Alphacouncil Agent

Name: Alphacouncil Agent
Author: Zhao73

作者：Zhao73版本 1.0.15i★ –i在你的电脑上运行

注册名称io.github.Zhao73/alphacouncil-agent

安装

概览

作者提供的说明（英文原文）

Simulated investment committee: 27 investor lenses read the same filings, debate, and a PM decides.

PopNx MCP 的三大支柱

这三项永远不会合并成一个分数：意见、测量和人气是不同的东西。

用户评价i暂无评价评价功能将在后续阶段与账户功能一起开放
我们的基础检查i1 项中通过 1 项依据公开信息检查；尚未扫描代码
使用情况i尚未统计★ –

它能帮你做什么

我们还没有为它写通俗的介绍。下面是我们从注册中心读取到的事实。

连接方式: 在你的电脑上运行
传输方式: stdio
分类: 会计、财务与税务

安装

选择你使用的 AI 应用，然后复制设置。

安装之前

基础检查：1 项中通过 1 项
在你的电脑上运行，拥有你的用户账户的权限（文件、网络、应用）。
注册中心没有列出需要填写的密钥。

你需要

npm已安装 Node.js（用于 npx 命令）

你用的是哪个应用？

ClaudeClaude CodeCursorVS CodeChatGPT

在上方选择你的应用。我们会记住它，下次按钮会显示“安装到 …”。

打开 Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config，把下面的内容粘贴到 claude_desktop_config.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "alphacouncil-agent": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "alphacouncil-agent"
      ]
    }
  }
}

在终端中运行这条命令

claude mcp add alphacouncil-agent -- npx -y alphacouncil-agent

在 Cursor 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .cursor/mcp.json，或 ~/.cursor/mcp.json

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "alphacouncil-agent": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "alphacouncil-agent"
      ]
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用，然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空，由你自己填写。

在 VS Code 中打开

或者自己复制设置

粘贴到项目中的 .vscode/mcp.json

{
  "servers": {
    "alphacouncil-agent": {
      "type": "stdio",
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "alphacouncil-agent"
      ]
    }
  }
}

浏览器会先询问是否打开应用，然后应用会显示设置并请你确认。密钥的值会留空，由你自己填写。

这个服务器在你的电脑上运行，而 ChatGPT 只能连接互联网上的服务器。请选择其他应用。

你的选择通过 Cookie 保存在这台设备上，无需账户。

这些设置是根据作者在注册中心的条目生成的。如果 README 的写法不同，请以 README 为准。

它能做什么

它在你的电脑上运行；安装后，工具列表会显示在你的 AI 应用中。

基础检查i

我们检查的是任何人都能看到的信息；我们没有阅读代码。不适用的检查项不计入总数。 · 检查于 2026年11月8日

✓ 通过
作者与仓库一致
注册名称已通过 GitHub 账户 Zhao73 验证，该账户拥有此仓库
… 尚未检查
仍在维护
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
… 尚未检查
有许可证
我们还没有从 GitHub 读取这个仓库
– 不适用
端点有响应
它在你的电脑上运行，没有互联网端点
– 不适用
使用 OAuth 登录
在你的电脑上运行，改用本地设置
… 尚未检查
工具描述中没有隐藏指令
它在你的电脑上运行；我们只能读取互联网端点的工具列表

与“会计、财务与税务”中的其他服务器比较i

星标数多于此分类中其他 2919 个服务器的 0%
发布到注册中心的时间比此分类中其他 2919 个服务器的 23% 更新
基础检查结果等于或优于此分类中其他 2919 个服务器的 100%

与注册中心里这个分类中所有活跃的服务器比较。只有当发布者拥有该仓库时，星标数才计入。

常见问题

Alphacouncil Agent 安全吗？

它在 1 项适用的基础检查中通过了 1 项。我们没有阅读代码。在添加密钥或令牌之前，请先看看这个服务器要求哪些权限，并使用只具备所需权限的密钥。

它需要哪些密钥或代码？

注册中心没有列出必需的密钥，不过有些服务器会在首次使用时要求你登录。

它在我的电脑上运行还是在云端？

它在你的电脑上运行。你的 AI 应用会在需要时启动它，数据不会经过作者的服务器（除非它自己调用在线服务）。

它还在维护吗？

GitHub 仓库最后更新于–，最新版本（1.0.15）于3个月前进入注册中心。

哪些应用可以使用它？

支持 MCP 的应用，例如 Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor 和 VS Code。你的电脑上还需要有 Node.js。

