Robin: AI-Powered Dark Web OSINT
Dark web OSINT over Tor: search onion engines, scrape pages, report with your own model.
Read-only MCP/agent-gateway readiness scanner — scores a repo across 7 security dimensions.
选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。
通过 3/3 项检查 · 在你的电脑上运行
第一步:你用哪个 AI?
选择你用的应用,步骤会显示在下方。
可连接 Claude,但需要先准备
需要先在电脑上安装 Node.js(只需一次) · 仅限电脑上的 Claude 应用(Windows 或 Mac),网页和手机不可用
SettingsDeveloperEdit Config
正在检查命令 · 通过后才会显示复制按钮
用 MCP Gateway Scan 告诉我你能帮我做什么,然后做一件给我看✓ 如果 Claude 说正在使用 MCP Gateway Scan,或回答中出现 MCP Gateway Scan 的工具名称,就表示连接成功
菜单名称已于 2026年11月11日 对照 Anthropic 帮助页面核实 · 你的界面可能因版本略有不同
ChatGPT 暂时无法连接 MCP Gateway Scan
MCP Gateway Scan 需要安装在你的电脑上,而 ChatGPT 只能连接在网上运行的服务器
A · 使用能连接 MCP Gateway Scan 的应用
B · 网络安全 类中能连接 ChatGPT 的其他服务器
从同类中使用较多的里挑选,仅限用地址即可连接、无需密钥的
可连接 Claude Code,但需要先准备
需要先在电脑上安装 Node.js(只需一次)
Mac:按 Command+空格,输入 Terminal · Windows:打开 PowerShell
正在检查命令 · 通过后才会显示复制按钮
应能看到 MCP Gateway Scan 在列表中并显示已连接
用 MCP Gateway Scan 告诉我你能帮我做什么,然后做一件给我看✓ 如果 Claude Code 说正在使用 MCP Gateway Scan,或回答中出现 MCP Gateway Scan 的工具名称,就表示连接成功
菜单名称已于 2026年11月11日 对照 Anthropic 帮助页面核实 · 你的界面可能因版本略有不同
可连接 Cursor,但需要先准备
需要先在电脑上安装 Node.js(只需一次)
正在检查命令 · 通过后才会显示复制按钮
用 MCP Gateway Scan 告诉我你能帮我做什么,然后做一件给我看✓ 如果 Cursor 说正在使用 MCP Gateway Scan,或回答中出现 MCP Gateway Scan 的工具名称,就表示连接成功
菜单名称已于 2026年11月11日 对照 Cursor 帮助页面核实 · 你的界面可能因版本略有不同
可连接 VS Code,但需要先准备
需要先在电脑上安装 Node.js(只需一次)
正在检查命令 · 通过后才会显示复制按钮
用 MCP Gateway Scan 告诉我你能帮我做什么,然后做一件给我看✓ 如果 VS Code 说正在使用 MCP Gateway Scan,或回答中出现 MCP Gateway Scan 的工具名称,就表示连接成功
菜单名称已于 2026年11月11日 对照 VS Code 帮助页面核实 · 你的界面可能因版本略有不同
Claude Code
正在检查命令 · 通过后才会显示复制按钮
Claude Desktop (claude_desktop_config.json)
正在检查命令 · 通过后才会显示复制按钮
Cursor (~/.cursor/mcp.json)
正在检查命令 · 通过后才会显示复制按钮
VS Code (mcp.json)
正在检查命令 · 通过后才会显示复制按钮
这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。
依据这个服务器的连接方式和各应用自己的文档,检查于 2026年11月10日。
在你的电脑上运行,适用于
ClaudeGooseLM StudioMsty StudioCherry StudioCursorVS Code + GitHub CopilotVisual StudioWindsurf (Devin Desktop)ZedKiroClineContinueJetBrains AI AssistantClaude CodeCodex CLIGemini CLIOpenCodenodecodeWarpLibreChatRaycast
它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。
我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月14日
注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 willianpinho 验证,该账户拥有此仓库
代码最后更新于4个月前
使用 MIT
它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点
在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置
它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表
提问、分享技巧或报告无法使用。按“有帮助”数量排序。
还没有评价
与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。
它在 3 项适用的基础检查中通过了 3 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。
注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。
它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。
GitHub 仓库最后更新于4个月前,最新版本(0.1.1)于5个月前进入注册中心。
支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Node.js。
同一分类中有:Robin: AI-Powered Dark Web OSINT, HOL Guard, SonarQube MCP Server
同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。
如何看卡片:↓ 每周下载量i★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i
Dark web OSINT over Tor: search onion engines, scrape pages, report with your own model.
