MCP YouTube Transcript
An MCP server retrieving transcripts of YouTube videos
作者による説明(英語の原文)
DMARC analytics for AI assistants: SPF/DKIM, compliance, anomalies, p=reject readiness, onboarding.
この3つを1つのスコアにまとめることはしません。意見、測定、人気はそれぞれ別のものだからです。
このサーバーのやさしい解説はまだ書いていません。以下はレジストリから読み取った事実です。
使っているAIアプリを選んで、設定をコピーしてください。
Authorization「秘密」と表示された値は、あなたのアカウントの鍵です。絶対に人に教えたり、チャットに貼り付けたりしないでください。
必要なもの
どのアプリを使っていますか?
上でアプリを選んでください。選んだアプリを覚えておくので、次からはボタンに「…にインストール」と表示されます。
このアドレスはリクエストの header にキーが必要ですが、コネクタを追加するメニューでは設定できません。代わりにClaude Code、Cursor、VS Codeを使ってください。
ターミナルでこれを実行します
claude mcp add --transport http dmarkoff https://mcp.dmarkoff.com/mcp --header 'Authorization: your-value'動かす前に、空欄の値を入力してください。
プロジェクトの .cursor/mcp.json、または ~/.cursor/mcp.json に貼り付けます
{
"mcpServers": {
"dmarkoff": {
"url": "https://mcp.dmarkoff.com/mcp",
"headers": {
"Authorization": "your-value"
}
}
}
}ブラウザがアプリを開いてよいか確認し、そのあとアプリが設定を表示して確認を求めます。キーの値は空欄のままなので、自分で入力してください。
プロジェクトの .vscode/mcp.json に貼り付けます
{
"servers": {
"dmarkoff": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://mcp.dmarkoff.com/mcp",
"headers": {
"Authorization": "your-value"
}
}
}
}ブラウザがアプリを開いてよいか確認し、そのあとアプリが設定を表示して確認を求めます。キーの値は空欄のままなので、自分で入力してください。
このアドレスはリクエストの header にキーが必要ですが、コネクタを追加するメニューでは設定できません。代わりにClaude Code、Cursor、VS Codeを使ってください。
選んだアプリは、この端末のCookieに保存されます。アカウントは不要です。
Authorization 秘密 必須 HTTP headerこの設定は、作者のレジストリ登録情報から作成しています。READMEと違う場合は、READMEに従ってください。
このサーバーのツール一覧はまだ読み取っていません。エンドポイントは順番にチェックしています。
誰でも見られる情報をチェックしており、コードは読んでいません。当てはまらない項目は数に入れていません。 · 2026年11月6日にチェック
公開者(dmarkoff.com)がリポジトリの所有者(dmarcoff)ではありません。別の人が登録した可能性があります
このリポジトリはまだGitHubから読み取っていません
このリポジトリはまだGitHubから読み取っていません
まだチェックしていません。エンドポイントは順番にチェックしています
まだチェックしていません。エンドポイントは順番にチェックしています
まだチェックしていません。エンドポイントをチェックするときにツール一覧を読み取ります
レジストリでこのカテゴリにある有効なすべてのサーバーと比較しています。スターは、公開者がリポジトリの所有者である場合だけ数えます。
当てはまる基本チェック1項目のうち0項目に合格しました。コードは読んでいません。キーやトークンを追加する前に、サーバーがどんなアクセスを求めているかを確認し、必要な権限だけを持つキーを使ってください。
入力が必要なもの:Authorization
作者のクラウドで動きます。インストール不要でインターネット経由でつながりますが、送った内容は作者のサーバーを通ります。
GitHubリポジトリの最終更新は–、最新バージョン(1.5.0)がレジストリに届いたのは6 日前です。
Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor、VS CodeなどのMCP対応アプリで使えます。URLでつながるので、リモートMCPサーバーに対応したアプリ(開発者モードのChatGPTなど)でも使えます。
同じカテゴリには:MCP YouTube Transcript, Google Analytics MCP, BibiGPT YouTube Video Summarizer
同じカテゴリで、ほかの作者が作ったサーバー。スターの多い順。
カードの見方:★ GitHubスターi3つの柱:レビュー · チェック · 利用状況i更新=最新バージョンをレジストリに公開した日i
An MCP server retrieving transcripts of YouTube videos
GA4 MCP server for AI agents: schema discovery, server-side aggregation, analysis-ready defaults.
AI video summarizer: summarize and transcribe YouTube, Bilibili, TikTok and podcast videos.