有什么可以替代它？

同一分类中有：Finance Toolkit, SolidInvoice, Korea Tax Calculator

替代选择

同一分类中其他作者的服务器，按星标数排序。

如何看卡片：★ GitHub 星标i三大支柱：评价 · 检查 · 使用情况i更新 = 最新版本发布到注册中心的时间i

Finance Toolkit

作者：JerBouma

500+ transparent financial methods calculated from raw statements, not third-party endpoints.

电脑或云端★ 5,496MIT昨天更新

安装

SolidInvoice

作者：SolidInvoice

Create and send invoices and quotes, manage clients, and track payments in SolidInvoice.

在云端运行★ 981MIT9天前更新

安装

Korea Tax Calculator

作者：UpstageAI

Korean tax calculation and tax-audit judgment MCP: 96 tools with statutory citations.

在你的电脑上运行★ 97MIT前天更新

安装

作者的 README

打开 README

按原文从作者的仓库复制。PopNx MCP 没有审查或背书其内容。HTML、图片和脚本已被移除。链接会离开本站。

An investment-research council you can inspect

One request becomes sourced evidence, competing method views, a bull/bear challenge, and a portfolio-manager verdict.

English · 中文 · 日本語

Install · Try the data layer · See how calls expand · Read a report

v1.7: concise setup with remembered choices, conclusions first, expanded daily history and full method-dependency checks. Fresh confirmation is still required. Upgrade details and data-source boundaries.

Question → sourced evidence → frozen method stances → Bull/Bear challenge → PM decision + saved audit

Historical UI recording (MP4) · Historical report artifact (SOX, Chinese)

The recording predates the current 26-seat candidate. It demonstrates an earlier interface only—not current timing, method fidelity, data accuracy, four-code-host validation, or ChatGPT Work validation.

One question. An inspectable case.

AlphaCouncil turns a ticker question into a reviewable research process. Parallel evidence workers gather public sources, selected investment-method seats interpret the same dated facts, bull and bear challenge the case, and a portfolio manager records the decision and its invalidation conditions. Missing inputs stay visible instead of being filled with guesses.

The same repository supports Codex, Claude Code, OpenCode, and Grok Build, plus a tool-only ChatGPT Work developer-mode gateway. It classifies companies, ETFs, and market indices before research so a basket is not analyzed as if it were an operating company.

Install in Codex

Prerequisite: Node.js 18 or newer. Install with these two shell commands:

codex plugin marketplace add Zhao73/alphacouncil-agent

codex plugin add alphacouncil-agent@alphacouncil

Plugins load when Codex starts. Fully quit and restart Codex, open a new session, then enter this in the Codex composer:

@alphacouncil-agent analyze AAPL

For ChatGPT Work developer mode, Claude Code, OpenCode, Grok Build, Windows, troubleshooting, and the optional global npm command, use the [complete install guide](docs/INSTALL.md).

Free first run

Check the keyless public-data layer before starting a council:

# Codex

@alphacouncil-agent AAPL news

Claude Code, OpenCode, or Grok Build

/alpha AAPL news

This check starts no council workers and requires no data-vendor key. For bounded research in Codex, use @alphacouncil-agent AAPL quick; on the three slash-command hosts, use /alpha AAPL quick.

Choose the depth before it runs

AlphaCouncil shows the work plan first. Full research asks separately for method seats, evidence breadth, and depth; the user confirms them before workers start. Full tiers use 15 / 30 / 60 minute ceilings—never a hidden token or currency estimate.