Local-first AI agent security evidence and approval workflows through HOL Guard's stdio MCP server.
Analyze code quality and security with SonarQube Server or Cloud directly in AI assistants.
按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。
Read-only static scanner for MCP / agent-gateway production-readiness anti-patterns.
Point it at a repo, get a 7-dimension red/yellow/green score in seconds.
Built by the team behind the [Provenwright MCP Gateway Readiness Audit](https://provenwright.com/audit) — a full cited audit with evidence index, scored gap matrix, and 90-day roadmap. Full audit: provenwright.com/audit
npx mcp-gateway-scan ./path/to/your/gateway
It scans your code and config for the failure modes that turn an MCP gateway from a demo into an incident — authorization decided by the model, error handlers that fail _open_, unpinned supply chains, dark traces, unbounded spend, inline secrets, and missing operational levers — and prints exactly where each one lives.
100% read-only. It only _reads_ files. It never executes your code, never makes network calls, and never prints a secret value — for inline-secret hits it reports the location only ( ), with the value redacted.
# one-off
npx mcp-gateway-scan
pnpm add -g mcp-gateway-scan mcp-gateway-scan
Requires Node ≥ 18.
mcp-gateway-scan <path> [options]
Options: --json Machine-readable JSON instead of the terminal report --ci Compact, no-color output for pipelines; exits 1 on any RED --no-color Disable ANSI colors -h, --help Show help -v, --version Print version
Exit codes: 0 no red dimensions 1 one or more red dimensions 2 usage / IO error
Before you wire a third-party MCP server into an agent that holds real credentials, point connect at it and get a single top-line verdict — CONNECT, REVIEW, or DO-NOT-CONNECT — over the same 7 dimensions, with the single worst finding surfaced first.
# the server's repo checkout
mcp-gateway-scan connect ./some-mcp-server
mcp-gateway-scan connect ./.mcp.json
mcp-gateway-scan connect ./package.json
The verdict reduces the dimension scores into one decision:
| Verdict | When | Exit |
|---|---|---|
| DO-NOT-CONNECT | any S1 (full-compromise-class) dimension is red | 1 |
| REVIEW | concrete-or-possible risk (red S2/S3 or any yellow) | 1 |
| CONNECT | every dimension green on the static checks | 0 |
Same scan engine, same --json / --ci flags, same read-only / secret-redaction guarantees — connect only re-frames the output as a connect/no-connect decision. A green CONNECT is a good signal, not a guarantee: a static scan cannot vouch for the publisher or runtime behavior.
The same package can also run as an MCP server so your agent runs the scan conversationally — just ask it to "scan this repo for gateway-readiness".
Claude Code (one command):
claude mcp add gateway-scan -- npx -y mcp-gateway-scan mcp
Cursor / any MCP client — add to your .mcp.json:
{
"mcpServers": { "gateway-scan": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "mcp-gateway-scan", "mcp"] } } }
Then ask your agent to run the `scan_gateway` tool:
{ "path": " ", "ci": false } (ci optional — adds the CI gate verdict).Same package, two modes —
mcp-gateway-scan mcpis the server (use it from your
agent); the default
mcp-gateway-scanis the CLI (run it directly in a terminal
or CI). The
mcpsubcommand does not change the CLI behavior.
mcp-gateway-scan is listed on the [Glama MCP directory](https://glama.ai/mcp/servers/willianpinho/mcp-gateway-scan), where you can inspect its tool schema, Try it in the browser, or deploy the containerized server straight from the listing. The build spec and release process are documented in docs/glama-release.md.
