Pith

할 수 있는 일

이 서버는 아직 쉬운 말로 된 요약을 쓰지 못했어요. 아래는 레지스트리에서 읽어 온 사실이에요.

• 연결 방식: 클라우드에서 실행
• 전송 방식: Streamable HTTP
• 카테고리: 검색 및 AI 기억

설치

쓰고 있는 AI 앱을 고른 다음 설정을 복사하세요.

필요한 것

• 클라우드에서 실행설치할 것 없음. 인터넷으로 연결돼요

어떤 앱을 쓰세요?

https://pith.science/mcp

claude mcp add --transport http pith https://pith.science/mcp

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "pith": {
      "url": "https://pith.science/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "servers": {
    "pith": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://pith.science/mcp"
    }
  }
}

https://pith.science/mcp

선택한 앱은 이 기기의 쿠키에만 저장돼요. 계정은 필요 없어요.

이 설정은 제작자의 레지스트리 정보로 만들었어요. README와 다르면 README를 따르세요.

할 수 있는 일

도구 이름과 설명은 서버가 2026년 11월 9일에 알려 준 그대로예요. 우리가 아니라 제작자가 쓴 글이고, 일반 텍스트로만 보여 드려요.

• get_review

  Pith's review of one specific paper, in one call: the verdict, confidence, novelty and correctness scores, one-line summary, weakest assumption, and the paper's argument as short labeled statements (premise, machinery, core claim, falsifier) already extracted, so the paper's prem

• search_papers

  Search Pith-reviewed papers by title and abstract. Call this when the user names a research topic, phenomenon, method, or paper title without an identifier, or asks whether Pith has reviewed anything on a subject. Each result carries the paper's verdict, summary, and review link.

• latest_reviews

  The papers Pith reviewed most recently, newest first. Call this when the user asks what is new, notable, or recently reviewed in a field or overall. days caps how far back to look (max 90).

• analyze_paper_claims

  The structured argument of one specific paper: what it actually asserts, the premises it assumes, the machinery connecting those premises to the claim, and the falsifier, as short labeled statements in argument order (premise, machinery, claim, falsifier). Use this for requests a

• get_claims

  Alias of analyze_paper_claims: the same ledger of what the paper asserts, its premises, machinery, and falsifier, in argument order.

• search_claims

  Full-text search over every scientific claim Pith has extracted, across all reviewed papers. Call this when the user asks who claims something, whether a claim appears in the recent literature, or what evidence bears on a statement. Returns each matching claim with its paper, ver

• get_paper_falsifier

  The falsifier for one specific paper's core claim: the concrete observation, experiment, or computation that would settle or disprove it, plus how many people are watching for that result. Use this when the user asks what would falsify the paper, prove it wrong, test its central

• get_falsifier

  Alias of get_paper_falsifier: the same falsifier and watcher count.

• get_signed_reviews

  Published human signed reviews of one paper: reviewer identity, axis deltas against the machine review, claim verdicts, defects, predictions, and who paid. Call this when the user asks what human experts said about a paper, on top of the machine review.

• get_reviewer_record

  A reviewer's published signed reviews and, when present, their calibration record (Brier score, open predictions, positivity skew). Call this when the user asks about a named Pith reviewer or how trustworthy a reviewer's track record is.

• get_record

  The compiled record of one paper: the authors' own sentences, arranged with typed labels. It carries the main claim in the authors' words, each abstract sentence's role, results with the qualifications the authors state beside them, the conditions of the study, measurements with

• resolve_paper

  Turn a pasted arXiv id, arXiv URL, DOI, or Pith Number into the arXiv id the other tools key on. ``resolved`` is false when the input did not become an arXiv id.

• paper_packet

  One paper's compiled record, small enough to hold beside others: the main claim and contribution in the authors' words, each abstract sentence with its role and probability, paper-level labels, and, for full-text records, conditions, measurements, results and limitations, with to

• citation_neighbors

  One hop from a paper: every reference entry with its resolved work identity, the papers that cite it, and, where a record exists, the citing sentences with their labeled intent. An edge means the paper names the other work, not that the work supports the citing claim.

