原型 · 预览版:收录官方注册中心里的全部服务器,每 30 分钟同步一次。评价和账户功能将在后续阶段推出。
PopNx MCP为使用 AI 的人准备的 MCP 服务器 · 用大白话讲清楚

FrankenSurf

作者:yail259版本 0.50.0i★ –i在你的电脑上运行
注册名称io.github.yail259/frankensurf

安装

概览

作者提供的说明(英文原文)

Read any web page and search the web: 28 tools, cheapest first, every page checked.

PopNx MCP 的三大支柱

这三项永远不会合并成一个分数:意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。

它能帮你做什么

我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。

  • 连接方式: 在你的电脑上运行
  • 传输方式: stdio
  • 分类: 网页与浏览器

安装

选择你使用的 AI 应用,然后复制设置。

安装之前

  • 基础检查:1 项中通过 1 项
  • 在你的电脑上运行,拥有你的用户账户的权限(文件、网络、应用)。
  • 注册中心没有列出需要填写的密钥。

你需要

  • PyPI已安装 Python 的 uv(用于 uvx 命令)

你用的是哪个应用?

在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它,下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。

打开 Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config,把下面的内容粘贴到 claude_desktop_config.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "frankensurf": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "frankensurf"
      ]
    }
  }
}

在终端中运行这条命令

claude mcp add frankensurf -- uvx frankensurf

在 Cursor 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json,或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "frankensurf": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "frankensurf"
      ]
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

在 VS Code 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json

{
  "servers": {
    "frankensurf": {
      "type": "stdio",
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "frankensurf"
      ]
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用,然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空,由你自己填写。

这个服务器在你的电脑上运行,而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。

你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上,无需账户。

这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同,请以 README 为准。

它能做什么

它在你的电脑上运行;安装后,工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。

基础检查i

我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息;我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月8日

  • ✓ 通过

    作者与仓库一致

    注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 yail259 验证,该账户拥有此仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    仍在维护

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • … 尚未检查

    有许可证

    我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库

  • – 不适用

    端点有响应

    它在你的电脑上运行,没有互联网端点

  • – 不适用

    使用 OAuth 登录

    在你的电脑上运行,改用本地设置

  • … 尚未检查

    工具描述中没有隐藏指令

    它在你的电脑上运行;我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表

与“网页与浏览器”中的其他服务器比较i

  • 星标数多于此分类中其他 1380 个服务器的 0%
  • 发布到注册中心的时间比此分类中其他 1380 个服务器的 60% 更新
  • 基础检查结果等于或优于此分类中其他 1380 个服务器的 100%

与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时,星标数才计入。

常见问题

FrankenSurf 安全吗?

它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前,请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限,并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。

它需要哪些密钥或代码?

注册中心没有列出必需的密钥,不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。

它在我的电脑上运行还是在云端?

它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它,数据不会经过作者的服务器(除非它自己调用在线服务)。

它还在维护吗?

GitHub 仓库最后更新于–,最新版本(0.50.0)于21天前进入注册中心。

哪些应用可以使用它?

支持 MCP 的应用,例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Python (uv)。

有什么可以替代它?

同一分类中有:Browser Use, Chrome DevTools MCP, MCP Server Browser

替代选择

同一分类中其他作者的服务器,按星标数排序。

如何看卡片:★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱:评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i

Browser Use

作者:browser-use

Browser agents and stealth cloud browsers for AI: run web tasks, fill forms, extract data.

电脑或云端★ 120,087MIT18天前更新
安装

Chrome DevTools MCP

作者:ChromeDevTools

MCP server for Chrome DevTools

在你的电脑上运行★ 54,821Apache-2.016天前更新
安装

MCP Server Browser

作者:bytedance

MCP server for browser use access

在你的电脑上运行★ 39,550Apache-2.014个月前更新
安装

作者的 README

打开 README

按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。

Frankensurf

Access 96% of the web, cheaply and accurately.

A free, self-hosted alternative to Firecrawl: one container, the same API, and every page checked before your agent reads it.

Website · Docs · Quick start · Benchmark · Why I built it


Most scrapers count a 200 as a success, so your agent ends up reading challenge pages, empty app shells and menus, and answering anyway. Frankensurf reads each page with the cheapest tool that works, checks it's the real page, and climbs to stealth browsers (or paid APIs, if you allow them) only when a site pushes back. It speaks Firecrawl's API, so anything with a Firecrawl URL setting can point at it.

