Lunara Intelligence

Lunara Intelligence — MCP server

Regulatory obligations for AI systems, with the article that sets each date and a link to primary law.

Your model very likely knows some of these dates wrong. The EU AI Act was amended on 27 July 2026 by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, which deferred the Annex III high-risk obligations by sixteen months — five days before they would have applied — while leaving Article 50 exactly where it was. Any training corpus assembled before that carries the superseded date, and the two are quoted together often enough that getting one right is no evidence of getting the other right.

This server exists so a model can look the answer up instead of recalling it.

Connect

The hosted endpoint is live. The npm package is not published yet — the install command below resolves to nothing until the @lunara scope is claimed, and this repository refuses to advertise it in the meantime.

Point any MCP client that speaks Streamable HTTP at:

https://luiqtimzcsoqnizybifs.supabase.co/functions/v1/lunara-mcp

Once the package is published, this is the local alternative:

// Claude Code: .mcp.json — or claude_desktop_config.json

{ "mcpServers": { "lunara": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@lunara/mcp"] } } }

Node 18 or later. No dependencies, no API key, no account. Reading is free and always will be: a claim nobody can check is worth nothing.

If you cannot run a local process, the same server answers over HTTPS:

https://luiqtimzcsoqnizybifs.supabase.co/functions/v1/lunara-mcp

Streamable HTTP, one POST per JSON-RPC message, stateless, no key. Both transports import the same module, so they cannot drift into giving different dates.

Integrity

Every document this server reads is published with a detached Ed25519 assertion over its SHA-256, and the server verifies it on each fetch. A corpus that fails verification produces an error, not an answer — a client that reports a bad signature and then answers anyway has told you something is wrong and acted as though it were not.

Verification being *unavailable* is different from verification *failing*, and they are reported differently: a runtime without Ed25519 in WebCrypto, or an authority serving no assertion, reads as unverified rather than being dressed up as verified. Keys are at /.well-known/keys.json, the method and a worked example at https://lunarasociety.com/signing.html.

Tools

What it will not do

It does not answer when it cannot reach the authority. There is no bundled copy of the corpus. A cached table would let this server keep answering with a date that was amended months ago, which is exactly the failure the institution publishing it has already had to correct. If lunarasociety.com is unreachable, you get an error explaining that, not a remembered date. An oracle that guesses is worse than an oracle that is down, because you cannot tell which answer you got.

It will tell you nothing applies. Three outcomes of the applicability model conclude that no obligation in the corpus reaches the asker, including the one most people hit: the California AI Transparency Act reaches generative systems above one million monthly users, and below that line it imposes nothing. A qualifier that only ever escalates is a sales funnel.

It is not legal advice. Obligations are marked verified — checked against primary law, with that source linked so you can reach the same conclusion without trusting us. The applicability model is marked interpretation, because which obligation catches you is our reading. You are free to take the facts and leave the reading.

Where the answers come from

https://lunarasociety.com/corpus/obligations.json, generated from a single obligation table and gated in CI so the published corpus and the site can never disagree. Tense is never stored anywhere — a static document does not know when it is being read, so it states application dates, and this server computes "in force" against the moment of your call.

Corrections, including two we published against ourselves and the policy that requires it: https://lunarasociety.com/evidence.html

If an entry does not follow from the source it cites, that is a defect. — we would rather be told than found out.