Spec Driven Development
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
作者による説明(英語の原文)
Text-blind context control plane for AI agents. Select high-utility context under token budgets.
この3つを1つのスコアにまとめることはしません。意見、測定、人気はそれぞれ別のものだからです。
このサーバーのやさしい解説はまだ書いていません。以下はレジストリから読み取った事実です。
使っているAIアプリを選んで、設定をコピーしてください。
どのアプリを使っていますか?
上でアプリを選んでください。選んだアプリを覚えておくので、次からはボタンに「…にインストール」と表示されます。
リンク先は作者自身のファイルです。私たちが置いたり再パッケージしたりしたものではありません。ファイルを開くと、Claude Desktopがインストールします。
ターミナルでこれを実行します
ブラウザがアプリを開いてよいか確認し、そのあとアプリが設定を表示して確認を求めます。キーの値は空欄のままなので、自分で入力してください。
ブラウザがアプリを開いてよいか確認し、そのあとアプリが設定を表示して確認を求めます。キーの値は空欄のままなので、自分で入力してください。
これはパソコンで動くサーバーですが、ChatGPTがつなげるのはインターネット上のサーバーだけです。ほかのアプリを選んでください。
選んだアプリは、この端末のCookieに保存されます。アカウントは不要です。
この設定は、作者のレジストリ登録情報から作成しています。READMEと違う場合は、READMEに従ってください。
パソコンで動くサーバーです。インストールすると、ツール一覧がAIアプリに表示されます。
誰でも見られる情報をチェックしており、コードは読んでいません。当てはまらない項目は数に入れていません。 · 2026年11月7日にチェック
レジストリ名は、リポジトリを所有するGitHubアカウント cole-h06 で確認済みです
このリポジトリはまだGitHubから読み取っていません
このリポジトリはまだGitHubから読み取っていません
これはパソコンで動くため、インターネット上のエンドポイントはありません
パソコンで動き、代わりにローカルの設定を使います
パソコンで動くサーバーです。ツール一覧を読み取れるのは、インターネット上のエンドポイントがある場合だけです
レジストリでこのカテゴリにある有効なすべてのサーバーと比較しています。スターは、公開者がリポジトリの所有者である場合だけ数えます。
当てはまる基本チェック1項目のうち1項目に合格しました。コードは読んでいません。キーやトークンを追加する前に、サーバーがどんなアクセスを求めているかを確認し、必要な権限だけを持つキーを使ってください。
レジストリには必須のキーは載っていません。ただし、最初に使うときにサインインを求めるサーバーもあります。
あなたのパソコンで動きます。必要なときにAIアプリが起動し、データは作者のサーバーを通りません(サーバー自体がオンラインサービスを呼び出す場合を除きます)。
GitHubリポジトリの最終更新は–、最新バージョン(1.0.9)がレジストリに届いたのは12 日前です。
Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor、VS CodeなどのMCP対応アプリで使えます。パソコンにMCPBも必要です。
同じカテゴリには:Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, Agent Data Tools: Utilities
同じカテゴリで、ほかの作者が作ったサーバー。スターの多い順。
カードの見方:★ GitHubスターi3つの柱:レビュー · チェック · 利用状況i更新=最新バージョンをレジストリに公開した日i
MCP Server that facilitates spec-driven development workflows, not just Vibe Coding.
Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.
103 tools: JSON repair, CSV, hashes, cron, dates, units, validators. 25 free calls.
作者のリポジトリから書かれたとおりにコピーしたものです。PopNx MCPは内容を確認・推奨していません。HTML、画像、スクリプトは取り除いています。リンクはこのサイトの外へ移動します。
Provenance-aware context control plane for AI agents.
Omneum is an open-source context control plane for AI agents, built to optimize the evidence entering an LLM's context window.
Agents accumulate context from retrieval, tools, memory, and previous sessions, but longer context windows don't guarantee better reasoning. Context rot can slowly degrade downstream answer accuracy even when the relevant information has already been retrieved.
Install Omneum:
pip install omneum
Run the context reconstruction demo:
git clone https://github.com/cole-h06/omneum.git
cd omneum python -m examples.context_quality_demo.before_after
Five retrieved chunks, four distinct claims, 80-unit context budget.
Compare retrieval-order packing with Omneum's claim-coverage selection under the same context budget.
| Metric | Raw RAG | Omneum |
|---|---|---|
| Chunks retained | 3 | 2 |
| Claim coverage | 2/4 | 4/4 |
| Budget used | 75/80 | 51/80 |
Packing chunks in retrieval order consumes 75 units while covering only two claims. Omneum retains two original chunks covering all four, using 32% less context capacity.
The demo measures its budget with the SDK's word/punctuation counter.
Set up the MCP server →
Omneum uses a graph-based mathematical analysis, calculated from Observation objects, to estimate the structural reliability of sources and the support for claims found in retrieved context.
Importantly, this analysis does not naively assume every source has derived its information independently. The same information often propagates across multiple sources. Without dependency tracking, five observations from different sources can be difficult to distinguish from five reports derived from the same upstream source.
For example, consider:
Source A: Acme's 2025 annual report
Claim: Acme reported $4.2 billion in revenue for 2025.
Source B: Financial article reporting the same claim Claim: Acme reported $4.2 billion in revenue for 2025. Upstream: Acme's 2025 annual report
How much support should that claim receive? That depends partly on the reliability of the sources reporting it. But how do we determine the reliability of the sources? By looking at the claims they support.
This definition seems circular, and it is. Nonetheless, it provides a well-defined notion of reliability that helps distinguish strongly supported context from weakly supported context.
