Figma Context MCP
Give your coding agent access to your Figma data. Implement designs in any framework in one-shot.
Beschreibung vom Entwickler (englisches Original)
AI drafting, design review and a drawing memory in BricsCAD on Linux: 128 tools, pure AutoLISP
Diese drei werden nie zu einer Punktzahl zusammengefasst: Meinungen, Messungen und Beliebtheit sind verschiedene Dinge.
Für diesen Server haben wir noch keine Zusammenfassung in einfacher Sprache geschrieben. Unten stehen die Fakten, die wir aus der Registry gelesen haben.
Wähle die KI-App, die du nutzt, und kopiere die Einstellungen.
Der Entwickler hat in der Registry keine Installationsangaben gemacht. Sieh dir unten die README des Entwicklers an.
Läuft auf deinem Computer; die Tool-Liste erscheint nach der Installation in deiner KI-App.
Wir prüfen Informationen, die jeder sehen kann; den Code haben wir nicht gelesen. Checks, die nicht zutreffen, werden nicht mitgezählt. · Geprüft am 8. Nov. 2026
Der Registry-Name wurde mit dem GitHub-Konto Psalmustrack bestätigt, dem das Repo gehört
Dieses Repo haben wir noch nicht von GitHub gelesen
Dieses Repo haben wir noch nicht von GitHub gelesen
Dieser Server läuft auf deinem Computer; es gibt keinen Endpunkt im Internet
Läuft auf deinem Computer und nutzt stattdessen lokale Einstellungen
Läuft auf deinem Computer; Tool-Listen können wir nur von Endpunkten im Internet lesen
Verglichen mit allen aktiven Servern dieser Kategorie in der Registry. Sterne zählen nur, wenn dem Herausgeber das Repo gehört.
Er hat 1 von 1 zutreffenden Basischecks bestanden. Den Code haben wir nicht gelesen. Bevor du einen Schlüssel oder Token hinzufügst, sieh nach, welche Zugriffe der Server verlangt, und nutze einen Schlüssel, der nur die Berechtigungen hat, die du brauchst.
Die Registry nennt keinen erforderlichen Schlüssel, manche Server bitten dich aber bei der ersten Nutzung, dich anzumelden.
Er läuft auf deinem Computer. Deine KI-App startet ihn bei Bedarf, und die Daten laufen nicht über die Server des Entwicklers (außer der Server ruft selbst einen Onlinedienst auf).
Das GitHub-Repo wurde zuletzt – geändert, und die neueste Version (1.3.0) kam vor 3 Monaten in die Registry.
Apps, die MCP unterstützen, etwa Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor und VS Code.
In derselben Kategorie: Figma Context MCP, Claude Real Video, Figma MCP Server
Server derselben Kategorie von anderen Entwicklern, sortiert nach Sternen.
So liest du eine Karte:↓ Downloads pro Wochei★ GitHub-SterneiDrei Säulen: Bewertungen · Checks · NutzungiAktualisiert = neueste Version in der Registry veröffentlichti
Give your coding agent access to your Figma data. Implement designs in any framework in one-shot.
Let any LLM watch a video locally — and search everything it has ever watched.
The Figma MCP server brings Figma design context directly into your AI workflow.
Unverändert aus dem Repo des Entwicklers übernommen. PopNx MCP hat den Inhalt weder geprüft noch empfiehlt es ihn. HTML, Bilder und Skripte wurden entfernt. Links führen von dieser Website weg.
Let AI draw in your CAD. An MCP server for any AutoLISP-capable CAD — no COM, no SDK, no plugins. Pure AutoLISP. The reference adapter drives BricsCAD on Linux: the first MCP server for a professional DWG CAD on Linux.
