan-producingchange_signature, edit_symbol, bulk_replace, organize_imports, move_fileByte-exact edits or a review plan; use apply_edit_plan where an edit-plan envelope is returned
Advisorymove_symbol, delete_readinessBlast radius, cycle/architecture risks, or a deletion verdict; no automatic source write
Safety infrastructureapply_edit_plan, rollback_last_applyVerification/application of an edit-plan envelope and drift-safe restoration

Refactor uses the Rust Weavatrix graph internally for evidence but never exports Core methods. Install the separate Weavatrix plugin for read-only repository intelligence. The Refactor MCP owns exactly its 11 extension methods; --profile=rename is an optional narrower two-method workflow.

Safety model and exact limits

  • Ambiguous names fail with candidate ids instead of selecting the first match.
  • PARTIAL means the graph proved the edits in the plan but did not prove that no other semantic references exist. uncertainReferences names the places requiring review.
  • Every file in a plan carries a content hash. A changed working tree makes the preview stale instead of applying the old coordinates.
  • Apply requires WEAVATRIX_ALLOW_SOURCE_EDITS=1 plus a short-lived, single-use token bound to that repository and exact recomputed plan.
  • rollback_last_apply refuses to overwrite files that drifted after the transaction.
  • Multi-file writes are journaled and crash-recoverable. They are not observationally atomic to unrelated processes: another process may briefly observe an intermediate filesystem state.

Only edits with proven provenance are applied. A lexical or graph backend is deliberately more conservative than a language server and must not be read as a claim of full compiler semantics.

Measured benchmark, with unlike layers kept separate

The checked-in August 2026 benchmark uses equivalent adversarial TypeScript, Rust, and Python fixtures. Each has seven required edits, four traps, and a build/test gate. Protocol runs count exact o200k_base initialization, catalog, request, and response tokens. Agent runs use the actual cumulative usage reported by Codex CLI with pinned gpt-5.6-sol / medium reasoning. No byte proxy or estimated tokens-per-second conversion is used.

The new rename-only profile kept all nine protocol runs at 12/12 while reducing fixed MCP context from 9,331 to 485 tokens. Its guided TypeScript agent A/B is:

ArmCorrectnessMedian end-to-endMedian input tokens
Naked Codex12/12 x342,602 ms72,169
Weavatrix 1.0.6 --profile=rename12/12 x348,389 ms108,155
Weavatrix 1.0.5 full surface12/12 x358,719 ms275,784
Serena12/12 x368,728 ms388,271

The full agent matrix is 12/12 in all 27 TypeScript/Rust/Python runs; every run also completed operationally and passed the sanitized edit-channel audit. The deterministic protocol matrix also exposed a language-specific Serena defect: its suggested find_symbol → rename_symbol flow scored 7/12 on TypeScript in all three runs, while Rust and Python passed. It also found and drove fixes for Rust macro calls and Python f-string/module-level call evidence.

On this toy TypeScript repository naked Codex is still faster and cheaper than the narrowed profile. Weavatrix's demonstrated value is preview-before-write, named uncertainty, stale-plan refusal, explicit authorization, and rollback—not a universal small-repository token win.

See the full methodology, all language medians, raw-result links, and limitations.

Contract

The 11 Refactor tool names, schemas, and result states are frozen in contract/refactor-tools.v1.json. All refactor operations are native Rust; the host uses the read-only weavatrix-rust engine internally for graph evidence without exporting its methods on the default surface.

Versions 0.1.x used the JavaScript engine. That line continues as weavatrix-refactor-js and keeps a separate state directory, token store, and rollback journal.

License

MIT.

问 PopNx