Run	Model-call structure	Time ceiling
Data check	Keyless tools only; no council workers and no additional model fan-out	Outside the council tiers
Quick research	4 evidence workers in parallel → 1–4 method seats in parallel → Bull and Bear in parallel → PM	10 minutes
Full — fast	8 core or exactly 11 all-scope evidence workers start together; each selected method stance is frozen deterministically before one isolated explanation worker; 3 debate rounds → PM	15 minutes
Full — normal	Same confirmed roster, frozen-stance sequence, 3 debate rounds, and PM, with a larger depth envelope	30 minutes
Full — slow	Same confirmed roster and stages with the largest depth envelope	60 minutes

These are queue-to-terminal persistence ceilings, not measured completion times. They guarantee an explicit terminal record even when work is incomplete; a successful live fast run within 15 minutes has not yet been demonstrated across the four hosts. Fast keeps the full contract but uses an auditable stage-aware reasoning profile and one shared lifecycle budget per primary/retry/repair chain; retries cannot silently double a seat's cap.

When an instrument classification and typed-fact coverage are already available, the selector also shows an eight-family advisory method match derived from all 26 physical pack manifests. An explicit objective and holding horizon additionally calibrate the match and separate directional, non-voting risk, and context-only contributions; out_of_scope is never a negative vote. For a one-year directional request, the PM maps sourced base-case total return to one published rating rubric instead of counting conservative method seats; the server binds the frozen price/currency and recomputes that return from a same-currency target plus income. An out_of_scope seat remains visible in the method bench but is structurally absent from the PM rating path. It is only a prefill: every pack remains selectable, no run starts without explicit confirmation, and a missing classification produces no guessed default. The output represents AI-generated method simulations—not human experts, independent models, or a promise of profit. See method-panel recommendation and seat evidence.

Only the slow run with all methods and all evidence workers enables the additional verification path; the other full tiers do not claim that extra check.

What you gain

Benefit	What it changes
A council, not one answer	Evidence specialists, method seats, opposing cases, and a PM expose where agreement comes from.
A stance before the story	Each selected full-run method stance is fixed from structured inputs before its isolated explanation is written.
Claims you can trace	Material report claims must point to source IDs; missing evidence remains a stated gap.
Disagreement that survives synthesis	Three cross-examination rounds and persisted minority or opposing reports keep the losing case available for review.
The right research path for the asset	Companies use issuer evidence; ETFs use dated holdings look-through; indices use aggregate methodology. The first data check is keyless.

How the architecture differs

This compares workflow shapes, not named products. A particular tool may implement a different design.

Review concern	Single-model reply or common shared-context flow	AlphaCouncil
Correlated errors	One shared context can carry an early mistake into every later step	Evidence seats and opposing paths run in isolated workers; they may still use the same provider or model and are not independent models
Position formation	The position can be composed together with its explanation	A structured stance is frozen before explanatory prose
Source trace	Traceability depends on the prompt and host	Every material claim is required to carry a source ID
Minority view	Dissent can be folded into the final summary	Minority and opposing reports remain surfaced as review artifacts

What the seats are—and are not

The method-seat formulas are AI-authored reconstructions of published methods, pending human review. The named practitioners have not reviewed or endorsed these seats. They are not impersonations, independent models, or validated replicas. A stance is a structured argument to check against its inputs and sources—not a validated investment model.

Current source evidence boundary: 26 provisional method seats, 0 validated method models, 0/8 registered-and-completed canonical evaluation runs, and 0/4 live-host end-to-end runs. Passing source tests does not change those zeros.

Disclaimer

AlphaCouncil is for education and research only. It is not investment advice, a recommendation, or a solicitation. AI-generated analysis can be incomplete, outdated, or wrong. Verify the evidence yourself and consult a licensed professional before making an investment decision. The authors accept no liability for losses.

Go deeper

Detailed English product, usage, tools, and architecture reference
Complete four-host installation guide
Report contract and complete example report
Roadmap, security model, attribution, and changelog
Standalone terminal client: language → ticker → model → methods, with clickable evidence and debate. Developer entry: npm run terminal after npm ci --prefix terminal.
Existing local viewers: npm run tui and npm run gui

Runtime outputs are written outside the repository under ~/.alphacouncil-agent/runs/ /.

Evidence first. Disagreement visible. Decisions reviewable.

↑ Back to top