プロトタイプ · プレビュー版:公式レジストリのすべてのサーバーを掲載し、30分ごとに同期しています。レビューとアカウント機能は今後のステップで始まります。
PopNx MCPAIを使う人のためのMCPサーバー · やさしい言葉で解説

Verify SCITT receipts from Forestrie transparency logs, offline

作者:forestrieバージョン 0.8.1i★ –iパソコンで動く
レジストリ名dev.forestrie/verify

インストール

概要

作者による説明(英語の原文)

Verify a SCITT receipt under a trust root you hold — offline, no backend, no key, no network

PopNx MCPの3つの柱

この3つを1つのスコアにまとめることはしません。意見、測定、人気はそれぞれ別のものだからです。

できること

このサーバーのやさしい解説はまだ書いていません。以下はレジストリから読み取った事実です。

  • 接続方法: パソコンで動く
  • トランスポート: stdio
  • カテゴリ: その他

インストール

使っているAIアプリを選んで、設定をコピーしてください。

インストールの前に

  • 基本チェック:1項目中1項目に合格
  • あなたのパソコンで、あなたのユーザーと同じ権限(ファイル、ネットワーク、アプリ)で動きます。
  • レジストリには、入力が必要なキーは載っていません。

必要なもの

  • npmNode.jsのインストール(npxコマンドに必要)

どのアプリを使っていますか?

上でアプリを選んでください。選んだアプリを覚えておくので、次からはボタンに「…にインストール」と表示されます。

Claude Desktop → Settings → Developer → Edit Config を開き、claude_desktop_config.json にこれを貼り付けます

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "verify": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@forestrie/mcp-verify"
      ]
    }
  }
}

ターミナルでこれを実行します

claude mcp add verify -- npx -y @forestrie/mcp-verify

Cursorで開く

または、設定を自分でコピーする

プロジェクトの .cursor/mcp.json、または ~/.cursor/mcp.json に貼り付けます

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "verify": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@forestrie/mcp-verify"
      ]
    }
  }
}

ブラウザがアプリを開いてよいか確認し、そのあとアプリが設定を表示して確認を求めます。キーの値は空欄のままなので、自分で入力してください。

VS Codeで開く

または、設定を自分でコピーする

プロジェクトの .vscode/mcp.json に貼り付けます

{
  "servers": {
    "verify": {
      "type": "stdio",
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@forestrie/mcp-verify"
      ]
    }
  }
}

ブラウザがアプリを開いてよいか確認し、そのあとアプリが設定を表示して確認を求めます。キーの値は空欄のままなので、自分で入力してください。

これはパソコンで動くサーバーですが、ChatGPTがつなげるのはインターネット上のサーバーだけです。ほかのアプリを選んでください。

選んだアプリは、この端末のCookieに保存されます。アカウントは不要です。

この設定は、作者のレジストリ登録情報から作成しています。READMEと違う場合は、READMEに従ってください。

できること

パソコンで動くサーバーです。インストールすると、ツール一覧がAIアプリに表示されます。

基本チェックi

誰でも見られる情報をチェックしており、コードは読んでいません。当てはまらない項目は数に入れていません。 · 2026年11月6日にチェック

  • ✓ 合格

    作者とリポジトリが一致

    レジストリ名はドメイン forestrie.dev で確認済みです(レジストリがドメインの所有を確認しています)

  • … 未チェック

    今もメンテナンスされている

    このリポジトリはまだGitHubから読み取っていません

  • … 未チェック

    ライセンスがある

    このリポジトリはまだGitHubから読み取っていません

  • – 対象外

    エンドポイントが応答する

    これはパソコンで動くため、インターネット上のエンドポイントはありません

  • – 対象外

    OAuthでサインイン

    パソコンで動き、代わりにローカルの設定を使います

  • … 未チェック

    ツールの説明に隠れた指示がない

    パソコンで動くサーバーです。ツール一覧を読み取れるのは、インターネット上のエンドポイントがある場合だけです

その他のほかのサーバーとの比較i

  • このカテゴリのほかの32435件のうち0%よりスターが多い
  • このカテゴリのほかの32435件のうち87%より最近レジストリに公開
  • 基本チェックの結果が、このカテゴリのほかの32435件のうち100%と同じかそれ以上

レジストリでこのカテゴリにある有効なすべてのサーバーと比較しています。スターは、公開者がリポジトリの所有者である場合だけ数えます。

よくある質問

Verify SCITT receipts from Forestrie transparency logs, offlineは安全ですか?

当てはまる基本チェック1項目のうち1項目に合格しました。コードは読んでいません。キーやトークンを追加する前に、サーバーがどんなアクセスを求めているかを確認し、必要な権限だけを持つキーを使ってください。

どんなキーやコードが必要ですか?

レジストリには必須のキーは載っていません。ただし、最初に使うときにサインインを求めるサーバーもあります。

パソコンで動きますか、それともクラウドですか?