*"Draw a DN80 flange: front view, hatched section, dimensions — then model it in 3D."*
*Real-time capture, unedited: front view with bolt circle, hatched section, radial/diameter dimensions, leader, title block — then the same flange modeled as a 3D solid with an AI-written parametric AutoLISP loop and one boolean subtraction. ~20 seconds, 12 tool calls.*
| Complete 2D drawing, drawn by Claude | 3D solids with booleans | Clean render for AI vision |
|---|---|---|
Every other MCP server for a professional DWG CAD (multiCAD-mcp, autocad-mcp, CAD-MCP, ...) talks to the CAD through Windows COM — none of them can run on Linux, and none of them does real 3D.
BricsCAD is the professional DWG CAD that *does* run natively on Linux. This server drives it through a mechanism that needs no API at all: an AutoLISP file bridge. The MCP server writes LISP expressions to a file, triggers a tiny MCP command inside the CAD, and reads the result back. That's the whole trick — and it unlocks everything the CAD can do, including 3D solid modeling.
Because the bridge is plain AutoLISP + standard DXF entmake + AutoCAD-compatible commands, it is portable by construction: AutoCAD, ARES Commander (also Linux-native!), ZWCAD, GstarCAD and the IntelliCAD family all speak the same language. Porting means swapping the autoload file name and the keystroke trigger — adapters welcome.
MCP client (Claude, Cursor, ...) BricsCAD (Linux)
│ │ ▼ ▼ server.py (FastMCP, 128 tools) c:MCP AutoLISP command │ writes LISP ──► /tmp/mcp_bricscad.in │ triggers via xdotool ──► reads, evals line by line │ reads result ◄── /tmp/mcp_bricscad.out
slot, bolt_circle, rounded_rect, polygon, center_mark: one call, the server does the mathdraw_batch executes N operations in one round-trip, wrapped in one undo group (one batch = one Ctrl+Z)get_selection reads the GUI pickfirst set; select_by/select_window highlight what the AI found *before* acting; modify tools accept "selection"boolean_verified cuts *and measures* the change against the volume you expected (a cut that lands short reads SHORT, not success); overhang_report reads the STL mesh and says whether a part prints without supports, scoring all six orientations; contact_report over an assembly (assembly_place/assembly_list/assembly_clear) says who touches whom, who interferes, and who is an orphan — a part touching nothing, because its job was superseded and nobody noticed; hole_report physically probes every hole and says which are actually open (a drawing lies about its holes until something checks); graph_build/graph_trace read the 2D geometry as a connectivity graph — separate networks, exact run lengths, and the open ends that are real breaks vs T-junctions, with the joining tolerance *emerging from the drawing* instead of hardcodedmemory_enable puts a journal beside the .dwg that the CAD writes by itself, catching the edits the *human* makes in the GUI while no tool is running; tag_entity gives entities semantic roles ("muro-nord", "asta-principale") keyed to handles, which survive save and reopen; world_report answers *what is here, what did I call it, what changed since I last looked* — and revalidates every claim against the live drawing before answering (an entity erased behind the AI's back reads DEAD (erased since tagging), reported, never hidden). The next prompt — or the next session — starts knowing the drawing instead of re-surveying itlambdacad://traps resource that costs nothing until readrender_view: BricsCAD's internal PNG render (clean, no UI, ~30 KB) for vision modelscreate_sheet (A4…A0, margins zeroed so paper mm = sheet mm), add_viewport (ask for 1:50 and it *is* 1:50 — measured back off the entity, and parked on a non-plotting layer), fit_viewport (measures what is drawn and picks the largest STANDARD scale that fits — 1:37 is not a scale), title_block (border + ISO 7200 cartouche, sized from the sheet), export_sheet_pdf, which checks its own work by measuring the page of the PDF it just wroteexport_stl: 3D solids straight to the slicer, parked on the origin)list_documents shows which one the tools are pointing at (plus unsaved changes and read-only), use_document picks another; every reply says which drawing answered, and warns when it changes underfootrun_lisp evaluates arbitrary AutoLISP (multi-line, multi-expression): capable models write parametric code and love itFull reference: docs/TOOLS.md · How it works: docs/ARCHITECTURE.md
| Metric | Result |
|---|---|
| Tool calls for a complete dimensioned flange | 200 → 22 (9× fewer round-trips vs primitive-per-call) |
| Trigger latency | 0.25 s per call |
| Error reporting | per-line LISP errors (msg=L2: ...) → models self-correct without screenshots |
| Exactness | entity_length on an r=20 circle: 125.664 / 1256.637 (2πr, πr² exact) |
Details and model-behavior notes (Sonnet writes parametric LISP, Haiku uses typed tools): docs/BENCHMARKS.md
BRICS_DISPLAY=:0 python tests/test_tools.py # ~135 checks incl. review + memory groups, ~2-4 min
python tests/test_tools.py 3d edges export # or just some groups python tests/test_tools.py --list
An integration suite: it drives the CAD you already have running, then measures what came out — closed-form volumes, bounding boxes, the value stored inside a dimension, triangle counts read out of the STL. Never "no error".
