Supabase
MCP server for interacting with the Supabase platform
Beschreibung vom Entwickler (englisches Original)
Safe PostgreSQL migrations: schema drift, lock analysis, safe rewrites, data checksums. Read-only.
Diese drei werden nie zu einer Punktzahl zusammengefasst: Meinungen, Messungen und Beliebtheit sind verschiedene Dinge.
Für diesen Server haben wir noch keine Zusammenfassung in einfacher Sprache geschrieben. Unten stehen die Fakten, die wir aus der Registry gelesen haben.
Wähle die KI-App, die du nutzt, und kopiere die Einstellungen.
SOURCE_DATABASE_URL, TARGET_DATABASE_URL, PGVOUCH_LLMAls geheim markierte Werte sind Schlüssel zu deinem Konto. Gib sie nie weiter und füge sie nie in einen Chat ein.
Du brauchst
Welche App nutzt du?
Wähle oben deine App. Wir merken sie uns, damit der Button beim nächsten Mal „In … installieren“ anzeigt.
Öffne Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config und füge dies in claude_desktop_config.json ein
{
"mcpServers": {
"pgvouch": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"pgvouch",
"mcp"
],
"env": {
"SOURCE_DATABASE_URL": "your-value",
"TARGET_DATABASE_URL": "your-value",
"PGVOUCH_LLM": "your-value"
}
}
}
}Führe das in deinem Terminal aus
claude mcp add pgvouch --env SOURCE_DATABASE_URL=your-value --env TARGET_DATABASE_URL=your-value --env PGVOUCH_LLM=your-value -- npx -y pgvouch mcpTrag die leeren Werte ein, bevor du ihn startest.
In .cursor/mcp.json in deinem Projekt oder in ~/.cursor/mcp.json einfügen
{
"mcpServers": {
"pgvouch": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"pgvouch",
"mcp"
],
"env": {
"SOURCE_DATABASE_URL": "your-value",
"TARGET_DATABASE_URL": "your-value",
"PGVOUCH_LLM": "your-value"
}
}
}
}Dein Browser fragt, ob er die App öffnen darf, dann zeigt die App die Einstellungen und bittet dich um Bestätigung. Schlüsselwerte bleiben leer, damit du sie selbst einträgst.
In .vscode/mcp.json in deinem Projekt einfügen
{
"servers": {
"pgvouch": {
"type": "stdio",
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"pgvouch",
"mcp"
],
"env": {
"SOURCE_DATABASE_URL": "your-value",
"TARGET_DATABASE_URL": "your-value",
"PGVOUCH_LLM": "your-value"
}
}
}
}Dein Browser fragt, ob er die App öffnen darf, dann zeigt die App die Einstellungen und bittet dich um Bestätigung. Schlüsselwerte bleiben leer, damit du sie selbst einträgst.
Dieser Server läuft auf deinem Computer, und ChatGPT kann sich nur mit Servern im Internet verbinden. Wähle eine andere App.
Deine Auswahl bleibt in einem Cookie auf diesem Gerät; kein Konto nötig.
PGVOUCH_LLM envDiese Einstellungen werden aus dem Registry-Eintrag des Entwicklers erzeugt. Wenn in der README etwas anderes steht, folge der README.
Läuft auf deinem Computer; die Tool-Liste erscheint nach der Installation in deiner KI-App.
Wir prüfen Informationen, die jeder sehen kann; den Code haben wir nicht gelesen. Checks, die nicht zutreffen, werden nicht mitgezählt. · Geprüft am 7. Nov. 2026
Der Registry-Name wurde mit dem GitHub-Konto Shubh-Sgr bestätigt, dem das Repo gehört
Dieses Repo haben wir noch nicht von GitHub gelesen
Dieses Repo haben wir noch nicht von GitHub gelesen
Dieser Server läuft auf deinem Computer; es gibt keinen Endpunkt im Internet
Läuft auf deinem Computer und nutzt stattdessen lokale Einstellungen
Läuft auf deinem Computer; Tool-Listen können wir nur von Endpunkten im Internet lesen
Verglichen mit allen aktiven Servern dieser Kategorie in der Registry. Sterne zählen nur, wenn dem Herausgeber das Repo gehört.