あなたのパソコンで動きます。必要なときにAIアプリが起動し、データは作者のサーバーを通りません(サーバー自体がオンラインサービスを呼び出す場合を除きます)。

今もメンテナンスされていますか?

GitHubリポジトリの最終更新は–、最新バージョン(0.8.1)がレジストリに届いたのは4 日前です。

どのアプリで使えますか?

Claude Desktop、Claude Code、Cursor、VS CodeなどのMCP対応アプリで使えます。パソコンにNode.jsも必要です。

代わりに使えるものは?

同じカテゴリには:Spec Driven Development, Remote Desktop Commander, Apify MCP Server

代わりの候補

同じカテゴリで、ほかの作者が作ったサーバー。スターの多い順。

カードの見方:★ GitHubスターi3つの柱:レビュー · チェック · 利用状況i更新=最新バージョンをレジストリに公開した日i

Remote Desktop Commander

作者:desktop-commander

Remote Desktop Commander: use files, terminal and processes on your own computers from any AI app.

クラウドで動く★ 211昨日更新
インストール

Apify MCP Server

作者:apify

Extract data from any website with thousands of scrapers, crawlers, and automations on Apify Store ⚡

クラウドで動く今日更新
インストール

作者のREADME

READMEを開く

作者のリポジトリから書かれたとおりにコピーしたものです。PopNx MCPは内容を確認・推奨していません。HTML、画像、スクリプトは取り除いています。リンクはこのサイトの外へ移動します。

@forestrie/mcp-verify

Verify a SCITT receipt from a Forestrie transparency log under a trust root you hold. Offline: no backend, no account, no key, no network. An MCP server whose only tools verify and decode receipts.

{

"mcpServers": { "forestrie-verify": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@forestrie/mcp-verify"] } } }

npx -y @forestrie/mcp-verify demo

Why

Agents act on statements they did not witness being made: a quote, an approval, a tool result, another agent's output. Usually the record of what was said is kept by the party that said it, so nobody downstream can ask "did you really say that, and did you say it to everyone?"

A Forestrie receipt is a proof that a statement was sealed into an append-only transparency log. This package checks that proof against a trust root you hold, in your own process, without contacting Forestrie. With the right root it also answers the harder question: whether the log you were shown is the log everyone else was shown. What transparency adds, where it stops, and what a receipt contains: TRANSPARENCY.md.

What it proves

ToolReference verbWhat it answers
verify_receiptforestrie verifyWere these exact payload bytes sequenced at this entry id?
verify_grant_receiptforestrie verify-grantWas this grant admitted to this log — i.e. was the signer entitled to write?
verify_selfforestrie verifyDoes this package's own release receipt vouch for the bytes it ships?
decode_receiptforestrie decode-receipt --jsonWhat is actually in this receipt? (Renders the CBOR only. Verifies nothing.)

Every tool is annotated readOnlyHint: true, openWorldHint: false. That is not decoration: it is the machine-readable form of _"this tool touches nothing"_, and an agent can see it without running anything.

Trust roots

You do not ask for "verification". You say which root you trust, and the result says what that root can see:

RootWhat you supply
genesisthe forest's genesis document, captured when you registered
known-log-keya log owner key (keyXy, P-256) or KS256 address (ks256Address) you hold out of band
known-accumulatora snapshot of the log's peaks, from a chain read
checkpoint-chaina retained chain of .sth checkpoints, plus genesis or keyXy; delegation limits enforced per link

KS256 (secp256k1) roots verify offline too. An EOA root verifies by ecrecover, from a genesis or a known-log-key with ks256Address. A contract root (a Safe) cannot be checked without a chain read, which this package never makes: pass ks256Attestation, an ERC-1271 record fetched elsewhere (@forestrie/mcp-resolve's fetch_ks256_attestation tool, or forestrie-cli's fetch-ks256-attestation). The result is then valid _under the contract's signers at the attested block_, and says which block. A 20-byte ks256Address asserts, and does not prove, which log it owns. checkpoint-chain takes ks256Attestation too, with the KS256 genesis for the forest chain id; one attestation covers one delegation certificate, so a Safe that rotated its delegate needs one per certificate: pass them as the ks256Attestations array. Every attestation is reported in the result as used, or unused with a reason; none is silently ignored. checkpoint-chain also enforces each link's delegation limits (mmrStart, mmrEnd, expiresAt): delegation_out_of_range, delegation_expired. Since 0.7.0 a peak attached to a receipt is checked against the leaf and inclusion path rather than trusted (@forestrie/receipt-verify 3.2.0), which closes a hole in the known-accumulator and checkpoint-chain roots. Details: docs/trust-roots.md.

The roots are not ordered by strength. The first two check the operator's signature locally and cannot see a split view. The last two match the peak against an accumulator the operator does not control, and can. Every result answers four questions, sealing, split-view, append-authority and attribution, each ok, failed, or not_answered_by_this_root. The last is a real answer and must reach the user; a client that renders only ok is using this tool wrong.