Gets past walls 41 web tools behind one call: plain HTTP, Jina Reader, browsers, free stealth browsers, then paid APIs only if you allow them. Every page checked A challenge page, a login wall or a search page whose results never loaded counts as a failure, with a receipt saying why. Drop-in for Firecrawl Same API, one Docker container. Check it on your own URLs first with frankensurf compare .

On 150 sites picked blind: 96% read right with paid fallbacks against 85% for Firecrawl's cloud on its own, and 88% with free tools only. On a harder blind set of 148 less-known sites: 88.5% against 70.3%, and 81.8% free. Against a self-hosted Firecrawl on the same sites, 126 read against 89 (details, losses included).

Quick start

As a Firecrawl-compatible server (one container, free tools inside, no account needed):

docker run -d -p 3002:3002 --shm-size=1g -e FRANKENSURF_API_KEY=pick-a-key ghcr.io/yail259/frankensurf

Then point your tool's Firecrawl URL at http://localhost:3002 with that key (which tools, and how).

As a Python package and CLI (Python 3.12+, on Linux, macOS, or Windows through WSL):

pip install "frankensurf[mcp]"

frankensurf install # every free tool: browsers, stealth browsers, local search, Crawl4AI frankensurf read "https://www.walmart.com/search?q=air+fryer" --explain

The read climbs until it gets the real page:

https://www.walmart.com/search?q=air+fryer

✗ http CAPTCHA 0.4s ✗ local CAPTCHA 1.5s ✓ camoufox got the page 15.6s

air fryer - Walmart.com 24,192 characters via camoufox, complete (107 results), free

frankensurf install works like playwright install: name just the tools you want (frankensurf install search chromium), add --with-deps for the browsers' system libraries on Linux, --list to see what's installed where, and frankensurf uninstall all to remove it. No Docker needed. Each release is installed from PyPI on fresh Ubuntu and macOS machines and checked.

Use it

From an agent, as an MCP server (setup for each client):

claude mcp add frankensurf -- frankensurf-mcp

From Python:

import frankensurf as fs

page = fs.read("https://example.com/pricing") if page.ok: print(page.title, page.text[:500]) else: print("couldn't read it:", page.failure) # {"code": "CAPTCHA", "message": ...}

pages = fs.batch(urls, links=True) # paced per site, in order hits = fs.search("playwright python tutorial", recency="month") page = await fs.aread(url) # aread, abatch, asearch inside async code

For a long-running service, keep one Runtime open: async with Runtime() as web: await web.read(url).

Map and crawl: fs.map(url) lists a site's URLs; fs.crawl(url, limit=50) reads a section of it as markdown.

Agent mode (pip install "frankensurf[agent]", any LiteLLM model): fs.ask("question") searches, reads and answers with sources, and says what it couldn't read; fs.extract(urls, schema=...) and fs.summarize(url). Agent mode.

In Docker, one install for your whole network: docker run -p 3002:3002 -e FRANKENSURF_API_KEY=... ghcr.io/yail259/frankensurf (Docker).

From any tool that takes a Firecrawl URL (GPT Researcher, Hermes Agent, OpenClaw, Open WebUI, Dify, LibreChat, n8n, LangChain, LlamaIndex and others): frankensurf serve, then point it at http://127.0.0.1:3002 (setup).

From the command line:

frankensurf read https://example.com --markdown

frankensurf search playwright python tutorial --recency week frankensurf watch https://news.ycombinator.com/ --link-pattern 'item\?id=\d+'

In Claude Code as a plugin (the MCP server plus the skill that teaches Claude to use it):

/plugin marketplace add yail259/frankensurf

/plugin install frankensurf@frankensurf

From LangChain, the OpenAI Agents SDK or CrewAI (pip install "frankensurf[langchain]", and so on):

from frankensurf.agent_tools import langchain_tools   # or openai_agents_tools, crewai_tools

tools = langchain_tools() # frankensurf_read, frankensurf_search

You get raw page data, not answers: text or markdown, JSON-LD, the page's own JSON, images, and the receipt. Your agent decides what the page means. If it isn't what it wanted, it asks again with retry_of= and Frankensurf skips every tool it already tried.