作者のリポジトリから書かれたとおりにコピーしたものです。PopNx MCPは内容を確認・推奨していません。HTML、画像、スクリプトは取り除いています。リンクはこのサイトの外へ移動します。
DMARC analytics inside your AI assistant.
DMARKOFF MCP connects your DMARC monitoring data to AI assistants — Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Windsurf — through the Model Context Protocol. Instead of opening a dashboard and building filters, you ask a question and get an answer with real numbers behind it.
Endpoint: https://mcp.dmarkoff.com/mcp Requires: an active DMARKOFF account and an API key from app.dmarkoff.com/account/mcp
*"Which domains dropped in compliance over the last 14 days?"*
The AI checks health across all your projects and surfaces the ones that changed — ranked by how much.
*"Why is SPF failing on example.com? Who's the problem sender?"*
The AI checks return paths, finds the sending source (say, SendGrid using its own bounce domain instead of yours), and tells you what to fix.
*"Anything unusual in email traffic compared to last week?"*
The AI compares the last fully reported day against the 14 days before it — compliance rate, unknown sender volume, message counts. The kind of check most teams skip because setting it up manually takes too long.
*"Can example.com go to p=reject yet?"*
The AI reads DMARKOFF's readiness plan for the domain and gives you its verdict. It names the senders that still need DKIM and where to set it up, the unknown sources you have to confirm are not yours, and the exact record to publish once nothing holds the step. Tell it which senders are yours, and it records that for the plan. Before it takes out a sender the plan counts as your own, it asks you.
https://mcp.dmarkoff.com/mcpclaude (any value)Works on Free (1 custom connector limit), Pro, Max, Team, and Enterprise.
Click + in the chat window → Connectors → Manage Connectors → Add custom connector, paste the URL, complete the OAuth flow.
Or edit the config file (~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json on macOS):
{
"mcpServers": { "dmarkoff": { "command": "npx", "args": [ "mcp-remote", "https://mcp.dmarkoff.com/mcp", "--header", "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY" ] } } }
claude mcp add --transport http dmarkoff https://mcp.dmarkoff.com/mcp \
--header "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY"
Settings → Tools & MCP → Add new MCP server, select Streamable HTTP, enter the URL.
Or edit ~/.cursor/mcp.json:
{
"mcpServers": { "dmarkoff": { "url": "https://mcp.dmarkoff.com/mcp", "headers": { "Authorization": "Bearer YOUR_API_KEY" } } } }
Enable Developer Mode, then go to Settings → Apps → Create App:
https://mcp.dmarkoff.com/mcpChatGPT registers its own OAuth client with the server, then opens a DMARKOFF page where you paste your API key.
Edit ~/.codeium/windsurf/mcp_config.json:
{
"mcpServers": { "dmarkoff": { "serverUrl": "https://mcp.dmarkoff.com/mcp", "headers": { "Authorization": "Bearer YOUR_API_KEY" } } } }
Note: Windsurf uses
serverUrl, noturl.
→ [Full connection guide for all clients](docs/connect.md)
Show me an overview of all my DMARC projects
Which domains have Critical severity right now?
Why is SPF failing on example.com? Which senders are the problem?
Are there anomalies in email traffic over the last 24 hours?
Show me source details for example.com grouped by ISP — only rows where SPF is failing
We publish p=reject on example.com — why did some mail still get delivered?
Gmail is throttling us on example.com. What are they actually complaining about?
Our SPF record is at 10 lookups — which includes still carry mail and which can go?
Compliance on example.com dropped last week. Did the DMARC or SPF record change?
Yesterday's Google report for example.com is missing. Is it late, or is something wrong?
Can example.com move to p=reject? What's holding it?
Klaviyo is ours, and the unknown host sending as example.com is not. Record that for the plan.
Live DNS checks — these work for any domain, monitored or not:
Check the SPF record for example.com — are there too many DNS lookups?
What DMARC policy does example.com have right now?
Look up the DKIM key for selector "google" on example.com
Onboarding a new domain — the assistant registers it and hands you the exact TXT record to publish:
Add example.com to my project and tell me what to put in DNS
We already have DMARC on example.com — add our reporting address without touching the rest of the record
I published the record for example.com. Will its reports reach my project?