Er hat 1 von 1 zutreffenden Basischecks bestanden. Den Code haben wir nicht gelesen. Bevor du einen Schlüssel oder Token hinzufügst, sieh nach, welche Zugriffe der Server verlangt, und nutze einen Schlüssel, der nur die Berechtigungen hat, die du brauchst.
Das musst du eintragen: SOURCE_DATABASE_URL, TARGET_DATABASE_URL
Er läuft auf deinem Computer. Deine KI-App startet ihn bei Bedarf, und die Daten laufen nicht über die Server des Entwicklers (außer der Server ruft selbst einen Onlinedienst auf).
Das GitHub-Repo wurde zuletzt – geändert, und die neueste Version (0.4.4) kam vor 34 Tagen in die Registry.
Apps, die MCP unterstützen, etwa Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor und VS Code. Außerdem brauchst du Node.js auf deinem Computer.
In derselben Kategorie: Supabase, MongoDB MCP Server, Elasticsearch MCP Server
Server derselben Kategorie von anderen Entwicklern, sortiert nach Sternen.
So liest du eine Karte:★ GitHub-SterneiDrei Säulen: Bewertungen · Checks · NutzungiAktualisiert = neueste Version in der Registry veröffentlichti
MCP server for interacting with the Supabase platform
MongoDB Model Context Protocol Server
MCP server for interacting with Elasticsearch
Unverändert aus dem Repo des Entwicklers übernommen. PopNx MCP hat den Inhalt weder geprüft noch empfiehlt es ihn. HTML, Bilder und Skripte wurden entfernt. Links führen von dieser Website weg.
An MCP server + CLI that lets AI assistants safely inspect, plan and _prove_ PostgreSQL migrations. The LLM proposes; deterministic code decides.
Real output against the seeded demo databases (1M transactions, 2M ledger entries) with the target broken as in step 2 below. Typing is real-time; command run times are shortened (the verify run took 14.0 s).
Writing ALTER TABLE is the easy part of a database migration. The hard parts are:
CREATE INDEX on a busy table blocks every write until it finishes. A "1 ms" ALTER TABLE can still cause an outage by waiting in the lock queue.AI assistants now write migrations, but they hallucinate objects, ignore locks and can't prove anything. PgVouch gives them (and you) read-only tools that answer those four questions, and it wraps every AI suggestion in deterministic checks.
All numbers come from npm run eval against the seeded Docker databases. The full tables are in evals/.
| What | Result |
|---|---|
| Drift detection over 32 seeded scenarios (tables, views, functions, triggers, enums, extensions, RLS) | 100% precision, 100% recall (34 true positives, 0 false positives, 0 missed) |
| Exact differing rows found by checksum bisection | 100% of seeded row changes, 0 false rows |
| Rows fetched to find them | 311 rows instead of 6,079,997 (the rows in the mismatched tables, both sides) |
Lock mode predicted vs lock actually taken (read from pg_locks) | 36/36 statements, on PostgreSQL 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17 |
Table rewrite predicted vs actual rewrite (pg_class.relfilenode changed) | 35/35 statements |
| Sequence left behind its data after a copy (next INSERT would hit a duplicate key) | found 1/1, 0 false alarms in 10 checks |
| Rules-only migration plans that pass a shadow run on a real schema copy | 27/27 |
| LLM plans (local llama3.2, 3B), 17 drift scenarios of the first 21-scenario suite, *validator-only acceptance (v0.1.0)* | 5.9% valid on first try, 17.6% after one retry, 82.4% fell back to the rules plan; 0/3 accepted LLM plans passed the shadow run |
Application stall during the migration, measured on the 1M-row table with a probe query every ~10 ms (evals/results-rewrite.md):
| Migration | Original: max stall | PgVouch rewrite: max stall | Rewrite total time |
|---|---|---|---|
CREATE INDEX | 1.58 s | 47 ms | 2.1 s |
ADD FOREIGN KEY (2M rows) | 1.01 s | 49 ms | 1.2 s |
ADD CHECK | 440 ms | 63 ms | 0.85 s |
SET NOT NULL | 625 ms | 31 ms | 0.68 s |
ADD COLUMN ... NOT NULL DEFAULT gen_random_uuid() | 10.94 s | 964 ms | 108.7 s (batched backfill) |
ALTER COLUMN merchant_id TYPE bigint | 6.51 s | 93 ms | 28.0 s (includes re-creating its foreign key; +3 manual steps) |
What the LLM numbers show: a small local model is not reliable at migration planning. That's why PgVouch never trusts it. The validator rejected 14/17 plans (unparseable SQL, hallucinated or duplicate objects, blocking DDL). The 3 it accepted were *safe but incomplete*, and only the shadow run caught that (e.g. a missing index and a sequence left out when re-creating a dropped table). Deterministic rules plans passed all 17 (27/27 with the scenarios added later). Details: evals/results-llm.md.