When each root is the effective choice, why a genesis document fetched at check time is weaker than one kept from registration, what a signature root cannot distinguish, and the demo transcript: docs/trust-roots.md.

You do not have to trust the operator

A receipt means something without assuming the Forestrie operator is honest:

  • A pipe, not a store. Only content hashes enter the log. Your statement and its receipt stay with you, and verification is pure over those bytes, so a check never has to ask the operator for anything.
  • The operator does not hold the authority. A log's root key belongs to the log's owner, and the instance bootstrap key to whoever deployed the forest's contract. The operator's sealer signs checkpoints only for logs that have leased its key, within each lease's MMR range.
  • One published history. Checkpoints are published to the univocity contract, which refuses any that are inconsistent with what it already holds. The accumulator roots above check against that.

An operator can still decline to act, and that is visible: it can refuse admission, withhold data it serves, or stop sealing. It cannot rewrite or fork anchored history, or sign for a log that has not leased its key. Who holds which key, and what an operator can and cannot do: key custody and operator powers.

This package's own provenance

Software provenance is the familiar use case for a transparency log, so this package applies it to itself. Every release registers a small statement (package name, version, git commit) in a Forestrie log and ships the receipt inside the tarball. npx -y @forestrie/mcp-verify verify --self, or the verify_self tool, checks it offline. This complements npm's SLSA provenance; it does not replace it. Today the receipt chains to a log on the public development lane. Details: docs/self-registration.md.

That bundle is also the subject of a worked example: fetching this package's own release receipt from the public lane, verifying it under the bundled key, seeing the documented delegation_invalid under the genesis root, and getting split-view ok from a chain read — end to end in a few seconds, with no account. It lives in @forestrie/mcp-resolve's README, because fetching is that package's job, not this one's.

The verification arithmetic comes from @forestrie/receipt-verify, pinned to an exact version and published and attested separately. The tarball ships src and the frozen conformance vectors it is tested against (fixtures/PROVENANCE.md), so the arithmetic can be re-run rather than taken on trust.

Installing the package pulls in more than a verifier needs. @modelcontextprotocol/sdk brings a web stack, including express, hono, jose, cors and ajv, for HTTP transports this package never uses: it constructs only the stdio transport. The verification core never imports the SDK, and the browser-safety gate enforces that, so importing the package's "." export gives you the arithmetic without any of it.

Bundled resources, and the two calls they make runnable

The tarball ships its fixtures as forestrie://fixtures/… MCP resources, so an agent that holds nothing of its own can run a real verification. Two calls reach a pass from resources alone; both are asserted by test/node/mcp-smoke.test.ts.

A grant receipt at the genesis root — verify_grant_receipt with:

ArgumentResource
receiptgolden/grant-receipt.cbor
committedGrantgolden/committed-grant.cbor (derived from golden/manifest.json at read time)
entryIdthe text of golden/entry-id.txt
trust{root: "genesis", genesis: golden/grant-genesis.cbor}

Result: verify-grant: PASS · root=genesis · sealing ok, split-view not answered at this root, append-authority ok, attribution ok.

A payload receipt at an accumulator root, offline, against a real anchor — verify_receipt with the lane-A bundle (fixtures/lane-a/PROVENANCE.md): a real receipt from a public lane and the accumulator the univocity contract had published for its log at block 46770471, captured by an independent chain read. (That lane's content was reset on 2026-09-20; the bytes still verify, the URLs they came from no longer resolve.)

ArgumentResource
receiptlane-a/receipt.cbor
payloadlane-a/statement.cose
entryIdthe text of lane-a/entry-id.txt
trust{root: "known-accumulator", accumulator: lane-a/accumulator.cbor}

Result: verify: PASS · root=known-accumulator · sealing ok, split-view ok, append-authority ok, attribution ok, with anchor.matchedPeak set. Unlike the demo's self-derived snapshot, this anchor is the contract's published state, so the split-view answer is evidence as of that block. The same receipt passes under {root: "known-log-key", keyXy: {b64: }} and reports delegation_invalid under {root: "genesis", genesis: lane-a/genesis.cbor}, because its log is a grandchild of the forest root (docs/self-registration.md).

A resource's bytes are passed back as {b64: }; a text resource such as lane-a/log-key.xy.b64 is base64 text already, so its text goes in b64 as is. golden/burial/public-key.xy.b64 offers the burial chain's root key the same way, so checkpoint-chain can be driven from resources — to its documented negative verdict, since the burial bundle ships no leaf preimage.

Registry

This server is listed as dev.forestrie/verify in the official MCP registry.

Development

mise install           # node 22.14.0, pnpm 10.6.5

pnpm install pnpm test # browser-safe gate + encoding-copy gate + server.json gate + unit tests pnpm build

Conventions, invariants and the release checklist: AGENTS.md.

Licence

MIT.

PopNxに聞く