Analytics (require API key)
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
projects_overview | Summary across all projects: domain counts, three compliance rates, severity breakdown |
list_domains | Filter domains by severity, search query, payment status; pagination |
get_domain_full_data | Full diagnostic: DMARC/SPF/DKIM records, stats, timeline, trends, and the same numbers over the previous period — start here |
get_domain_stats | Compliance percentages for a custom date range |
get_domain_timeline | Day-by-day message counts and auth results |
get_domain_activity_health | Per-day SPF/DKIM/DMARC severity vs 14-day baseline — detect when and why things changed |
get_domain_senders | Top sending sources broken down by known ESPs, unknown, forwarded — per provider or per sending domain, with each sending domain's place in the readiness plan |
get_domain_source_details | Per-record detail grouped by IP, ISP, hostname, reporter or individual report, with filters — and how long each reporter takes to send its reports |
get_domain_anomaly_report | Last settled day (2 days ago, UTC) vs the 14 days before it — flags compliance drops, volume drops, days without reports, reports that stopped and mail sent as a parked domain; excluded and unpaid domains are not judged on volume |
get_geo_sources | Top 100 sending locations with compliance stats |
get_domain_detail | DMARC record text, policy, health status per dimension, errors, name servers |
get_spf_records | SPF return paths, lookup count, errors, pass/fail volume per source |
get_dkim_records | DKIM selectors, signing domains, pass/fail volume per source |
get_record_history | Past versions of a DMARC, SPF or DKIM record with what changed between checks — when did this break |
get_policy_overrides | Why receivers did not enforce your policy: ARC, forwarding, sampling, local rules |
get_smtp_rejections | Mail throttled or rejected at SMTP time, by reason — Gmail's 421/550 codes explained |
get_spf_usage | Which SPF mechanisms actually carry mail, and which senders your record misses — for lookup-limit clean-ups |
get_enforcement_status | DMARKOFF's readiness plan for a domain: whether it can move to quarantine or reject (or first take pct off), what holds it, which sources to confirm, and the record to publish |
Live DNS (API key, but no monitored project)
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
dns_check_spf | Current SPF record, what receivers evaluate it to (ok, permerror and so on), parsed include tree and lookup count |
dns_check_dmarc | Current DMARC policy from DNS. With a project, whether the record sends reports to it |
dns_check_dkim | DKIM public key for a given selector |
dns_check_txt | All TXT records with type classification — including spf-ignored, a record that looks like SPF but receivers do not read |
generate_dmarc_record | The DMARC record a domain should publish, merged on top of what is already in DNS and repaired where the checker rejects it, keeping the policy in force, with a list of what changes. With a project, adds your reporting address to rua |
Onboarding (requires API key and owner access to the project)
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
add_domain | Adds up to 20 domains to a project and returns the DMARC record to publish for each. Safe to repeat: it says where a domain already is |
Source decisions (requires API key and owner access to the project, or a shared project whose owner lets you manage sources)
| Tool | What it does |
|---|---|
set_source_decision | Records your call on a sending source (ours, not ours, or ignore) for the readiness plan, or clears it. Asks before taking out a source the plan counts among your own senders |
Every tool is read-only (readOnlyHint: true per MCP spec) except two. add_domain creates domains. It never updates or deletes anything, and each non-parked domain it adds consumes a paid domain slot on your plan. set_source_decision saves, changes or clears your decision on one sending source of a domain, or confirms that a source you took out stays out. It cannot add or remove domains, change your DNS or touch report data. Taking out one of the plan's own senders is not saved until you confirm, and each change is logged with the API key as its author. The tool reference lists which sources that check covers.
→ [Full tool reference with parameters](docs/tools.md)
add_domain creates domains in a project you own. set_source_decision records your decision on a sending source in a project you own, or one shared with you to manage sources. Its description tells the assistant to use it only at your request, and the server does not take out a source the plan counts among your own senders until you confirm. Every other tool is read-only. No tool deletes domains or report data, and none changes your DNSDNS checks tell you SPF is failing. DMARKOFF MCP tells you which specific sender is causing the failure, how many messages it affected over the last two weeks, and what the fix is. That data comes from your aggregate reports — the actual traffic — not just what's published in DNS.
It also answers the questions that come after: whether the problem is new (every domain report carries the previous period beside the current one), what a record looked like before someone edited it, why a receiver ignored the policy you published, and which parts of an oversized SPF record are still earning their DNS lookups.
When you want to tighten the policy, it reads DMARKOFF's own verdict on whether a domain can go to quarantine or reject. That verdict comes from the plan behind the policy recommendation in the DMARKOFF app and the policy-upgrade email, so the assistant and DMARKOFF give you the same answer.
Tools don't appear in the client → Confirm your client supports Streamable HTTP (not just SSE). → Some clients need a full restart after config changes.
401 Unauthorized → Check your API key at app.dmarkoff.com/account/mcp.
**"No proj
冒頭だけを表示しています。続きはリポジトリで読めます