Spec Driven Development
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
作者提供的说明(英文原文)
Find the right AI model for your job. Free discovery and ranking; tests on your own key.
这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。
我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。
选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。
X-OpenRouter-Key标为机密的值是你账户的钥匙。千万不要分享给别人,也不要粘贴到聊天里。
你需要
你用的是哪个应用?
在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。
这个地址需要在请求的 header 中放入密钥,而添加连接器的菜单无法设置。请改用 Claude Code、Cursor 或 VS Code。
在终端中运行这条命令
claude mcp add --transport http xfms https://xfms.xpansion.dev/mcp --header 'X-OpenRouter-Key: your-value'运行前请先填写空着的值。
粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"xfms": {
"url": "https://xfms.xpansion.dev/mcp",
"headers": {
"X-OpenRouter-Key": "your-value"
}
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json
{
"servers": {
"xfms": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://xfms.xpansion.dev/mcp",
"headers": {
"X-OpenRouter-Key": "your-value"
}
}
}
}浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。
这个地址需要在请求的 header 中放入密钥,而添加连接器的菜单无法设置。请改用 Claude Code、Cursor 或 VS Code。
你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。
X-OpenRouter-Key 机密 HTTP header这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。
工具名称和描述与服务器在 2026年11月7日 报告的完全一致。这些内容由作者撰写,不是我们写的;我们以纯文本形式显示。
rankThe full shortlist for a job worked out with discover: 5 proven models and 1 promising newcomer, each with its standing on every requirement, plus near misses and what would change the order. Pass the discover session.
pickThe single best proven model for a job worked out with discover, with why and the runners-up. Pass the discover session.
discoverDiscovery: finds the true requirements of the person's job before any model is chosen. Start with purpose: the reply carries the discovery instructions and the evidence catalogue. YOU ask the person the questions (one thing each, plain words, offering the returned choices); then
benchmarkThe live test: the 5 proven models and 1 promising newcomer from discovery do the person's real tasks side by side, every requirement is judged, and the results pick the winner. First call (session + tasks) returns the estimate and an offer — nothing is spent. Show the person the
field_resultsResults from real comparisons on Model Source for one kind of job (call with no job_type for the list): which models passed, how often, which won, typical cost per task and the most common failure. Counted without anyone's job details. A starting point; test on the person's own w
watch_jobSaves a finished job for XF Model Watch, which re-tests it as new models arrive and emails the person only when a model passes every must-have and ranks higher on their priorities. Needs a signed-in subscriber. Ask the person first: Model Watch keeps the job and its example tasks
compareSame live test as benchmark, but on the models the person names (model_ids). Needs a finished discover session so every requirement is judged. Estimate first, then go=true.
我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月8日
发布者(xpansion.dev)不是仓库所有者(VisionAIrySE);可能是其他人代为上架的
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
在 861 毫秒内响应(HTTP 200)
无需登录
已读取 7 个工具描述,未发现针对 AI 的隐藏指令
与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。
它在 3 项适用的基础检查中通过了 2 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。
你需要填写:X-OpenRouter-Key
它在作者的云端运行。通过互联网连接,无需安装,但你发送的内容会经过作者的服务器。
GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.5.3)于22天前进入注册中心。
支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。它通过 URL 连接,所以接受远程 MCP 服务器的应用也可以使用,例如开启开发者模式的 ChatGPT。
同一分类中有:Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, Tool Guardian
同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。
如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.
Too many MCP servers eating your context? A router that loads each tool's schema only when needed.
按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。
Find the AI model your job really needs, and prove it on your own tasks.
AI is specialized. There are 450+ models on OpenRouter, and the one every vendor calls "the best" was not measured on your job. XF Model Source works inside the assistant you already use (Claude Code, Cursor, Cline, Continue, any MCP client) and does three things:
Scores and claims can't tell you whether a model will follow your exact format or avoid inventing a detail. So the test, not the leaderboard, makes the final call, and each shortlisted model shows how it has really done in our own comparisons.