Of course claim-level scores are only useful for context selection if they can be mapped back to chunks. To bridge this gap, Omneum stores a claim-to-chunk mapping: each chunk retains its original text and chunk_id, while its associated claim_ids reference the claims evaluated in the graph. A chunk can contain multiple claims, and the same claim can appear across multiple chunks. This allows the algorithm to associate claim support with the actual passages competing for space in the context window.
But selecting context is not simply a matter of ranking chunks by their individual scores. Omneum derives chunk utility from the claims associated with each passage, then ranks chunks to fill the model's window under a limited token budget. When a nonempty question is supplied, finalized claim contributions are weighted by deterministic, local lexical relevance over the original passage text. Repeated evidence from the same inferred source cluster earns only an improvement over its best selected relevance. Without a question, Omneum keeps its question-blind claim-coverage selection. Selected passages are reconstructed from their original text.
The selected passages are then reconstructed from their original text into the context passed to the LLM. The analysis itself never needs to read that text because it operates exclusively on structured relationships between sources and claims.
Omneum runs between retrieval and generation. The Python SDK accepts retrieved chunks and relevance scores from the calling retrieval pipeline, or computes relevance locally using BM25 or MiniLM when explicitly enabled.
Retrieval / tools
│ ▼ ┌───────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ ContextMapper / Observation input │ │ │ │ Source, claim and provenance mapping │ │ Structured Observation construction │ └─────────────────────┬─────────────────────┘ │ Structured observations ▼ ┌───────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Python SDK · prepare_context() │ │ │ │ Retrieved chunks and relevance scores │ │ Query conditioning / candidate discovery │ │ Original text retained locally │ └─────────────────────┬─────────────────────┘ │ Structured observations ▼ ┌───────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Omneum evaluator │ │ │ │ Provenance-aware graph inference │ │ Dependency-adjusted claim support │ │ No original source text required │ └─────────────────────┬─────────────────────┘ │ Graph evaluation ▼ ┌───────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Python SDK │ │ │ │ Claim-to-chunk score mapping │ │ Question-weighted claim support │ │ Marginal claim coverage │ │ Token-budget enforcement │ │ Original text reconstruction │ └─────────────────────┬─────────────────────┘ │ Reconstructed context ▼ Agent / LLM
client.prepare_context() uses Omneum's provenance-aware graph inference to evaluate source reliability and claim support, accounting for dependencies between sources. The SDK uses those results to rank and select retrieved passages within the token budget, then reconstructs their original text for the model.
The prepared context is returned in result["context"], with selected passages in result["chunks"] and evaluation scores in result["evaluation"].
Note: Omneum supports Python 3.11–3.14 on macOS and Ubuntu. The Python SDK is the currently supported client library.
Supported Platforms:
| Platform | Supported |
|---|---|
| macOS (Apple Silicon / arm64) | ✅ |
| macOS (Intel / x86_64) | ✅ |
| Linux (Ubuntu 22.04+ / x86_64) | ✅ |
Run the installer to configure the local evaluator:
omneum install
Run omneum install from your normal login account. Don't run the command with sudo.
The installer runs unprivileged while it downloads and verifies the evaluator release. The daemon version is pinned to the installed Python package version. For example, Omneum 1.0.3 only accepts daemon assets from v1.0.3; it doesn't resolve latest or fall back to another release.
The archive is verified against the release SHA256SUMS before installation. A missing checksum, mismatched digest, unexpected archive entry, link, or path traversal stops the install before anything from the archive runs.
Administrator access is requested only when installing machine-level service files. On Ubuntu, this includes the managed runtime under:
/opt/omneum
and public client configuration at:
/etc/omneum/config.toml
The evaluator runs under a dedicated service identity, isolating its VOPRF private key from the login account and MCP server process. macOS uses launchd; Ubuntu uses systemd.
omneum-server exposes Omneum's MCP tools over stdio and communicates with the locally installed evaluator service. The installer finishes by sending a VOPRF request through that path and verifying the response against the configured public key. A running service alone does not count as a successful installation.
See docs/guides/installation.md for service accounts, sockets, installed paths, custom endpoints, and failure handling.
Add Omneum to your MCP configuration:
{
"mcpServers": { "omneum": { "command": "omneum-server" } } }
Restart the MCP client. It launches omneum-server over stdio and exposes Omneum's tools to your agent.
If the executable isn't found, locate it with command -v omneum-server and use the returned absolute path as command.
Ask your agent to call Omneum's ping tool. A successful connection returns:
{
"status": "ok" }
Omneum evaluates structured observations, selects retrieved chunks under a token budget, and reconstructs the selected text for the downstream LLM. The evaluator computes dependency-adjusted claim support, while the Python SDK handles chunk selection and reconstruction.
In this example, the FAQ derives its audit retention claim from the security policy. The upstream dependency is recorded through upstream_sources.
from datetime import datetime, timezone
from omneum import ContextMapper, Source from omneum.information import SourceReference from omneum.context_selection import claim_id
now = datetime.now(timezone.utc) policy_url = "https://example.com/security-policy"
records = [ { "id": "obs-policy", "url": policy_url, "attribute": "audit_retention_days", "value": 90, "upstream": [], "text": "Audit logs are retained for 90 days.", }, { "id": "obs-faq", "url": "https://example.com/faq", "attribute": "audit_retention_days", "value": 90, "upstream": [ SourceReference(kind="web_document", identifier=policy_url) ], "text": "Audit logs are retained for 90 days.", }, { "id": "obs-incident", "url": "https://example.com/incident-report",
冒頭だけを表示しています。続きはリポジトリで読めます