What changed because of it: those numbers were measured when the validator alone decided. Now an LLM plan is accepted only if it passes the validator and a shadow run whose result matches the source exactly; a shadow failure is sent back to the LLM for one retry, then PgVouch falls back to the rules plan. So the 3 incomplete plans above would now be rejected. The LLM eval has not been re-run with the new pipeline yet, so there is no new number here.
The trade-off is visible: the rewrites that need a backfill take much longer in total, but the application keeps running. These are single runs on a laptop (Apple M1, 8 cores, Docker Desktop). Expect the absolute numbers to vary; the gap is the point.
flowchart LR
A["AI assistant (Claude Code, Cursor)"] -- "MCP (JSON-RPC, stdio)" --> S U["You (terminal)"] -- CLI --> S subgraph S["PgVouch core"] I["F1 introspect pg_catalog"] --> D["F2 diff (pure function)"] D --> P["F7 planner LLM + guardrail validator"] L["F5 lock analyzer (Postgres parser)"] --> R["F6 safe rewrites"] R --> P P --> SH["F10 shadow run (throwaway container)"] V["F3 chunked checksums"] --> B["F4 bisection"] P --> RC["F12 receipt (SHA-256)"] end S -- "read-only SQL" --> SRC[("source DB")] S -- "read-only SQL" --> TGT[("target DB")] P -. "structured facts only, no rows" .-> LLM["Ollama (local) or Gemini"]
Golden rule: the LLM never touches a database and never decides pass/fail. It proposes; the parser, the rules and the shadow run decide.
| # | Feature | How |
|---|---|---|
| F1 | Schema introspection | pg_catalog (not information_schema, which hides index methods, partial-index predicates and NOT VALID) |
| F2 | Drift detection | A pure diffSchemas(source, target) over tables, columns, indexes, constraints, sequences, views, functions, triggers (including disabled ones), enum types, extensions and row-level security: deterministic and sorted, with severity rules, and it never guesses renames |
| F3 | Data verification | md5(string_agg(md5(row::text) ORDER BY pk)) per primary-key chunk, inside a REPEATABLE READ snapshot with normalized session settings. Text keys are ordered byte-wise (COLLATE "C"), so servers with different collations agree. Also checks that every identity/serial sequence on the target is ahead of its data. On a target still being replicated to, --recheck looks at the differences again after a delay and reports only those that never catch up |
| F4 | Checksum bisection | Merkle-style: split the mismatched chunk at its median key and recurse only into halves whose hashes differ |
| F5 | Lock analyzer | libpg-query (Postgres' own parser, WASM) → rule table → risk from reltuples |
| F6 | Safe rewrites | CONCURRENTLY, NOT VALID + VALIDATE, UNIQUE ... USING INDEX, expand/contract, batched DO loops with COMMIT per batch |
| F7 | Guarded LLM planner | zod-checked JSON → validator (parses, allow-list, objects exist, no unsafe DDL) → shadow run (the result must match the source) → one retry with the errors → rules-only fallback |
| F8 | MCP server | 7 read-only tools over stdio |
| F9 | Eval suite | 32 drift/data scenarios, 36 lock statements with ground truth from Postgres, and a stall benchmark under load |
| F10 | Shadow runs | Copies the target's *schema* into a disposable container, applies the plan, and diffs the result against the source |
| F11 | Reversibility | Tags each step reversible / reversible-with-backfill / data-lossy and generates rollback SQL |
| F12 | Receipts | JSON of drift + verification + plan + shadow, with a SHA-256 over canonical (sorted-key) JSON |