Benchmark

Cost per 1,000 correct pages: Frankensurf's free tools $0 in fees, about $0.01 of a $5/month server (87–88% right); with paid fallbacks $0.22 (96%); Firecrawl on its own $0.71 on its Scale plan, $0.98 on Standard (85%). How that's worked out.

scripts/toolbench.py runs each tool on its own, then Frankensurf, on the same pages with the same content checks. The newest set: 148 less-known sites in 15 categories, picked before any was read, every tool on its own, paid ones included (28 October 2026, rows and corrections in benchmarks/2026-10-28-heldout9/).

ToolSites readMedianCost per 1k
Plain HTTP only41.9%0.9 sfree
Jina Reader only68.2%3.3 sfree
Firecrawl only70.3%4.3 s$5.22
Zyte only70.3%9.5 snot reported
Frankensurf, free tools only81.8%4.8 s$0
Frankensurf, with paid fallbacks88.5%4.9 s$0.96
  • Frankensurf read 28 sites Firecrawl missed; Firecrawl read 1 it missed.
  • Every tool's reads put together come to 84.5%; Frankensurf reads more than that, through retries and rescues.
  • Its slowest tenth takes 33.0 s against Firecrawl's 10.9 s.
  • This set is harder than the last: every tool read 10 to 20 points less. A rerun the same evening gave 87.2% and 79.7%.

The set before (150 sites, 11 October 2026, rows in benchmarks/2026-10-11/):

ToolSites readMedianCost per 1k
Plain HTTP only48.7%1.2 sfree
Camoufox only68.7%10.9 sfree
Jina Reader only73.3%1.5 sfree
Firecrawl only84.7%4.6 s$4.28
Zyte only86.0%10.7 snot reported
Frankensurf, free tools only88.0%3.6 s$0
Frankensurf, with paid fallbacks96.0%2.9 s$0.98
  • Frankensurf read 17 sites Firecrawl missed; Firecrawl read none it missed.
  • With no paid tools at all it is level with the best paid tool on its own (88.0% against 86.0% and 84.7%; at 150 sites that gap is within the noise).
  • Its slowest reads are slower: the slowest tenth takes 25.7 s against Firecrawl's 10.6 s, when a read climbs several tools.
  • Not a one-off: 95.3% vs 85.3% on the set the day before; 89.5% vs 80.3% and 88.5% vs 74.1% on earlier fresh sets.

Every tool on the 11 October set

ToolSites readMedianCost per 1k
Patchright only38.7%4.1 sfree
Headless Chromium only40.7%2.7 sfree
Plain HTTP only48.7%1.2 sfree
Camoufox only68.7%10.9 sfree
Scrapling only68.7%8.5 sfree
Jina Reader only73.3%1.5 sfree
Firecrawl only84.7%4.6 s$4.28
Zyte only86.0%10.7 snot reported
Frankensurf, free tools only88.0%3.6 s$0
Frankensurf, with paid fallbacks96.0%2.9 s$0.98

Medians are over pages read; cost is per 1,000 pages read right. ZenRows and Scrapfly are left out (their plans ran out of credits). From a fresh cloud VM, whose data-centre address sites wall more often: free tools 82.0%, lightning mode 84.0% at a 1.2 s median. See Benchmarks.

Against self-hosted Firecrawl

Firecrawl is open source too, so the fair question for anyone running their own is how the Firecrawl you'd self-host does. Its docs say self-hosted instances don't get Fire-engine, the anti-bot layer of its cloud. Same 150 sites, 23 October 2026, both servers in Docker on one machine, each site read by both with the first reader alternating site by site:

Self-hosted Firecrawl 2.11.604Frankensurf 0.52.0 (free tools)
Pages read right89 of 150126 of 150
Wrong page passed on as the page185
Nothing back4319
Memory while readingabout 4.2 GB, six containers1.4 GB, one container
Median, pages both read4.2 s4.8 s
Slowest tenth, pages both read9.8 s17.8 s
Time to give up on a page (median)1.5 s16.5 s
  • Frankensurf read 38 sites the self-hosted Firecrawl did

只显示了开头部分;其余内容请在仓库中阅读

问 PopNx