• paper_bridge

  Whether either paper cites the other, the resolved works both cite (on or off arXiv), and the papers that cite both.

• paper_connections

  What other arXiv papers do with this paper, and what it does with the arXiv papers it cites: builds on, uses the method or tool, uses the data, compares with, cites as support or background, or contests. Each group counts distinct papers and quotes the citing authors' own sentenc

• check_claim

  Which arXiv papers support a scientific statement, which contradict it, and which study it without deciding, each with the paper's own main claim quoted and the classifier's probability. Call this before asserting a scientific result, when a user asks whether something is establi

• verify_citation

  Whether the cited paper's own sentences support what a sentence attributes to it: supports, partly supports (a condition is missing), contradicts, or not addressed, with the single best sentence from the paper quoted. Call this before citing a paper for a specific claim, or to ch

• find_passages

  Author sentences the classifier labeled with one role, across every stored record, each with its probability and paper. Abstract-tier records cover limitation, result and main_claim; full-text records add condition, citation and measurement.

• record_coverage

  Sources read and levels run for one paper's record, or the number of stored records by tier. Call before treating an empty result as a finding: an empty list means nothing in the examined scope matched.

• my_citations

  For the papers claimed on the account behind your key: how many papers cite each, whether they cite it as support, extension or disagreement, and the citing sentence quoted. Call when the user asks who is building on or disputing their work. Needs a personal key.

• my_reviews

  Pith's machine review verdict and the count of published signed human reviews for each paper claimed on the account behind your key. Needs a personal key.

• check_my_draft

  Resolve each reference in a draft, flag retracted works, and for arXiv papers show how later papers cite them: as support, and whether any contest them, with the contesting sentence quoted. Call before a submission or when a user wants their reference list checked. Needs a person

• ask_field

  Read the papers closest to a question and return, for each, whether its own abstract sentences answer yes, no or not addressed, with the deciding sentence quoted. Call when a user asks whether something holds across the literature. Candidates are chosen by meaning, so a paper tha

기본 점검i

누구나 볼 수 있는 정보를 점검했고, 코드는 읽지 않았어요. 해당하지 않는 항목은 개수에서 뺐어요. · 2026년 11월 9일 점검

• ! 주의

  제작자와 저장소 일치

  레지스트리에 소스 저장소가 없어서, 게시자(pith.science)와 코드를 맞춰 볼 수 없어요

• … 아직 점검 안 함

  계속 관리되고 있음

  아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요

• … 아직 점검 안 함

  라이선스 있음

  아직 GitHub에서 이 저장소를 읽어 오지 않았어요

• ✓ 통과

  엔드포인트 응답

  385ms 만에 응답(HTTP 200)

• – 해당 없음

  OAuth로 로그인

  로그인 필요 없음

• ✓ 통과

  도구 설명에 숨겨진 지시 없음

  도구 설명 24개를 읽었고, AI에게 보내는 숨겨진 지시는 없었어요

검색 및 AI 기억 카테고리의 다른 서버와 비교i

• 이 카테고리의 다른 서버 5730개 중 0%보다 스타가 많아요
• 이 카테고리의 다른 서버 5730개 중 47%보다 최근에 레지스트리에 공개됐어요
• 기본 점검 결과가 이 카테고리의 다른 서버 5730개 중 39%와 같거나 더 좋아요

레지스트리에서 이 카테고리의 활성 서버 전체와 비교했어요. 스타는 게시자가 저장소를 소유한 경우에만 세요.

대안

같은 카테고리에서 다른 제작자가 만든 서버예요. 스타 순으로 정렬했어요.

카드 보는 법:↓ 주간 다운로드i★ GitHub 스타i세 기둥: 리뷰 · 점검 · 사용 정도i업데이트 = 최신 버전을 레지스트리에 공개한 날i

제작자의 README

저장소에서 README를 찾지 못했어요