[RED] D2 Fail-close / fail-open posture S1
Error handlers on the call path return allow/true/ok or pass — the system fails OPEN. A degraded auth/policy check silently becomes 'allow'. Launch blocker. ✗ gateway.ts:23 fail-open on error path return { allowed: true };
[GREEN] D6 Security, secrets & identity S1 No inline secrets; credentials referenced from a manager/env and IDP/OIDC identity wiring is present. ✓ docker-compose.yml:7 secret-manager / env reference DATABASE_URL: op://Production/gateway-db/url
SCORE ┌────────┬──────────────────────────────────────────┬─────────┬──────────┐ │ Dim │ Title │ Status │ Severity │ ├────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────┼─────────┼──────────┤ │ D1 │ Tool-access governance & RBAC │ RED │ S1 │ │ ... │ ... │ ... │ ... │ └────────┴──────────────────────────────────────────┴─────────┴──────────┘
0 green 0 yellow 7 red
--ci prints a compact, greppable summary and exits non-zero on any red dimension, so a regression (a new fail-open handler, an unpinned image, a committed secret) fails the build:
# .github/workflows/gateway-readiness.yml
RED D2 S1 Fail-close / fail-open posture (findings=1) RESULT green=4 yellow=2 red=1 VERDICT FAIL — red dimension(s) present; see findings above.
| Dim | Checks for |
|---|---|
| D1 Tool-access / RBAC | Authorization expressed in prompts; absence of a gateway policy layer |
| D2 Fail-close | catch/except blocks that return allow/true/ok/pass; missing timeouts |
| D3 Onboarding / supply chain | :latest, @main, npx -y …@, unpinned images; rewards sha256: / integrity |
| D4 Observability | Presence/absence of OTel / traceparent / spans; raw prompts in logs |
| D5 Routing / cost | Missing max_tokens / budget / rate-limit / quota |
| D6 Secrets / identity | Inline secret literals (location only, value redacted); rewards op:// / vault: / process.env; IDP/OIDC |
| D7 Prod-readiness | Missing kill-switch / feature-flag, 429 / rate-limit, eval / red-team gate |
Each dimension is scored 🟢 green / 🟡 yellow / 🔴 red with a severity tag, plus the matched evidence (file:line). The methodology behind the rubric maps to OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications, the MCP spec (2025-06-18), and OpenTelemetry GenAI semantic conventions.
mcp-gateway-scan fixtures/secure # mostly green
mcp-gateway-scan fixtures/vulnerable # mostly red
The fixtures/vulnerable tree contains only fake, non-functional placeholder secrets (sk-EXAMPLENOTREAL…, AKIAEXAMPLE…) so you can see the redacted-secret output safely.
Every finding is meant to be defensible to a skeptical senior engineer. The scanner distinguishes prompt content (a system-message string / YAML prompt field) from code that merely documents a pattern — so a doc comment quoting rg 'only use|if the user is admin' is not flagged as authorization-in-prompt, while the same words inside a real system prompt are. Comment lines and grep-recipe / regex documentation are suppressed across all dimensions, and "control present" signals are matched in code/config, not prose.
This is a fast, free heuristic wedge — a static pattern scanner. A green score is a good signal, not a guarantee; a red score is a concrete pointer to fix. It does not run fault-injection, inspect your live IAM/IDP, or read your traces. That depth is what a full MCP Gateway Readiness Audit provides: a cited Gap Matrix and a sequenced 90-day remediation roadmap.
| This scanner (free, MIT) | Full MCP Gateway Readiness Audit (paid) | |
|---|---|---|
| Method | static pattern checks | read-only review of your live codebase |
| Live tests | — | fault-injection (F1–F5), trace verification |
| Evidence | matched line | per-finding file:line in an evidence index |
| Output | 7-dimension score | cited gap matrix + severity + sequenced 90-day roadmap |
| Delivery | instant, automated | expert engagement + live review session |
Need the full audit? This scanner is a free heuristic wedge.
The [Provenwright MCP Gateway Readiness Audit](https://provenwright.com/audit) goes deeper:
read-only assessment of your live codebase, per-finding evidence (file + line),
a cited Gap Matrix, and a sequenced 90-day remediation roadmap.
See a sample report: provenwright.com/sample/
Full audit info: provenwright.com/audit
Book a 15-min call: cal.com/willianpinho
Email: me@willianpinho.com
MIT © Willian Pinho