That distinction is the whole point. The bridge answers OK whenever the CAD accepted the command, which is not the same as the CAD having done what was asked. Every bug found so far was of that shape: the classic CHAMFER silently switching to *all edges*; a layout that plots rotated 90°, so an A3 landscape sheet comes out portrait, the drawing falls off the paper and the export writes a perfectly valid, entirely empty page; and — the one that reached a release — running object snap dragging programmatic coordinates onto nearby geometry, so five blocks placed in a row each landed on the previous. A volume, a bounding box, a measured dimension and the page of a PDF are exact signatures: every one of those surfaced as arithmetic that did not add up.
The suite draws in a scratch region (x ≥ 50000), erases it afterwards, and fails if the entity count does not come back to where it started. It still works in the active drawing, so point it at a scratch one.
With 128 tools, the interesting question is which ones earn their place — and which fail often enough to signal a docstring or design problem. The server appends one JSON line per call to ~/.lambdacad/usage.jsonl:
{"t": 1786526823.4, "tool": "draw_batch", "ms": 198, "err": 0}
Tool name, duration, error flag. Never the arguments — no coordinates, no paths, no drawing data — and nothing ever leaves your machine. Disable with LAMBDACAD_TELEMETRY=0.
python scripts/usage_report.py # per-tool calls, error rate, p50
python scripts/usage_report.py --core 95 # smallest set covering 95% of calls python scripts/usage_report.py --reset # archive the current log
The --core output is a data-driven candidate for CORE_TOOLS (compact mode): after a few weeks of real use, the choice of which tools deserve a place in a schema-limited client stops being a guess. Early signal from the integration suite itself: run_lisp alone is ~half of all calls — on clients that load schemas on demand (Claude Code's tool search), the long tail of typed tools costs nothing until used, so the rich docstrings stay.
Requirements: Linux, BricsCAD (any recent version — tested on V26), Python 3.10+, xdotool.
git clone https://github.com/Psalmustrack/lambdacad-mcp
cd lambdacad-mcp ./install.sh
The installer creates a venv, installs the AutoLISP bridge into BricsCAD's Support/on_doc_load.lsp (idempotent, marker-delimited), and prints ready-to-paste config for Claude Code / Claude Desktop.
Then:
bricscad tools appear.| Variable | Default | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
BRICS_DISPLAY | session $DISPLAY | X display where BricsCAD runs (e.g. :77 for a nested Xephyr) |
BRICS_COMPACT | off | 1 = expose only 14 essential tools (~1k schema tokens instead of ~7k) for clients that inject every schema |
BRICS_MCP_IN / BRICS_MCP_OUT | /tmp/mcp_bricscad.{in,out} | bridge file paths |
run_lisp and run_command execute arbitrary code inside BricsCAD by design — that's what makes the server fully general. O
Nur der Anfang wird gezeigt; den Rest findest du im Repo