| F13 | Lock-queue preflight | "Safe to run right now?": the locks each statement needs vs. live pg_locks + pg_stat_activity, using Postgres' full 8×8 lock conflict table |
| F14 | PR review action | pgvouch review --format markdown + a GitHub Action: lock analysis and safe rewrites of changed migrations as a job summary and one PR comment |
There are two ways to use PgVouch:
| Option A: npm package | Option B: clone the repo | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Your own databases, CI, or an AI assistant | Trying every feature on seeded demo databases, or contributing |
| Needs | Node 22 (or 20.12+) | Node 22 (or 20.12+) and Docker |
| Commands run as | pgvouch (or npx pgvouch ) | npm run cli -- |
1. Try it now, no database needed. Point it at any migration file:
npx pgvouch locks my_migration.sql --offline # the locks each statement takes, and the risk
npx pgvouch rewrite my_migration.sql --offline # a safe, non-blocking version of the same migration
No migration file handy? Create one: echo "CREATE INDEX idx_amount ON transactions (amount);" > my_migration.sql
2. Install it (optional: npx pgvouch works without installing):
npm install -g pgvouch
pgvouch --help
3. Point it at your databases. Create a read-only role on each database (the SQL is here), then put a .env file in the folder you run PgVouch from:
SOURCE_DATABASE_URL=postgres://pgvouch_ro:PASSWORD@staging-host:5432/your_db
TARGET_DATABASE_URL=postgres://pgvouch_ro:PASSWORD@prod-host:5432/your_db PGVOUCH_LLM=none # rules-only plans; set it to ollama to let a local LLM propose plans
Variables already set in your environment take precedence over .env. Then check that both connections are read-only:
pgvouch doctor # must say read_only=true and write privileges: none
4. Run it:
pgvouch diff # schema drift (exit code 1 if any)
pgvouch verify --rows # checksums + exact differing rows pgvouch verify --rows --recheck 3 # target still being replicated to: ignore rows in flight pgvouch locks my_migration.sql # lock impact per statement, with real table sizes pgvouch preflight my_migration.sql # would it have to wait for locks RIGHT NOW? pgvouch rewrite my_migration.sql # safe multi-step script pgvouch review --format markdown migrations/*.sql # PR-comment report (offline, used by the GitHub Action) pgvouch plan --no-llm # rules-only plan that makes target match source pgvouch plan # LLM plan (Ollama) behind guardrails pgvouch shadow # plan, then prove it on a throwaway container (needs Docker) pgvouch receipt --shadow # hashed audit record pgvouch receipt-verify pgvouch-receipt.json
locks --fail-on high exits with code 1, so it can gate a CI pipeline on risky migrations.
preflight answers a different question: not "what will this lock?" but "is anyone holding or waiting for a conflicting lock right now?". It lists the sessions it would queue behind (pid, user, application, state, transaction age; never their query text), and flags that CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY waits for every older transaction in the database. It exits with code 1 if the migration would wait. PgVouch never terminates sessions.
5. Also: use it from an AI assistant (npx -y pgvouch mcp), or review every migration pull request with the GitHub Action (step 4 there).
The repo includes two seeded Postgres databases, so you can try every feature without touching a real database. Requirements: Node 22 (or 20.12+) and Docker.
git clone https://github.com/Shubh-Sgr/pgvouch.git && cd pgvouch
npm in
Nur der Anfang wird gezeigt; den Rest findest du im Repo