The server is hosted. There is nothing to install. The address is:
`https://xfms.xpansion.dev/mcp`
claude mcp add model-source --transport http https://xfms.xpansion.dev/mcp, then /mcp inside Claude Code to sign in.model-source, choose Streamable HTTP, paste the address, save, then select Restart. When it shows Authenticate, select it and sign in with your email.codex mcp add model-source --url https://xfms.xpansion.dev/mcp, then codex mcp login model-source.~/.cursor/mcp.json):{
"mcpServers": { "model-source": { "url": "https://xfms.xpansion.dev/mcp" } } }
Sign-in is free and needs only your email. Then ask your assistant: *"Help me pick an AI model for pulling the invoice number, date, total and vendor out of invoices as JSON, about 2,000 a month. The cheapest one that gets every field right."*
X-OpenRouter-Key header. It is used for that run and never stored.discover (finds the job's real requirements), rank (the full shortlist with the evidence behind it), pick (the single best proven model), compare (the screening round and test on your tasks), benchmark, field_results (what has worked for jobs of the same kind), and watch_job (XF Model Watch).
No conversations are kept. We log the one-line description you start with and an anonymous ID to count use. Our own daily comparisons are published at https://xfms.xpansion.dev, every answer and every verdict, so the method can be checked.
docs/methodology.md.A comparison uses a handful of your sample tasks, and a model grades part of the answers. Read a result as strong evidence for your decision, not a guarantee. We can only report on models we have tested, and the ranking before the test is a shortlist, not a verdict.
XFMS doesn't stand alone — it's the model-selection layer of the [Xpansion Framework](https://xpansion.dev).
**Humans communicate with intent compressed by contextual experience.
AI simply predicts patterns in language. Xpansion is the execution
layer that bridges them.**
Every sentence a human types carries lifetimes of context that the speaker assumes the other side will decompress — what counts as "good enough," which constraints are non-negotiable, what failures last month taught them, what their house style demands. AI doesn't share that context. It predicts patterns in language, filling in the gaps with whatever's plausible to its training data. The result reads as plausible but isn't intent-honoring: sessions lose context, security holes ship silently, contracts break without warning, and there's no way to verify that what was built actually matches what was asked for. They don't know what they don't know, and neither does AI.
Xpansion closes the gap. It decompresses finite intent upfront, enforces it through code-driven AI behavior, and delivers binary-verified results against the intent across persistent memory that survives every session boundary.
When you say *"the best model for this task"*, you're compressing a lot: what counts as *best* depends on whether you care about factual reasoning or coherent prose, whether cost matters more than latency, whether you actually need vision or just text, whether the call has to stream, whether a particular benchmark dominates your real workload. AI on its own predicts the pattern — *what model do most people pick for queries that look like this?* — and gives you a plausible-sounding answer that's often wrong for *you*.
XFMS does the decompression. It takes your stated purpose, infers which benchmarks actually map to it, honors your stated primary preferences without silently overriding them, surfaces the latent requirements you didn't know to ask about (streaming for real-time chat, vision for OCR), and probes the top picks against your real query to verify the recommendation — not predict it. Then it tells you, in plain English, why it picked what it picked.
The rest of the Xpansion stack enforces the same decompress- enforce-verify contract for different parts of the work:
Dispatch) — runtime task router. Watches what kind of work you're doing and routes it to the right tool.XFFI) — turns *"build me a feature"* into a finite spec with binary terminals *before* any code gets written. Stops scope drift at the source.XFBA) — checks every code edit against contracts. Stops broken function signatures and mismatched types from ever reaching production.XSIA) — maps the blast radius of a proposed change before it lands. Tells you what else might break.XFTC) — manages how much of the conversation has to stay in the assistant's working memory. Prevents context loss in long sessions.XFXA) — verifies every promise from the spec was actually met before declaring a task done. The final binary check.XFMT) — session snapshots that stay searchable across conversations. Your assistant remembers what you decided last week.XFSA) — static + AI security scanning on every code edit. Catches secrets, injection paths, and unsafe patterns before they ship.The full picture, with the rest of the modules, lives at xpansion.dev.
Xpansion is in pre-signup right now. Early access and founding licenses are open at xpansion.dev. XFMS is the first piece to ship public + free — the rest follow.
git clone https://github.com/VisionAIrySE/XFMS.git
cd XFMS python3 -m venv .venv .venv/bin/pip install -e .[dev] .venv/bin/python -m pytest tests/ -v
The tests mock the HTTP layer so they run offline — no API keys needed to develop.
This client library is MIT-licensed. The recommender engine, the catalog, and the ingestion pipeline are not open source. See NOTICE for the patent reservation language and the relationship to the broader Xpansion Framework IP.
SECURITY.md